« First « Previous Comments 8 - 47 of 406 Next » Last » Search these comments
More guns are the answer. Whites conquered Africa with guns, definitively defeating every army thrown against the by the spear chuckers. Concealed carry on a massive scale would make blacks respectful of the whites once again.
Criminal gene
I do not think so. It is 100% cultural and related to single motherhood (which is sky high for blacks).
The same Democrat morons today will tell you straight to your face that a boy doesn't need a father, there are 238 genders, and a single mother with government assistance is just as good if not better than a 2 parent household.
CCWs
D's of today are clearly anti-science, which unfortunately is not being pointed out to them in media.
Even though dogs have been domesticated for a shorter amount of time (50,000 years) than the races have been separate.
I do not see how races would be drastically different in their genetic makeup.
There are discrepancies within races.
Not sure where Patrick got his data from.
How is it possible that only 12% of the population (blacks) assault whites at more than 5x the reverse rate?
It's possible only if black people are far more racist than white people and deliberately choose to attack whites.
The same Democrat morons today will tell you straight to your face that a boy doesn't need a father, there are 238 genders, and a single mother with government assistance is just as good if not better than a 2 parent household.
Is it racist to attack your great great great great great great great great grandfathers oppressor's decendents???
Supreme Court justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote a dissenting opinion arguing that jurors who express familiarity with FBI crime stats should be banned from Capital case juries for “racial bias.”
Yes, really.
The opinion was in relation to Kristopher Love, a black man who was convicted of capital murder in the course of a robbery that happened in 2015.
Before Love’s trial, prospective members of the jury filled out a questionnaire which included the following two questions.
“68. Do you sometimes personally harbor bias against members of certain races or ethnic groups?”
“69. Do you believe that some races and/or ethnic groups tend to be more violent than others?”
The prospective juror answered no to the first question but then answered yes to the second and explained that he understood “[n]on-white” races to be the “more violent races” because he had seen statistics to this effect in “[n]ews reports and criminology classes” he had taken.
Despite the juror making clear that his views were based on statistics and not his personal feelings about black people, Love’s counsel moved to exclude the prospective juror based on “his stated beliefs that . . . non-whites commit more violent crimes than whites.”
Christopher Brennan was a white man. Kyle Stone is black, not even of legal age to drink.
It’s yet another black-on-white murder, this time in the white man’s backyard.
Welcome to life in 2022 St. Louis, where a black-on-white murder barely makes the local news, in a nation supposedly dominated by white supremacy, white privilege, systemic inequality, implicit bias, and invidious discrimination.
But when killing the opposite side, blacks do it at 2x the proportion as whites do (8% vs 16%).
I’ve been the victim of black on white crime in the past… as has been my mother and brother.
This was addressed once we moved away from Oakland. The black on white crime stats ring home to me.
My liberal friends accuse me of being racist if I ever bring up crime statistics with them.
Hircus saysBut when killing the opposite side, blacks do it at 2x the proportion as whites do (8% vs 16%).
Those are the absolute numbers. You could say that blacks kill whites at 2x the reverse if the population contained equal numbers of white and black people.
But the populations are very different. There are far more whites than blacks in the US, say 5x more whites. So black people kill white people at somewhere around 10x the reverse rate when you take the populations into account.
This implies that blacks are deliberately killing white people, which is a black racism far more pervasive and deadly than that of whites.
I’ve been the victim of black on white crime in the past… as has been my mother and brother.
This was addressed once we moved away from Oakland. The black on white crime stats ring home to me.
My liberal friends accuse me of being racist if I ever bring up crime statistics with them.
Right, the dilemma is this:
A: Avoid black men because you know that you have at least a 10x rate of being assaulted by them.
B: Don't avoid black men because the majority of black men will not hurt you.
What's more important, your own safety, or being fair to the black guys who won't hurt you? You can make an argument either way, but at least some extra caution around black men is clearly warranted.
It's (almost like [don't know how to do crossout on PatNet}) is, the "good" black people are having to carry the burden of suspicion based on the actions of the thugs.
[don't know how to do crossout on PatNet}
stereotomy says[don't know how to do crossout on PatNet}
@stereotomy You can use the "strike" html tag, like this:crossed out
@richwicks Why does your example actually show the tags?
« First « Previous Comments 8 - 47 of 406 Next » Last » Search these comments
It's possible only if black people are far more racist than white people and deliberately choose to attack whites.
Why is this violent racism never mentioned in the mainstream press?