If any idiot can fake the fake, then certainly the assets of the Deep State can fake the entire politician. Creating legends and ghosts is what the Intel agencies do, and it has the additional satisfaction for them of succeeding in foisting a total fraud on the people.
"Oh, look, har, har, they idiots still believe it's Biden!"
If any idiot can fake the fake, then certainly the assets of the Deep State can fake the entire politician. Creating legends and ghosts is what the Intel agencies do, and it has the additional satisfaction for them of succeeding in foisting a total fraud on the people.
"Oh, look, har, har, they idiots still believe it's Biden!"
I'm pointing out that you're being tricked.
A very fucking common propaganda technique which I believe you are falling for, is to produce fake examples of conspiracies to discredit people who are investigating REAL conspiracies. It's called kookification, that's why that cunt Judy Woods is around claiming that "directed energy weapons" took out the world trade centers. She's totally full of shit, her job is to make EVERYBODY that suspects that it was an inside job (and has good reason to believe it is an inside job) look as crazy as she PRETENDS to be.
Our government isn't so stupid that they would be using a mask that wouldn't completely cover the neck, OF COURSE. What you're posting is a quick and shitty photoshop job. Find it in VIDEO otherwise you're just being OBVIOUSLY tricked.
I saw the original hi def feed from that interview, conducted by Biden's MSM buddies, and I wondered why they let it through because you could see the distinct transition in his neck where his skin color changed from mask/makeup to whomever. The little picture above is low def, and could be artificially enhanced. It is clear that they are not always on their top game when releasing them from the makeup wagons, there are lots of bloopers and glitches.
It would be interesting to get a tour of the infrastructure supporting the outfitting of DC. They probably have a Burbank worthy array of personnel and facilities underground or in the Congress buildings to support all of this ersatz theater.
They probably read their ticker tape instructions from Switzerland while their dressers are gearing them up in the makeup wagons for the day's puppeteering.
I saw the original hi def feed from that interview, conducted by Biden's MSM buddies, and I wondered why they let it through because you could see the distinct transition in his neck where his skin color changed from mask/makeup to whomever. The little picture above is low def, and could be artificially enhanced. It is clear that they are not always on their top game when releasing them from the makeup wagons, there are lots of bloopers and glitches.
I think I recall seeing that high def video, and came to the conclusion it was shadows / lighting. I think I even posted here about it. If it was actually a mask edge, and it looked as horrible as the framegrab, then everyone in the room would have noticed and warned them.
Not a mask. More like an opportunistic framegrab and maybe some photoshop.
A major point to me is, the more you wish to be beguiled into seeing what they want you to see or guide you to see, the more you have to enter a denial state and not trust the the perceptions from your own eyes and ears. A lot of people want the magic trick to work.
It seems to be part of the transition from denial to acceptance, that you want to negotiate your way back into a comfortable state of denial rather than the dysphoric condition of realizing the extent of the treachery and deceit.
I'm wondering if eventually a close relationship between armed IRS agents and Department Of Foreign Nazi Infiltration of America (otherwise known as Department of Homeland Security) and FEMA will be demonstrated. https://t.me/Absolute1776/16075
“We’ve never done this before, but because of a number of things we got done on a bipartisan basis — like a billion, 200 million-dollar infrastructure project — like what we’re doing today, we passed yesterday, helping take care of everything from health care to God knows what else,” Biden said.
“We’ve never done this before, but because of a number of things we got done on a bipartisan basis — like a billion, 200 million-dollar infrastructure project — like what we’re doing today, we passed yesterday, helping take care of everything from health care to God knows what else,” Biden said.
It's not the same quote, which is "God only knows what's in that thing", and that's in QUOTES.
Quoting is one thing, that can be taken out of context, but paraphrasing and then calling it a quote, that's just deceptive.
I have a TON of experience with propaganda and bullshit "news". There's quite a few people who are absolutely, maniacally, obsessively driven to report what they think is "the truth" - these people are competing against the entire corporate machine of propaganda, and they compete against these LAZY sites that don't even bother to verify what they report.
Trying to find somebody that is "telling the truth" but "makes mistakes" is difficult but they exist. You know how I find them? They've been deplatformed, they mention other people that do the same thing they do, but you have to find one or two first, and all this bullshit, makes it really hard to get started.
Do you really have to burst ALL my bubbles like that? How cruel.
I'm not trying to be an asshole.
With the SHIT that is going on today, and with the GARBAGE running our nation today, we don't have to do anything other than stick strictly to the truth.
When something UNTRUE is repeated, it weakens your position. If you show somebody "on the fence" or especially on the other side of the fence something that turns out to be incorrect, they dismiss EVERYTHING you say from that point forward. You have to be careful and readily admit error, but really, avoid error.
I make errors all the time, but you must notice I get crazy when something really interesting shows up, and there's no way to verify it. Then I have to spend up to 30 minutes to find out if some supposed headline or story actually exists. It's a bitch. I had to check that audio, and it's false, it's misleading to say the least.
Here's an example - were any of the protesters at the January 6th "insurrection" armed? I bet you think no. That's wrong, some were. Not most of them, a very small number of them, I don't think ANY of them entered the Capitol. I heard constantly "not a single protester was armed" - that's not true.
The right lies as much as the left, not knowingly, they just don't know! There's people CONVINCED that the Mueller report has some dirt in it, just ask them where. You have to check everything, and it's GRUELING. Take my argument with @"mostly reader" I don't think he's evil, I think he's wrong. I challenge him with the full expectation that he cannot defend his position. He further solidifies my current belief that most people that think this is an "unprovoked war" can't defend that position. I didn't just hear that Victoria Nuland picked the new leader, I had to track that down and verify it was correct. I had to find out what Burisma was, I had to find out that Ihor Kolomoyskyi was basically the owner of Burisma, that he ran the television station that Zelenskyy was on, and I still make mistakes. I thought Crimea was Russia's ONLY warm water port, that's not strictly true, it's the most important to them.
If everybody spent a LITTLE effort to confirm what they hear, and increase their reliability, and everybody checked their work, think of what a think tank would be here? It would be awesome.
If you think this is Nancy Pelosi, you are one of the "I" words. They are refurbishing the old bird with a younger stable of actress(es) and cgi to line her up as the actor to take Biden Actor's place. Is this why "real" Pelosi and her husband appear to be stumbling, mumbling drunk all the time, their 'retirement' is at hand aka useless idiot Illuminati graveyard? We are truly in the era of manufactured name stealer politicos. Remember, nearly every picture of politicians and celebs go through an automated photoshop type app that removes wrinkles and makes them look younger. 'Real' Nancy looks like a sagging mass of wrinkles and wattles.
This is supposed to be her 'after' a face lift. They will claim that 'new Nancy' is just great plastic surgery rather than Globalist reincarnation.
Very nervous looking Paul Pelosi with Young Nancy Actress in Asia. He was probably there to giver her tips on staying in character. He is 'pre-bribed and blackmailed', being already a pedo and in on the same graft that Hunter Biden is. He's kind of a Hunter without the crack pipe. Makes you wonder if they put real Nancy in the grave and told him to cooperate with the charade or die along with her.
They aren't IRS agents, they are a militia. Since they can't get NG or military to do their dirty work, they will generate another armed paramilitary group out of whole bureaucratic cloth to persecute the citizenry for the DC Lubyanka. It's Communism 101.
They just happen to be a militia that can collect their own extortion and pay for themselves.
They'll be breaking down doors and seizing stuff right and left, and will also shoot a few people. Everybody gets a little Ruby Ridge action.
« First « Previous Comments 17,493 - 17,532 of 42,280 Next » Last » Search these comments
"Oh, look, har, har, they idiots still believe it's Biden!"
I'm pointing out that you're being tricked.
A very fucking common propaganda technique which I believe you are falling for, is to produce fake examples of conspiracies to discredit people who are investigating REAL conspiracies. It's called kookification, that's why that cunt Judy Woods is around claiming that "directed energy weapons" took out the world trade centers. She's totally full of shit, her job is to make EVERYBODY that suspects that it was an inside job (and has good reason to believe it is an inside job) look as crazy as she PRETENDS to be.
Our government isn't so stupid that they would be using a mask that wouldn't completely cover the neck, OF COURSE. What you're posting is a quick and shitty photoshop job. Find it in VIDEO otherwise you're just being OBVIOUSLY tricked.
I saw the original hi def feed from that interview, conducted by Biden's MSM buddies, and I wondered why they let it through because you could see the distinct transition in his neck where his skin color changed from mask/makeup to whomever. The little picture above is low def, and could be artificially enhanced. It is clear that they are not always on their top game when releasing them from the makeup wagons, there are lots of bloopers and glitches.
It would be interesting to get a tour of the infrastructure supporting the outfitting of DC. They probably have a Burbank worthy array of personnel and facilities underground or in the Congress buildings to support all of this ersatz theater.
They probably read their ticker tape instructions from Switzerland while their dressers are gearing them up in the makeup wagons for the day's puppeteering.
I think I recall seeing that high def video, and came to the conclusion it was shadows / lighting. I think I even posted here about it. If it was actually a mask edge, and it looked as horrible as the framegrab, then everyone in the room would have noticed and warned them.
Not a mask. More like an opportunistic framegrab and maybe some photoshop.
It seems to be part of the transition from denial to acceptance, that you want to negotiate your way back into a comfortable state of denial rather than the dysphoric condition of realizing the extent of the treachery and deceit.
"Just get on the train. It's for your own good."
https://en-volve.com/2022/08/09/biden-god-knows-what-else-is-in-the-democrats-inflation-reduction-act/
https://t.me/Absolute1776/16075
It's not in the video. That story is bullshit. I always look for the part of the video when they make claims, and they are lying about what he said.
https://nypost.com/2022/08/08/biden-says-inflation-bill-funds-healthcare-god-knows-what-else-in-bizarre-speech/
It's not the same quote, which is "God only knows what's in that thing", and that's in QUOTES.
Quoting is one thing, that can be taken out of context, but paraphrasing and then calling it a quote, that's just deceptive.
I have a TON of experience with propaganda and bullshit "news". There's quite a few people who are absolutely, maniacally, obsessively driven to report what they think is "the truth" - these people are competing against the entire corporate machine of propaganda, and they compete against these LAZY sites that don't even bother to verify what they report.
Trying to find somebody that is "telling the truth" but "makes mistakes" is difficult but they exist. You know how I find them? They've been deplatformed, they mention other people that do the same thing they do, but you have to find one or two first, and all this bullshit, makes it really hard to get started.
I'm not trying to be an asshole.
With the SHIT that is going on today, and with the GARBAGE running our nation today, we don't have to do anything other than stick strictly to the truth.
When something UNTRUE is repeated, it weakens your position. If you show somebody "on the fence" or especially on the other side of the fence something that turns out to be incorrect, they dismiss EVERYTHING you say from that point forward. You have to be careful and readily admit error, but really, avoid error.
I make errors all the time, but you must notice I get crazy when something really interesting shows up, and there's no way to verify it. Then I have to spend up to 30 minutes to find out if some supposed headline or story actually exists. It's a bitch. I had to check that audio, and it's false, it's misleading to say the least.
Here's an example - were any of the protesters at the January 6th "insurrection" armed? I bet you think no. That's wrong, some were. Not most of them, a very small number of them, I don't think ANY of them entered the Capitol. I heard constantly "not a single protester was armed" - that's not true.
The right lies as much as the left, not knowingly, they just don't know! There's people CONVINCED that the Mueller report has some dirt in it, just ask them where. You have to check everything, and it's GRUELING. Take my argument with @"mostly reader" I don't think he's evil, I think he's wrong. I challenge him with the full expectation that he cannot defend his position. He further solidifies my current belief that most people that think this is an "unprovoked war" can't defend that position. I didn't just hear that Victoria Nuland picked the new leader, I had to track that down and verify it was correct. I had to find out what Burisma was, I had to find out that Ihor Kolomoyskyi was basically the owner of Burisma, that he ran the television station that Zelenskyy was on, and I still make mistakes. I thought Crimea was Russia's ONLY warm water port, that's not strictly true, it's the most important to them.
If everybody spent a LITTLE effort to confirm what they hear, and increase their reliability, and everybody checked their work, think of what a think tank would be here? It would be awesome.
This is supposed to be her 'after' a face lift. They will claim that 'new Nancy' is just great plastic surgery rather than Globalist reincarnation.
30% of the population is stupid, and coincidentally, that's about Biden's approval number.
https://t.me/BenjaminFulfordWDSGroup/69945
Just call into SWAT that there are people with firearms doing drug deals there.
No, that's the inflated, manipulated Globalist press number.
Makes you wonder if they put real Nancy in the grave and told him to cooperate with the charade or die along with her.
https://t.me/gatewaypunditofficial/16554
They just happen to be a militia that can collect their own extortion and pay for themselves.
They'll be breaking down doors and seizing stuff right and left, and will also shoot a few people. Everybody gets a little Ruby Ridge action.
It's not a perfectly clear line.
Russian government tax collectors in masks confiscate business inventory to cover the business's back taxes. Those agents look like bandits.
Colombian drug dealers build schools and hospitals in areas where the official government fails to do so. Those drug dealers look like a government.
How do you know this? I'm not saying this isn't true, I just don't know how you determine this to be true.
« First « Previous Comments 17,493 - 17,532 of 42,280 Next » Last » Search these comments