patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,261,205 comments by 15,059 users - goofus, mell online now
Can we agree on one thing?
invite response
2020 Jan 27, 5:53pm 1,963 views 12 comments
by rdm ➕follow (1) 💰tip ignore
Comments 1 - 12 of 12 Search these comments
3
mell
2020 Jan 27, 6:00pm
It's a great quality though, wouldn't have minded a taste of it during her prime.
5
Bd6r
2020 Jan 27, 6:08pm
Bd6r
2020 Jan 27, 6:08pm
rdm says
yes, agreed. Ms Lewinsky and Mr Clinton are adults and where they stuff their cigars is their business and their business only (exception may be Ms Clinton, who was apparently fine with that). And religious right with their interpretation of Family Values is to some extent the cause of current ridiculous impeachment procedures, as the left now has vendetta.
Can we agree on one thing? That thing being that Ken Starr is the least self aware, most repugnant, pompous, self aggrandizing, wormy little weasel of a pansy, to enter this debacle of a trial?
yes, agreed. Ms Lewinsky and Mr Clinton are adults and where they stuff their cigars is their business and their business only (exception may be Ms Clinton, who was apparently fine with that). And religious right with their interpretation of Family Values is to some extent the cause of current ridiculous impeachment procedures, as the left now has vendetta.
6
mell
2020 Jan 27, 6:17pm
Right but dont forget Clinton was impeached for perjury. Sure it was about sex and cigars which seems ridiculous but you could make the same case for the Trump campaign helpers being ruthlessly prosecuted and sentenced for seemingly harmless things they said or didn't say. The Dems have no right to this bs trial here and when a is said and done they will likely pay for it with lost votes if not worse consequences for some of their ring leaders.
7
Bd6r
2020 Jan 27, 6:21pm
Bd6r
2020 Jan 27, 6:21pm
mell says
Yeah, but Clinton should not have been asked anything about Ms Lewinsky in first place. Same as today - I don't see any evidence of crime with tRUMP - the reason why he has to be impeached has now rapidly changed several times. It is clear that both times impeachment is a partisan witch-hunt, and nothing else.
Right but dont forget Clinton was impeached for perjury. Sure it was about sex and cigars which seems ridiculous but you could make the same case for the Trump campaign helpers being ruthlessly prosecuted and sentenced for seemingly harmless things they said or didn't say. The Dems have no right to this bs trial here and when a is said and done they will likely pay for it with lost votes if not worse consequences for some of their ring leaders.
Yeah, but Clinton should not have been asked anything about Ms Lewinsky in first place. Same as today - I don't see any evidence of crime with tRUMP - the reason why he has to be impeached has now rapidly changed several times. It is clear that both times impeachment is a partisan witch-hunt, and nothing else.
8
socal2
2020 Jan 27, 8:13pm
rd6B says
Clinton had been credibly accuse of rape before he banged young Lewinsky.
Should Epstein, Matt Lauer, Charlie Rose, Roger Ailes and all of the other scumbags that abused their positions of power to fuck their young subordinates never be asked about their behavior?
Yeah, but Clinton should not have been asked anything about Ms Lewinsky in first place.
Clinton had been credibly accuse of rape before he banged young Lewinsky.
Should Epstein, Matt Lauer, Charlie Rose, Roger Ailes and all of the other scumbags that abused their positions of power to fuck their young subordinates never be asked about their behavior?
9
Rin
2020 Jan 27, 9:08pm
Rin
2020 Jan 27, 9:08pm
rd6B says
First of all, it was the Paula Jones sexual harassment deposition where Clinton was accused of whipping out his 'Slick Willy' in front of Paula.
And thus, asking about sexual peccadilloes is a part of the hearing process to determine a sort of pattern in play.
Now, the fact that the only thing which Ken Starr had was that, was not enough for an impeachment hearing, when his investigation was suppose to be about Whitewater and other insider trading types of offenses.
Yeah, but Clinton should not have been asked anything about Ms Lewinsky in first place.
First of all, it was the Paula Jones sexual harassment deposition where Clinton was accused of whipping out his 'Slick Willy' in front of Paula.
And thus, asking about sexual peccadilloes is a part of the hearing process to determine a sort of pattern in play.
Now, the fact that the only thing which Ken Starr had was that, was not enough for an impeachment hearing, when his investigation was suppose to be about Whitewater and other insider trading types of offenses.
11
Bd6r
2020 Jan 28, 7:28am
Bd6r
2020 Jan 28, 7:28am
socal2 says
I think the investigation started about Whitewater and other questionable dealings of Clinton's in past, and when Starr could not fish out anything there (key word is could not fish - I am sure there was something - but it will be impossible to convict any politician of that type of fraud) he switched to Clinton's love life which is retarded. Kinda similar to today's ORANGEMANBAD impeachment - he was supposed to be impeached for Russian collusion, then when that does not stick, lets see if he has interfered in elections, and then lets see if he has asked Ukrainians for something...all of this will contribute to greater polarization of society. I am trying to be open-minded and see the point of people whom I disagree, but I can not tolerate TV these days at all and have not watched anything other than weather news for last 2-3 years as all I hear is ORANGEMAN BAD DIVERSITY GOOD WHITE MALES SUCK.
Clinton had been credibly accuse of rape before he banged young Lewinsky.
Should Epstein, Matt Lauer, Charlie Rose, Roger Ailes and all of the other scumbags that abused their positions of power to fuck their young subordinates never be asked about their behavior?
I think the investigation started about Whitewater and other questionable dealings of Clinton's in past, and when Starr could not fish out anything there (key word is could not fish - I am sure there was something - but it will be impossible to convict any politician of that type of fraud) he switched to Clinton's love life which is retarded. Kinda similar to today's ORANGEMANBAD impeachment - he was supposed to be impeached for Russian collusion, then when that does not stick, lets see if he has interfered in elections, and then lets see if he has asked Ukrainians for something...all of this will contribute to greater polarization of society. I am trying to be open-minded and see the point of people whom I disagree, but I can not tolerate TV these days at all and have not watched anything other than weather news for last 2-3 years as all I hear is ORANGEMAN BAD DIVERSITY GOOD WHITE MALES SUCK.
12
Rin
2020 Jan 28, 9:24am
Rin
2020 Jan 28, 9:24am
rd6B says
Exactly, and that's how Paula Jones and Linda Tripp (two normally forgotten bimbos) made American history. Now, kids growing up in the 23rd century can read all about it.
rd6B says
Which comes back to a 'he said, she said' type of circular argument, since for the most part, Donald Trump has confirmed to the public that he's a lifelong trash talker, many decades ago.
So yes, Trump is guilty of being a trash talker [ sarcasm on ] and should be impeached for having foul speech syndrome. [ sarcasm off]
I think the investigation started about Whitewater and other questionable dealings of Clinton's in past, and when Starr could not fish out anything there (key word is could not fish - I am sure there was something - but it will be impossible to convict any politician of that type of fraud) he switched to Clinton's love life which is retarded
Exactly, and that's how Paula Jones and Linda Tripp (two normally forgotten bimbos) made American history. Now, kids growing up in the 23rd century can read all about it.
rd6B says
he was supposed to be impeached for Russian collusion, then when that does not stick, lets see if he has interfered in elections, and then lets see if he has asked Ukrainians for something...all of this will contribute to greater polarization of society.
Which comes back to a 'he said, she said' type of circular argument, since for the most part, Donald Trump has confirmed to the public that he's a lifelong trash talker, many decades ago.
So yes, Trump is guilty of being a trash talker [ sarcasm on ] and should be impeached for having foul speech syndrome. [ sarcasm off]
Set aside which side of this impeachment you might be on. Can we agree on one thing? That thing being that Ken Starr is the least self aware, most repugnant, pompous, self aggrandizing, wormy little weasel of a pansy, to enter this debacle of a trial?