Under pressure (from the weight of 40 stories of skyscraper), steel melts.
Pressure is inversely proportional to the square of temperature. As pressure increases, say by 9 times atmospheric (to make the math easy), melting point is reduced to 1/3rd of its standard temp and pressure value.
Back in the day we called this a "works bomb". Lime-a-way worked better than draino. You crumple the aluminum foil into little balls to maximize surface area.
Shake it and it gets hot quick. The HCL in the Lime a Way reacts with the foil producing hydrogen gas. Put it in a trash can or a mail box and it makes a big bang. Dumb kids having "Good times."
Under pressure (from the weight of 40 stories of skyscraper), steel melts.
Pressure is inversely proportional to the square of temperature. As pressure increases, say by 9 times atmospheric (to make the math easy), melting point is reduced to 1/3rd of its standard temp and pressure value.
Clausius–Clapeyron is generally applicable to gases only. Liquids and solids are considered "non compressible" but at temperature the yield stress of the steel (or any metal) drops off quite rapidly. Add to that a load (and give the damaged area where the plane entered, the load is now redistributed amongst the other structural members) and catastrophic failure is not a physical impossiblity.
You’re right, solid/liquid phase transition should use this equation (with pressure inversely proportional to melting temperature). College thermodynamics was a while ago..
The Evil Empire speaks more truth than our own leaders. It's all relative, but that's a switcheroo worth noting. Of course, the Euro forces and banksters destroying our country are the same ones plotting against Russian resources for generations.
Post Office Central is in Switzerland, the King is the Postmaster General of the Commonwealth, and the Freemasons and Post Office are joined at the hip. So, of course, the USPS is going to be integral to any plan implementing the pending election frauds. It's another top down, follow the orders under pain and retribution organization.
GreaterNYCDude: You’re right, solid/liquid phase transition should use this equation (with pressure inversely proportional to melting temperature). College thermodynamics was a while ago..
Even if this might explain some instances of some local effects, it explains nothing about the collapse of the entire buildings.
Maybe Trump is trying to push the value of Bitcoin past the threshold that McAfee set up that would release all of his purloined government computer files. Apparently, there was a concerted effort to hold Bitcoin below this trigger point to prevent the dead man's switch from activating.
Pressure is inversely proportional to the square of temperature. As pressure increases, say by 9 times atmospheric (to make the math easy), melting point is reduced to 1/3rd of its standard temp and pressure value.
Let's call it the "pancake in a pressure cooker" theory. @goofus did you make that up or read it in Popular Mechanics?
« First « Previous Comments 40,102 - 40,141 of 42,089 Next » Last » Search these comments
Under pressure (from the weight of 40 stories of skyscraper), steel melts.
Pressure is inversely proportional to the square of temperature. As pressure increases, say by 9 times atmospheric (to make the math easy), melting point is reduced to 1/3rd of its standard temp and pressure value.
Back in the day we called this a "works bomb". Lime-a-way worked better than draino. You crumple the aluminum foil into little balls to maximize surface area.
Shake it and it gets hot quick. The HCL in the Lime a Way reacts with the foil producing hydrogen gas. Put it in a trash can or a mail box and it makes a big bang. Dumb kids having "Good times."
Clausius–Clapeyron is generally applicable to gases only. Liquids and solids are considered "non compressible" but at temperature the yield stress of the steel (or any metal) drops off quite rapidly. Add to that a load (and give the damaged area where the plane entered, the load is now redistributed amongst the other structural members) and catastrophic failure is not a physical impossiblity.
https://t.me/BenjaminFulfordFansWDSGroup/141134
https://t.me/BannonWarRoom/50462
https://t.me/ninoscorner/16464
https://t.me/ninoscorner/16529
Even if this might explain some instances of some local effects, it explains nothing about the collapse of the entire buildings.
Now she says that's false:
https://nitter.poast.org/mtgreenee/status/1835356642084335649#m
Let's call it the "pancake in a pressure cooker" theory.
@goofus did you make that up or read it in Popular Mechanics?
« First « Previous Comments 40,102 - 40,141 of 42,089 Next » Last » Search these comments