Veteran MD Drops Bombshell About 5G Technology Dangers At 5G Hearing
2019 Jan 9, 8:58pm 5,176 views 25 comments
« First « Previous Comments 16 - 25 of 25 Search these comments
16
rocketjoe79
2019 Jan 10, 4:39pm
rocketjoe79
2019 Jan 10, 4:39pm
The new tech is apparently gong to track your phone position in real-time, and used phased arrays to send signals directly. This will require millions of antennae in cities. Will the signal strength be significant enough to be dangerous? I have radio waves (AM and FM) around me constantly, but I don't think they are detrimental.
So, no big deal. If it's just city folk getting brain cancer and going crazy, how will we know?
So, no big deal. If it's just city folk getting brain cancer and going crazy, how will we know?
17
Heraclitusstudent
2019 Jan 10, 4:44pm
Heraclitusstudent
2019 Jan 10, 4:44pm
justme says
yet visible light below UV is not ionizing radiation either. Yet does it not create a photovoltaic effect? Photons hitting atoms excite electrons to higher energy bands where some other effect happens. The point is it doesn't need to be ionizing radiation to even extract electrons.
justme says
It depends on the chemical bond and possible reactions. Many chemical reactions just happen more slowly at lower temperatures.
justme says
But we are not talking of heating up an entire body of matter. Some molecules may have resonance with specific frequencies. So while the overall temperature impact on the body is close to 0, the impact on 1 molecule could be higher, and maybe enough to alter it.
1. What is the frequency of UV light needed for the photoelectric effect? How much higher is the frequency of UV light than the frequency of cellphone signals? Do cellphones emit UV light? Does the sun emit UV light? Is it now clear why sunlight is dangerous and cellphone signals are not?
yet visible light below UV is not ionizing radiation either. Yet does it not create a photovoltaic effect? Photons hitting atoms excite electrons to higher energy bands where some other effect happens. The point is it doesn't need to be ionizing radiation to even extract electrons.
justme says
2. Heating: What temperature is needed to break chemical bonds?
It depends on the chemical bond and possible reactions. Many chemical reactions just happen more slowly at lower temperatures.
justme says
What steady-state temperature will be reached in 1 liter of water
But we are not talking of heating up an entire body of matter. Some molecules may have resonance with specific frequencies. So while the overall temperature impact on the body is close to 0, the impact on 1 molecule could be higher, and maybe enough to alter it.
18
kt1652
2019 Jan 10, 5:09pm
kt1652
2019 Jan 10, 5:09pm
I am not too worried about all the EMF/waves around us...yet. But I still play it safe, put the phone far away from my brain when I sleep. I used to work with EE's that were convinced there is evidence of higher brain cancer rate amongst those working around high power EMF exposure.
So tin foil hatter were right afterall.
Magnetic fields too:
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-railway-cancer-idUSHO97905220070529
So tin foil hatter were right afterall.
Magnetic fields too:
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-railway-cancer-idUSHO97905220070529
19
Patrick
2019 Jan 10, 5:56pm
Patrick
2019 Jan 10, 5:56pm
Heraclitusstudent says
Exactly. There is a lot of circumstantial evidence that even non-ionizing radiation is somehow causing cancer:
https://thetruthaboutcancer.com/mobile-phone-radiation/
Not saying 5G has an effect... but it doesn't appear to be an easy conclusion.
Exactly. There is a lot of circumstantial evidence that even non-ionizing radiation is somehow causing cancer:
https://thetruthaboutcancer.com/mobile-phone-radiation/
22
Patrick
2022 Oct 18, 12:19pm
Patrick
2022 Oct 18, 12:19pm
https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/well-being-dangers-of-5g
Well Being: Dangers of 5G
More evidence of regulatory and corporate media capture
23
Blue
2023 Sep 24, 12:31am
https://emfacademy.com/smart-meter-radiation/
In fact, the World Health Organization has specifically listed non-ionizing radiation from things like cell-phones, WiFi routers, and smart meters as “possible carcinogens,” meaning they could increase cancer risks.
“A wireless smart meter produces radiofrequency microwave radiation with two antennas in approximately the same frequency range (900 MHz to 2.4 GHz) as a typical cell tower. But, depending on how close it is to occupied space within a home, a smart meter can cause much higher RF exposures than cell towers commonly do.
In fact, the World Health Organization has specifically listed non-ionizing radiation from things like cell-phones, WiFi routers, and smart meters as “possible carcinogens,” meaning they could increase cancer risks.
“A wireless smart meter produces radiofrequency microwave radiation with two antennas in approximately the same frequency range (900 MHz to 2.4 GHz) as a typical cell tower. But, depending on how close it is to occupied space within a home, a smart meter can cause much higher RF exposures than cell towers commonly do.
« First « Previous Comments 16 - 25 of 25 Search these comments
She also links cases of diabetes to EMF radiation, but doesn't have time to go into all the effects of this hazardous technology, but urges congress to do more studies on 5G before approving of this, calling it "irresponsible".
Really worth a listen: (5 min)
www.1Qt5B39LB7c