by mell ➕follow (10) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 2 - 41 of 68 Next » Last » Search these comments
Michael Levitt, a Nobel laureate and Stanford biophysicist, began analyzing the number of COVID-19 cases worldwide in January and correctly calculated that China would get through the worst of its coronavirus outbreak long before many health experts had predicted.
Now he foresees a similar outcome in the United States and the rest of the world.
While many epidemiologists are warning of months, or even years, of massive social disruption and millions of deaths, Levitt says the data simply don't support such a dire scenario — especially in areas where reasonable social distancing measures are in place. ...
But he also blames the media for causing unnecessary panic by focusing on the relentless increase in the cumulative number of cases and spotlighting celebrities who contract the virus. By contrast, the flu has sickened 36 million Americans since September and killed an estimated 22,000, according to the CDC, but those deaths are largely unreported. ...
"What we need is to control the panic," he said. In the grand scheme, "we're going to be fine." ...
While the COVID-19 fatality rate appears to be significantly higher than that of the flu, Levitt says it is quite simply put, "not the end of the world." ...
"The real situation is not as nearly as terrible as they make it out to be," he said.
mell saysDude predicted China numbers to a T.
Or China lies are based on his numbers.
The numbers are fairly accurate afaik. Most of my acquaintances working abroad have returned to work.
we will have created some herd immunity with those already infected
Only optimistic paths: an existing antiviral drug starts to work, or the virus peters out for the summer.
I will post a counter to all this:
https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/when-will-coronavirus-peak-Bay-Area-SF-15152009.php
UCSF professor of epidemiology Dr. Jeffrey Martin said what we’ll see in the next week or two really represents transmission that occurred in the past one to three weeks, roughly between Feb. 14 and the first week of March.
"Most of that period was when we were not in an intensive social distancing mode," Martin said. "It was spreading in an invisible way in early March. That is what we will see in the next 10 to 14 days. People shouldn’t be confused by that, however, and thinking that what we have been doing hasn’t been working."
That does not necessarily invalidate what Michael Levitt is saying.
State and local governments are operating in a cloud of delusion.
And why in the hell do sales taxes only cover goods and not services when 77% of our GDP is comprised of services anyway? I could NEVER understand that. All the way back to the 1980s, yeah. But from 1990ish onwards, no.
So this is a nice kick-in-the-ass wake up call for states to start adding services into the mix. They can lower the overall tax rate covering both goods and services and still make even more of a revenue haul than they did even during normal times. No more 10% sales tax rates. More like 3% on all goods and most services. Poor would benefit from this, too.
Heraclitusstudent saysOnly optimistic paths: an existing antiviral drug starts to work, or the virus peters out for the summer.
Maybe you overlooked several other optimistic paths:
- hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin actually works as several labs have claimed; no one seems to have proved it doesn't work
- it's really not all that contagious compared to regular flu, explaining why only 20% of Diamond Princess passengers go it
- it will simply burn out quickly here because of the social distancing, as in China
Quite frankly the quality of comments here has been dropping. Most people are posting sectarian guff and seem to see the entire world through WHATISGOODFORTRUMP goggles. It's idiotic and thoroughly uninteresting.
Quite frankly the quality of comments here has been dropping. Most people are posting sectarian guff and seem to see the entire world through WHATISGOODFORTRUMP goggles. It's idiotic and thoroughly uninteresting.
The total number of person infected in still going up exponentially in most countries. Italy number of deaths is doubling every 5 days, in the US it is doubling every 3 days .
Complete lockdowns will just "flatten the curve" meaning a large part of the population will still get sick, just slower. This means it is absolutely possible that 150 millions people could get sick in the US in the next year, and 1 million people die. Everything that is said here doesn't make that alternative less probable.
« First « Previous Comments 2 - 41 of 68 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,265,362 comments by 15,132 users - SharkyP online now