patrick.net

ABC: Quick, run to the presses and the newsdesk! Another 40 year old allegation of a highly respected, never "Criminally involved" Judicial Appointee that can't be collaborated and is anonymous! Minutes between learning of the accusation and putting it out there!

ABC: Stop! Don't publish anything related to an interview with an Epstein Accuser. Never mind he's already plead guilty to sexual misconduct before! Put the story away! Years after the Interview was filmed!

The same network that:

Smeared the Covington Kids within hours
Ran Kavanaugh anonymous/unsubstantiated smears within minutes
Believed Jussie Smollett to the end.

.... want us to believe they sat on an interview, backed by accuser-provided photos, with an already-convicted Epstein for years because they were concerned about evidence and substantiation.

Editorial standards seem to fluctuate with the potential political fallout.

Editorial standards seem to fluctuate with the potential political fallout.

I believe you are laboring under the illusion that ABC has "Editorial Standards." Pravda would blush at this blatant propaganda.

MSMedia is pure propaganda. That is verifiable fact.

However, ABC News did not seem to have the same concerns throughout Kavanaugh’s contentious nomination process, eagerly offering its network as a platform for the unfounded allegations.

For example, ABC chose to highlight remarks from an unnamed woman who was “involved in a second allegation of sexual misconduct by Brett Kavanaugh during his freshmen year at Yale University.”

The outlet did not name the alleged witness but quoted her saying, “All I can say is, ask Brett.”
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/11/05/abc-news-says-epstein-bombshell-didnt-satisfy-its-standards-ran-unfounded-allegations-on-kavanaugh/

To review:
Previously convicted on similar allegations: Not enough evidence, despite photographic evidence provided by the witness
Anonymous Remark about 35 year old incident: Right to the Newsdesk.

It is striking how the Epstein story, which should still be front-page news, has clearly been pushed into the background to protect lots of powerful people.

The former ABC News employee who leaked the video of Amy Robach talking about the network refusing to run her story on one of Jeffrey Epstein's accusers was fired from their current job at CBS News.

Project Veritas released a video Tuesday of Robach discussing the information she received years earlier from Virginia Roberts Giuffre on a hot mic. She can be heard expressing her frustration surrounding ABC News's refusal to air the interview and claimed that the network made the decision after receiving threats from Buckingham Palace after they had found out Prince Andrew was implicated in the story. She also alleged that Epstein may have been murdered.

"It was unbelievable what we had. Clinton, we had everything," she stated. "I tried for three years to get it on to no avail. And now it's all coming out, and it's like these new revelations, and I freaking had all of it."

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/cbs-news-fires-staffer-who-leaked-abc-news-video-about-epstein-cover-up-report

CBS (?!) fires staffer who had access to Amy Robach complaining about her withheld story and leaked it.

https://pagesix.com/2019/11/07/cbs-news-fires-staffer-who-had-access-to-leaked-amy-robach-audio/

Lugenpresse! In bed together! Why didn't CBS do a segment ribbing their competitor for not putting the Epstein Piece out?

https://www.theonion.com/british-royal-family-condemns-media-s-ugly-attacks-on-t-1840178870