patrick.net

Love it

It is a necessary step to save the Republic. Otherwise, you better start learning Mandarin, and get ready for the real 'SQUASH'. Covid terrorism is just a preview.

One state out of 50 has balls. America definitely has a low T problem.

Weird. In the Pennsylvania case that was shelved by SCOTUS in lieu of the Texas case, Penn made a most bizarre argument that even if the election were fraudulent, criminal, and unconstitutional, that SCOTUS should not intervene because of some imaginary threat to State's rights, voter rights and citizen freedoms. They were basically arguing that SCOTUS should suborn election crime in deference to a straw man legal bogey, without embarrassment it seems.

These politicians are so bedazzled by their own corruption, some CCP hacks have actually seduced them into believing that they have autocratic super powers (or will once the coup is established)? Stranger than ultrafiction.

"Oh, sirs and xirs of SCOTUS, don't you recognize our supreme and unilateral authority as new Commissars of the CCP?"

Ceffer says

Weird. In the Pennsylvania case that was shelved by SCOTUS in lieu of the Texas case

I don't believe that the PA case involved the Elector Clause like the Texas one does.

I also don't get where Texas (and now other states joining the suit like Louisana) has any standing. I mean, their own state legislatures' rights & privileges under the Electors Clause were not infringed by what went down in PA.

And there is the practical matter that the Electors are required to meet on Dec 14. So what will SCOTUS do even if the side with Texas, et al. in this case that will be germane to assigning those Electors by that time? The Electors have already been chosen because the election was certified in most of those states. And all those states have to do is flip the bird at whatever SCOTUS ruling happens because by the time the courts enforce it for realz the EC ballots would already be in their locked chests heading for D.C.

But as the Blind Man says, "We shall see! We shall see."

Hmm, MSM pollution. The Penn case only had the injunction part refused, the rest is still in play, or they might try to join the Texas group. So, the claims as usual of the case completely burning was wrong from the propaganda mill.

Ted Cruz had an interview which showed he had an intricate appreciation of the legal subtleties, and he is a high honors graduate of Harvard Law. I think he also helped brainstorm this Texas case, so it might be on solid ground.

A group of renegade, fraudulent states engaging in unconstitutional fiat with a high enough count of electoral votes pollute the entire election for everybody? It's true if not legal.
I heard a commentator say that they have never considered that there should be a minimum legal standard of election performance from all states, or equal protection is violated?

Yeah, who knows?

TrumpingTits says

I also don't get where Texas (and now other states joining the suit like Louisana) has any standing. I mean, their state legislaturess rights & privileges under the Electors Clause were not infringed by what went down in PA.

If the president is elected because of the fraudulent actions of one state it effects all states.

Ted Cruz has already argued in front of SCOTUS - and Won. Liberals are starting to worry - hence, the vitriolic, wild-eyed responses of the criminally insane leftists. They thought they could steal the election, and we would just lie down and go away. Back to business as usual: placating Iran, Korea, and the CCP on the Global stage, making America second to all, Pursuing misguided climate policies, and in all likelihood getting us into another war to keep "War INC." in Business. Fuck all that.

I hope we can bring this to a halt, set things straight, and get Dominion out before the next election. But time is short. I worry.

Onvacation says

If the president is elected because of the fraudulent actions of one state it effects all states

The Electors in PA engaged fraud when they elected POTUS? Where? How? And especially...why?

Any reports of fauthless Electors? No?

Electors are the only ones who elect POTUS as defined in the Electors Clause, unless a Contingent Election happens. So unless you have proof otherwise, no fraud happened in the EC voting.

And Texas filed their case on the Electors Clause - not the Bullshit Fantasy That Whatever Happens In Another State Impacts Them Clause -- and nothing that happened in any other state impacted their selection of Texas Electors. So no standing.

By the 'logic' you present, that means even if PA had a squeaky clean election that still went to Biden then that would also negatively impact other states too. Ditto with their legislature overriding the vote and assigning Electors directly. Or if an Elector dies right before voting in the EC, thus throwing the election. So would a butterfly farting to the left instead of to the right at a crucial moment. Blah, blah, blah. In all those cases, by your logic, 'effected' States would have standing in SCOTUS to bitch about it

Sorry. But that just isn't how the world works. That isn't even common sense. There is no right for a state to bitch about the outcome of something another state does in exercising its sovereign rights. Esp when the exercise thereof is guaranteed no matter how other state's merely disapprove. Esp when no harm came to the exercise of the same rights & privileges as Texas claimed (interefering in its own selection of Electors) but could not prove.

See the parallels here with this and free speech and censureship thereof? Not an accident.

To be honest, I don't see why this isn't obvious to others besides myself. And it is getting quite annoying esp when those pushing this crap are otherwise smart people such as yourself.

This is why the Constitution and election laws law concentrate on procedure - esp fallback procedure - and not outcomes, leaving the outcomes to take care of themselves. You seem to to be thinking on the outcome and working backwards to the procedure. That is the only thing that explains your (and others)) thinking that came up with the logic, from what I can tell.

I think we just need more helicopters...

TrumpingTits says

Sorry. But that just isn't how the world works. That isn't even common sense. There is no right for a state to bitch about the outcome of something another state does in exercising its sovereign rights. Esp when the exercise thereof is guaranteed no matter how other state's merely disapprove. Esp when no harm came to the exercise of the same rights & privileges

Yeah, I'm just a conspiracy theorist. If Trump doesn't come out with the real evidence soon it's just political theatre and Trump was just a hired actor.

We're, me and many, are just hoping against hope Trump really is about to pull some rabbits out and the whole corrupt pyramid of deep state power is about to implode.

The last year has really shown that it's not a game. I went to ocean beach in SF this morning with my wife and dog for a little break. Over the bay bridge and into the city we worked our way down Geary past many boarded up storefronts. Everyone on the street wore masks, everyone! There seemed to be plenty of parking in front of all the closed businesses. These streets are normally vibrant with shoppers and diners and you might have to drive around the block a couple times to find parking. Ghost town.

Really not looking forward to the new normal being permanent.

Onvacation says

new normal

Obama the fuck-tard used to like to say that. That Obama guy who let Joe Biden's son fuck his daughter and film it.

just_passing_through says

That Obama guy who let Joe Biden's son fuck his daughter and film it.

I would bet that Hunter and his sibs were molested by Joe as children, and that they got used to sex with each other. I would also bet that Obama was molested as a child.
When Hunter's laptop was available, one shot showed him on top of what looked like a young Asian male, so he swings both ways.

Sexual molestation in childhood creates dissociative personalities and Stockholm syndrome aka the victims have fluid multiple roles that they can enact based on circumstances. The trauma causes them to develop the dissociative personality as a survival mechanism. They try to be whatever the people around them want them to be. That's very handy in politics and in generating a Manchurian like Obama, and it is why child molestation tends to be prized by Globalists. It creates malleable figures who can also be blackmailed. They adapt very well to fictitious legend generated for them for publicity purposes.

Besides, those aren't Obama's daughters, they are stage props. Who knows what Obama and Michelle were up to with them to give up the 'daughters' to a sleaze like Hunter.

Onvacation says

If Trump doesn't come out with the real evidence soon it's just political theatre and Trump was just a hired acto

Unfortunately, doesn't matter what he comes out with at this point. The EC already voted. So while this can go to PA courts and should, it won't effect the EC vote whatsoever. Best we can hope for is some judicial rulings..especially knocking down mail in balloting in PA. It is unconstitutional (to the state's constitution), that will prevent a lot of this from happening again. There may even be at the federal level some invalidations for Congress offices, but doubtful. But if it happened, then there would be special elections for the Reps and Senators effected.

Onvacation says

We're, me and many, are just hoping against hope Trump really is about to pull some rabbits out and the whole corrupt pyramid of deep state power is about to implode.

Yeah. So was I. But what is now increasingly clear is that instead they were discrediting the election so that Trump can run again in 2024. Provided that the GOP establishment doesn't rig the primaries against him like the Dems have done with keeping Bernie out.

Onvacation says

Really not looking forward to the new normal being permanent.
Well, look on the bright side! The layoffs will start soon at CNN, MSNBC, New York Slimes, etc. A Trumpless Media World is not going to be kind for their ratings & revenues.

Famous last words in the movies: "Goodbye, Mr. Bond."

Famous last words in 2020 election: "Goodbye, Mr. Trump."

rocketjoe79 says

Ted Cruz has already argued in front of SCOTUS - and Won.

Do you have a link for this? I haven't heard of it.

Patrick says

rocketjoe79 says

Ted Cruz has already argued in front of SCOTUS - and Won.

Do you have a link for this? I haven't heard of it.

Wikipedia: Texas Solicitor General
Appointed to the office of Solicitor General of Texas by Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott,[41][48] Cruz served in that position from 2003 to 2008.[26][39] The office was established in 1999 to handle appeals involving the state, but Abbott hired Cruz with the idea that Cruz would take a "leadership role in the United States in articulating a vision of strict constructionism". As Solicitor General, Cruz argued before the Supreme Court of the United States nine times, winning five cases and losing four.[44]

and the Footnote article:
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/06/30/the-absolutist-2

Which, hilariously, was written by Jeffrey Toobin.