The MSM is not likely to mention #WalkAway because that would be free publicity for the moment.
Then again, they were not too bright when it came to Trump's election. They handed him the election with their headlines of daily outrage. Maybe some of their current conniptions are due to the fact that they know they did it themselves.
Paul Joseph Watson is correct in that conservative is the new counter culture. People detest being told what to think. Trump has brilliantly made this MSM brainwashing evident to the average voter.
The more the MSM calls trump a nazi, the more its viewers #walkaway .
I'm seeing #WalkAway explode on Twitter and FB, and wondering how the MSM and Democrats are dismissing it as "russians". Its development seems extremely organic, and the guy who founded the movement is a well known gay former Democrat (Brandon Straka).
Ludicrous to cling onto the leftoid narrative. Just imagine somebody would have been promoted to the editorial board of a newspaper tweeting blacks must die and go extinct and it's sick fun to be mean to them. C'mon guys, it's time to throw in the towel here and protest the modern left, you don't want to be associated with lunatics.
Ludicrous to cling onto the leftoid narrative. Just imagine somebody would have been promoted to the editorial board of a newspaper tweeting blacks must die and go extinct and it's sick fun to be mean to them. C'mon guys, it's time to throw in the towel here and protest the modern left, you don't want to be associated with lunatics.
Seriously. Anyone that can read the NYT knowing Sarah Jeong is an editor there has no moral ground to stand on.
Aposematism (from Greek ἀπό apo away, σῆμα sema sign) is a term coined by Edward Bagnall Poulton[1][2] for Alfred Russel Wallace's concept of warning coloration.[3] It describes a family of antipredator adaptations in which a warning signal is associated with the unprofitability of a prey item to potential predators.[4] The unprofitability may consist of any defences which make a prey difficult to eat, such as toxicity, foul taste or smell, or aggressive nature. Aposematism always involves an advertising signal which may take the form of conspicuous animal coloration, sounds, odours[5] or other perceivable characteristics.
Ludicrous to cling onto the leftoid narrative. Just imagine somebody would have been promoted to the editorial board of a newspaper tweeting blacks must die and go extinct and it's sick fun to be mean to them. C'mon guys, it's time to throw in the towel here and protest the modern left, you don't want to be associated with lunatics.
The problem continues to be that Trump supporters don't know the difference between liberals, Democrats and the crazy fringe which is in neither of those two groups.
The problem continues to be that Trump supporters don't know the difference between liberals, Democrats and the crazy fringe which is in neither of those two groups.
The Crazy Fringe is now on the editorial board of the New York Times.
The problem continues to be that Trump supporters don't know the difference between liberals, Democrats and the crazy fringe which is in neither of those two groups
Neither does the Democrat leadership. Must be all the same thing.
A fairly balanced, libertarian take on the Jeong situation at the NYT. Calls out the clear double standard.
This is a great write-up. However this perfectly illustrates why the Libertarians can't win and their candidates get run over by the leftoid mob every time, and why we have Trump in the white house and why he is necessary. The left will apply this forgiveness selectively only to theirs while cuntishly screaming from the rooftops to fire everybody on the right who is seeking for forgiveness. Trump put an end to this and it was about time. Once the left has returned to the table of reason then, maybe then we can hopefully have a true Libertarian president one day.
Cuckservatives have "Called out the Double Standard" long enough with no results. It's time to Alinsky them back with boycotts, calling it the "Racist New York Times Editorial Board", and "all the Rascist, Sexist News fit to print" , harassing advertisers - "Why do you support a racist, sexist publication", and treating it as if it crossed a line.
Merely "What if you changed it to black" isn't enough. It's simply calling them racist, sexist, and agist, without apology or an attempt to be reasonable, but simply as a stated fact.
"The New York Times Editorial Board is a fringe, anti-American extremist organization packed with Racists, Sexists, and Agists." And dismiss anything involving that group as tainted.
Nobody is under any obligation to buy their service.
Yep. Nor obligated to give them the benefit of the doubt, not bash them constantly as Extremist Racists, or not boycott them, and not harass their advertisers endlessly.
Comments 1 - 40 of 92 Next » Last » Search these comments
Then again, they were not too bright when it came to Trump's election. They handed him the election with their headlines of daily outrage. Maybe some of their current conniptions are due to the fact that they know they did it themselves.
Adding a few links to help:
https://twitter.com/hashtag/walkaway
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDb4InP9mRZR9oogD1b2dOQ
https://www.instagram.com/explore/tags/walkaway/
Too true. You have the right to your own opinion, as long as it agrees with the MSM.
I've heard the MSM mention #WalkAway. CNN, MSNBC, and even David Hogg all attribute #WalkAway to russian bots.
The more the MSM calls trump a nazi, the more its viewers #walkaway .
It's crazy.
I'm seeing #WalkAway explode on Twitter and FB, and wondering how the MSM and Democrats are dismissing it as "russians". Its development seems extremely organic, and the guy who founded the movement is a well known gay former Democrat (Brandon Straka).
Because he has eternalized it for all of us to mock endlessly?
Yeah. It's only won them the Presidency, and the SCOTUS for an entire generation (probably the rest of your life). So sad.
Seriously. Anyone that can read the NYT knowing Sarah Jeong is an editor there has no moral ground to stand on.
And because the Media is immune from any Feedback Loop, they are making it worse and worse.
Witness the Times new hire, another wealthy Ivy League White Male Hating immigrant, verified by Aposematism.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aposematism
I'm pretty sure she's also an alcoholic.
Lol, learned a cool word, thanks.
The problem continues to be that Trump supporters don't know the difference between liberals, Democrats and the crazy fringe which is in neither of those two groups.
Thank you Trump for finishing off this disgusting organization.
The Crazy Fringe is now on the editorial board of the New York Times.
So what does that have to do with liberals or Dems?
Neither does the Democrat leadership. Must be all the same thing.
Welps, there goes the argument "uh uh uh, well ANTIFA and other far left groups aren't the voice of the Democrat party."
Nope, they're just the editors of their largest media outlets.
A fairly balanced, libertarian take on the Jeong situation at the NYT. Calls out the clear double standard.
This is a great write-up. However this perfectly illustrates why the Libertarians can't win and their candidates get run over by the leftoid mob every time, and why we have Trump in the white house and why he is necessary. The left will apply this forgiveness selectively only to theirs while cuntishly screaming from the rooftops to fire everybody on the right who is seeking for forgiveness. Trump put an end to this and it was about time. Once the left has returned to the table of reason then, maybe then we can hopefully have a true Libertarian president one day.
Maybe the NYT should hire Richard Spencer to balance her out? Good idea?
Cuckservatives have "Called out the Double Standard" long enough with no results. It's time to Alinsky them back with boycotts, calling it the "Racist New York Times Editorial Board", and "all the Rascist, Sexist News fit to print" , harassing advertisers - "Why do you support a racist, sexist publication", and treating it as if it crossed a line.
Merely "What if you changed it to black" isn't enough. It's simply calling them racist, sexist, and agist, without apology or an attempt to be reasonable, but simply as a stated fact.
"The New York Times Editorial Board is a fringe, anti-American extremist organization packed with Racists, Sexists, and Agists." And dismiss anything involving that group as tainted.
None of that violates the 1st amendment, btw.
Sure--NYT is a private company. They can hire whoever the heck they want.
Nobody is under any obligation to buy their service.
Yep. Nor obligated to give them the benefit of the doubt, not bash them constantly as Extremist Racists, or not boycott them, and not harass their advertisers endlessly.
Comments 1 - 40 of 92 Next » Last » Search these comments