It’s a world full of grifters and chancers trying to make a buck off the gullible. If the believers were to put it down and leave it alone for 30 days they would see they would be better off.
Some are just aspies/autists that have glommed on to an obsession, and can't let it go.
David Irving rooted for the Germans as a kid and he saw dogfights over his home. No bad upbringing, no nothing. But from childhood he was Nazis Good and Misunderstood. Just because some synapse fires some way in his brain, and you'll never convince him otherwise. Even if he accepts something after decades of painful argumentation and abundant evidence, he'll simply twist it in a new way to conform to his humbug.
Some Truther, Denier, etc. will be like "Fine, Fine, there is Prussian Blue in the gas chamber, but the Soviets must have put it in there after the fact." And his followers will be all like "Irving conclusively proved the Soviets added the Prussian Blue to frame the Nazis", and 98% of the Public isn't anywhere that deep into the details and a few new suckers are born.
Occam's razor may get you out the door, but it's reductionism doesn't explain everything. The world and nature ARE complicated and phenomena are tangled. Most people's views and defense mechanisms reflect the world they prefer, not the world that is, and the gaslighting follows what they prefer.
From what I recall of rw's posts, his Overton window is a withered vestigial limb and novelty freaks him out. He doesn't present much in the way of meaningful content but mans a machine gun nest to strafe and sharpshoot everybody else, kind of like a glowie provocateur without compensating redeeming contribution to the community. At least most people present stuff that you can triangulate over time or just get a laugh out of. Raving paranoia gets boring.
I remember our conspiracy theory buddy Gary who is proving to be quite correct in a bunch of seemingly at the time outlandish theories and he took endless mockery for it. I told him I did not dismiss conspiracy theories, I just tabled them until I could do proper investigation, which is tedious and time consuming. If that investigation puts you at odds with 'the narrative', in some ways it can also put you in danger.
He thought I was on the payroll of the Rothschilds. I am still waiting for the checks.
ZOG is rapidly descending into GOG vs. MAGOG. However, your defense perspective is necessary to the sorting of things, and the historical contexts are much appreciated.
Some people have their humbug and no matter what, no matter how much a complex web with nothing more than the weakest (and sometimes fanciful) connections there are between the strands, they prefer their complex web to Occam's Razor.
None of you know what Occam's Razor is.
You will tell me that it is the postulate that the simplest explanation is the most reasonable explanation.
That's not it.
It's that the explanation with the least number of assumptions is the most likely correct. The explanation with no assumptions must be correct.
Isn't it odd that the very foundation of the modern world, most of you do not know? Occam's Razor is the basis of all modern science, but almost everybody misquotes the postulate.
From what I recall of rw's posts, his Overton window is a withered vestigial limb and novelty freaks him out. He doesn't present much in the way of meaningful content but mans a machine gun nest to strafe and sharpshoot everybody else
Please
You post nonsense continually. You post Benjamin Fulford's bullshit even though I have shown you repeatedly that he is at least wrong if not outright dishonest. This is a man that lives in Japan, claims he's been visited by literal ninjas and there have been assassination attempts on him.
And you non stop reference him, endlessly.
I have researched and rejected who you reference now. You will post his bullshit again, and again and again
And you say my Overton window is too small? You purposely post nonsense from what I would bet is an intelligence asset whose job is to muddy the waters. Is that your job as well?
You will tell me that it is the postulate that the simplest explanation is the most reasonablelikely explanation.
Well that isn't Occam's Razor...
Explanation with least number of assumptions. You are all trained to think of the simplest solution, so even complete nonsense is believed by the public now.
You will tell me that it is the postulate that the simplest explanation is the most reasonable likely explanation
The postulate that needs the LEAST amount of assumptions or speculation.
Fact: The Hijackers were on video boarding the planes. Fact: They were proven to have been in and out of Saudi Intel Safehouses Fact: The Hijackers purchased tickets and sought flight training reported by multiple witnesses Fact: Two Planes crashed into the Two Towers Speculation: Saudi Intel, or a clique within Saudi Intel, did 9/11 Conclusion#1: The Hijackers did 9/11
Fact: The Dancing Israelis lived in Brooklyn reasonably close to the Twin Towers Speculation: And probably working for Mossad Speculation: And probably somehow planted explosives in the Two Towers. Conclusion #2: The Dancing Israelis did 9/11.
The theory that relies on the most facts and least speculation/assumptions is the most likely correct.
It was funny how Xi gave foreign agent man Blinken the bum's rush, and the undeclared foreign agent returned to the foreign occupied foreign city state of DC to immediately bad mouth China. "Ukraine had great German fertilizer from WWII, and has new, fresh Slav fertilizer courtesy of Zelensky and NATO, plus a bounty of captive women to enthrall and rape, and children to feed our draco overlords and blood addictions. It is ready to open again and do business with more fiat money laundering checks from our fiat money printing presses! The future looks bright, it really, really does!"
Fact: The Dancing Israelis lived in Brooklyn reasonably close to the Twin Towers Speculation: And probably working for Mossad Speculation: And probably somehow planted explosives in the Two Towers. Conclusion #2: The Dancing Israelis did 9/11.
No, you are strawmanning.
I don't believe nor inferred they worked for Mossad. I have told you it's a fact they all had airline tickets to leave the country. It's a fact they were videotaping the first tower being hit that alone proves they had foreknowledge you don't need a mountain of evidence to ascertain this
Israel has several intelligence agencies just like the US does. They are just shit Israeli intelligence. Mossad is not.
It wasn't Israel alone that did 9/11, that's the distraction. It was Israel, the Saudis, and the US at least. Because they got away with it, they will do it again. That is why it WAS important for you to realize, but you never will, so you doom the next generation to less rights, less knowledge, more slavery and another false flag attack.
People fret over a one world government. 3 nations conspired to start 25 years of war fought by US, and you, you are obsessed with protecting a foreign nation that was part of that, Israel. I am interested in protecting none of the guilty, you are. I will not engage in misprison of treason.
Don't have to worry so much about sunburn at sea level for my pasty Irish skin. The chemtrails seem to have taken care of that. I have gone out exposed for a couple of hours on bike and can't feel any burn on my arms.
Disney used to have studios in Silver Lake in LA. Of course, show biz has incredible numbers of gays in supporting work. Silver Lake to this day just off Hollywood has extremely high concentrations of AIDS clinics and S&M Bondage/gay bars and clubs. Supposedly the S&M gay capital of LA.
Fuck the dogs. More like, "Don't vote for anyone you wouldn't trust with your child. Or, an Illuminati Witch who kicks out peeling the faces off of teenage girls."
« First « Previous Comments 36,442 - 36,481 of 41,230 Next » Last » Search these comments
Some are just aspies/autists that have glommed on to an obsession, and can't let it go.
David Irving rooted for the Germans as a kid and he saw dogfights over his home. No bad upbringing, no nothing. But from childhood he was Nazis Good and Misunderstood. Just because some synapse fires some way in his brain, and you'll never convince him otherwise. Even if he accepts something after decades of painful argumentation and abundant evidence, he'll simply twist it in a new way to conform to his humbug.
Some Truther, Denier, etc. will be like "Fine, Fine, there is Prussian Blue in the gas chamber, but the Soviets must have put it in there after the fact." And his followers will be all like "Irving conclusively proved the Soviets added the Prussian Blue to frame the Nazis", and 98% of the Public isn't anywhere that deep into the details and a few new suckers are born.
From what I recall of rw's posts, his Overton window is a withered vestigial limb and novelty freaks him out. He doesn't present much in the way of meaningful content but mans a machine gun nest to strafe and sharpshoot everybody else, kind of like a glowie provocateur without compensating redeeming contribution to the community. At least most people present stuff that you can triangulate over time or just get a laugh out of. Raving paranoia gets boring.
I remember our conspiracy theory buddy Gary who is proving to be quite correct in a bunch of seemingly at the time outlandish theories and he took endless mockery for it. I told him I did not dismiss conspiracy theories, I just tabled them until I could do proper investigation, which is tedious and time consuming. If that investigation puts you at odds with 'the narrative', in some ways it can also put you in danger.
He thought I was on the payroll of the Rothschilds. I am still waiting for the checks.
I've never gotten a check from the JIDF or the Rockefellers, stingy cheap bastards for all the work I do to defend ZOG.
Four dicks and two pussies.
https://www.dailysignal.com/2016/04/20/in-the-market-for-fetal-body-parts-a-babys-brain-sells-for-3340/
None of you know what Occam's Razor is.
You will tell me that it is the postulate that the simplest explanation is the most reasonable explanation.
That's not it.
It's that the explanation with the least number of assumptions is the most likely correct. The explanation with no assumptions must be correct.
Isn't it odd that the very foundation of the modern world, most of you do not know? Occam's Razor is the basis of all modern science, but almost everybody misquotes the postulate.
richwicks says
Please
You post nonsense continually. You post Benjamin Fulford's bullshit even though I have shown you repeatedly that he is at least wrong if not outright dishonest. This is a man that lives in Japan, claims he's been visited by literal ninjas and there have been assassination attempts on him.
And you non stop reference him, endlessly.
I have researched and rejected who you reference now. You will post his bullshit again, and again and again
And you say my Overton window is too small? You purposely post nonsense from what I would bet is an intelligence asset whose job is to muddy the waters. Is that your job as well?
Well that isn't Occam's Razor...
Explanation with least number of assumptions. You are all trained to think of the simplest solution, so even complete nonsense is believed by the public now.
The postulate that needs the LEAST amount of assumptions or speculation.
Fact: The Hijackers were on video boarding the planes.
Fact: They were proven to have been in and out of Saudi Intel Safehouses
Fact: The Hijackers purchased tickets and sought flight training reported by multiple witnesses
Fact: Two Planes crashed into the Two Towers
Speculation: Saudi Intel, or a clique within Saudi Intel, did 9/11
Conclusion#1: The Hijackers did 9/11
Fact: The Dancing Israelis lived in Brooklyn reasonably close to the Twin Towers
Speculation: And probably working for Mossad
Speculation: And probably somehow planted explosives in the Two Towers.
Conclusion #2: The Dancing Israelis did 9/11.
The theory that relies on the most facts and least speculation/assumptions is the most likely correct.
Therfore Conclusion #1 is the most likely.
"Ukraine had great German fertilizer from WWII, and has new, fresh Slav fertilizer courtesy of Zelensky and NATO, plus a bounty of captive women to enthrall and rape, and children to feed our draco overlords and blood addictions. It is ready to open again and do business with more fiat money laundering checks from our fiat money printing presses! The future looks bright, it really, really does!"
https://t.me/WW3INFO/39593
No, you are strawmanning.
I don't believe nor inferred they worked for Mossad. I have told you it's a fact they all had airline tickets to leave the country. It's a fact they were videotaping the first tower being hit that alone proves they had foreknowledge you don't need a mountain of evidence to ascertain this
Israel has several intelligence agencies just like the US does. They are just shit Israeli intelligence. Mossad is not.
It wasn't Israel alone that did 9/11, that's the distraction. It was Israel, the Saudis, and the US at least. Because they got away with it, they will do it again. That is why it WAS important for you to realize, but you never will, so you doom the next generation to less rights, less knowledge, more slavery and another false flag attack.
People fret over a one world government. 3 nations conspired to start 25 years of war fought by US, and you, you are obsessed with protecting a foreign nation that was part of that, Israel. I am interested in protecting none of the guilty, you are. I will not engage in misprison of treason.
https://t.me/davidavocadowolfe/126938
https://t.me/SGTnewsNetwork/65343
https://t.me/SGTnewsNetwork/65350
From the river to the sea, Israel will be.
That was the Likud's literal motto for a while, like 30 years ago
Now they cynically call it racist, when it's applied to Palestinians, and not the Jewish racial group.
« First « Previous Comments 36,442 - 36,481 of 41,230 Next » Last » Search these comments