patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,232,660 comments by 14,741 users - DhammaStep, Misc online now
invite response« First « Previous Comments 1,591 - 1,630 of 1,702 Next » Last » Search these comments
1594
porkchopXpress
2024 Aug 7, 5:30am
porkchopXpress
2024 Aug 7, 5:30am
Georgia Citizens declare a STATE OF EMERGENCY with Georgia’s Election System.
A press conference was held at the State Election Board meeting to expose evidence of fraud, widespread voter roll manipulation and demand action ahead of the 2024 Presidential Election
https://rumble.com/v59z2sq-citizens-declare-state-of-emergency-with-georgia-election-system-august-6-2.html
A press conference was held at the State Election Board meeting to expose evidence of fraud, widespread voter roll manipulation and demand action ahead of the 2024 Presidential Election
https://rumble.com/v59z2sq-citizens-declare-state-of-emergency-with-georgia-election-system-august-6-2.html
1595
Patrick
2024 Aug 8, 9:11am
Patrick
2024 Aug 8, 9:11am
https://ground.news/article/youngkin-issues-executive-order-codifying-election-security-measures_aa477d
Youngkin mandates all paper ballots for presidential elections in Virginia
1596
AD
2024 Aug 8, 11:39am
AD
2024 Aug 8, 11:39am
.
Even in 2012 the NY Times warned about fraud with mail in ballots. Now they are silent on this because paid AntiFa volunteers on behalf of Democrat party organizations like Bend the Arc and Act Blue are engaging in mail in ballot harvesting.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
By Adam Liptak
Oct. 6, 2012
https://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/07/us/politics/as-more-vote-by-mail-faulty-ballots-could-impact-elections.html
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — On the morning of the primary here in August, the local elections board met to decide which absentee ballots to count. It was not an easy job.
The board tossed out some ballots because they arrived without the signature required on the outside of the return envelope. It rejected one that said “see inside” where the signature should have been. And it debated what to do with ballots in which the signature on the envelope did not quite match the one in the county’s files.
“This ‘r’ is not like that ‘r,’ ” Judge Augustus D. Aikens Jr. said, suggesting that a ballot should be rejected.
Ion Sancho, the elections supervisor here, disagreed. “This ‘k’ is like that ‘k,’ ” he replied, and he persuaded his colleagues to count the vote.
Scenes like this will play out in many elections next month, because Florida and other states are swiftly moving from voting at a polling place toward voting by mail. In the last general election in Florida, in 2010, 23 percent of voters cast absentee ballots, up from 15 percent in the midterm election four years before. Nationwide, the use of absentee ballots and other forms of voting by mail has more than tripled since 1980 and now accounts for almost 20 percent of all votes.
Yet votes cast by mail are less likely to be counted, more likely to be compromised and more likely to be contested than those cast in a voting booth, statistics show. Election officials reject almost 2 percent of ballots cast by mail, double the rate for in-person voting.
“The more people you force to vote by mail,” Mr. Sancho said, “the more invalid ballots you will generate.”
Election experts say the challenges created by mailed ballots could well affect outcomes this fall and beyond. If the contests next month are close enough to be within what election lawyers call the margin of litigation, the grounds on which they will be fought will not be hanging chads but ballots cast away from the voting booth.
In 2008, 18 percent of the votes in the nine states likely to decide this year’s presidential election were cast by mail. That number will almost certainly rise this year, and voters in two-thirds of the states have already begun casting absentee ballots. In four Western states, voting by mail is the exclusive or dominant way to cast a ballot.
The trend will probably result in more uncounted votes, and it increases the potential for fraud. While fraud in voting by mail is far less common than innocent errors, it is vastly more prevalent than the in-person voting fraud that has attracted far more attention, election administrators say.
In Florida, absentee-ballot scandals seem to arrive like clockwork around election time. Before this year’s primary, for example, a woman in Hialeah was charged with forging an elderly voter’s signature, a felony, and possessing 31 completed absentee ballots, 29 more than allowed under a local law.
The flaws of absentee voting raise questions about the most elementary promises of democracy. “The right to have one’s vote counted is as important as the act of voting itself,” Justice Paul H. Anderson of the Minnesota Supreme Court wrote while considering disputed absentee ballots in the close 2008 Senate election between Al Franken and Norm Coleman.
Voting by mail is now common enough and problematic enough that election experts say there have been multiple elections in which no one can say with confidence which candidate was the deserved winner. The list includes the 2000 presidential election, in which problems with absentee ballots in Florida were a little-noticed footnote to other issues.
In the last presidential election, 35.5 million voters requested absentee ballots, but only 27.9 million absentee votes were counted, according to a study by Charles Stewart III, a political scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He calculated that 3.9 million ballots requested by voters never reached them; that another 2.9 million ballots received by voters did not make it back to election officials; and that election officials rejected 800,000 ballots. That suggests an overall failure rate of as much as 21 percent.
Some voters presumably decided not to vote after receiving ballots, but Mr. Stewart said many others most likely tried to vote and were thwarted. “If 20 percent, or even 10 percent, of voters who stood in line on Election Day were turned away,” he wrote in the study, published in The Journal of Legislation and Public Policy, “there would be national outrage.”
The list of very close elections includes the 2008 Senate race in Minnesota, in which Mr. Franken’s victory over Mr. Coleman, the Republican incumbent, helped give Democrats the 60 votes in the Senate needed to pass President Obama’s health care bill. Mr. Franken won by 312 votes, while state officials rejected 12,000 absentee ballots. Recent primary elections in New York involving Republican state senators who had voted to allow same-sex marriage also hinged on absentee ballots.
There are, of course, significant advantages to voting by mail. It makes life easier for the harried, the disabled and the elderly. It is cheaper to administer, makes for shorter lines on election days and allows voters more time to think about ballots that list many races. By mailing ballots, those away from home can vote. Its availability may also increase turnout in local elections, though it does not seem to have had much impact on turnout in federal ones.
