A sitting Congressman claiming that "we" will fight a sitting President..... in the streets.
It'll be a long, nasty, dirty war.
If you're not alarmed by this sort of rhetoric, and don't find it to be cause to immediately demand that any such "lawmaker" be expelled and even prosecuted for a terrorist threat you're not very bright (or could be a Democrat).
It would be legal to call for a general strike, for example.
But fighting in the streets is another matter. That's a declaration of intent to commit violence against a sitting government.
Congressman from California calling for a Civil War against Trump
I think we need a WALL! on San Andreas fault to stop crazies from entering USA. When the Big One hits, the crazies will quietly slide into ocean. If they try to scale the WALL, they should be mowed down with machine guns.
The Congreeswoman from Michigan the other day calling the sitting President a MotherFucker and threatening impeachment, WITHOUT any proof of a crime.
Occassional-Cortez saying yesterday that illegal migrants, with only the shirts on their backs, are acting MORE American. ...."“And not only that but the women and children on the border seeking refuge and opportunity in the U.S. with nothing but the shirt on their backs are acting more American than any person who seeks to keep them out ever will be.”"
Now, this lunatic from California stating they will fight Trump in the streets (through a Civil War).
Plus the list of many others...
WTF......
These are elected CongressPeople, not some off the street rednecks making these statements.
Why do they hate a "Wall" so much? If you want to keep criminals, drug dealers and gangs out, build a wall. It's a lot cheaper to build a fucking wall, rather than dealing with criminals after they have committed a crime.
dealing with criminals after they have committed a crime.
If you read Solzhenitsyn's book on Gulag you'll find that the Commies treated common criminals much better than their political rivals and considered the former to be their natural allies. They even coined a special term "socially friendly" for them (as opposed to "socially hostile" and "socially suspicious" for people who didn't commit any true crime but were "guilty" of being of "wrong" "social background" or harbouring "wrong" thoughts). Seems like Dems are firmly on the same path.
They don't hate a wall. There are tons of videos and interviews over the years by elite Dems who state they were FOR a wall to keep illegals out.
They hate Trump. So they will disagree with anything he wants.
It's time for Trump to use reverse psychology on them, just like you do with a toddler or child. He needs to state he wants the OPPOSITE of what he really wants. Then when the Dems flip to an opposing point of view, he'll secretly get what he wanted all along.
Dealing with the Dems in congress is just like dealing with obstinate toddlers.
Maybe part of the reason the Left has turned so violent is that they realize they have betrayed and sold out the poorest people in the country. This leads to a lot of inner turmoil that becomes violent aggression against the people who are pointing it out.
A sitting Congressman claiming that "we" will fight a sitting President..... in the streets.
It'll be a long, nasty, dirty war.
If you're not alarmed by this sort of rhetoric, and don't find it to be cause to immediately demand that any such "lawmaker" be expelled and even prosecuted for a terrorist threat you're not very bright (or could be a Democrat).
It would be legal to call for a general strike, for example.
But fighting in the streets is another matter. That's a declaration of intent to commit violence against a sitting government.
Remember this face:
http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=234837