patrick.net

Heraclitusstudent says

The ice age was great for nature

Tell that to the flash frozen mammoths.

Heraclitusstudent says

The ice age was great for nature.

Assertion projection much?

2007 NASA: Arctic Ice Free by 2013.

www.youtube.com/embed/iMq0C19sqm8

I swear, I don't wish this on that dorky girl, but wouldn't the funniest thing be for her to be groped by a Muslim Gang on a security camera that gets leaked to the Public before Swedish Authorities can conceal it?

Onvacation says

Heraclitusstudent says

The ice age was great for nature

Tell that to the flash frozen mammoths.

Flash frozen mammoth 🤤
Toss that sucker in the flash fryer!

Ok you want to decrease the average temperature of the planet fast?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sahara_Sea

Dig a channel through some sand bars to the Mediterranean Sea, let the ocean water flood the low lying parts of the Sahara desert, bringing humidity and lowering temperatures in the region which should promote rainfall and (with desalination plants) provide for agricultural development of the region. Right now it’s lifeless empty desert where it never fucking rains. You could turn that into an oasis with this one little move.
It would cut down on sand storms in the area, which stretch far west over the Atlantic even influencing rainfall in Brazil. The incredibly hot temperatures of the Sahara also provide the seeds of hurricanes which annually batter the East cost of the USA and the Caribbean. Reducing these temps would reduce the power of hurricanes, and reduce their number. It would reduce global temperature averages as well through cloud formation and precipitation, as well as just reflection off the surface of the new inland sea.

If you’re serious about global warming, this is a serious first step.

NoCoupForYou says

I swear, I don't wish this on that dorky girl, but wouldn't the funniest thing be for her to be groped by a Muslim Gang on a security camera that gets leaked to the Public before Swedish Authorities can conceal it?

She should be grateful. If it weren't for Global Warming, they would be groping her with cold fingers.

The 400 threads on reddit were a little rough on this topic but the 800 threads on Twitter gave a much smoother transitional argument...
Misc says

When the ice sheets that connected Asia with North America melted, now that was global warming.

Shaman says

If you’re serious about global warming, this is a serious first step.

Wait, a functional, measureable theory? How dare you!

Shaman says

If you’re serious about global warming, this is a serious first step.

Or telling Cat Ladies Passionate about Global Warming that buying MORE stuff on Amazon means more global warming....consume less = less global warming.

Do not use AC in summer, do not heat house to more than 50F in winter etc.

rd6B says

Cat Ladies Passionate about Global Warming

Now there's a name for a band!

Think about all that new water front Real Estate! Someone should tell Trump to buy the Sahara!

CBOEtrader says

Shaman says

If you’re serious about global warming, this is a serious first step.

Wait, a functional, measureable theory? How dare you!

That's the thing. In nearly all scifi movies mankind has invented one or more technologies to deal with such potential issues but in reality the politicians aren't looking for solutions because then they couldn't subjugate their people to globull warming bs carbon tax measures and that would loosen their chokehold on what should be free people.

More bs. Listening to reporter and Zimbabweans talk about how climate change causing starvation. Not overpopulation or deforestation which they themselves bring up.

What are we going on half a century of starving people in Africa commercials. Enough the only fault we have is that we keep sending food.

At least 24 charged with arson for fires in Australia, but climate change is problem.

Has anyone seen the "global average temperature anomaly" for 2019?

RC2006 says

Listening to reporter and Zimbabweans talk about how climate change causing starvation. Not overpopulation or deforestation which they themselves bring up.

Zimbabwe was considered the breadbasket of Africa, back when it was called Rhodesia and white peoples ran things. The black revolution came and took over and pushed out the white farmers and now the people own the land and starve in an agricultural paradise.
Serves them fucking right.

https://getpocket.com/explore/item/why-our-intuition-about-sea-level-rise-is-wrong

And has Greta taken volcanic events into her no doubt meticulous calculations
https://getpocket.com/explore/item/would-a-supervolcano-eruption-wipe-us-out?utm_source=pocket-newtab

georgeliberte says

And has Greta taken volcanic events into her no doubt meticulous calculations

The people running the simulation have to keep things interesting.

https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2020/01/11/swedes-vote-climate-policy-biggest-waste-tax-payer-money-2019/
Swedes Vote Climate Policy Biggest Waste of Tax Payer Money in 2019

HEYYOU says

The amount of heat being added to the oceans is equivalent to every person on the planet running 100 microwave ovens all day and all night."

Next time an alarmist squawks like chicken little, ask them, " how much has the temperature risen in the last century?"

"No amount of evidence will persuade an idiot"
Mark Twain

Co2 and warming are clearly disconnected.

Yeaaaaahhhh.... clearly

Total collapse of the "hoax"....

Onvacation says

"No amount of evidence will persuade an idiot"
Mark Twain

Heraclitusstudent says

Total collapse of the "hoax"....

So how much do you think the temperature has gone up in the last century?

The evidence, co2 rising temperature is not, is clear that manmade industrial co2 does not cause out of control global warming climate change.

Heraclitusstudent says

Yep.

How much will the temperature have to fall before you admit you have been scammed?

Onvacation says

How much will the temperature have to fall before you admit you have been scammed?

You've been saying the same for how long? A decade? two?
How much do they have to rise before you admit you were scammed?

Heraclitusstudent says

You've been saying the same for how long? A decade? two?

A couple of years, from before the temperature peaked.Heraclitusstudent says

How much do they have to rise before you admit you were scammed?

At least a couple of degrees. Ever wonder why the alarmists don't display the hockey stick graph anymore?

Heraclitusstudent says

The people running the simulation have to keep things interesting.

@heraclitusstudent

You seem so sane on many topics. How did you become an alarmist? What triggered you to believe the hype over a one degree/century (if you BELIEVE the adjusted data) anomaly?

Onvacation says

the hype over a one degree/century

More like 2 degrees Fahrenheit in 50 years and from a time when far less carbon was being added to the atmosphere than today.

And you've got a few things like
www.youtube.com/embed/FLCgybStZ4g
that make me go "hummm".

I personally don't care either way. It's not my life that will most affected.

But what matters is not the next 50 yrs of my life. Humanity hopefully will extend for hundreds and thousands of years. I don't know on what planet 1 degree a century is acceptable.

But how easy to believe that there is a world wide conspiracy of most climate scientists, in all countries, in many regimes, lying for decades.... for what exactly??? To prevent you from driving a SUV? Why? It makes absolutely 0 sense.

Whereas, political idealists, driven by big money from relevant industries... that's a normal part of the scenery.

Heraclitusstudent says

But how easy to believe that there is a world wide conspiracy of most climate scientists, in all countries, in many regimes, lying for decades.... for what exactly??? To prevent you from driving a SUV? Why? It makes absolutely 0 sense.

I wouldn't say they are purposefully lying, but there is alot of group-think going on. Any scientist that shows skepticism about the hyperbolic predictions of the Climate doom-mongers is basically shunned and run out of academia. Just like trying to be a Conservative Professor at any US college is nearly impossible these days.

How many "smart people" fell for all of the other hyperbolic predictions of the last 30 years - predicting mass starvation, unlivable cities, overpopulation, peak oil, new ice age etc? I trust these people had humanity's best interest at heart and were scientific leaders in their fields - but they were all spectacularly wrong.

That said, there are definitely some Marxists and America haters like Russia and OPEC that are using Climate Change to try and knock us down a peg because we are now such a massive energy producer reducing their international power.

At the end of the day, until they come up with solutions that aren't worse than the disease, nothing meaningful will be done.

Heraclitusstudent says

But how easy to believe that there is a world wide conspiracy of most climate scientists, in all countries, in many regimes, lying for decades.... for what exactly??? To prevent you from driving a SUV? Why? It makes absolutely 0 sense.

It's mostly politicians who are spreading the alarm. Real scientists don't care about consensus.

100 Authors Against Einstein - Scientific 'Consensus' and Scepticism
"Why 100 authors? If I were wrong, then one would have been enough!" - Albert Einstein

It's very simple:

Experiental Knowledge and Observing Actual Data in Real Life trumps Computer Models/Theories.

Heraclitusstudent says

But how easy to believe that there is a world wide conspiracy of most climate scientists, in all countries, in many regimes, lying for decades.... for what exactly??? To prevent you from driving a SUV? Why? It makes absolutely 0 sense.

What changed in the past 10 years that caused large numbers of the Medical Profession to suddenly declare Transgenderism wasn't a mental illness?

WHO just changed it in 2018
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2018/06/20/transgender-not-mental-illness-world-health-organization/717758002/

In fact this "news" article itself only gives one side of the story by repeating activist group tweets.

Not one datapoint changed: The link with child abuse, the link with high rates of suicide (regardless of familial/social acceptance), etc.

Skull measuring was hot for decades before real science prevailed: Those who thought cranial measurements were daft were a loud minority that didn't prevail until POLITICAL attitudes changed.

The Scientific Consensus is not perfect.

NoCoupForYou says

What changed in the past 10 years that caused large numbers of the Medical Profession to suddenly declare Transgenderism wasn't a mental illness?

It's not the medical profession that changed. It's the lobbies, the trans lobby just like the oil industry lobby. It's the politicians who exhausted their gay agenda. The only science so far that is almost complete BS and largely devoid on empirical facts is gender studies. With psychology a mixed basket.
The global warming story started way before the rise of SJW and woke culture.
I've people like onVacations on the Internet for like 20yrs.
Under Bush, these were the same people that didn't believe in evolution, for similar (tribal) reasons. Science is their out-group. End of argument.
Tons of evidence accumulated from all sides, but they haven't changed their tune by a iota.

Heraclitusstudent says

It's not the medical profession that changed. It's the lobbies, the trans lobby just like the oil industry lobby.

Here's what I need from the Global Warming Advocates:

Explain exactly what was wrong with your previous models of a decade/two decades/three decades ago, and demonstrate (not assert) that the problem has been fixed and the current modelling is accurate.

In other words, SHOW (with math and open data) why the sea level hasn't risen X inches and the temps haven't increased 2C

Simply pushing the effects down another decade is not an answer to valid questions about the proven inaccuracy of the model, which was off by a huge degree.

Claiming that something will grow 200 feet in two decades, but it only grows 40 feet, is a major fail.

Nothing was wrong with the models. They predicted a rise of temperatures and we saw a rise of temperatures. Models are never perfect but they ballparked efficiently what is happening. I.e. a problem that will be unacceptable in 100yrs unless we do something about it.

Plus it's no longer a question of model. We have now an empirical trend.