Election Fraud News

 invite response                
2021 Feb 2, 10:07pm   110,064 views  1,196 comments

by Patrick   ➕follow (52)   💰tip   ignore  

Can't find anything at all in the media anymore, except wildly biased yellow journalism.

Trump continues to insist there was mass fraud, but all media simply dismisses his claim as "false" without any reasoning or evidence.

I'm pretty damn sure Biden's election was fraudulent.

Update: after 2000 Mules presented the evidence, I'm 100% sure that Biden's election was fraudulent. See https://2000mules.com/

« First        Comments 814 - 853 of 1,196       Last »     Search these comments

814   Patrick   2023 Jan 18, 9:13pm  


FOIA Requests Reveal There Were No DOJ Investigations on Election Fraud After 2020 Election as Bill Barr Claimed

Exactly. The DOJ is not about to investigate a crime it was complicit in.
816   HeadSet   2023 Jan 20, 7:57am  

Even punishing election fraud with 2 years in jail would stop that fraud.
817   Patrick   2023 Jan 20, 9:17am  


This past week, as the House Transportation committee heard HF 4 which would provide driver's licenses to illegal aliens, this testifier told members:

"We are voting. Our people are voting. If you don't pass this bill, people are going to vote you all out."

Pretty audacious.
818   Patrick   2023 Jan 24, 8:51pm  


Arizona Senate Presentation Reveals That Hundreds Of Failed Tabulators In Maricopa County Likely Misread A QUARTER MILLION Ballots During 2022 Election – Lake’s Team Says “MORE EVIDENCE TO COME”
820   Patrick   2023 Jan 28, 1:01pm  

Could also be placed by Democrats to suppress donations to the RNC.

But there was indeed massive election fraud in 2020, and the Republic Party utterly failed to call it out.
821   Patrick   2023 Jan 30, 7:20pm  


Let's Build a Parallel, Open, Decentralized, Democratic System Online that Plugs into Our Existing One ...

The framers of the Constitution wanted to form a government that did not allow one person or entity to have too much control or authority. They knew that centralization was one of the most important ingredients for tyranny to arise. This is why - for the technology they had at the time - they decentralized by spreading the power out over the states and many representatives. ...

The one safe and proven way to regain power back to the individuals in a system is this: Instead of attacking with another centralized entity, you instead create a new decentralized platform to compete against it - or in this case, integrate with it. ...

Audrey was born in Taipei in 1981 and was considered a child prodigy. By eight months old she was already speaking. By 14 she had quit school and was programming full time for a leading IT tech company.

As the 2014 protests unfolded, Audrey realized the occupying protestors had no Wi-Fi. So, she showed up with 350 meters of ethernet cables and installed a communications hub that was transparent, open, and responsive to the demands of the public, making sure that truth was spreading faster than rumors and propaganda. She set up a live stream to a large projector screen out in the street where tens of thousands of people could see in real time what was being debated in Parliament as it was occupied.

It was so successful that after the protests were peacefully resolved, Taiwan’s government invited Audrey to build a system of communication for the entire country that she now calls “a Listening Society.”

“It transformed our society,” says Audrey. “If you asked a random person in 2010 on the streets of Taiwan: ‘Would the people somehow unite under the banner (of this movement), people would look at you like you are crazy.”

“Transparency (in government) creates trust” is one of her mantras. And she lives by it. Every Wednesday from 10am to 10pm she meets with people in her government office. Like the police who wear body cameras, anyone is allowed to come and talk as long as they agree that their conversation will be video recorded and posted online in real time for everyone to see. Imagine if this was how government officials met in America or elsewhere?

She swears by the philosophy - what she calls “radical transparency” - where nearly all information concerning government (except the ultra sensitive) is disclosed online so that citizens can engage with the government on an even ground. She combines this with the principles of civic participation, and rough consensus using upvoting and downvoting platforms and polls.

Audrey adds, “The most important thing of course is trust… So through radical transparency, through open government… we make sure that people understand the context - the ‘why’ of policy making. Not just the ‘what’ of the result of the policy. We ensure that everybody is included in the discussion. And that makes it possible for Democracy to truly work.” ...

Imagine downloading an iGov app that had everything you needed for participatory government. Picture a virtual town hall for ideas to percolate, and instant feedback loops from up-voting and down-voting by voters. Imagine representatives following that feedback with their actions. Envision a video platform for those running to debate on, and a way for voters to generate questions to ask in the debates. Imagine having a newsfeed of all of the bills and actions your representatives are considering and voting on in the near future, along with Town Hall ideas of how to fix problems generated by your fellow citizens.

Visualize a truly transparent government - representatives that video record every meeting, every bill that is voted on, and posts them online in real time for constituents to check, review, dissect, and give feedback on. ...

Imagine a system providing real-time accurate polling and grading of representatives - graded by the voters and the constituents participating. Are the representatives doing what the people want? Are they doing what they promised? Are they acting with transparency? How do their actions line up with the desires of the constituents? Picture a similar decentralized way to how we review products online, but for our representatives. ...

But, you might be asking…. with all this, why would a representative want to join this iGov platform?

Well, because if we all agreed to it - across party lines - it would be impossible for any representative to get elected through normal elections unless they volunteered to be part of the new digital system. The iGov system would be a check and balance against voter fraud as our blockchain ledgers and open sourced transparency would be eons harder to corrupt than the current one. ...

I like the idea of videotaping all government interactions and making it all available online instantly, and of the people continuously reviewing all government actions on a public website. I created a page for each Congressman on this site for that reason.

I don't see how it solves the fundamental problem of voter fraud though.
822   richwicks   2023 Jan 30, 7:22pm  

Patrick says

Could also be placed by Democrats to suppress donations to the RNC.

But there was indeed massive election fraud in 2020, and the Republic Party utterly failed to call it out.

Could be, but what does that matter?

There's really no difference between the two parties. In 2024, they will try to run a Neocon, again. Whoever it is, it will be yet another bloodthirsty warmonger.
823   richwicks   2023 Jan 30, 7:26pm  

Patrick says

I don't see how it solves the fundamental problem of voter fraud though.

Pretty easy to count the number of people walking into a polling place, and having that correspond to the number of ballots counted at each polling place.

If we have to have mail in voting (and we absolutely do not), they should be segregated, and counted first, announced first, and then walk in ballots counted second.

Every voter should have a receipt to verify their vote. This can be done with a serial number.

We used to have exit polling, which has been a gold standard for decades, but it was George W. Bush that got rid of them. We haven't had real elections since 2000. Trump was a fluke, Biden is par for the course.
824   REpro   2023 Jan 30, 8:12pm  

We have some ancient problem with counting voters, while in meantime in China people pay for shopping by turning face into camera with face recognize software.
825   Patrick   2023 Jan 30, 11:47pm  

But to be fair, our problem is because our government still pretends that we have a choice among parties and candidates while we now know we mostly do not.

China does not even pretend that their voters have a choice. No other parties but the CCP are even legal there.
826   richwicks   2023 Jan 31, 12:57am  

REpro says

We have some ancient problem with counting voters, while in meantime in China people pay for shopping by turning face into camera with face recognize software.

China does indeed have its problem, but I bet the population forces reform there, before they do it in the land of the free and the brave.

China I consider a dystopia, the United States I see going toward complete lawlessness. What's the point of following the law when your own government is running child prostitution rings with Jeffrey Epstein, is sending CIA heads to DAVOS to suck Klaus Schwab's dick, and is adopting all the terribly policies of China, while at the same time is putting the nation under the yoke of unrestrained immigration that promotes lawlessness among racial groups to promote criminality within our society?

There's PROOF that the FBI made certain the WTC bombing of 1993 happen. PROOF, not evidence, proof. Emad Salem recorded all his conversations with the FIB, and warned them, and the FIB let it happen.


And here is his recording, which wikipedia doesn't think is worth linking to, and which youtube hides and eventually will make unfindable:


The FIB tried to convict him.

This is the goddamned nation we live in and will continue to live in until people understand our government is nothing but a group of murderers and thugs, you pay taxes to.

You probably scoff a bit at the idea that 9/11 was done by our government again, or with at least the help and assistance of our government. They murder US citizens for profit of offense companies and you pay for it. You're not going to do anything about it, you can't even accept what they are - sociopathic criminals.
827   HeadSet   2023 Jan 31, 8:01am  

richwicks says

We haven't had real elections since 2000. Trump was a fluke,

The cheat was in place for Trump on 2016 but it was not big enough. The Deepies fixed that issue for 2020.
828   Patrick   2023 Feb 3, 10:17am  

Right, I don't see why anyone thinks Trump has a chance against the Deep State/Democrat fraud machine in 2024.

They cheated before, it's overwhelmingly obvious, yet literally nothing was done about it and no one was prosecuted.

Therefore they will do it again.
832   Patrick   2023 Feb 26, 1:54pm  


Anna Karenina
5 hr ago
Liked by Meryl Nass
How can you possibly think voting will fix issues? The 2 opposing camps are given to the peasants to keep them HOPING that once their chosen candidate gets elected things will be different. While they are HOPING they are not ACTING. Both sides are owned. The steady deterioration of rights and the growth of the State has been evident no matter which camp is in power. This is where voting led us. It is madness to believe that voting will get us out. Not to mention that if the Constitution has any power how can any administration bypass it and do unconstitutional things?? Where are the Justices stating “this is unconstitutional and cannot be done!” Where are the much touted “checks and balances”??? It is madness to think that doing the same think will yield different results.
833   Patrick   2023 Feb 27, 10:22pm  


‘Why isn’t he being prosecuted?’ Trump goes after Zuckerberg over $2 million donation to GA election board

Former President Donald J, Trump called for the prosecution of Mark Zuckerberg over a report that a group connected to the Facebook/Meta CEO gave $2 million to a Georgia elections board, a donation that may have violated state law.

“‘Why isn’t he being prosecuted?” Trump lashed out after Fox News Digital reported that a watchdog group is calling for an investigation into the “flagrant and egregious” violation of a Georgia state ban on private funding by the DeKalb County Board of Registration and Elections, a prohibition that was put into place after accusations that left-wing donors had exerted influence over the 2020 elections.

“He cheated on the Election(s). The whole system is RIGGED. Why isn’t he being prosecuted? The Democrats only know how to cheat. America isn’t going to take it much longer!” Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social along with a link to the Fox News report.
834   Patrick   2023 Feb 27, 10:33pm  


The Immovable Object is visibility of electoral data for any citizen from his phone — cross searched against property tax records — and dozens of other databases — at silicon speed.

When citizens, of any party, realize that their county registrar has voters living in banks, 7-Elevens, public parks, and their own homes — to their surprise — they experience what disenfranchisement means.

Visibility to evil drives social change.

It's our turn!
837   richwicks   2023 Mar 2, 5:47pm  

cisTits says

^^^^ In Maine and Alaska, the only solution now is for the state party to conduct their own, private process (which is how it should be) to pre-select candidates to run in the official RCV corrupt primary.

The Dems only want RCV in certain states. Won't see this in California, for example.

Ranked choice voting is not what you think it is. The problem is everybody picks the LEAST likely candidate to win in the first round, and you pick "more establishment" candidates later, so you always end up with an establishment candidate. It's actually designed to prevent non establishment candidates from gaining power.
840   Patrick   2023 Mar 7, 5:57pm  


Kayleigh McEnany: Biden Won’t Be ‘Able to Sleep His Way Through’ a 2024 Campaign as He Did in 2020

Yes he will. We have no democracy. We have open fraud in presidential elections now.

Biden could literally die right now and still be "elected" by yet another massive election fraud in 2024.

American democracy is over, done, ended. All we have is rule by Pfizer and the FBI with support from brain dead woketards who watch corporate news on TV.
846   HeadSet   2023 Mar 23, 7:16pm  

richwicks says

Hunh! Maybe I AM too cynical..

I dunno. Let's see what actually becomes of this.
847   richwicks   2023 Mar 23, 8:02pm  

HeadSet says

richwicks says

Hunh! Maybe I AM too cynical..

