patrick.net

Change in attitudes too,
" According to a November 2017 Economist/YouGov poll, 17 percent of Americans ages 18 to 29 now believe that a man inviting a woman out for a drink “always” or “usually” constitutes sexual harassment. ("


I mean wow!!

lostand confused says

Change in attitudes too,
" According to a November 2017 Economist/YouGov poll, 17 percent of Americans ages 18 to 29 now believe that a man inviting a woman out for a drink “always” or “usually” constitutes sexual harassment. ("


I mean wow!!

Leftoid idiocy has consequences!

lostand confused says

Why are young people having so little sex?

Perhaps young men are just being rational. Why ask out a womyn if the result can be being fired for sexual harassment, or even worse, sexual abuse/rape claims?
The most rational strategy is either paying for sex (prostitution), illegal in US, or fapping.

uhh... maybe because porn is so available and scripted to such a level that reality doesn't compete? Sex dolls are next - Rin wins.

Rin really needs to give his input on this issue.

My take, I think it's low-t. These 20 year old male buzzfeed types have the t-levels of an 80 year old men. They have no sex drive at all, except with each other.

Goran_K says

My take, I think it's low-t.

I wonder why t levels are low. Either having more stressful/violent formative years (instead of current sheltered, protected from reality youth) leads to increase of t levels, or some "household chemicals" such as phthalates decrease t levels, or perhaps both. But then again this is Current Year, so low t is good by feminist standards, does not matter that it makes average women less happy.

Goran_K says

These 20 year old male buzzfeed types

Is this a real woman or a Trans? I honestly can't tell.

www.youtube.com/embed/IpOloaTr0M4

dr6B says

I wonder why t levels are low. Either having more stressful/violent formative years (instead of current sheltered, protected from reality youth) leads to increase of t levels, or some "household chemicals" such as phthalates decrease t levels, or perhaps both. But then again this is Current Year, so low t is good by feminist standards, does not matter that it makes average women less happy.

I would like to know myself.

It seems like men from the 50s, 60s, real salt of the earth types, had no low-t problems. They could pop out 5 kids quick and easy.

These low-t types barely like women now days, and when they do try to have a kid, it's all artificial insemination, test tube shit.

Could be diet, could be environmental, or maybe it's socially constructed. That's how leftists view gender right?

Drop in male fertility over last 30 years.
https://www.gq.com/story/sperm-count-zero

Just another idiotic sex article. Nobody knows how much sex people are or are not having in any particular instance. Self reportage data harvesting is a boon to the serendipitous gonzo journalist and trash science psychologist/sociologist.

Goran_K says

when they do try to have a kid, it's all artificial insemination, test tube shit.

That might be related to having kids later in life. For women, fertility drops steeply with age.

Liberals and feminists ruin everything.

HeadSet says

mell says

Supplicating beta soyboys and misandrist fugly land whales = less sex.

Even so, 18 year old boys throughout time have been so hormonal that if during a dry spell the only target is a fat chick, its "Thar she blows" harpoon at the ready. Hard to believe that has changed.

Goran_K says

Rin really needs to give his input on this issue.

Folks, I do have an existence outside of PatNet, I can't always comment on every dysfunctional issue out there.

Here's my take ... fat chicks DO NOT get me a hard-on. Even if I didn't get that secret New England memo that Quebecoise were hot hoes, just 5+ hours north of Boston, I did get the memo about window shopping in Amsterdam's Red Light District. In fact, everyone on earth knows about that place. If I were 18 and forced to stare at land whales, I'd take that flight from Logan to Schiphol in a heartbeat.

I'm sorry, it's either slim/fit or none!

The problem is that the men of today are so pussified, that they're more or less, eunuchs in the eyes of women. I call these men, the Castrata (or Castrato, if you want your Latin to be gender precise). In other words, they're so afraid of offending women, since these women constantly label men as rapist-in-training, etc, that their general sense of associating a hard-on with banging a chick, gets disassociated. This has actually been going on, for much of the past generation. Alyssa Milano's MeToo movement was just a mainstream media go-live event, it was already in the underbelly of the university crowd, where many men were afraid of offending women for many years.

Rin says

Folks, I do have an existence outside of PatNet, I can't always comment on every dysfunctional issue out there.

Thank you for your input Rin, we know your time is valuable.

Fortwaynemobile says

Liberals and feminists ruin everything.

The party that brought us the sexual revolution has ruined it to the point that we live in a more prudish society than Victorians. I can only correlate it to a power struggle where femiiists turned the tables on traditional behaviors or men and women.

Now, women fuck all they want (or at least make up stories like men used to) and now men are shamed like little boys for acting on desires or flirtation. I’m so glad I’m not doing the single thing.

I think this is interesting. I have some theories based on a couple of young guys I know.

One is a home schooled "mama's boy". His father worries he is gay but doesn't think so . Neither to I. The problem is he is afraid he can't spend the bucks to take out a girl and impress her these days so he is shy to ask one out. I feel sorry for the kid.

I also think he has been given the brainwashing for a long time that his natural desires are "misogynistic" and "anti-female" etc.

Another idea is that they have put down boys for so long and promoted females for so long that now females have the status and good jobs that boys previously had; our society has emasculated the boys so they're now intimidated by the females and just give up.

Personally I subscribe to the notion that you should grab all the gusto you can while you can. If someone is offended say sorry and move on.

a.) MeToo... After watching what men have experienced with the MeToo movement over the past year, it’s understandable that men are apprehensive to make moves.

b.) Cubicles, stress, daily grind, cost of living. These are surely dropping testosterone in men and shrinking balls. Men aren’t hunting, they aren’t competing physically, they aren’t hiking, going in the ocean, shooting guns.

c.) Porn has reached holy grail levels... this has served to desensitized normal sexual intercourse.

clambo says

Another idea is that they have put down boys for so long and promoted females for so long that now females have the status and good jobs that boys previously had; our society has emasculated the boys so they're now intimidated by the females and just give up.

Which is why these fools are willing to put up with land whales... It's a sad state of affairs.

TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce says

Goran_K says

These 20 year old male buzzfeed types

Probably carry the purse for their women who won't have sex with them and walk around screaming about the evil patriarchy and white priviledge!

The young babes WANT OLD MAN COCK! (But are too shy to ask.) hence the drugs.

You've got an entire generation of boys who are afraid to make a physical move. You can't get laid unless you make a move. It's that simple. The idea now is that you would need to ask a girl permission to kiss her rather than having it spontaneously happen.

theoakman says

You've got an entire generation of boys who are afraid to make a physical move. You can't get laid unless you make a move. It's that simple. The idea now is that you would need to ask a girl permission to kiss her rather than having it spontaneously happen.

Even if you did, Blasey ford and those types will come after you 25 years later saying otherwise.

lostand confused says

theoakman says

You've got an entire generation of boys who are afraid to make a physical move. You can't get laid unless you make a move. It's that simple. The idea now is that you would need to ask a girl permission to kiss her rather than having it spontaneously happen.

Even if you did, Blasey ford and those types will come after you 25 years later saying otherwise.

Actually, I'm pretty sure 99% of women don't give a crap. She's 1 person in an entire generation. Besides, it's not even clear Kavanaugh ever met her.

dr6B says

Perhaps young men are just being rational. Why ask out a womyn if the result can be being fired for sexual harassment, or even worse, sexual abuse/rape claims?
The most rational strategy is either paying for sex (prostitution), illegal in US, or fapping.

The way to avoid sexual harassment is (1) be handsome, (2) be attractive, (3) don't be unattractive.

https://www.nbc.com/saturday-night-live/video/tv-funhouse-sexual-harassment-and-you/2751966

I have been checking out females since I was probably 15 or maybe before. That's 4+ decades ago.

Lately I'm in S. Florida and strangely there are quite a few hot chicks here and there and the natives are generally friendly. I was with my younger male neighbor checking out the beach last spring and noticed there were quite a few fatties around.

Back in CA for a summer he borrowed my place and brought back a fat chick and a slender chick. That's 50% fat chick index in his case.

He met another one and his friend got one from Plenty of Fish. I was astounded that they would even talk to the fat chicks. I warned him that sometimes you got to get your gun or however you like to say it, but there is something called "quality over quantity."

What is going on? Fat chicks are acting like they're normal or something and can actually date men? It's absolutely crazy to me.

When I was in college it was extremely rare to meet a fat chick and nobody, I mean NObody dated them. Some of them gave head in cars but nobody wanted to be seen out with them.

It's a little bit interesting; my friend is in great physical shape, no body fat, tall, not ugly and 30. I could lose 15 lbs but am large enough to look in proportion and I have more success than he does in this area. My one theory is I simply won't even go after the fat hags he does. He's willing to "settle" for everything he does.

He's willing to settle for being broke, he's willing to settle for not dating young hot chicks, he's willing to settle to drive a Toyota Yaris, he's willing to settle in all areas of his life.

I told him in all of his interactions with cute females (all over around here) to ask for their number if they seem to be extra friendly. "ABC=Always Be Closing" I tell him. I said to have cards with his number and just hand them out if he's shy to ask for their number.

BayArea says

c.) Porn has reached holy grail levels... this has served to desensitized normal sexual intercourse

Find a girl who likes porn, solves everything. They are out there.

clambo says

he's willing to settle for not dating young hot chicks, he's willing to settle to drive a Toyota Yaris,

That says everything right there.

Malcolm says

clambo says

he's willing to settle for not dating young hot chicks, he's willing to settle to drive a Toyota Yaris,

That says everything right there.

There's nothing wrong with having a simple car. Since I'd gotten my firm to pay for a driver, my old Accord just sits in the garage, in case I ever want to go out by myself. I have no need for cars, only money.

It looks like after years of being trolled upon ,,, Rin Wah Law, finally has an actual independent thread from the Rinster himself.

http://patrick.net/post/1317336/2018-07-10-in-the-ancient-world-code-of-hammurabi-in-the-medieval-world-magna-carta-and-finally-in-the-computer-age-rin-wah-law

"Ppl, I don't think you're understanding the significance of this.