Still, voting in person is more reliable, particularly since election administrators made improvements to voting equipment after the 2000 presidential election.
There have been other and more controversial changes since then, also in the name of reliability and efficiency. Lawmakers have cut back on early voting in person, cracked down on voter registration drives, imposed identification requirements, made it harder for students to cast ballots and proposed purging voter rolls in a way that critics have said would eliminate people who are eligible to vote.
But almost nothing has been done about the distinctive challenges posed by absentee ballots. To the contrary, Ohio’s Republican secretary of state recently sent absentee ballot applications to every registered voter in the state. And Republican lawmakers in Florida recently revised state law to allow ballots to be mailed wherever voters want, rather than typically to only their registered addresses.
“This is the only area in Florida where we’ve made it easier to cast a ballot,” Daniel A. Smith, a political scientist at the University of Florida, said of absentee voting.
He posited a reason that Republican officials in particular have pushed to expand absentee voting. “The conventional wisdom is that Republicans use absentee ballots and Democrats vote early,” he said.
Republicans are in fact more likely than Democrats to vote absentee. In the 2008 general election in Florida, 47 percent of absentee voters were Republicans and 36 percent were Democrats.
There is a bipartisan consensus that voting by mail, whatever its impact, is more easily abused than other forms. In a 2005 report signed by President Jimmy Carter and James A. Baker III, who served as secretary of state under the first President George Bush, the Commission on Federal Election Reform concluded, “Absentee ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud.”
On the most basic level, absentee voting replaces the oversight that exists at polling places with something akin to an honor system.
“Absentee voting is to voting in person,” Judge Richard A. Posner of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has written, “as a take-home exam is to a proctored one.”
Fraud Easier Via Mail
Election administrators have a shorthand name for a central weakness of voting by mail. They call it granny farming.
“The problem,” said Murray A. Greenberg, a former county attorney in Miami, “is really with the collection of absentee ballots at the senior citizen centers.” In Florida, people affiliated with political campaigns “help people vote absentee,” he said. “And help is in quotation marks.”
Voters in nursing homes can be subjected to subtle pressure, outright intimidation or fraud. The secrecy of their voting is easily compromised. And their ballots can be intercepted both coming and going.
The problem is not limited to the elderly, of course. Absentee ballots also make it much easier to buy and sell votes. In recent years, courts have invalidated mayoral elections in Illinois and Indiana because of fraudulent absentee ballots.
Voting by mail also played a crucial role in the 2000 presidential election in Florida, when the margin between George W. Bush and Al Gore was razor thin and hundreds of absentee ballots were counted in apparent violation of state law. The flawed ballots, from Americans living abroad, included some without postmarks, some postmarked after the election, some without witness signatures, some mailed from within the United States and some sent by people who voted twice. All would have been disqualified had the state’s election laws been strictly enforced.
In the recent primary here, almost 40 percent of ballots were not cast in the voting booth on the day of the election. They were split between early votes cast at polling places, which Mr. Sancho, the Leon County elections supervisor, favors, and absentee ballots, which make him nervous.
“There has been not one case of fraud in early voting,” Mr. Sancho said. “The only cases of election fraud have been in absentee ballots.”
Efforts to prevent fraud at polling places have an ironic consequence, Justin Levitt, a professor at Loyola Law School, told the Senate Judiciary Committee September last year. They will, he said, “drive more voters into the absentee system, where fraud and coercion have been documented to be real and legitimate concerns.”
“That is,” he said, “a law ostensibly designed to reduce the incidence of fraud is likely to increase the rate at which voters utilize a system known to succumb to fraud more frequently.”
Clarity Brings Better Results
In 2008, Minnesota officials rejected 12,000 absentee ballots, about 4 percent of all such votes, for the myriad reasons that make voting by mail far less reliable than voting in person.
The absentee ballot itself could be blamed for some of the problems. It had to be enclosed in envelopes containing various information and signatures, including one from a witness who had to attest to handling the logistics of seeing that “the voter marked the ballots in that individual’s presence without showing how they were marked.” Such witnesses must themselves be registered voters, with a few exceptions.
Absentee ballots have been rejected in Minnesota and elsewhere for countless reasons. Signatures from older people, sloppy writers or stroke victims may not match those on file. The envelopes and forms may not have been configured in the right sequence. People may have moved, and addresses may not match. Witnesses may not be registered to vote. The mail may be late.
But it is certainly possible to improve the process and reduce the error rate.
Here in Leon County, the rejection rate for absentee ballots is less than 1 percent. The instructions it provides to voters are clear, and the outer envelope is a model of graphic design, with a large signature box at its center.
The envelope requires only standard postage, and Mr. Sancho has made arrangements with the post office to pay for ballots that arrive without stamps.
Still, he would prefer that voters visit a polling place on Election Day or beforehand so that errors and misunderstandings can be corrected and the potential for fraud minimized.
“If you vote by mail, where is that coming from?” he asked. “Is there intimidation going on?”
Last November, Gov. Rick Scott, a Republican, suspended a school board member in Madison County, not far from here, after she was arrested on charges including absentee ballot fraud.
The board member, Abra Hill Johnson, won the school board race “by what appeared to be a disproportionate amount of absentee votes,” the arrest affidavit said. The vote was 675 to 647, but Ms. Johnson had 217 absentee votes to her opponent’s 86. Officials said that 80 absentee ballots had been requested at just nine addresses. Law enforcement agents interviewed 64 of the voters whose ballots were sent; only two recognized the address.
Ms. Johnson has pleaded not guilty.
Election law experts say that pulling off in-person voter fraud on a scale large enough to swing an election, with scores if not hundreds of people committing a felony in public by pretending to be someone else, is hard to imagine, to say nothing of exceptionally risky.
There are much simpler and more effective alternatives to commit fraud on such a scale, said Heather Gerken, a law professor at Yale.
“You could steal some absentee ballots or stuff a ballot box or bribe an election administrator or fiddle with an electronic voting machine,” she said. That explains, she said, “why all the evidence of stolen elections involves absentee ballots and the like.”
Amanda Cox contributed reporting from New York.
A version of this article appears in print on Oct. 7, 2012, Section A, Page 1 of the New York edition with the headline: Error and Fraud at Issue As Absentee Voting Rises.
Even in 2012 the NY Times warned about fraud with mail in ballots. Now they are silent on this because paid AntiFa volunteers on behalf of Democrat party organizations like Bend the Arc and Act Blue are engaging in mail in ballot harvesting.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
By Adam Liptak
Oct. 6, 2012
https://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/07/us/politics/as-more-vote-by-mail-faulty-ballots-could-impact-elections.html
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — On the morning of the primary here in August, the local elections board met to decide which absentee ballots to count. It was not an easy job.
The board tossed out some ballots because they arrived without the signature required on the outside of the return envelope. It rejected one that said “see inside” where the signature should have been. And it debated what to do with ballots in which the signature on the envelope did not quite match the one in the county’s files.
“This ‘r’ is not like that ‘r,’ ” Judge Augustus D. Aikens Jr. said, suggesting that a ballot should be rejected.
Ion Sancho, the elections supervisor here, disagreed. “This ‘k’ is like that ‘k,’ ” he replied, and he persuaded his colleagues to count the vote.
Scenes like this will play out in many elections next month, because Florida and other states are swiftly moving from voting at a polling place toward voting by mail. In the last general election in Florida, in 2010, 23 percent of voters cast absentee ballots, up from 15 percent in the midterm election four years before. Nationwide, the use of absentee ballots and other forms of voting by mail has more than tripled since 1980 and now accounts for almost 20 percent of all votes.
Yet votes cast by mail are less likely to be counted, more likely to be compromised and more likely to be contested than those cast in a voting booth, statistics show. Election officials reject almost 2 percent of ballots cast by mail, double the rate for in-person voting.
“The more people you force to vote by mail,” Mr. Sancho said, “the more invalid ballots you will generate.”
Election experts say the challenges created by mailed ballots could well affect outcomes this fall and beyond. If the contests next month are close enough to be within what election lawyers call the margin of litigation, the grounds on which they will be fought will not be hanging chads but ballots cast away from the voting booth.
In 2008, 18 percent of the votes in the nine states likely to decide this year’s presidential election were cast by mail. That number will almost certainly rise this year, and voters in two-thirds of the states have already begun casting absentee ballots. In four Western states, voting by mail is the exclusive or dominant way to cast a ballot.
The trend will probably result in more uncounted votes, and it increases the potential for fraud. While fraud in voting by mail is far less common than innocent errors, it is vastly more prevalent than the in-person voting fraud that has attracted far more attention, election administrators say.
In Florida, absentee-ballot scandals seem to arrive like clockwork around election time. Before this year’s primary, for example, a woman in Hialeah was charged with forging an elderly voter’s signature, a felony, and possessing 31 completed absentee ballots, 29 more than allowed under a local law.
The flaws of absentee voting raise questions about the most elementary promises of democracy. “The right to have one’s vote counted is as important as the act of voting itself,” Justice Paul H. Anderson of the Minnesota Supreme Court wrote while considering disputed absentee ballots in the close 2008 Senate election between Al Franken and Norm Coleman.
Voting by mail is now common enough and problematic enough that election experts say there have been multiple elections in which no one can say with confidence which candidate was the deserved winner. The list includes the 2000 presidential election, in which problems with absentee ballots in Florida were a little-noticed footnote to other issues.
In the last presidential election, 35.5 million voters requested absentee ballots, but only 27.9 million absentee votes were counted, according to a study by Charles Stewart III, a political scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He calculated that 3.9 million ballots requested by voters never reached them; that another 2.9 million ballots received by voters did not make it back to election officials; and that election officials rejected 800,000 ballots. That suggests an overall failure rate of as much as 21 percent.
Some voters presumably decided not to vote after receiving ballots, but Mr. Stewart said many others most likely tried to vote and were thwarted. “If 20 percent, or even 10 percent, of voters who stood in line on Election Day were turned away,” he wrote in the study, published in The Journal of Legislation and Public Policy, “there would be national outrage.”
The list of very close elections includes the 2008 Senate race in Minnesota, in which Mr. Franken’s victory over Mr. Coleman, the Republican incumbent, helped give Democrats the 60 votes in the Senate needed to pass President Obama’s health care bill. Mr. Franken won by 312 votes, while state officials rejected 12,000 absentee ballots. Recent primary elections in New York involving Republican state senators who had voted to allow same-sex marriage also hinged on absentee ballots.
There are, of course, significant advantages to voting by mail. It makes life easier for the harried, the disabled and the elderly. It is cheaper to administer, makes for shorter lines on election days and allows voters more time to think about ballots that list many races. By mailing ballots, those away from home can vote. Its availability may also increase turnout in local elections, though it does not seem to have had much impact on turnout in federal ones.
Still, voting in person is more reliable, particularly since election administrators made improvements to voting equipment after the 2000 presidential election.
There have been other and more controversial changes since then, also in the name of reliability and efficiency. Lawmakers have cut back on early voting in person, cracked down on voter registration drives, imposed identification requirements, made it harder for students to cast ballots and proposed purging voter rolls in a way that critics have said would eliminate people who are eligible to vote.
But almost nothing has been done about the distinctive challenges posed by absentee ballots. To the contrary, Ohio’s Republican secretary of state recently sent absentee ballot applications to every registered voter in the state. And Republican lawmakers in Florida recently revised state law to allow ballots to be mailed wherever voters want, rather than typically to only their registered addresses.
“This is the only area in Florida where we’ve made it easier to cast a ballot,” Daniel A. Smith, a political scientist at the University of Florida, said of absentee voting.