I dunno. Let's see what actually becomes of this.

Oh, I expect nothing will come of it. I'm just surprised a any court gave her a small win.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz probably wasn't elected in 2016, Tim Canova did. Benda Snipes the election supervisor illegally destroyed ballots, you know what happened to Snipes? Nothing. She resigned, but not because of that. Why should ballots EVER be destroyed?


On September 1, 2017, while litigation was ongoing, Snipes signed an order authorizing the destruction of 688 boxes containing the ballots. Litigation on the matter continued for another two weeks. On November 6, 2017, the court discovered that the ballots in question had been destroyed two months prior. The judge ruled that Snipes had illegally destroyed the ballots and that Canova be awarded attorney's fees. Snipes' attorney said a vendor had made and retained a digital copy of every ballot cast in the race and that the destruction of the ballots was neither intentional nor illegal.

Our election system is a joke. It's just so fucking obvious - why would Snipes order the ballots destroyed when there was ongoing litigation? Only one reason, an inspection of the ballots would have demonstrated fraud.

I bet the same thing happens in Arizona - they'll destroy the evidence and then say "oops! My bad!" and nobody will go to jail. Until the population gets fed up with not having elections and does something VIOLENT at this point, it's not going to change. That happened 6 years ago, and Schultz JUST resigned for having rigged the primaries for Hillary Clinton. Seriously, if ANYBODY else was run against Trump, and I mean anybody, Trump would have never been president.
849   The_Deplorable   2023 Mar 29, 2:33pm  

Patrick says
Just one county, but it's a start.

Yes! It is a start and it is what we need across the USA...

From the link: "The County Supervisors in Shasta County, California, voted last night to go with paper ballots in elections going forward. The vote was 3-2."

851   Patrick   2023 Mar 30, 7:20pm  


Jerry Nadler Just Said We Can't 'Trust an Election' to Get Rid of President Trump
Katie Pavlich

December 12, 2019

During debate on articles of impeachment in the House Judiciary Committee Wednesday night, Chairman Jerry Nadler undermined the vote of millions of Americans and said they can't be trusted to decide who should win the White House in 2020.

"We cannot rely on an election to solve our problems when the president threatens the very integrity of that election," Nadler said during his opening statement. "Nor can we sit on our hands while the President undermines our national security—and while he allows his personal interests and the interests of our adversary Russia to advance."


From 2019, but sounds to me like an advance confession that Nadler participated in the massive, unmistakable election fraud in 2020.
852   Patrick   2023 Apr 5, 10:59am  


My county recently voted to remove Dominion machines. A lot of normies became extremely upset about this, but they're unable to articulate why they're so upset. It's a lot like that time when people claimed CRT wasn't being taught, but then tossed their tendies when it was banned.

The argument that voting machines are rigged, or owned by groups with political ties isn't going to get you anywhere because it's complicated to explain, and easy to write off as a paranoid conspiracy theory.

A good way to approach the voting machine debate is by asking someone if they understand the concept of decentralization, and when and where it's used. If they have a clear understanding of decentralization, then ask them how they would feel about their county's votes being counted by one person- They don't know this person, nor the political connections this person may have, or if this person is compromised.

Many would agree that putting trust into one person to count all the votes is a gamble and could lead to problems. Instead, you would want to have several people counting, from both sides, so everyone can cross-check everyone else's work, thus making cheating a lot more challenging.

A small county only needs one or two machines to count all of their ballots. But with a machine you've effectively centralized the counting to one closed-source entity. This machine is no different from that single unknown person counting behind closed doors.
853   HeadSet   2023 Apr 5, 12:20pm  

Patrick says

Many would agree that putting trust into one person to count all the votes is a gamble and could lead to problems. Instead, you would want to have several people counting, from both sides, so everyone can cross-check everyone else's work, thus making cheating a lot more challenging.

You are assuming the Dems do not want cheating. The Dems want the machine counting in place precisely because it is a way to cheat for their side. The Dems actually believe that the public is too stupid to elect the proper people, so the ends justify the means. Top level Dems just want to preserve the grift.

« First        Comments 814 - 853 of 1,196       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions