by mell ➕follow (9) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 10 - 49 of 67 Next » Last » Search these comments
you think it doesn't work just because Trump thinks it does
rd6B sayshttps://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712(20)30534-8/fulltextResults
Of 2,541 patients, with a median total hospitalization time of 6 days (IQR: 4-10 days), median age was 64 years (IQR:53-76 years), 51% male, 56% African American...
Why so many blacks? They certainly seem to get this a lot more than anyone else.
If you think it doesn't work just because Trump thinks it does, and you get Wuhan virus, feel free not to take it and good luck to you.
as you see from above, TDS is very strong here
feel free to take it and good luck to you.
rd6B sayshttps://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712(20)30534-8/fulltextResults
Of 2,541 patients, with a median total hospitalization time of 6 days (IQR: 4-10 days), median age was 64 years (IQR:53-76 years), 51% male, 56% African American...
Why so many blacks? They certainly seem to get this a lot more than anyone else.
Our results also require further confirmation in prospective, randomized controlled trials that rigorously evaluate the safety
Patrick saysrd6B sayshttps://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712(20)30534-8/fulltextResults
Of 2,541 patients, with a median total hospitalization time of 6 days (IQR: 4-10 days), median age was 64 years (IQR:53-76 years), 51% male, 56% African American...
Why so many blacks? They certainly seem to get this a lot more than anyone else.
Because raycism, duh.
Wait. Black men make it to the age of 64???? This has to be an Onion piece. I thought they all died at 22 from cops or their fellow brothers because of oppression and all.
rd6B saysas you see from above, TDS is very strong here
First this should be flagged under the new "rules" but that aside you were right it is a peer reviewed but still observational study I asked for a peer reviewed clinical study that is not what this is. This is far from a definitive answer to the question at hand which the OP and others make it out to be, though it does have value.
Here is the caveat at the end of study "
Findings of this observational study provide crucial data on experience with hydroxychloroquine therapy, providing necessary interim guidance for COVID-19 therapeutic practice. These findings do support the recent NIH guidelines (Antiviral Therapy, 2020), indicating a potential role for hydroxychloroquine in treatment of hospitalized COVID-19 patients without co-administration of azithromycin. However, our results should be interpreted with some cau...
Why would we need another study to evaluate the safety of an old drug
constant movement of goal posts
observational study I asked for a peer reviewed clinical study
The latest studies all show that it's highly effective.
If you think it doesn't work just because Trump thinks it does, and you get Wuhan virus, feel free not to take it and good luck to you.
How 25%-50% of Covid-19 deaths could have been avoided: HCQ
So, the only reason why HCQ can not be efficient is because trump said it is efficient, and admitting ones own TDS is impossible. It is fucking hopeless and on par of creationist stubbornness in being anti-science just because
Fortunately most doctors aren't that stupid,
The most educated are the ones that usually fuck up the most because of their perceived superiority and knowledge. They're infallible. That's not who I want working on my physical body in most cases. Dead serious.
What we have been seeing worldwide, from India to the UK to the US, is the rebellion against the inner circle of no-skin-in-the-game policymaking “clerks” and journalists-insiders, that class of paternalistic semi-intellectual experts with some Ivy league, Oxford-Cambridge, or similar label-driven education who are telling the rest of us 1) what to do, 2) what to eat, 3) how to speak, 4) how to think… and 5) who to vote for.
But the problem is the one-eyed following the blind: these self-described members of the “intelligentsia” can’t find a coconut in Coconut Island, meaning they aren’t intelligent enough to define intelligence hence fall into circularities — but their main skill is capacity to pass exams written by people like them.
- Human races are more widely divergent than dog breeds, so if it is clear that dogs vary in temperament, human races should also.
Trump derangement Syndrome is matched by the equally strong and opposite insane force called Trump Delusion Syndrome. You are actually well situated to gain insight in to what causes that.
When history looks back on this era, the question "Why did so many people have such a Problem with Trump ?" will not be nearly as big a question as:
1) How and why was he elected in the first place ?
2) What does it say about the state of America and the character of it's people that they not only elected him, but they didn't reject him either, as he embarrassed the majority of it's citizens on a daily basis ?
But given choice between him and statue-toppling vandals, I will choose him every day.
But if you make the leap to generalizing that democrats are statue toppling vandals, then you are identifying the entire left with some crazies on far left.
But if you make the leap to generalizing that democrats are statue toppling vandals, then you are identifying the entire left with some crazies on far left.
Remember, the left couldn't even nominate Bernie Sanders.
It's interesting, the degree to which the noise on the far left, strengthens the right.
listening to conservative black voices. (by conservative - I don't mean necessarily republican).
If you are treating people as individuals, why obsess about group differences ?
I do not find Democrats objecting to statue toppling, or defunding the police, or even suspecting that BLM's 4-year cycle might have something to do with the election.
Among Democrats, I see only true believers in The Narrative, or those too intimidated by leftist violence to speak up.
Oh, and he promises to change nothing, has no platform, speaks in completely empty platitudes
richwicks saysOh, and he promises to change nothing, has no platform, speaks in completely empty platitudes
I agree, he could benefit from some intensive courses in lying from Trump.
Some of us prefer someone who lies way way way way way way way way way way way way way way way way way way way less, even if what they promise is far less compelling or exciting.
Right-wingers must be idiots, easily manipulated, so dangerous, so violent, horrible people.
recognize you're electing a puppet
richwicks saysrecognize you're electing a puppet
Sadly that may be the case, and historically has been, including with Trump, even if in his case he didn't expect to win and didn't fully decide who all his puppet masters were until after he was elected.
Hillary Clinton made a deal in Uranium One. She received 145 million dollars from various Russian sources after the deal was completed as "donations" to the Clinton Foundatio
richwicks says
Hillary Clinton made a deal in Uranium One. She received 145 million dollars from various Russian sources after the deal was completed as "donations" to the Clinton Foundatio
Which she used to start up a pediphile ring operating out of pizza parler that Seth Rich used to frequent just before he was killed by Hillary for giving the Ukranians the password to the DNC server and they had it hijacked to the Ukraine on Hunter Biden's orders. Better believe it, as this Top Sekret info came straight from Devin Nunes cow.
« First « Previous Comments 10 - 49 of 67 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,208,934 comments by 14,372 users - clambo online now