He posited a reason that Republican officials in particular have pushed to expand absentee voting. “The conventional wisdom is that Republicans use absentee ballots and Democrats vote early,” he said.
Republicans are in fact more likely than Democrats to vote absentee. In the 2008 general election in Florida, 47 percent of absentee voters were Republicans and 36 percent were Democrats.
There is a bipartisan consensus that voting by mail, whatever its impact, is more easily abused than other forms. In a 2005 report signed by President Jimmy Carter and James A. Baker III, who served as secretary of state under the first President George Bush, the Commission on Federal Election Reform concluded, “Absentee ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud.”
On the most basic level, absentee voting replaces the oversight that exists at polling places with something akin to an honor system.
“Absentee voting is to voting in person,” Judge Richard A. Posner of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has written, “as a take-home exam is to a proctored one.”
Fraud Easier Via Mail
Election administrators have a shorthand name for a central weakness of voting by mail. They call it granny farming.
“The problem,” said Murray A. Greenberg, a former county attorney in Miami, “is really with the collection of absentee ballots at the senior citizen centers.” In Florida, people affiliated with political campaigns “help people vote absentee,” he said. “And help is in quotation marks.”
Voters in nursing homes can be subjected to subtle pressure, outright intimidation or fraud. The secrecy of their voting is easily compromised. And their ballots can be intercepted both coming and going.
The problem is not limited to the elderly, of course. Absentee ballots also make it much easier to buy and sell votes. In recent years, courts have invalidated mayoral elections in Illinois and Indiana because of fraudulent absentee ballots.
Voting by mail also played a crucial role in the 2000 presidential election in Florida, when the margin between George W. Bush and Al Gore was razor thin and hundreds of absentee ballots were counted in apparent violation of state law. The flawed ballots, from Americans living abroad, included some without postmarks, some postmarked after the election, some without witness signatures, some mailed from within the United States and some sent by people who voted twice. All would have been disqualified had the state’s election laws been strictly enforced.
In the recent primary here, almost 40 percent of ballots were not cast in the voting booth on the day of the election. They were split between early votes cast at polling places, which Mr. Sancho, the Leon County elections supervisor, favors, and absentee ballots, which make him nervous.
“There has been not one case of fraud in early voting,” Mr. Sancho said. “The only cases of election fraud have been in absentee ballots.”
Efforts to prevent fraud at polling places have an ironic consequence, Justin Levitt, a professor at Loyola Law School, told the Senate Judiciary Committee September last year. They will, he said, “drive more voters into the absentee system, where fraud and coercion have been documented to be real and legitimate concerns.”
“That is,” he said, “a law ostensibly designed to reduce the incidence of fraud is likely to increase the rate at which voters utilize a system known to succumb to fraud more frequently.”
Clarity Brings Better Results
In 2008, Minnesota officials rejected 12,000 absentee ballots, about 4 percent of all such votes, for the myriad reasons that make voting by mail far less reliable than voting in person.
The absentee ballot itself could be blamed for some of the problems. It had to be enclosed in envelopes containing various information and signatures, including one from a witness who had to attest to handling the logistics of seeing that “the voter marked the ballots in that individual’s presence without showing how they were marked.” Such witnesses must themselves be registered voters, with a few exceptions.
Absentee ballots have been rejected in Minnesota and elsewhere for countless reasons. Signatures from older people, sloppy writers or stroke victims may not match those on file. The envelopes and forms may not have been configured in the right sequence. People may have moved, and addresses may not match. Witnesses may not be registered to vote. The mail may be late.
But it is certainly possible to improve the process and reduce the error rate.
Here in Leon County, the rejection rate for absentee ballots is less than 1 percent. The instructions it provides to voters are clear, and the outer envelope is a model of graphic design, with a large signature box at its center.
The envelope requires only standard postage, and Mr. Sancho has made arrangements with the post office to pay for ballots that arrive without stamps.
Still, he would prefer that voters visit a polling place on Election Day or beforehand so that errors and misunderstandings can be corrected and the potential for fraud minimized.
“If you vote by mail, where is that coming from?” he asked. “Is there intimidation going on?”
Last November, Gov. Rick Scott, a Republican, suspended a school board member in Madison County, not far from here, after she was arrested on charges including absentee ballot fraud.
The board member, Abra Hill Johnson, won the school board race “by what appeared to be a disproportionate amount of absentee votes,” the arrest affidavit said. The vote was 675 to 647, but Ms. Johnson had 217 absentee votes to her opponent’s 86. Officials said that 80 absentee ballots had been requested at just nine addresses. Law enforcement agents interviewed 64 of the voters whose ballots were sent; only two recognized the address.
Ms. Johnson has pleaded not guilty.
Election law experts say that pulling off in-person voter fraud on a scale large enough to swing an election, with scores if not hundreds of people committing a felony in public by pretending to be someone else, is hard to imagine, to say nothing of exceptionally risky.
There are much simpler and more effective alternatives to commit fraud on such a scale, said Heather Gerken, a law professor at Yale.
“You could steal some absentee ballots or stuff a ballot box or bribe an election administrator or fiddle with an electronic voting machine,” she said. That explains, she said, “why all the evidence of stolen elections involves absentee ballots and the like.”
Amanda Cox contributed reporting from New York.
A version of this article appears in print on Oct. 7, 2012, Section A, Page 1 of the New York edition with the headline: Error and Fraud at Issue As Absentee Voting Rises.
1598
DemocratsAreTotallyFucked
2024 Aug 10, 6:08am
DemocratsAreTotallyFucked
2024 Aug 10, 6:08am
SPECIAL REPORT: Pres. Trump’s Election Integrity Program at the RNC has:
-Engaged in about 100 lawsuits in 25 states
-Stopped 800k non-citizens from voting in New York City.
-Caught Appleton, Wisconsin not hiring Republicans as Poll Workers to assist voters in nursing homes (Special Voting Deputies) and forced them to do so by suing.
-Sued and won after catching Michigan’s Democrat Secretary giving election officials illegal instructions in secret to ignore mail ballot protections. Now MI must verify that signatures on mail ballots are accurate.
- Protected mail ballot safeguards in Pennsylvania.
- Sued the Biden-Harris admin for using tax tax dollars for partisan voter registration.
- Had 90,000 inactive voters removed from the rolls in Clark County, Nevada.
- Fought and won Georgia’s ballot application deadline, which is 11 days before the election.
-Vigorously defended Wisconsin, Michigan, Arizona, Florida, and Georgia’s election integrity laws through multiple lawsuits in each state.
-Hired election integrity staff in 18 states.
-Recruited tens of thousands of poll watchers, poll workers, and lawyers.
-Hosted numerous training sessions for poll watchers and poll workers in the swing states.
https://x.com/ElectionWiz/status/1822228907455586694
-Engaged in about 100 lawsuits in 25 states
-Stopped 800k non-citizens from voting in New York City.
-Caught Appleton, Wisconsin not hiring Republicans as Poll Workers to assist voters in nursing homes (Special Voting Deputies) and forced them to do so by suing.
-Sued and won after catching Michigan’s Democrat Secretary giving election officials illegal instructions in secret to ignore mail ballot protections. Now MI must verify that signatures on mail ballots are accurate.
- Protected mail ballot safeguards in Pennsylvania.
- Sued the Biden-Harris admin for using tax tax dollars for partisan voter registration.
- Had 90,000 inactive voters removed from the rolls in Clark County, Nevada.
- Fought and won Georgia’s ballot application deadline, which is 11 days before the election.
-Vigorously defended Wisconsin, Michigan, Arizona, Florida, and Georgia’s election integrity laws through multiple lawsuits in each state.
-Hired election integrity staff in 18 states.
-Recruited tens of thousands of poll watchers, poll workers, and lawyers.
-Hosted numerous training sessions for poll watchers and poll workers in the swing states.
https://x.com/ElectionWiz/status/1822228907455586694
1599
HeadSet
2024 Aug 10, 7:59am
HeadSet
2024 Aug 10, 7:59am
DemocratsAreTotallyFucked says
Stopping the steal is the best strategy. Trump already will win in a fair election.
Election Integrity Program
Stopping the steal is the best strategy. Trump already will win in a fair election.
1603
AmericanKulak
2024 Aug 11, 7:16pm
AmericanKulak
2024 Aug 11, 7:16pm
Folks - the Secretary of State of PA is a RINO named Al Schmidt. HE is responsible for elections.
@PAState on Twitter. He's refusing to answer ScottPressler.
Hey @Patrick, can we re-enable X embedded Tweets?
By the way, I said "Tranny" talking about "Dr" Loupis as a foreigner interfering in our elections and the page suddenly refreshed, and when I checked it had "reduced visibility". I hope when Elon moves X to TeXas, he's free of whatever CA law is forcing his hand.
@PAState on Twitter. He's refusing to answer ScottPressler.
Hey @Patrick, can we re-enable X embedded Tweets?
By the way, I said "Tranny" talking about "Dr" Loupis as a foreigner interfering in our elections and the page suddenly refreshed, and when I checked it had "reduced visibility". I hope when Elon moves X to TeXas, he's free of whatever CA law is forcing his hand.
1604
Patrick
2024 Aug 12, 11:47am
Patrick
2024 Aug 12, 11:47am
https://jameshowardkunstler.substack.com/p/the-party-line-is-a-mighty-squishy
Does anybody know what this shape-shifting chimera passed off as “our democracy” actually is? I will tell you. Like everything else in the Democratic Party’s tool-bag these days, it’s the opposite of what it appears to mean, namely: You, the demos give us, officialdom, the power to take whatever we like from you: your savings, your liberty, your stuff, your identity, and your posterity — because we are the boss-of-you, and don’t you forget it. . . and, by the way, the beatings will continue until morale improves.
It’s really that simple, though the deceptions cooked up to hide it are convoluted to the max. Like: engineering the illegal entrance to the US of millions from other lands and then using procedural hocus-pocus such as motor-voter registration and public assistance applications (free money + automatic voter registration) to stuff the election drop-boxes with the ballots of non-citizens — who, get this, don’t even have to be the ones casting those ballots, which can just be harvested, like so many oven-ready pullets, by lowly hired shills. If you catch onto the ruse, you’ll be instructed that borders are arbitrary roadblocks to social justice thrown up by the old white male patriarchy, and that these are “free and fair elections.” And if you object loudly enough, you lose your job, your livelihood, your Facebook account, and maybe get thrown into solitary confinement for a year. Our democracy.
1605
WookieMan
2024 Aug 12, 11:54am
WookieMan
2024 Aug 12, 11:54am
Nomograph says
Biden being elected was better??? What planet have you lived on the last 3.5 years? As a country and the world itself is in massively shit shape.
https://patrick.net/post/1381850/2024-08-10-election-fraud-cased-that-trump-lost
Biden being elected was better??? What planet have you lived on the last 3.5 years? As a country and the world itself is in massively shit shape.
1606
DemocratsAreTotallyFucked
2024 Aug 12, 1:35pm
DemocratsAreTotallyFucked
2024 Aug 12, 1:35pm
Nomograph says
..and Maduro just won re-election in Venezuela too.
https://patrick.net/post/1381850/2024-08-10-election-fraud-cased-that-trump-lost
..and Maduro just won re-election in Venezuela too.
1608
Patrick
2024 Aug 12, 5:52pm
Patrick
2024 Aug 12, 5:52pm
AmericanKulak says
@AmericanKulak I don't think this site ever had embedded Tweets. I'm not even sure how to do it.
I suppose it's a frame with a source from X. I'll look into it.
Hey Patrick, can we re-enable X embedded Tweets?
@AmericanKulak I don't think this site ever had embedded Tweets. I'm not even sure how to do it.
I suppose it's a frame with a source from X. I'll look into it.
1609
Patrick
2024 Aug 12, 5:58pm
Patrick
2024 Aug 12, 5:58pm
Huh, I looked at the source for an embedded Tweet with video on patriots.win, but don't see how exactly it's embedded:
The "tweet" class must have some associated magic.
The "tweet" class must have some associated magic.
1610
DemocratsAreTotallyFucked
2024 Aug 12, 6:01pm
DemocratsAreTotallyFucked
2024 Aug 12, 6:01pm
Patrick says
You might need a third-party plug-in. Sucks.
Huh, I looked at the source for an embedded Tweet with video on patriots.win, but don't see how exactly it's embedded:
The "tweet" class must have some associated magic.
You might need a third-party plug-in. Sucks.
1611
Patrick
2024 Aug 12, 6:02pm
Patrick
2024 Aug 12, 6:02pm
Huh, it's that damn "blob" thing again, something I don't really understand:
1612
Patrick
2024 Aug 12, 6:04pm
Patrick
2024 Aug 12, 6:04pm
DemocratsAreTotallyFucked says
Yes, it seems they are using some non-standard js library called Video.js:
I could probably use it, but am leery of installing anything I don't really understand.
You might need a third-party plug-in. Sucks.
Yes, it seems they are using some non-standard js library called Video.js:
data-vjs-player is a custom attribute used in Video.js, a popular open-source HTML5 video player. The data-vjs-player attribute is used to identify the HTML element that will be used to display the video player. Here is an example of how to use the data-vjs-player attribute in HTML:
In this example, the data-vjs-player attribute is added to the 'video' element with the ID 'my-video'. The 'data-setup' attribute is also used to configure the player, in this case setting the 'fluid' option to true to make the player responsive. The Video.js library will automatically detect the data-vjs-player attribute and initialize the player on the specified HTML element.
I could probably use it, but am leery of installing anything I don't really understand.
1613
DemocratsAreTotallyFucked
2024 Aug 12, 6:20pm
DemocratsAreTotallyFucked
2024 Aug 12, 6:20pm
Patrick says
Yup. Prolly will snag all the titty pics.
I could probably use it, but am leery of installing anything I don't really understand
Yup. Prolly will snag all the titty pics.
1614
stereotomy
2024 Aug 12, 6:41pm
stereotomy
2024 Aug 12, 6:41pm
Nomograph says
I would downvote @Nomograph, but it's just a curated bot. I wonder how much the original Nomograph was paid to have his PatNet UN hijacked for Globohomo purposes?
https://patrick.net/post/1381850/2024-08-10-election-fraud-cased-that-trump-lost
I would downvote @Nomograph, but it's just a curated bot. I wonder how much the original Nomograph was paid to have his PatNet UN hijacked for Globohomo purposes?
1616
DemocratsAreTotallyFucked
2024 Aug 12, 6:51pm
DemocratsAreTotallyFucked
2024 Aug 12, 6:51pm
stereotomy says
^^^ this
I would downvote Nomograph, but it's just a curated bot. I wonder how much the original Nomograph was paid to have his PatNet UN hijacked for Globohomo purposes?
^^^ this
1617
Patrick
2024 Aug 13, 1:41pm
Patrick
2024 Aug 13, 1:41pm
https://www.thegoldreport.com/news/how-a-left-wing-group-is-turning-doctors-into-activists
Approximately 50,000 physicians are now pressuring patients in Left-wing demographics to register to vote. These doctors wear badges displaying QR codes for patients to scan with their phones, which takes them to a website that registers them as voters.
1618
DemocratsAreTotallyFucked
2024 Aug 13, 3:30pm
DemocratsAreTotallyFucked
2024 Aug 13, 3:30pm
Patrick says
Useful Idiots (doctors doing this)
Approximately 50,000 physicians are now pressuring patients in Left-wing demographics to register to vote. These doctors wear badges displaying QR codes for patients to scan with their phones, which takes them to a website that registers them as voters.
Useful Idiots (doctors doing this)
1621
Patrick
2024 Aug 15, 11:29am
Patrick
2024 Aug 15, 11:29am
https://slaynews.com/news/texas-democrat-election-worker-charged-multiple-felonies-role-rigging-2022-midterms/
Texas Democrat Election Worker Charged with Multiple Felonies for Role in Rigging 2022 Midterms
An election worker in Harris County, Texas has been charged with multiple felonies for his role in a fraud scheme that resulted in paper ballot shortages in Republican precincts during the 2022 midterms.
Darryl Blackburn, a Democrat, has been charged with six felonies over his role in rigging the election. ...
There were insufficient paper ballots in many Republican precincts, the investigation found. ...
“But it is undeniable that there is a lot of evidence to show that Mr. Blackburn’s crime did impact the election.”
1622
Patrick
2024 Aug 15, 2:41pm
Patrick
2024 Aug 15, 2:41pm
https://x.com/Kahlissee/status/1823369063348781214
@Kahlissee
⚡️BREAKING: Israeli contractor claims Israel is behind rigging elections and online bot farms
Not China and not Russia
They claim Israel has rigged more than 30 elections
1623
Patrick
2024 Aug 16, 1:36pm
Patrick
2024 Aug 16, 1:36pm
https://slaynews.com/news/24-states-ag-file-emergency-stay-supreme-court-support-arizonas-proof-citizenship-voting-law/
24 State AGs File Emergency Stay with Supreme Court in Support of Arizona’s Proof of Citizenship for Voting Law
Twenty-four of the nation’s state attorneys general have filed an emergency stay with the United States Supreme Court to assert their support for Arizona’s election security law.
Nearly half of America’s state AGs have filed amicus briefs with the Supreme Court in support of Arizona’s law to require proof of U.S. citizenship to vote in federal elections.