In ancient times, before Cyrus the Great, Pericles of Athens, and Julius Caesar, the world transitioned from an agrarian-only to a mix of urban and agrarian societies. The Code of Hammurabi was an essential component of how a civilization evolved from its antecedent to its successor. Yes, this was a long time back.

Likewise, in medieval times, the power of the king (and the king only) was limited to a governing set of principles which the Magna Carta had established, making the nobles and the king accountable to the same body of laws. In the centuries following, this evolved into a limited monarchy with a Parliamentary form of govt.

Rin-Wah Law, were men are allowed to fuck w/o palimony/alimony, and be able to focus on their work and hobbies, will unleash the greatest creative minds out there. It will be a time like no other."

Rin says

Rin-Wah Law, were men are allowed to fuck w/o palimony/alimony, and be able to focus on their work and hobbies, will unleash the greatest creative minds out there

Seems like that’s already common in every single third world country. Where is their age of Pericles?
Probably missing along with their dads.

Quigley says

Rin says

Rin-Wah Law, were men are allowed to fuck w/o palimony/alimony, and be able to focus on their work and hobbies, will unleash the greatest creative minds out there

Seems like that’s already common in every single third world country. Where is their age of Pericles?
Probably missing along with their dads.

3rd world countries do not have a back drop of Ben Franklin, Alexander Hamilton, Ralph Waldo Emerson, Buckminster Fuller, Frank Lloyd Wright, & the rest.

The closest to the above, coming from a 3rd world nation (with prior culture), may have would have been Russia, prior to the country being turned into a Russian Mafia gangland, as a result of Soviet failures & the lawlessness which followed. There were many Soviet musicians, scientists, etc, but as with any authoritarian regime, if Stalin-to-Brezhnev didn't approve ... it's off to the gulag.

So you admit that there’s more to it than your pick of ho’s to fuck without consequences?
Interesting, considering you’ve been literally a one-issue poster, and that’s your one issue.

Quigley says

So you admit that there’s more to it than your pick of ho’s to fuck without consequences?
Interesting, considering you’ve been literally a one-issue poster, and that’s your one issue.

If you'd been reading between the lines, I've always strongly advocated for a modern Renaissance man, which yes, requires men to poke hoes than in wasting time in relationships, which drain men of all of their resources, esp in Femi-Nazi modern America.

"Last week, I read a report in the Santa Cruz Sheriff's Department media log (always an entertaining read!) and I came across this little nugget from last week:

'An adult female openly masturbated in a county park, wiping her body fluids on a mower tractor which was being operated by a male county employee. The female also groped the male operator while he sat on the tractor and exposed her vagina to his view. The male positively identified the female subject in an in field lineup. The female was on probation. A Superior court judge was contacted, and a bail increase was sought and granted. A request for a no pre-trial release or Sheriff's SOR was granted by the judge'."

If we deny these free range resources their right to zipless sexual intercourse, then we have only ourselves to blame.
Of course, she was probably a toothless meth freak, but free is free!

It took them a while to round up enough women willing to expose their vaginas for the field lineup. "Number four, step forward and wipe some vaginal fluids on the viewing window so our witness can be absolutely certain!"

'An adult female openly masturbated in a county park, wiping her body fluids on a mower tractor which was being operated by a male county employee.

Then the male employee said "Not again, mom!"

HeadSet says

'An adult female openly masturbated in a county park, wiping her body fluids on a mower tractor which was being operated by a male county employee.

The the male employee said "Not again, mom!"

She was just protesting some rape conviction they didn't get somewhere for someone who metoo'ed someone else. It's not a crime when wommyn do it ;)

PrivilegedtobeWhite says

The way to avoid sexual harassment is (1) be handsome, (2) be attractive, (3) don't be unattractive.

If you fail to call back after that one night with her, you instantly go from "handsome" to "rapist".

More important than looks is to keep damn good records of all the texts, emails, and even photos and movies, proving she was definitely a willing or more than willing participant. Even better if you can prove she is into something kinky.

If you have a one-night stand, even if you never want to see her again, follow it up with a text or email saying you were glad she had a great time, and get a reply which confirms that. Save the data for when the bitter blue-haired feminists convince her it was actually rape.

Just keep the info on hand and be ready to prove where you were and what you did at all times. If she finds it, say it's for your viewing pleasure. Which may also be a valid use, lol.

Of course this does not help in cases of completely fabricated events and relationships, as in the case of Blasey-Ford. But even then, being able to prove your location at specific points in time could be of great value.

clambo says

He's willing to settle for being broke, he's willing to settle for not dating young hot chicks, he's willing to settle to drive a Toyota Yaris, he's willing to settle in all areas of his life.

Maybe the best he's going to achieve is being broke, dating uglies and driving a Yaris. If he's dating, then he's going against the trend of the OP.

If you fail to call back after that one night with her, you instantly go from "handsome" to "rapist".

In the old days, a girl who expected more from a one night stand and did not get a call back felt "used." Now I see she can consider being "tricked" into sex as rape. God help you if you poured her some wine.