Comments 1 - 15 of 15 Search these comments
while creating good-paying, union jobs
As for lowering costs, perhaps there could be some law that forbids ISPs from writing contracts that don't allow you to share your service with neighbors (especially in apartment buildings). If you pay for service, you can use it any way you want.
Broadband over powerline (BPL) is a internet service type where customers get high-speed internet connections through their standard electrical outlets. Users simply plug a power line modem into any socket and there is no need for additional special wiring.
SunnyvaleCA saysI do, but it's a violation of the terms of service.As for lowering costs, perhaps there could be some law that forbids ISPs from writing contracts that don't allow you to share your service with neighbors (especially in apartment buildings). If you pay for service, you can use it any way you want.
What is preventing you from doing that now?
SunnyvaleCA saysAs for lowering costs, perhaps there could be some law that forbids ISPs from writing contracts that don't allow you to share your service with neighbors (especially in apartment buildings). If you pay for service, you can use it any way you want.
What is preventing you from doing that now?
zzyzzx saysI think fiber optic would be the way to go. It should be pretty easy to string up on existing power lines in residential areas. You could probably also take down and recycle all the 20th-century phone lines and copper cable TV lines as you go.Is this proven technology in use anywhere?
I doubt it, because the internet signal isn't going to make it past the first transformer (I think).
It has its issues and will require major investment to do. Plus, the power company will be in control of the entire thing.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broadband_over_power_lines
The last thing I would want is to be involved into FBI investigation when somebody downloads (or uploads) some pedo shit over the connection with my name on the account.
The last thing I would want is to be involved into FBI investigation when somebody downloads (or uploads) some pedo shit over the connection with my name on the account.
Liberal_in_blackface saysThe last thing I would want is to be involved into FBI investigation when somebody downloads (or uploads) some pedo shit over the connection with my name on the account.
Yup X10. I don't even like having a guest network and allowing people on it. My former employer would incentive potential tenants with free internet all the time. I'm not sure the damages, but he got fucked by one of his tenant stealing movies. Didn't cause long term harm, but it was one of those ISP attorneys that get the info on what was stolen and send the letter to the account holder. Basically settle for $1k or go to court and lose and pay $20k. It's a scam, but totally legal. Fuck attorneys. (although my old boss deserved it, lol).
It's come to the point where I believe people who have a negative financial balance with the system (meaning they receive more in government aid than they put in) should be ineligible to vote. That's the only way we'll ever put a stop to people voting for more handouts that others are forced to pay for with the threat of violence.
zzyzzx saysSunnyvaleCA saysAs for lowering costs, perhaps there could be some law that forbids ISPs from writing contracts that don't allow you to share your service with neighbors (especially in apartment buildings). If you pay for service, you can use it any way you want.
What is preventing you from doing that now?
The last thing I would want is to be involved into FBI investigation when somebody downloads (or uploads) some pedo shit over the connection with my name on the account.
Article starts off with fairly reasonable-sounding and noble goals. Maybe similar to programs that pushed electricity, water, and telephone service to under-served / poor communities.
And then we get some details...
So it's a "jobs program" for unions and work is conditioned of being only for special people who have special labor rules.
Isn't the whole idea of setting aside parts of the country for "native peoples of North America" is that they can continue to live a stone-age lifestyle? If they want to enter the
17th century21st century, they should integrate with society.But what will it cost us, Bernie?
This is but an estimate for a single part of his plan. Of course the actual cost will be much higher, the goals will not quite be reached, and there will be other huge additional payments for other aspects.
What, if anything should the federal government's roll in high-speed internet be? I'll grant that the service lends itself to monopolies and anti-competitive behavior. My part of Sunnyvale has only a single provider; there's no fiber or DSL, just Comcast.
Some discussion questions:
• Maybe the federal government should employ some anti-trust action, help to stimulate competition, and let the private companies vie for customers.
• As for lowering costs, perhaps there could be some law that forbids ISPs from writing contracts that don't allow you to share your service with neighbors (especially in apartment buildings). If you pay for service, you can use it any way you want.