The Republican Party of Arizona said on Thursday that it had filed the emergency application pending appeal from the U.S. Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
The emergency stay is “in support of HB 2492, our law requiring proof of citizenship to vote in presidential elections,” the state GOP revealed.
The Arizona law requires proof of citizenship for ballots even if they are filed by mail.
“The Constitution gives states the power to set voter qualifications, and AZ is leading the charge to ensure ONLY CITIZENS vote in our elections,” the Arizona GOP tweeted.
“This case has the potential to prevent non-citizen voting once and for all, which should have been the case all along.”
1624
Patrick
2024 Aug 18, 11:47am
Patrick
2024 Aug 18, 11:47am
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/politics/the-corruption-in-the-election-are-we-above-to-cross-the-rubicon/
Sunday, November 15, 2020
JON VOIGHT
The allegations of fraud are coming in from so many sources it has indeed confirmed what our computer forecast and we warned a long time ago would be the most corrupt election in American history.
Already there have been postal workers coming forward testifying that the dates were altered on postmarks. In another 234 pages of sworn affidavits, there are chilling allegations of major fraud in this election from just ONE county in Michigan alone. These allegations are being made by EYEWITNESS who saw outrageous federal crimes that violate everyone’s civil rights in this country.
There were batches of ballots where 60% of them had the SAME signature. Other EYEWITNESS saw a batch of ballots scanned 5 times. Still, other EYEWITNESS came forward who saw 35 ballots counted that was NOT connected to a voter record. Then there were poll workers marking ballots with NO mark for candidates and another came forward to say their deceased son was recorded as voting TWICE. There are other witnesses coming forward stating that provisional ballots were placed in the tabulation box.
Then there is a question about the software that caused an error in Antrim County which was used in Wayne County. Republican challengers were not readmitted but Democrats were admitted. Republican challengers were physically pushed from counting tables by officials. Democrats gave out a packet: “Tactics to Distract Republican Challengers”
Unfortunately, this is not a normal election where simply a Democrat or Republican is elected who you did not vote for. In the past, it was really no big deal. This time, everything is different. They really intend to change the very foundation of America and the left never respects freedom for they will not tolerate opposition.
The nation is divided as deeply as it was for the Civil War. If the courts overturn this mess, the Democrats will claim Trump stole the election. They will do everything in their power to overthrow him if not have him assassinated. This is the battle for the very soul of America. It will be not much different from when Caesar crossed the Rubicon and the corrupt senate fled because the people would not support them.
1628
AD
2024 Aug 19, 8:15am
AD
2024 Aug 19, 8:15am
.
This was all by design when Bill Clinton signed the Motor Voter Law in the early 1990s while Professors Cloward and Piven (of Cloward Piven Strategy) were standing behind him during the public signing.
********************************
https://www.yahoo.com/news/republicans-ask-supreme-court-block-100050322.html
The Republican National Committee is urging the Supreme Court to intervene in an Arizona election dispute this week and block up to 40,000 of the state's registered voters from casting ballots in the presidential race.
Republican state lawmakers say these voters did not provide proof of their citizenship when they were registered and now they should be barred from voting in person or by mail.
Although Congress made it easier for Americans to register to vote, those federal rules cannot override "the Arizona Legislature’s sovereign authority to determine the qualifications of voters and structure participation in its elections," they said in an emergency appeal filed Aug. 9.
This was all by design when Bill Clinton signed the Motor Voter Law in the early 1990s while Professors Cloward and Piven (of Cloward Piven Strategy) were standing behind him during the public signing.
********************************
https://www.yahoo.com/news/republicans-ask-supreme-court-block-100050322.html
The Republican National Committee is urging the Supreme Court to intervene in an Arizona election dispute this week and block up to 40,000 of the state's registered voters from casting ballots in the presidential race.
Republican state lawmakers say these voters did not provide proof of their citizenship when they were registered and now they should be barred from voting in person or by mail.
Although Congress made it easier for Americans to register to vote, those federal rules cannot override "the Arizona Legislature’s sovereign authority to determine the qualifications of voters and structure participation in its elections," they said in an emergency appeal filed Aug. 9.
1629
Patrick
2024 Aug 19, 12:26pm
Patrick
2024 Aug 19, 12:26pm
https://barsoom.substack.com/p/what-happens-when-the-regime-steals
What Happens When the Regime Steals the 2024 Election?
Does anyone have a good answer to this?
Note that I did not say ‘if’ the regime steals the election.
So far the 2024 election is proceeding according to the same playbook as 2020. Trump is touring the country, holding massive rallies that generate vast enthusiasm. He puts his foot in his mouth as often as he strikes rhetorical gold, making his online supporters oscillate wildly along the familiar it’s so over/we’re so back pendulum, alternately convinced that victory is inevitable and that their leader is determined to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory by, for instance, declaring that he wants lots of immigration because AI is coming (no, that didn’t make sense to me, either). None of this matters to the base, who continue to turn out in their tens of thousands, regardless of what the big man says or doesn’t say. It’s all vibes.
Meanwhile, Kamala hides from the public, refuses interviews, avoids any unscripted interactions, and doesn’t attend rallies. She’s an idiot, of course – a mentally deficient, vindictive, charmless, alcoholic dollar-store prostitute. Every time she opens her mouth in public the word salad that cackles out elicits incredulous mockery from everyone who bothers to pay attention, just as she always has. She can’t even run on her record – the border broke on her watch, and so did the economy, with her campaign insisting, remarkably, that inflation is fine but also, supermarkets need price controls to prevent gouging. In recognition of this, her team plays hide-the-candidate, a game the regime’s fluffers in the legacy propaganda outlets are only too happy to assist with.
This is precisely the strategy adopted by Joe Biden in the 2020 campaign, which he conducted entirely from the comfort of his basement. Biden was obviously senile. Everyone could see it. His running mate was as unlikable then as she is now. So they both stayed out of view, let the press do his talking for them, while Trump ran around the country holding massive, enthusiastic rallies.
