The plane was Ukrainian (An-12), and so was the crew. The cargo wasn't, which is the opposite of what your post conveys.
Don't know what you are on about and don't even know why I am answering this. There were links.: "According to information published in the well-informed T channel NEZYGAR, the plane was transporting weapons that Ukraine resold from its stocks received from Western countries (stingers, javelins, AKs with ammunition, etc.) to the military wing of the Middle East Hezbollah through the Serbian organized crime group, by a long route through Syria and Jordan (to elude the attention of the Russian Aerospace Forces). The value of the contract is 9 million US dollars, of which 3 million have already been transferred as an advance to accounts in the UAE.
As NEZYGAR writes, the CIA shared information about the flight with weapons for Hezbollah with Mossad. And then it was already a matter of technology for one of the most formidable special services of our time ...
It turns out that, firstly, Ukraine resells weapons to NATO, and secondly, the CIA has access to the deepest secrets of Ukrainian intelligence, including these resales. It is possible that the United States themselves has a share in this, writes our journalist Alexander Grishin." https://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=203764 United States is using Ukraine to launder weapons sales. I wonder how that could possibly have happened?
Don't know what you are on about and don't even know why I am answering this.
I'm "on" that web page that you posted, but only posted it as an image (not a link). dailymail is ok as a source, not great, but not to be dismissed, so I found it curious. I went through the trouble of finding the href, and read the full article of which YOU posted only the snapshot. To reiterate: dailymail reports that the the deal was between governments of Serbia and Bangladesh. It's the opposite of what your image implies. I also pointed out that whoever truncated the image to leave out those relevant details is obviously quite dishonest.
Now you are doubling down, but using links from a different source, not your "original" dailymail. You are following up with links from rumormillnews instead.
See, if you from the get go posted a link to rumormillnews rather than truncated image from dailymail, then I wouldn't have bothered at all. Like I haven't in the past when I saw your links to that resource. Info-dumpster-diving may be fun, who am I do dissuade someone from doing it?
Now you are doubling down, but using links from a different source, not your "original" dailymail. You are following up with links from rumormillnews instead.
Yes, I agree completely, and think it is incumbent on you to put me on 'ignore' immediately so that your exquisite sensitivities are no longer besmirched. I guess I fell for the troll trap.
@Ceffer - I leave it to you to talk to that scrambled egg "mostly reader". He's got SECRET INFORMATION so he can't ever share sources, unless they are in Russian, and aren't easily translated, but he KNOWS. He's not a glowie at all.
Nah, AF never posted anything intelligible. He drove me nuts actually, one of the few people that got under my skin because he would never engage in any reasoning and what he wrote was just nonsense to me.
Nah, he wrote here very recently, said he was 74. I don't think he's actively an asshole. Claimed he was strapped for time. I don't have any objection to that. But if you write, you have an obligation to respond to either correct your own thinking or to correct other's thinking.
I don't think "mostly reader" can be corrected, and he sure as fuck doesn't want to share how he forms his opinions. He's like a liberal - just absolutely outraged you don't think like he's telling you to think, but can't be bothered to explain how you're wrong. Trust me, I'm licking Putin's asshole all the time, according to him - you know, because that will win the war for Russia, and if I didn't do it, well, they would lose, or something.
Since Joes mind is tapioca anyway, are they going to spin it, that Hunter is some tortured soul put up to all of his over seas illegal dealings by his bully abusive father? By time that comes out in trial Joe will be in hospice or dead already.
Since Joes mind is tapioca anyway, are they going to spin it, that Hunter is some tortured soul put up to all of his over seas illegal dealings by his bully abusive father?
There is no Hunter Biden diary. The story is false. I tried to find it, it doesn't exist as far as I can tell, and if it did, it would be all over the net.
« First « Previous Comments 17,081 - 17,120 of 42,180 Next » Last » Search these comments
Don't know what you are on about and don't even know why I am answering this. There were links.:
"According to information published in the well-informed T channel NEZYGAR, the plane was transporting weapons that Ukraine resold from its stocks received from Western countries (stingers, javelins, AKs with ammunition, etc.) to the military wing of the Middle East Hezbollah through the Serbian organized crime group, by a long route through Syria and Jordan (to elude the attention of the Russian Aerospace Forces). The value of the contract is 9 million US dollars, of which 3 million have already been transferred as an advance to accounts in the UAE.
