Don't know what you are on about and don't even know why I am answering this.
I'm "on" that web page that you posted, but only posted it as an image (not a link). dailymail is ok as a source, not great, but not to be dismissed, so I found it curious. I went through the trouble of finding the href, and read the full article of which YOU posted only the snapshot. To reiterate: dailymail reports that the the deal was between governments of Serbia and Bangladesh. It's the opposite of what your image implies. I also pointed out that whoever truncated the image to leave out those relevant details is obviously quite dishonest.
Now you are doubling down, but using links from a different source, not your "original" dailymail. You are following up with links from rumormillnews instead.
See, if you from the get go posted a link to rumormillnews rather than truncated image from dailymail, then I wouldn't have bothered at all. Like I haven't in the past when I saw your links to that resource. Info-dumpster-diving may be fun, who am I do dissuade someone from doing it?
Now you are doubling down, but using links from a different source, not your "original" dailymail. You are following up with links from rumormillnews instead.
Yes, I agree completely, and think it is incumbent on you to put me on 'ignore' immediately so that your exquisite sensitivities are no longer besmirched. I guess I fell for the troll trap.
@Ceffer - I leave it to you to talk to that scrambled egg "mostly reader". He's got SECRET INFORMATION so he can't ever share sources, unless they are in Russian, and aren't easily translated, but he KNOWS. He's not a glowie at all.
Nah, AF never posted anything intelligible. He drove me nuts actually, one of the few people that got under my skin because he would never engage in any reasoning and what he wrote was just nonsense to me.
Nah, he wrote here very recently, said he was 74. I don't think he's actively an asshole. Claimed he was strapped for time. I don't have any objection to that. But if you write, you have an obligation to respond to either correct your own thinking or to correct other's thinking.
I don't think "mostly reader" can be corrected, and he sure as fuck doesn't want to share how he forms his opinions. He's like a liberal - just absolutely outraged you don't think like he's telling you to think, but can't be bothered to explain how you're wrong. Trust me, I'm licking Putin's asshole all the time, according to him - you know, because that will win the war for Russia, and if I didn't do it, well, they would lose, or something.
Since Joes mind is tapioca anyway, are they going to spin it, that Hunter is some tortured soul put up to all of his over seas illegal dealings by his bully abusive father? By time that comes out in trial Joe will be in hospice or dead already.
Since Joes mind is tapioca anyway, are they going to spin it, that Hunter is some tortured soul put up to all of his over seas illegal dealings by his bully abusive father?
There is no Hunter Biden diary. The story is false. I tried to find it, it doesn't exist as far as I can tell, and if it did, it would be all over the net.
Jane Goodall wonders why WEF/Globalists are going to the trouble of dumbing down the sheeple and eliminating white brains when they could just breed apes and monkeys to take our place. She doesn't realize the sadistic gratification of humiliation, murder, and parting out actual humans:
If they block UV wavelengths from 270-300 nm, Vitamin D skin production stops, resistance to disease ensues and cancer production is enhanced. Also less effective agriculture for the democide agendas. https://t.me/greatreject/39438
That's the first that I have seen a visual representation of what I heard was on the laptop. I had read somewhere that wishing Joe would die was in a diary on the laptop. Why Hunter digitized everything is a mystery to me. There's a lot of truth in that meme of Hunter with a helmet cam, with about ten cameras attached to it, with the caption. "Hunter anytime he's doing drugs with hookers."
If they block UV wavelengths from 270-300 nm, Vitamin D skin production stops, resistance to disease ensues and cancer production is enhanced. Also less effective agriculture for the democide agendas.
Haha - I heard about this yesterday. They are claiming to be putting up some sort of shield at a Lagrange point to dim the sun.
Let me explain why this is total bullshit and trust me, they know it's bullshit.
The only Lagrange point that would EVER be between the Earth and the sun is L3. This is the same position of the moon, EXCEPT 180 degrees away from it, so the opposite side of the Earth where the moon would be, but the same position.
So, it would eclipse the earth, as often as the moon does. So, once in a blue moon, to say the least - VERY rarely.
Finally, they claim it would be the size of Brazil, well, the moon's shadow IS about the size of Brazil, a little larger, it would be humongous. It would have to be a balloon of some sort, and Lagange points are where gravity cancels out entirely, they are stable points. As a result, there's a LOT of space crap at Lagrange points. That's why the James Webb telescope has already had an impact, and it will have more...
What I'm saying is this, supposed plan, to block out the sun, is ludicrously stupid. It's like saying we'll have flying cars in just 20 years or that we'll have nuclear fusion in 10 - both of those would be FAR easier to do and are actually possible. To put something at a Lagrange point that would actually reduce the sun significantly, it would probably have to be the size of fucking Earth, and even then, it would only put the Earth in shadow, once a lunar month for a maybe 1/2 hour.
« First « Previous Comments 17,091 - 17,130 of 42,172 Next » Last » Search these comments
I'm "on" that web page that you posted, but only posted it as an image (not a link). dailymail is ok as a source, not great, but not to be dismissed, so I found it curious. I went through the trouble of finding the href, and read the full article of which YOU posted only the snapshot. To reiterate: dailymail reports that the the deal was between governments of Serbia and Bangladesh. It's the opposite of what your image implies. I also pointed out that whoever truncated the image to leave out those relevant details is obviously quite dishonest.
Now you are doubling down, but using links from a different source, not your "original" dailymail. You are following up with links from rumormillnews instead.
See, if you from the get go posted a link to rumormillnews rather than truncated image from dailymail, then I wouldn't have bothered at all. Like I haven't in the past when I saw your links to that resource. Info-dumpster-diving may be fun, who am I do dissuade someone from doing it?
Is this a joke? I can't even understand that abominable run-on sentence.
Yes, I agree completely, and think it is incumbent on you to put me on 'ignore' immediately so that your exquisite sensitivities are no longer besmirched. I guess I fell for the troll trap.
Pedo-bear Pete!
Awesome, in the most malignant way possible.
Clearly you haven't heard kumala speak!
@Ceffer - I leave it to you to talk to that scrambled egg "mostly reader". He's got SECRET INFORMATION so he can't ever share sources, unless they are in Russian, and aren't easily translated, but he KNOWS. He's not a glowie at all.
Nah, AF never posted anything intelligible. He drove me nuts actually, one of the few people that got under my skin because he would never engage in any reasoning and what he wrote was just nonsense to me.
Ceffer says
Nah, he wrote here very recently, said he was 74. I don't think he's actively an asshole. Claimed he was strapped for time. I don't have any objection to that. But if you write, you have an obligation to respond to either correct your own thinking or to correct other's thinking.
I don't think "mostly reader" can be corrected, and he sure as fuck doesn't want to share how he forms his opinions. He's like a liberal - just absolutely outraged you don't think like he's telling you to think, but can't be bothered to explain how you're wrong. Trust me, I'm licking Putin's asshole all the time, according to him - you know, because that will win the war for Russia, and if I didn't do it, well, they would lose, or something.
https://t.me/WeTheMedia/71634
You have indeed fell for the troll trap. It didn't happen here though.
https://t.me/WeTheMedia/71638
Michelle Obama's mother is Marian Robinson
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marian_Shields_Robinson
Since Joes mind is tapioca anyway, are they going to spin it, that Hunter is some tortured soul put up to all of his over seas illegal dealings by his bully abusive father?
By time that comes out in trial Joe will be in hospice or dead already.
So the joke is, Kamala's speech writer writes the same way Kamala talks.
There is no Hunter Biden diary. The story is false. I tried to find it, it doesn't exist as far as I can tell, and if it did, it would be all over the net.
Here's Ashley Biden's diary:
https://www.scribd.com/document/548463188/Ashley-Biden-s-Diary
https://www.docdroid.net/AHRA5wJ/alleged-ashley-biden-diary-full-release-nf-wm-rev2-pdf
Real stuff is easy to find. EVERYTHING is online now.
https://t.me/SGTnewsNetwork/27793
https://t.me/greatreject/39438
Hunter don't diary, he films. Maybe it's Kamala's diary.
That's the first that I have seen a visual representation of what I heard was on the laptop. I had read somewhere that wishing Joe would die was in a diary on the laptop.
Why Hunter digitized everything is a mystery to me. There's a lot of truth in that meme of Hunter with a helmet cam, with about ten cameras attached to it, with the caption. "Hunter anytime he's doing drugs with hookers."
Haha - I heard about this yesterday. They are claiming to be putting up some sort of shield at a Lagrange point to dim the sun.
Let me explain why this is total bullshit and trust me, they know it's bullshit.
The only Lagrange point that would EVER be between the Earth and the sun is L3. This is the same position of the moon, EXCEPT 180 degrees away from it, so the opposite side of the Earth where the moon would be, but the same position.
So, it would eclipse the earth, as often as the moon does. So, once in a blue moon, to say the least - VERY rarely.
Finally, they claim it would be the size of Brazil, well, the moon's shadow IS about the size of Brazil, a little larger, it would be humongous. It would have to be a balloon of some sort, and Lagange points are where gravity cancels out entirely, they are stable points. As a result, there's a LOT of space crap at Lagrange points. That's why the James Webb telescope has already had an impact, and it will have more...
What I'm saying is this, supposed plan, to block out the sun, is ludicrously stupid. It's like saying we'll have flying cars in just 20 years or that we'll have nuclear fusion in 10 - both of those would be FAR easier to do and are actually possible. To put something at a Lagrange point that would actually reduce the sun significantly, it would probably have to be the size of fucking Earth, and even then, it would only put the Earth in shadow, once a lunar month for a maybe 1/2 hour.
« First « Previous Comments 17,091 - 17,130 of 42,172 Next » Last » Search these comments