9
0

Why we are so lucky to have Trump as President


 invite response                
2019 Feb 10, 11:49am   5,234 views  65 comments

by Patrick   ➕follow (58)   💰tip   ignore  

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2018/01/28/dennis_prager_i_was_wrong_donald_trump_is_a_great_president.html

“My opposition to Donald Trump was wrong,” said Dennis Prager, describing Donald Trump as a “great president” whose political successes are connected to a disregard for the left-wing and partisan Democrat news media narratives.

Prager’s comments came during Thursday’s episode of his eponymous radio show. While Prager has said that Trump was his last choice during the Republican primaries, he supported him vigorously in the general election against Hillary Clinton.

“The only way to govern [while advancing] the principles of conservatism,” said Prager, was to disregard left-wing and partisan Democrat agitation pushed across the news media landscape. Prager said:

I was wrong. My opposition to Donald Trump was wrong, in retrospect. I was wrong. I had friends who supported him, and I didn’t understand them. I said, “Are you not aware of what he said about John McCain? Isn’t that enough to disqualify the guy?” They perceived in him what I did not perceive in him, that these over-the-top statements – as objectionable as the statements themselves may be, and none of them defended the statements – nevertheless, what they perceived was accurate: a man who doesn’t give a damn about what the press says about him. That is the only way to govern. It is the only way to advance the principles of conservatism in the United States is to not give a damn.

“[Donald Trump] is so much better a president than Mitt Romney would’ve made,” said Prager, describing Romney as “tepid” and concerned with appealing to news media outlets such as The New York Times.

A president’s actions are a more important metric of presidential success than a president’s demeanor, said Prager:

Would I like Donald Trump to have Mitt Romney’s temperament, or for that matter Barack Obama’s temperament? Yeah. So what? I would like a whole host of things. People are packages. What a president does is more important to me than a president’s demeanor. He is so much better a president than Mitt Romney would’ve made. Mitt Romney would’ve awakened every day to read The New York Times editorial page to see how he’s covered. Mitt Romney gave us Romneycare in Massachusetts. I campaigned for Mitt Romney, he would’ve been a better president [than Barack Obama]. Any Republican is better than any Democrat, that’s just the way it is. Having said that, Romney would’ve been a tepid president. Nothing comparably conservative compared to Donald Trump.

Concerns with a president’s demeanor should be secondary to broader analyses of a president’s impact, said Prager.

“He has turned out to be a great president with big communication flaws, in the way he tweets and some of the things he says and his temperament,” said Prager. “My temperament is the opposite. I love dignity. I love understatement. Okay, so be it. So what? I’m not sure I’d be as good a president as he. How do you like that? That’s how good he’s been.”

« First        Comments 49 - 65 of 65        Search these comments

49   Shaman   2019 Feb 11, 9:54am  

Kakistocracy says
anyone capable or willing to have intelligent thought and not willing to blindly follow the leadership.


Well that criteria rules out every single Leftist whatever their position or station. People like you just blindly believe in the Leftist dogma and brand everyone who disagrees with the slightest precept as a racist sexist heretic who should be imprisoned in a re-education camp at the very least. There’s no thought on the Left, just mindless spewing of the doctrine spouted by their leadership.

Meanwhile, nobody has gone to jail or been even inconvenienced for disagreeing with Trump or the Right.
50   MisdemeanorRebel   2019 Feb 11, 10:16am  

The Democrats are so self righteous and ANGRY! Loosen up and have some fun. The Country is doing well!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 11, 2019

51   anonymous   2019 Feb 11, 11:45am  

Quigley says
There’s no thought on the Left, just mindless spewing of the doctrine spouted by their leadership.


Obviously not bothered to check the contents of the forum now. Check the posters, the sources - say from the last 3 months of 2018 and January up to about the 15th or so.

Just read this morning on here someone thinks the Jefferrsons was reality television

Quigley says
People like you just blindly believe in the Leftist dogma


That would be allegation at best since the reality is there is no way for yourself or anyone to know my voting record or other beliefs other than the few comments I have put on here.

As I have stated over and over but will do it one more time - (all caps to make it easier to read this time)

BLIND OBEDIENCE TO ANYTHING OR ANYONE INCLUDING YOUR LEADERS IN THE MLITARY AS WELL AS THE CILIVIAN WORLD IS A FOOL'S ERRAND AND A GREAT WAY TO GET HARMED OR KILLED FOR NO GOOD REASON.

QUESTION EVERYONE AND EVERYTHING INCUDING YOUR PARENTS, OTHER FAMILY MEMBERS, TEACHERS, LEADERS FROM ALL WALKS OF LIFE , CLERGY - ANYONE IN AN AUTHORITY POSITION

NEVER TRUST ANYONE 100% EVER - FOR ANYTHING - FOR ANY REASON - QUESTION EVERYTHING AND LOOK FOR THE MOTIVE
52   Shaman   2019 Feb 11, 11:54am  

Kakistocracy says
NEVER TRUST ANYONE 100% EVER, FOR ANYTHING FOR ANY REASON


There are people who are trustworthy, and there are those who are not. Placing everyone into one of the two categories is a recipe for either disaster or winding up alone.
For example, I trust my wife 100%, but she’s been “vetted” by our long and fruitful relationship. Knowing how to tell the difference between people is difficult, but it’s a study worth pursuing, as it means literally everything.
53   anonymous   2019 Feb 11, 11:59am  

Placing people on a pedestal or giving 100% trust will always result in disappointment or worse because they are human and will always fail in one manner or another.

Expect failure and be surprised and happy when it is no where near as bad as it could be.
55   anonymous   2019 Feb 11, 1:09pm  

Looks Great !

Let them work 12-18 hour shifts for whatever the minimum wage is in the area, no union and that wall problem is solved.

Next problem...
56   MrMagic   2019 Feb 11, 1:28pm  

Kakistocracy says
Quigley says
There’s no thought on the Left, just mindless spewing of the doctrine spouted by their leadership.


Obviously not bothered to check the contents of the forum now.


Actually, I just checked the contents lately, take a look at what I found, regarding mindless spewing by the Lefties:

http://patrick.net/user/Kakistocracy

Pretty amazing stuff, wouldn't you agree?

Check this out too:

http://patrick.net/user/marcus

Is there a pattern we're seeing?

Maybe the content here too:

http://patrick.net/user/jazz_music

Yes, I believe there seems to be a pattern developing of mindless spewing.

And lastly, check this one out:

http://patrick.net/user/HEYYOU

Yep, no doubt there is definitely a pattern the last few months. Thanks for pointing it out!
57   anonymous   2019 Feb 11, 2:45pm  

In response to comment 62, the respondent forgot one small detail.

Check the posters, the sources - "say from the last 3 months of 2018 and January up to about the 15th or so".

Moi did not come back here until after the 15th of January.

As for those lovely messages you are trying to send to me from here - the mailbox you are trying to send to has been configured to automatically send everything to the trash that originates from here so I never see them unless I read the posting on line.

Thanks also for posting on my threads and bumping them up to the top - saves me from doing it.

Muuaaahhh !
58   anonymous   2019 Feb 11, 2:58pm  

59   MrMagic   2019 Feb 11, 3:54pm  

Kakistocracy says
Check the posters, the sources - "say from the last 3 months of 2018 and January up to about the 15th or so".

Moi did not come back here until after the 15th of January.


Is that so? Did you forget about these? Why leave out all your wonderful posts before those 3 months?



or maybe these:

http://patrick.net/comments?a=Kakistocracy&offset=40#comments

and that's before mentioning the other screen names of yours.....

Kakistocracy says
As for those lovely messages you are trying to send to me from here - the mailbox you are trying to send to has been configured to automatically send everything to the trash that originates from here so I never see them unless I read the posting on line.


Now if we could only send your new posts here automatically to "trash", that would be an improvement!
61   Shaman   2019 Feb 11, 4:35pm  

Once again, to counter Kaki’s assertion that the world thinks less of the USA with Trump in charge. The Pew center found that the world finds us 45% more of a threat since Trump was elected! We bad!

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/02/11/pew-nations-more-fearful-of-u-s-power-and-influence-since-trump-election/
62   MisdemeanorRebel   2019 Feb 13, 9:03am  

MrMagic says
Yep, no doubt there is definitely a pattern the last few months. Thanks for pointing it out!


Just wait, they are still digesting Mueller's investigation is about to wrap up with no collusion.

Of course, his report - if there is a FINAL report - will emphasize all the leads that weren't completely closed, rather than that no collusion was found.

« First        Comments 49 - 65 of 65        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions