patrick.net

I might but a round of hot molten lead in his head might be so cool with it.

with someone 14 to 17 years old and was no more than 10 years older than the person.

The measure won’t apply when a minor is under 14, when the age gap is larger than 10 years, or when either party says the sex wasn’t consensual.

Thanks for making me barf my insides out.

Fucked up shit. I don't understand why the left is pushing this pedo shit. Where the fuck is the money in it? Is there some super ultra wealthy pedo pushing this shit? Some rich homo somewhere or what?

Everyone needs to calm down and take a deep breath.
First, I don't agree with the bill, but be aware this is ONLY about whether an offender appears on the sex offender registry. They are still guilty of statutory rape. Nothing has changed.

Hircus says

with someone 14 to 17 years old and was no more than 10 years older than the person.

The measure won’t apply when a minor is under 14, when the age gap is larger than 10 years, or when either party says the sex wasn’t consensual.

More from the article:

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Friday signed a law that would give judges a say on whether to list someone as a sex offender for having oral or anal sex with a minor.

The bill would expand the discretion currently granted judges in statutory rape cases and was promoted as bringing fairness under the law to LGBTQ defendants.

The current law, in place for decades, permits judges to decide whether a man should be placed on California’s sex offender registry if he had voluntary intercourse with someone 14 to 17 years old and was no more than 10 years older than the person.

But that discretion only applied to a man who had vaginal intercourse. The new change permits judges to use that same discretion when the case involves voluntary oral or anal sex.

The measure won’t apply when a minor is under 14, when the age gap is larger than 10 years, or when either party says the sex wasn’t consensual.

The bill was introduced by state Sen. Scott Wiener, a San Francisco Democrat.

Still, California is a piece of pedophile shit now.

If homosexuality can be spread through a virus like HPV spreads cervical cancer, that would go a long way towards explaining why:
1)Gay people haven’t been weeded out of the population with natural selection.
2)why pockets of permissible and encouraged gayness always grow and grow their gay populations in those cities.
3) why young boys who are coerced into gay sex or raped by gay pedophiles so very often wind up gay themselves.

I’m thinking that curing AIDS was a bad move.

NancyPelosiHaircut says

Fucked up shit. I don't understand why the left is pushing this pedo shit. Where the fuck is the money in it? Is there some super ultra wealthy pedo pushing this shit? Some rich homo somewhere or what?

I believe leftists vote for anything that creates chaos.

Thread title does not correspond to the legislation it addresses. Dismiss.

Automan Empire says

Thread title does not correspond to the legislation it addresses. Dismiss.

it does. it protects pedos in name of equality. left is so obsessed with equality that they don't fucking understand consequences of anything they do anymore.

It does correspond, with this correction:

A 24 year old man can now fuck a 14 year old boy in the ass and get away with it in CA, if the (probably also gay) judge says it was "consensual".

I predicted this.

If you still live in CA and you have children you are officially bad parents.

No amount of money or good weather is going to make me stay in a place where my minor child can be raped by 20+ year olds.