10
1

Kamala Harris


               
2021 Feb 2, 8:03pm   71,435 views  1,090 comments

by Onvacation   follow (4)  

We need a thread for our "vice President". I'll start with when she was having cocaine fueled orgies with Montel Williams.

original link

« First        Comments 1,072 - 1,090 of 1,090        Search these comments

1074   ElYorsh   2025 Jan 6, 10:30am  

Why is Kamala being called Madam President during the certification of election results?
1075   MolotovCocktail   2025 Jan 6, 11:03am  

ElYorsh says


Why is Kamala being called Madam President during the certification of election results?


She is President of the Senate and of this special session of Congress.

The Twelfth Amendment since 1804 has provided that the vice president, as President of the Senate, receives the Electoral College votes, and then, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, opens the sealed votes. The Electoral Count Act of 1887 requires the votes to be counted during a joint session on January 6 following the meetings of the presidential electors.[1] The act also specifies that the president of the Senate presides over the session.[2]


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_session_of_the_United_States_Congress
1076   ElYorsh   2025 Jan 6, 12:04pm  

Got it. Thank you. I didn't go to school in the US and this was my first time watching it live.
1079   Booger   2025 Feb 18, 4:59pm  




He could have just said drunk or stoned.
1080   WookieMan   2025 Feb 18, 8:54pm  

Booger says

He could have just said drunk or stoned.

Drunk for sure. I suppose maybe took edibles at times. Probably why she didn't go to the border. Not legal for recreational use there in Texas. She could have at least gone to NM, AZ or CA to get high. So I think she's a drinker or just didn't do her job.
1082   Misc   2025 Sep 7, 8:01am  

The LAPD pulled its protection for Kamala.

Gotta wonder if it was because she was doing Coke.
1083   zzyzzx   2025 Sep 8, 7:16am  

Misc says

The LAPD pulled its protection for Kamala.

Gotta wonder if it was because she was doing Coke.


Did that stop them from protecting Hunter?
1084   RWSGFY   2025 Sep 8, 7:59am  

Why the end of her SS protection is news at all? It's a SOP for a former Veep to have SS protection for 6 months after leaving the office. And LASD protection shouldn't even have happened.
1085   Misc   2025 Sep 8, 10:46pm  

zzyzzx says

Did that stop them from protecting Hunter?


He shared.
1088   The_Deplorable   2025 Nov 1, 10:57am  

The belief that Kamala is presidential material is laughable.
1090   Patrick   2025 Dec 19, 8:35am  

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/men-are-men-friday-december-19-2025


The New York Times ran a delicious ironic story yesterday below the incredible headline —I promise this is real— “The D.N.C. Is Scrapping Its Report on What Went Wrong in 2024.”

When lanky, mild-mannered white guy Ken Martin was elected to head the Democrat National Party early this year, it was in the wake of the worst-case scenario for the donkey party: a national Trump landslide. After screwing up initial candidate selection so badly that Biden flamed out in the first Trump debate, the anti-democratic Democrat elites performed a quick coup, and with a David Copperfield-like wave of their ruling sticks —SHAZAM!— and a puff of sulphuric smoke, in ran Kamala the Cackler. She appeared without any time-wasting public debate, and saved all the risky controversy that might have been caused by Democrat primary voters.

Having anointed a new candidate, and like a Dyson super-vac set on ’11,’ party elites hoovered up a Solomonic warchest from donors— $2.5 billion spent over just six weeks. And still they lost every swing state. Every single one. Not just that, but despite all that money and effort, they lost both chambers of Congress, handing Trump a gold-embossed mandate and perfecting voters’ utter rejection of their “not Trump” agenda. ...

In the most astonishing quote of all, the Mr. Rogers lookalike finally said the quiet part out loud: all the Democrats care about is winning. “Here’s our North Star: Does this help us win?” Mr. Martin said in a widely reported statement. “If the answer is no, it’s a distraction from the core mission.”

And there you have it.

It was pretty rich. This win-at-all-costs mindset is the same kind of anti-democratic nonsense that got the Democrats into this mess in the first place. Shut up and let the party elites decide what you need to know. Had they run a competitive mini-primary in the summer of 2024, instead of just selecting Kamala, they might have found a stronger candidate.

Now they are doing the same thing, all over again, raising the question of who really runs the party? The party’s members? Clearly not. Shady, behind-the-scenes billionaires? Nancy Pelosi? An artificial intelligence in orbit? Emperor Palpatine? ...

Others called the decision to seal up the report “cowardice,” “a hilarious self-own,” and “mind-bogglingly stupid.” Other folks described it in blunter terms, in ways that cannot be reprinted in this family blog.

But don’t judge too quickly. It’s not like they’re attacking democracy or anything. Coronating selected candidates without voting and burying inconvenient reports to protect the rich and powerful is definitely not ‘threatening democracy.’ Spending $2.5 billion in a blitz, losing every swing state and both chambers, then sealing the official report explaining how it all went wrong —especially the parts that might embarrass big donors and consultants— is just smart politics.

When Martin said winning trumps everything, that included voting, transparency, honest self-criticism, equal rights, rebuilding trust with the base, campaign promises, and control of the thermostat. And, apparently, winning even trumps democracy itself.

« First        Comments 1,072 - 1,090 of 1,090        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste