▲
34
2
▼

Political Humor Thread


 invite response                
2019 Feb 17, 4:30pm   3,030,764 views  40,254 comments

by Patrick   ➕follow (60)   💰tip   ignore  

« First        Comments 1,743 - 1,782 of 40,254       Last »     Search these comments

1743   MisdemeanorRebel   2019 Jul 25, 11:07am  

marcus says

Impressive logic, considering that we now know that indicting the President was off the table, regardless of how much evidence they had.

As for the big show, sure Mueller's testimony is not as damning as many on the right feared. But do you think anyone was really expecting there to ever be enough votes in the senate (let alone the house) to impeach Trump ?


Impeach Trump on what grounds? High Crimes and Misdemeanors after a 2-year, multi-million, unlimited special counsel investigation failed to find so much as Trump removing the fire warning tag from his Mattress?
1744   Tenpoundbass   2019 Jul 25, 11:28am  

marcus says
AGAIN, INDICTING TRUMP WAS NOT A LEGAL OPTION, as long as Trump is POTUS.


He stated publicly after the report was first released. That the Can't impeach sitting president rule had nothing to do with his decision to not indict.

Nice try though.

That was why he had to recant his previous testimony. Look Mueller is not as Sharp as the people's he's locked up in this witch hunt.

He lied under oath but will probably not get in trouble for it.
1746   MisdemeanorRebel   2019 Jul 25, 11:37am  

marcus says
AGAIN, INDICTING TRUMP WAS NOT A LEGAL OPTION, as long as Trump is POTUS.


This isn't hard.

There was nothing preventing Mueller from listing charges he felt Trump should be charged with. Indeed, his job was to investigate Collusion.

Congress would then take the next step, which is to impeach for High Crimes and Misdemeanors referred in his Report.

He failed to find anything criminal to list.
1749   MisdemeanorRebel   2019 Jul 25, 11:49am  

marcus says

Actually all the forms of possible obstruction are detailed . Read the report.

A relevant video from yesterday:

https://www.cbsnews.com/video/why-mueller-didnt-charge-trump-with-obstruction/


Stop saying "Read the Report", I'm not going to waste my life reading hundreds of pages of nonsense. I know it's simply wishful thinking and an attempt by Leftists to make it appear there is some wrong doing in there that is actionable (via Impeachment or otherwise), when we all know there isn't, or we'd be hearing specifics as to what it was, and we would have heard the same things endlessly starting many months ago.

The fact is Trump was accused of no crime, nor obstruction, by Mueller. Everything else is just desperate attempts to keep the door open to impeachment on nothing.

The real story is all the fake news Bombshells that turned out to be completely fabricated or erroneous.
1750   HeadSet   2019 Jul 25, 11:50am  

Marcus, that video disproves your point.
1751   Tenpoundbass   2019 Jul 25, 11:54am  

Mueller is in deep legal trouble for not actually knowing a damn thing about his own investigation. But the bottom feeders are to obtuse to even realize it.
1752   MisdemeanorRebel   2019 Jul 25, 12:00pm  

marcus says


https://www.justsecurity.org/64679/did-trump-and-his-team-successfully-obstruct-muellers-investigation/


Biased website. Sid Blumenthal is a notorious biased impeachment Dem, his name is all over the site.

POTUS can fire the FBI Director for any or no reason. It's an unbounded Presidential power and cannot be Obstruction.
Nor is it Obstruction to ask a private citizen to ask somebody to reconsider Recusing themselves.
The President can even fire and appoint new acting AGs in succession endlessly if he wants. An unbounded power that cannot be Obstruction.
1753   HeadSet   2019 Jul 25, 12:00pm  

Of course, both McGahn and Lewandowski avoided carrying out the president’s orders.

Were these men fired for not carrying out the orders? Since nobody was fired, and the "orders" were not carried out, it is just a likely those men convinced the President or the President deferred to their judgement on these issues. One cannot be prosecuted for actions one thought about, but never carried out. If this is all you have for "obstruction," you are really digging. No collusion, so lets dig deep to compose a process crime.
1754   MisdemeanorRebel   2019 Jul 25, 12:01pm  

HeadSet says
Were these men fired for not carrying out the orders? Since nobody was fired, and the "orders" were not carried out, it is just a likely those men convinced the President or the President deferred to their judgement on these issues. One cannot be prosecuted for actions one thought about, but never carried out. If this is all you have for "obstruction," you are really digging. No collusion, so lets dig deep to compose a process crime.


Yep, it's Straining at Gnats. If we're at this point, talking about things that Trump reportedly said to others that never were implemented, there really is nothing.

If Trump said "Do something, lie to federal officials investigating the matter about the fact I told you to do it and/or that it was ever done." and it actually went down, THEN that might be obstruction of justice.
tell
If Trump said "I want you to do X. Why can't you do X?" to advisors and it was not done, that's not obstruction. If it was, almost everybody with advisors/legal counsel would be guilty of obstruction.
1756   HeadSet   2019 Jul 25, 12:21pm  

Tenpoundbass says


I do not think it was the Russian government that gave the $145 million. I recall that money came from the Canadian who profited from the deal.
1757   Onvacation   2019 Jul 25, 12:56pm  

jazz_music says
This is overdue for Trump.

Something for the churches to do for the nation.

That's sick.
1760   MisdemeanorRebel   2019 Jul 25, 2:07pm  

NOBODY! HAS! EVER! DISRESPECTED! A PRESIDENT! THE WAY! TERRY JONES! DID!

www.youtube.com/embed/fwW6II3CbwA
1763   MisdemeanorRebel   2019 Jul 25, 2:10pm  









UNPRECEDENTED! RACIST! NO PRESIDENT BEFORE OBAMA WAS TREATED SO! BIGOTS!
1764   MisdemeanorRebel   2019 Jul 25, 2:23pm  

marcus says
Obviously five photos of hate against Bush were the required response. Do you think this Mueller thing has HPM triggered just a little.


jazz_music says
that is an effigy of Obama hanging there.


Yep. Just to show that it's not necessarily RACIST! EVIL! WHITE SUPREMACISTS! That do things with Presidential Effigies. Nor is it UNPRECEDENTED! RISE! OF! HATE!





1765   Onvacation   2019 Jul 25, 3:27pm  

jazz_music says
Onvacation says
That's sick.
that is an effigy of Obama hanging there.

How do you like it now?

I know what it is. Sick.
1771   HeadSet   2019 Jul 26, 7:19am  

Tenpoundbass says


Be careful what you post. Omar has quite enough material to use without using fakes like this. Do not emulate Marcus by posting any meme that agrees with your viewpoint, with out checking facts first.
1772   Tenpoundbass   2019 Jul 26, 9:09am  

She has a long history of radical views.

https://twitter.com/ilhanmn/status/1061293976429490179?lang=en

The other quote, never said it was a Twitter quote. And when the whole Liberal institution has a page dedicated to calling it a lie. You know those lying mother fuckers are spinning like fuck. The Fake News calling anything fake news is a fucking Laugh.
The same fucking Idiot that would laugh about 9-11 would say some shit just like that.
Quit caving to the lying Liberals. They can't spin their own reality. This evil CUNT is a fucking Ass wiper with her hand, and wants every American dead.

Straight Up. Fact Check That!

« First        Comments 1,743 - 1,782 of 40,254       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste