patrick.net

So he's willing to be responsible for the bloody Revolution 2.0, but not a couple of manbun fags rioting, that could be put down with two full throttle back hands to the chops.

As I said, the 'supremes' pussed out. I guess you could call them supreme pussies.

Like the Dread Scott decision, punted on a major issue, civil war a couple years later.

To be fair, I don’t think a succession needs to be bloody. No one would have died in the civil war if Lincoln had just decided to let the South go.

And in this case you don’t have some huge moral issue to deal with. Basically the country is divided between labor who are having their jobs taken via outsourcing or immigration vs costal elites who benefit from this plus the Kardashian fan morons who support them.

And since in this election the elites told labor to go fuck yourself and diluted our votes with blatant cheating, I see no reason why we should be beholden to a government not chosen by the people.

Pussy.

A lot of people are like that. Most people will go along to avoid any argument. Roberts only wants to hear nice cases.

ignoreme says

I see no reason why we should be beholden to a government not chosen by the people.

I agree. Without the consent of the governed, the government is illegitimate.

And when we voted one way and they used fraud to make it come out another way, they do not have our consent.

election2020 says

I am starting to think that "defense department" helped to elevate Trump to presidential podium to clean up the "deep state" coup and takeover by CCP without looking as they are installing dictatorship.

I hope so. It would be nice to think SOMEBODY in the federal government actually gives a damned about the Constitution and doesn't want to keep this nation in 100 years of worthless wars. I have completely lost faith in the government, at every level.

Is there a reason everyone is just accepting this “report” as truth?

I highly doubt the incident is anything but fabricated.

FuckTheMainstreamMedia says

Is there a reason everyone is just accepting this “report” as truth?

I highly doubt the incident is anything but fabricated.

Seems fake to me too.

election2020 says

I don't see how Trump could have won without powerful people backing him.

Maybe he was an actor hired to lose to Hillary?

If the electronic election report is released with indisputable proof of election fraud I'll believe! Otherwise it's all political theatre.

FuckTheMainstreamMedia says

Is there a reason everyone is just accepting this “report” as truth?

I highly doubt the incident is anything but fabricated.

Hal Turner is extremely unreliable, IMHO. They reported some nonsense story about 50,000 Chicoms in a Maine Bunker getting bombed by a lone F-16.

Think about the amount of concrete & steel and manhours required to build a huge underground complex with more capacity than Giants Stadium. No way Al's 16-room Motel and 1000s of Concrete Mixers are going to be missed daily running all over Aroostok/Rural Maine. And of course an F-16 couldn't carry anywhere near enough payload to knock out an underground complex of that magnitude. You'd need at least a flight of B-52s with massive FAEs or such like.

Report is apocryphal most likely, but Intelligence definitely seems to have Roberts' Epstein tapes. You can tell when they turn and they have their nuts in a vice by their behavior.

I also think that when Boris Johnson had 'Covid', It was a cover for when he was abducted, tied to a chair and rubber hosed into submission by MI5 and MI6. He has acted very weirdly and inconsistently since then, not like 'pre-Covid' at all.

FuckTheMainstreamMedia says

Is there a reason everyone is just accepting this “report” as truth?

I highly doubt the incident is anything but fabricated.

This story is beyond absurd. The justices disagree all the time, and they regularly TELL US THEY DISAGREE BY ATTACHING A DISSENT to the order. This is why there are so many 8-1, 7-2 etc opinions. If anyone disagrees with the majority they will tell us how and why they do so. They have done it over and over and over again in the past - no reason this would be any different.

Here of course, there was no dissent on the merits or lack thereof, there was not even a concurrence. It was a per curiam order. It was a very polite "go f yourself" to an absurd suit brought by Texas who did not have any standing. Texas knew as much, but they wanted to get a case in front of SCOTUS, and this was the only way to do it (via original jurisdiction). What they got for their efforts was a 9-0 "fisting" on the standing issue, which anyone who understood the basics of federalism embedded in the Constitution knew was going to happen.