As NEZYGAR writes, the CIA shared information about the flight with weapons for Hezbollah with Mossad. And then it was already a matter of technology for one of the most formidable special services of our time ...
It turns out that, firstly, Ukraine resells weapons to NATO, and secondly, the CIA has access to the deepest secrets of Ukrainian intelligence, including these resales. It is possible that the United States themselves has a share in this, writes our journalist Alexander Grishin."
https://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=203764
United States is using Ukraine to launder weapons sales. I wonder how that could possibly have happened?
It's for the good of America doncha know?
Through Serbia, which is friendly to Russia? This does not make any sense whatsoever.
I'm "on" that web page that you posted, but only posted it as an image (not a link). dailymail is ok as a source, not great, but not to be dismissed, so I found it curious. I went through the trouble of finding the href, and read the full article of which YOU posted only the snapshot. To reiterate: dailymail reports that the the deal was between governments of Serbia and Bangladesh. It's the opposite of what your image implies. I also pointed out that whoever truncated the image to leave out those relevant details is obviously quite dishonest.
Now you are doubling down, but using links from a different source, not your "original" dailymail. You are following up with links from rumormillnews instead.
See, if you from the get go posted a link to rumormillnews rather than truncated image from dailymail, then I wouldn't have bothered at all. Like I haven't in the past when I saw your links to that resource. Info-dumpster-diving may be fun, who am I do dissuade someone from doing it?
Is this a joke? I can't even understand that abominable run-on sentence.
Yes, I agree completely, and think it is incumbent on you to put me on 'ignore' immediately so that your exquisite sensitivities are no longer besmirched. I guess I fell for the troll trap.
Pedo-bear Pete!
Awesome, in the most malignant way possible.
Clearly you haven't heard kumala speak!
@Ceffer - I leave it to you to talk to that scrambled egg "mostly reader". He's got SECRET INFORMATION so he can't ever share sources, unless they are in Russian, and aren't easily translated, but he KNOWS. He's not a glowie at all.
Nah, AF never posted anything intelligible. He drove me nuts actually, one of the few people that got under my skin because he would never engage in any reasoning and what he wrote was just nonsense to me.
Ceffer says
Nah, he wrote here very recently, said he was 74. I don't think he's actively an asshole. Claimed he was strapped for time. I don't have any objection to that. But if you write, you have an obligation to respond to either correct your own thinking or to correct other's thinking.
I don't think "mostly reader" can be corrected, and he sure as fuck doesn't want to share how he forms his opinions. He's like a liberal - just absolutely outraged you don't think like he's telling you to think, but can't be bothered to explain how you're wrong. Trust me, I'm licking Putin's asshole all the time, according to him - you know, because that will win the war for Russia, and if I didn't do it, well, they would lose, or something.
https://t.me/WeTheMedia/71634
You have indeed fell for the troll trap. It didn't happen here though.
https://t.me/WeTheMedia/71638
Michelle Obama's mother is Marian Robinson
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marian_Shields_Robinson
Since Joes mind is tapioca anyway, are they going to spin it, that Hunter is some tortured soul put up to all of his over seas illegal dealings by his bully abusive father?
By time that comes out in trial Joe will be in hospice or dead already.
So the joke is, Kamala's speech writer writes the same way Kamala talks.
There is no Hunter Biden diary. The story is false. I tried to find it, it doesn't exist as far as I can tell, and if it did, it would be all over the net.
Here's Ashley Biden's diary:
https://www.scribd.com/document/548463188/Ashley-Biden-s-Diary
https://www.docdroid.net/AHRA5wJ/alleged-ashley-biden-diary-full-release-nf-wm-rev2-pdf
Real stuff is easy to find. EVERYTHING is online now.
« First « Previous Comments 17,081 - 17,120 of 42,180 Next » Last » Search these comments