4
0

Bigoted woman won't sell house to Trump voters


               
2018 Mar 31, 10:23am   7,691 views  31 comments

by Patrick   follow (59)  

Bigoted is a dictionary-perfect definition of this woman:

adjective
1. utterly intolerant of any creed, belief, or opinion that differs from one's own.


http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2018/03/28/no-trump-buyers/

“I told her [the realtor] that I didn't want her to sell it to a Trump supporter,” said the woman.

She wants a sale contingent upon how someone votes, but is that legal?

Attorney Allen Sawyer doesn't believe so.

“That's an unlawful contractual term that infringes the freedom of association and first amendment rights,” said Sawyer. ...

“People have a right to believe what they want to believe and they shouldn't be restricted from purchasing property based on that,” said Sawyer.

Despite the legal issues, certified appraiser Ryan Lundquist says the seller may be limiting the pool of potential buyers.

“39 percent of voters voted for Donald Trump in the Sacramento region. That's an absolute fact,” said Lundquist.


Some good comments:

"That is yet another example of how biased and anti-diversity the left really is. As if we needed another example."
"What is it about liberalism that causes such intolerance?"
"Ahh…progressives and Californians…what a breed. At least they are consistent…laws, ethics, open mindedness only applies to them when they agree with it…if they don't agree then it doesn't apply!"
"Turn away black or hispanic Trump supporter? Bring it on!"
"There is a reason we have voting booths. That is so we can cast our votes privately and without neighborhood loony knowing how we voted."
"The left always chants “tolerance and inclusivity” and yet has no tolerance and is exclusive to certain groups of people, not to mention always shutting down the opposing opinion."

« First        Comments 29 - 31 of 31        Search these comments

29   HeadSet   @   2018 Apr 7, 3:46pm  

Mell says

and to lesser extent by the fascist right

What the devil is a "fascist right?" A Fascist is one who believes in government control but not ownership of the means of production. That position is admittedly to right of Communist, but is just another form of Socialism. Hence the best known Fascists, the NAZI party, has a name that translates to "National Socialist Workers Party." "Socialist" and "Workers Party" are hardly right wing concepts, since the Right tends to support limited government. The ultimate right winger would be an Anarchist, who believes in no government at all.

Fascism may be the future though, since like Communism it gives government the control it desires, but unlike Communism it allows the vitality of the free market so that government does not have to preside over a stagnating collectivized economy. China seems to be going the Fascist route by allowing private ownership but definitely maintaining control. USA seems to be heading to Fascism as well by continually adding more controls and licensing over the existing private property and persons.
30   MisterLefty   @   2018 Apr 8, 4:39am  

Damned Bigtoed Women!
31   mell   @   2018 Apr 8, 12:42pm  

HeadSet says
What the devil is a "fascist right?" A Fascist is one who believes in government control but not ownership of the means of production. That position is admittedly to right of Communist, but is just another form of Socialism. Hence the best known Fascists, the NAZI party, has a name that translates to "National Socialist Workers Party." "Socialist" and "Workers Party" are hardly right wing concepts, since the Right tends to support limited government. The ultimate right winger would be an Anarchist, who believes in no government at all.

Fascism may be the future though, since like Communism it gives government the control it desires, but unlike Communism it allows the vitality of the free market so that government does not have to preside over a stagnating collectivized economy. China seems to be going the Fascist route by allowing private ownership but definitely maintaining control. USA seems to be heading to Fascism as well by continually adding more controls and licens...


There is a good argument to be made that the Nazis were leftists as you mentioned, I have made that before and there is discussions amongst historians about this, but it usually ends with those historians being labeled as "revisionists" which is almost as bad as Nazi. In the end it doesn't matter communists are red painted fascists a famous quote goes. The fascist movement is quite old, much older than the Nazis (comes from the latin word fasces) and it has been more often attributed to so-called right-wing regimes, but in the end it's all the same principle, whether you have government run corporations or big private corporations in bed with politicians, the result is usually the same. Few connected people get very reach and the rest stays poor. It is also true that the non-fascist conservative wing - which is arguably much larger - has been historically advocating for small government and thus certainly cannot be grouped together with the mostly fascist (cultural-marxist) left and the fascist/neocon right. I would definitely argue that recent history has shown that the left has now thoroughly claimed the monopoly on fascism and oppressive government (and facist movements such as antifa) force.

« First        Comments 29 - 31 of 31        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste