What about 'designed to fail' didn't you understand? Nothing like promoting marginal technologies with no legs, using them to launder tax money and profits to elites, then sequestering the the energy assets that actually work to hold society hostage.
Clif High's audit of solar panels. Still wildly optimistic, because I doubt that solar panels will perform in any meaningful sense over 20 years. Electronics tend to deteriorate a lot between 10 and 15 years just through materials stresses
The billing complexity out here is enough to scare me off. That said, you're saying a 100W panel costs $100. If it generates 0.5 kWh per day, you're looking at 182.5 kWh per year. At your specified $0.13 per kWh that's $23.73 generated per year for a total payoff within 5 years. Double the costs to account for labor and the inverter hardware, but triple the $0.13 because... California. So a solar panel system would seem to make sense in an area like mine. (Again, if someone can explain all the crazy billing stuff, I might consider it.)
The billing complexity out here is enough to scare me off. That said, you're saying a 100W panel costs $100.
I just don't believe any of the fairy financial projections about solar, with or without tax credits. They are an albatross waiting to happen.
Since everything that the Green and Global Warming crowd have said is a lie, what makes one think they would not manufacture fake news about longevity and usability? After ten years, whoever put your stuff in is going to be in the wind, and the Guv probably won't stand by anything any more. Your problem, and costly to remove the stuff, likely with stiff hazardous trash removal fees.
« First « Previous Comments 21,901 - 21,940 of 42,079 Next » Last » Search these comments
https://t.me/DH_newz/2440
Wouldn't happen. Can't portray people of colour in a negative light.
https://t.me/greatreject/48801
The billing complexity out here is enough to scare me off. That said, you're saying a 100W panel costs $100. If it generates 0.5 kWh per day, you're looking at 182.5 kWh per year. At your specified $0.13 per kWh that's $23.73 generated per year for a total payoff within 5 years. Double the costs to account for labor and the inverter hardware, but triple the $0.13 because... California. So a solar panel system would seem to make sense in an area like mine. (Again, if someone can explain all the crazy billing stuff, I might consider it.)
Not a real story.
yes satire
I just don't believe any of the fairy financial projections about solar, with or without tax credits. They are an albatross waiting to happen.
Since everything that the Green and Global Warming crowd have said is a lie, what makes one think they would not manufacture fake news about longevity and usability? After ten years, whoever put your stuff in is going to be in the wind, and the Guv probably won't stand by anything any more. Your problem, and costly to remove the stuff, likely with stiff hazardous trash removal fees.
« First « Previous Comments 21,901 - 21,940 of 42,079 Next » Last » Search these comments