This has now officially (more so than the past comments) become a divisive party line "I'm better than you, and you suck" thread.
TPBs paedophelia comment to all liberals was certainly a blast from left field, eh? BTW Which I steered clear of because comments are only a problem if the recipient refuses to be stomped on.
I don't always agree with TPB. I may be stepping out of bounds site rules wise, but I sometimes think he's a bit looney. BUT, he also has valid opinions that most the time are reasonable, if not correct. And if/when I disagree, I'll ask a question. Same with Marcus. Same with you (which I think I'm on your ignore list).
Discourse can be tense but also polite. You will receive what you put out. If you act a fool that's how people will treat you. This thread has devolved into foolishness.
Sure wish you and Marcus would take a stab, even a list of preferred candidates in a ranked order.
Even someone not running for fucks sake! Tell us what you want and NOT mention Trump in it!
The problem is I think they like Trumps policy, they don't like his demeanor and personality. Which I'd actually agree with. Trump is a cunt. But he's doing something that no politician (he is now) has had the balls to do, hence why he got elected and will again. Nerds and wimps despise him. This is anecdotal fact.
A Vermont Socialist, a Gay Mayor of a 3rd Tier City*, and a frumpy Minnesota Woman leading the pack so far. Trump better look out.
* Sorry, if you asked 100 people to name 10 US cities, lucky if South Bend was mentioned once. Really an exurb/satellite city. He must be the Deep State Candidate, the could-be-anybody candidate.
Had they let Tulsi debate she would be the front runner. She's still my girl in the primaries. I'd have to look at her platform before I voted for Trump if she was the dem candidate.
That seems reasonable to me. I can see it's distracting to have a very active hate-filled thread on the home page, but once you know that's what it's about, why bother to look at it again?
The best solution to bad ideas is to ignore them. Replying or talking about them gives them free advertising.
I'm open to ideas about how to change the site though.
Yes, it was long known that Biden had no chance of winning the nomination, and thus no threat to Trump. Therefore, the impeachment had nothing to do with any political favors. Rather, the impeachment was an opportunistic exaggeration played into into a "gotcha" for an impeachment attempt that has been going on since Trump won, and only because Trump won.
« First « Previous Comments 4,978 - 5,017 of 41,371 Next » Last » Search these comments
We will have one billionaire pitted against another...pivotal to see if Mr Shorty 0.5 oz soda or Orange man bad will win...
I don't always agree with TPB. I may be stepping out of bounds site rules wise, but I sometimes think he's a bit looney. BUT, he also has valid opinions that most the time are reasonable, if not correct. And if/when I disagree, I'll ask a question. Same with Marcus. Same with you (which I think I'm on your ignore list).
Discourse can be tense but also polite. You will receive what you put out. If you act a fool that's how people will treat you. This thread has devolved into foolishness.
Which Democratic Candidate do you prefer?
Sure wish you and Marcus would take a stab, even a list of preferred candidates in a ranked order.
Even someone not running for fucks sake! Tell us what you want and NOT mention Trump in it!
The problem is I think they like Trumps policy, they don't like his demeanor and personality. Which I'd actually agree with. Trump is a cunt. But he's doing something that no politician (he is now) has had the balls to do, hence why he got elected and will again. Nerds and wimps despise him. This is anecdotal fact.
jazz_music says
jazz_music says
jazz_music says
jazz_music says
So who are you voting for in the presidential election?
Fascist Comedians? hahahahaha
Like Joe Rogan and Dave Chappelle
A Vermont Socialist, a Gay Mayor of a 3rd Tier City*, and a frumpy Minnesota Woman leading the pack so far. Trump better look out.
* Sorry, if you asked 100 people to name 10 US cities, lucky if South Bend was mentioned once. Really an exurb/satellite city. He must be the Deep State Candidate, the could-be-anybody candidate.
Had they let Tulsi debate she would be the front runner. She's still my girl in the primaries. I'd have to look at her platform before I voted for Trump if she was the dem candidate.
That seems reasonable to me. I can see it's distracting to have a very active hate-filled thread on the home page, but once you know that's what it's about, why bother to look at it again?
The best solution to bad ideas is to ignore them. Replying or talking about them gives them free advertising.
I'm open to ideas about how to change the site though.
You should be able to get it in a second or two, not have to scroll down a wall of words.
Nicest woman you'd ever meet.
We have no real choices. The system is only going to let someone they want in. They must have wanted Trump because he is our president.
I heard that Trump was a hired actor paid to lose to Hillary.
It's all political theatre. They love it when we fight over the actors in the play while they continue to rape and pillage.
At least they have iPhones and aren't starving. ⁸
I still enjoy mocking liberal inanity.
marcus says
"Overused picture... Nasty Butthurt remark about Trump....Nasty Butthurt Remark about Trump Voters." Or endless text.
YES!
« First « Previous Comments 4,978 - 5,017 of 41,371 Next » Last » Search these comments