patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,376,011 comments by 15,740 users - Glock-n-Load, PeopleUnited online now
« First « Previous Comments 28 - 42 of 42 Search these comments
30
Maga_Chaos_Monkey
@
2024 Apr 6, 11:18am
Maga_Chaos_Monkey
@
2024 Apr 6, 11:18am
Patrick says
Yeah and a republic. Democracy on it's own is mob rule.
This is why we have the Bill of Rights, and representatives rather than direct democraccy.
Yeah and a republic. Democracy on it's own is mob rule.
33
HeadSet
@
2024 Apr 23, 4:38pm
HeadSet
@
2024 Apr 23, 4:38pm
Patrick says
Wow. If that is real, a judge that thinks the Constitution does not apply is nothing but a tyrant and needs to be removed.
https://twitter.com/ChestyPullerGst/status/1782783716936327622
Wow. If that is real, a judge that thinks the Constitution does not apply is nothing but a tyrant and needs to be removed.
34
MolotovCocktail
@
2024 Apr 23, 4:49pm
MolotovCocktail
@
2024 Apr 23, 4:49pm
HeadSet says
She's Acting Justice of the New York Supreme Court, too. She's probably doing this for politicking to become full Justice.
This will automatically win an appeal. But nothing will happen to her.
Patrick says
https://twitter.com/ChestyPullerGst/status/1782783716936327622
Wow. If that is real, a judge that thinks the Constitution does not apply is nothing but a tyrant and needs to be removed.
She's Acting Justice of the New York Supreme Court, too. She's probably doing this for politicking to become full Justice.
This will automatically win an appeal. But nothing will happen to her.
35
Ceffer
@
2024 Apr 23, 10:13pm
Ceffer
@
2024 Apr 23, 10:13pm
It is often said the second foreign occupied fraternal twin of Washington DC is New York. Whatever DC wants, DC gets from the incestuous relationship. The foreign occupied foreign city state of Washington DC has a Globalist flag, its own separate legal system, and its own so called Constitution, and it ain't the one they administer for the Republic.
What say you, they administer our Constitution FOR us? Well, that explains a lot, doesn't it.
What say you, they administer our Constitution FOR us? Well, that explains a lot, doesn't it.
38
Patrick
@
2026 Feb 19, 9:38am
Patrick
@
2026 Feb 19, 9:38am
“The Constitution isn’t optional. The point of the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement is to hassle the government. It’s supposed to be difficult to search or arrest people. That’s not a bug; that’s a feature of our American republic.”
- Justin Amash
- Justin Amash
39
Misc
@
2026 Feb 19, 10:25am
Patrick says
Then the reality of having to remove millions of illegals sets in.
Considering all the other unconstitutional crap the government does, I have no problem with them rounding up these criminals for deportation.
“The Constitution isn’t optional. The point of the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement is to hassle the government. It’s supposed to be difficult to search or arrest people. That’s not a bug; that’s a feature of our American republic.”
- Justin Amash
Then the reality of having to remove millions of illegals sets in.
Considering all the other unconstitutional crap the government does, I have no problem with them rounding up these criminals for deportation.
40
Misc
@
2026 Feb 19, 10:29am
Patrick says
Then the reality of having to remove millions of illegals sets in.
Considering all the other unconstitutional crap the government does, I have no problem with them rounding up these criminals for deportation. Them being here simply interferes with my Rights.
“The Constitution isn’t optional. The point of the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement is to hassle the government. It’s supposed to be difficult to search or arrest people. That’s not a bug; that’s a feature of our American republic.”
- Justin Amash
Then the reality of having to remove millions of illegals sets in.
Considering all the other unconstitutional crap the government does, I have no problem with them rounding up these criminals for deportation. Them being here simply interferes with my Rights.
41
RWSGFY
@
2026 Feb 19, 10:49am
RWSGFY
@
2026 Feb 19, 10:49am
Misc says
This is not how it works. This is not how any of this works.
Patrick says
“The Constitution isn’t optional. The point of the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement is to hassle the government. It’s supposed to be difficult to search or arrest people. That’s not a bug; that’s a feature of our American republic.”
- Justin Amash
Then the reality of having to remove millions of illegals sets in.
Considering all the other unconstitutional crap the government does, I have no problem with them rounding up these criminals for deportation. Them being here simply interferes with my Rights.
This is not how it works. This is not how any of this works.
42
Misc
@
2026 Feb 19, 11:08am
RWSGFY says
Judges should get used to having their wacko orders simply disregarded.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/federal-judge-who-ordered-no-warrantless-ice-arrests-colorado-asserts-doj-not-complying
This is not how it works. This is not how any of this works.
Judges should get used to having their wacko orders simply disregarded.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/federal-judge-who-ordered-no-warrantless-ice-arrests-colorado-asserts-doj-not-complying
« First « Previous Comments 28 - 42 of 42 Search these comments
***
Thought experiment. If we had to rewrite a constitution from scratch today what would it say? What rights/ liberties / freedoms would be most important? Are any of the issues addressed obsolete in the modern era? Are there new protections that should to be enumerated given the interconnectedness of the modern world?