« First « Previous Comments 41 - 80 of 210 Next » Last » Search these comments
Obama is better for the environment, but much worse for the economy
Look at his trade deals.
Obama is better for the environment, but much worse for the economy. I agree with the individual mandate for healthcare, but disagree with the level of socialization of health plans (i.e., making people with money subsidize the poor too much). His pompousness can be annoying, so I'll give you that. I love his transparency though and the fact that the dude works his butt off to get stuff done. Look at his trade deals. Overall, Trump is a WAY better president than Obama but certainly not perfect. You never get everything you want in a president or government.
They wont bring up specifics though.
Their brainwashing is significantly lowering intellect of debate in our country. Very sad
I've been nothing but specific and you've ignored all my points.
Provide support for one of your 20 bullet points. Saying TRUMP IS A LIAR is a tantrum not a criticism. Choose a topic, then support it please. So far you havent done that
I chose a topic and supported it.
Not to mention that I chose the topic of his tax plan and explained to you exactly why it is horrible policy.
LeonDurham saysWhat did the US get from NKA?
A complacent, disarmed Kim, as opposed to one who wants to bomb us.
What do you feel we lost in the deal? Do you not remember the missile scare? That was where team Obama left us and where HRC was taking us.
You didnt support a single one of your assertions in that post. Please choose one, and support it so we can discuss.
Clearly, Trump has achieved tremendous success as compared to Pussy Cat Obama. NK literally gained nuclear weapons while Pussy Cat Obama shivered. Obama could not even get China's cooperation. Useless President. Put the world in a very unsafe position.
rump said wages are rising for the first time in 19 years. That is false
Trump said the trade deficit with China was $500 billion
Clearly, Trump has achieved tremendous success as compared to Pussy Cat Obama. NK literally gained nuclear weapons while Pussy Cat Obama shivered. Obama could not even get China's cooperation. Useless President. Put the world in a very unsafe position.
Trump said the trade deficit with China was $500 billion. That is false.
So he played a little game with Trump. And look at what he got ? !
Lol, no you didnt. You are arguing that tax rates shouldnt be 100% BUT the level that Trump lowered them from is tyrannical. You didnt explain why or how you came to that conclusion besides FUCK TRUMP. Do you have rationale or is your argument just FUCK TRUMP?
Please don't make stuff up. I never said anything was tyrannical. If you have to resort to strawman arguments, then you've lost.
I heard Trump say it was $350 billion.
Why do you think Trump must know every single statistic, or else he is a liar? Kinda silly to have such expectations of any human.
Show us the exact quote so we know what you are talking about.
https://tradingeconomics.com/china/balance-of-trade Simply looking at the charts and saying $500 billion isnt far off. May be more fair to say $400 billion/yr, but $500 million was surpassed more than a few times, and is basically accurate for the purposes of his speech.
I see no evidence of any of this. Do you actually believe the stuff you say ?
Everyone knows these geopolitical games are complicated
He got put in his place, and the world is a far safer place because of it.
So Kim leaves Singapore having gained much of the international legitimacy the dynastic dictatorship has sought for decades. But the gifts from Trump did not end there. He also announced an end to US military exercises in the Korean peninsula – the “war games” which he said were costly and, deploying language Pyongyang itself might have used, “very provocative”. Trump also hinted at an eventual withdrawal of the 28,000 US troops stationed in the Korean peninsula.
And what did Kim give Trump in return for this bulging bag of goodies? The key concession, the one Trump repeatedly invoked, was a promise of “complete denuclearisation”. Trump held this aloft as if it were a North Korean commitment to dismantle its arsenal, with work beginning right away. To be sure, such a commitment would be a major prize, one that would merit all the congratulation a beaming Trump was heaping on himself. But this is where you need to look at the small print.
First, the text itself says merely: “The DPRK commits to work toward complete denuclearisation of the Korean Peninsula.” Kim has promised not “complete denuclearisation” but simply “to work toward” that end. Negotiators the world over know is the fudging language you use when you’ve extracted something less than a real commitment. Kim has offered only an aspiration, with no deadline or timetable, not a concrete plan.
Why do you think Trump must know every single statistic
No you didn't. He's said it's $500 billion over 19 times.
He literally doesn't understand the trade deficit is imports minus exports. He quotes the import number as the deficit. He is a moron.
He literally doesn't understand the trade deficit is imports minus exports. He quotes the import number as the deficit. He is a moron.
I heard him say $350 billion on CNBC just last week. Not denying he never said $500 billion.
He understands China imposing a 25% tax on cars we export to them while we don't is not fair. Obama did not understand that.
He understands China imposing a 25% tax on cars we export to them while we don't is not fair. Obama did not understand that.
You don't think it's important for the President of the US to be accurate when discussing the trade deficit? You don't think it's important for him to know whether the figure is 350 or 500?
Yes--I think the President should know what the trade deficit with China is. That's pretty damn important.
Strategist saysHe understands China imposing a 25% tax on cars we export to them while we don't is not fair. Obama did not understand that.
You can be sure he had thught londg and hard about it and consulted many Washinton wonks and economists about the pros and cons of a trade war with China.
You can be sure that TRump did none of that. AS experts working close to Trump have acknowledges, he was the knowledge on these issues of a 5th grader.
Hey, I get it. That's very attractive to a lot of people (I wonder why ?).
No President can expect to know everything. It's not a high school geography test. That's why they have teams of advisors, who's job is to know the details.
Trump knows how to make things happen, how to negotiate, how to get things done. That's the President 's job.
Strategist says
No President can expect to know everything. It's not a high school geography test. That's why they have teams of advisors, who's job is to know the details.
Trump knows how to make things happen, how to negotiate, how to get things done. That's the President 's job.
So, what have been the results of his negotiation skills so far? What are his accomplishments?
Making unprecedented progress on:
NK
Iran
Islam
Israel/Mid East
China trade
NAFTA trade
European trade
It's off by about 40%. If you consider that "not far off", then Trump is definitely your guy.
So, what have been the results of his negotiation skills so far? What are his accomplishments?
Strategist says
Making unprecedented progress on:
NK
Iran
Islam
Israel/Mid East
China trade
NAFTA trade
European trade
Nonsense. We've made no real progress on any of those fronts. Please detail any concrete gains.
Try harder, offer the actual support of your critiques and maybe someone would agree w you.
But you really think the threats were real, and not just trash talk ?
Here is a sample:
Sanctions on Iran to ensure a permanent and verifiable end to 100% of their nuclear program. Anything else will only result on them getting nukes like NK did.
Better trade deals around the globe. A compliant NKA. China actually respecting us and negotiating its tariffs is huge.
As if a hard core Trump cuck, or hyper libertarian, is ever going to agree with a middle of the road reality based person ?
Read the stats. The August numbers were estimated to be $500 B and came in at $300 B. Given this type of fluctuation it is not at all unrealistic to give a back if the envelope figure of $500B.
« First « Previous Comments 41 - 80 of 210 Next » Last » Search these comments
What is your most well-reasoned anti-Trump argument? If you think he's a liar, please post the video. Or if you disagree with legislation he pioneered or executive orders, please post a link and reasoning.