It was obvious to everyone that Trump would win, easily, in a landslide.
And he did win.
Except where it mattered.
Everyone saw what happened on election night. They stopped the count in swing counties in which it looked like Trump would win. When the country went to bed, Trump was comfortably in the lead. When they woke up, the Democrats had magically found boxes of ballots with Biden’s name on them. In some places Democrat-controlled vote-counting centres covered the windows to prevent an angry public from seeing what was happening within. Elsewhere the count lingered on for a week, weeks even, so that the Democrats could count up the number of Trump votes and introduce a sufficient quantity of Biden votes. Then of course there were all the questions about electronic voting integrity, with revelations that the machines were not airgapped, but were in fact unsecurely connected to the Internet.
When it was all said and done, Trump exceeded his performance in 2016, but Biden obtained more votes than any presidential candidate in history.
Despite never leaving his basement. ...
Of course the propagandists gaslit everyone – election fraud was a conspiracy theory, it was the most secure election in history, and so on and so forth. That this was the precise opposite of what they’d been saying for the previous four years – that Russia had hacked Our Democracy – was neither here nor there. Later Time Magazine bragged that they had ‘fortified’ the election, which everyone understood to as an admission that they’d stolen it.
Election fraud in America utilizes a variety of tactics: ballot stuffing, ballot harvesting from senile seniors, registering illegal immigrants and other non-citizens to vote (which, as everyone knows, is why the regime is so hostile to voting ID laws), electronically forged ballots, and forged mail-in ballots. Definitive evidence of any one form of electoral fraud is extremely difficult to obtain, requiring painstaking forensic work. Even when such evidence is found, it will only pertain to one form of fraud, in one or a few locations. This enables regime respecters to claim that fraud is rare, and does not occur on a large enough scale to swing elections. Somehow they never say that any cheating at all is unacceptable. Funny that.
Not everyone fell for the fraud, of course. Outraged rallies began to spontaneously rise up across the country, ultimately converging on DC for the doomed J6 ‘insurrection’.
It didn’t matter.
The propagandists called Trump’s supporters terrorists. Those who entered the Capitol were arrested, imprisoned, subjected to various forms of psychological torture.
The regime stole the election in broad daylight, grinned with its hands in the cookie jar, looked the country right in the eyes with crumbs dribbling down its wobbling chins, grinned “What cookie?”, and dared anyone to call it on their blatant lies.
The regime got away with it.
It is obvious that they are doing the same thing again. It worked the first time, so why would they not? The Biden administration proved that you don’t need a charismatic candidate, or even a minimally competent one. All you need is a warm body that can be wheeled in front of the cameras every now and then. The compliance of the propaganda organs renders any embarrassing behaviour from the warm body wholly irrelevant. Enough of the population is so thoroughly brainwashed, so completely incapable of evaluating reality, so utterly prostrated before propaganda, that they will believe whatever they are told to believe and they will do so with the whole of their hollowed-out hearts. Not everyone, to be sure ... but enough. Particularly as those most completely captured are the Single Woke Females, the professional-managerial class aparat-chicks that infest the institutions.
In the confusing months between November 2020 and J6, there was rampant speculation Trump would take some sort of bold action – a military coup d’etat, or even a Civil War. There’s no question that if he’d given the word his supporters would have turned out in their millions. Everyone sensed that it was go time, and they were ready to go. In the end, after some half-hearted lawsuits and a few rallies, the big man lost his nerve. Go home, he told his supporters. Go in peace. It’s over.
He may well have been right to do so. The Biden presidency was disastrous for America. The economy has fallen apart; inflation has wiped people out; the leaking border has shattered, letting in tens of millions, many criminals, many very possibly much worse than criminals; America has found itself embroiled in wars all over the world, which threaten to turn nuclear. The last four years have been an almost unprecedented national humiliation. Biden is, without a shadow of a doubt, the worst president America has ever had. ...
As horrible as the last four years have been for America, they were nowhere near as bad as a Civil War would have been.
Maybe Trump understood this. Maybe it wasn’t cowardice on his part, but prudence – he did not want to be the one to unlock the hellgate in the District of Columbia, and unleash the legions of the damned on the continent.
So what happens in November, when the Democrats steal the election in broad daylight once again, and their cackling idiot Kali assumes the Oval Office.
The most likely answer is: nothing. ...
So when the deep state steals the election for its papier-mâché candidate, Trump will probably do what Trump did the last time: put on a good show, make lots of noise, and then swallow his losses and his boundless pride and go back to Mar-A-Lago ... while those of his supporters who are too hot-headed to take the hint, take the hit.
What happens next is hard to say. Again, probably just a continuation, and an acceleration, of the same decay into impoverished single-party totalitarianism that America has already been experiencing.
Maybe the first amendment will finally be destroyed via explicit implementation of hate speech and counter-disinformation laws. But maybe that won’t be necessary, and instead an end-run around the first amendment will be found: some sort treaty with the EU, for example, which forces American social media platforms to abide by European regulations.
Maybe they’ll finally come for everyone’s guns. Oh, sure, that will start the Civil War, you say. Cops going door to door confiscating people’s black rifles will find themselves full of holes. Only that isn’t how it will happen. People will simply be ordered to turn their weapons in; those who do not comply will find their bank accounts frozen. It is very difficult to shoot a frozen bank account. Will people be angry? Sure. Angry enough to start shooting? Who will they shoot? The ATM? The people responsible are inaccessibly distant.
Maybe they’ll naturalize all of the illegals who have flooded in, expanding Democrat voter rolls by tens of millions overnight. They can even have honest elections after that, because the demographic changes will mean that no Republican will ever win an election again ... certainly no anti-immigration Republican. ...
‘Voting harder’ doesn’t seem like it will do anything. It doesn’t matter how aggressively you get out the vote if the other side just fakes as many additional votes as they need to cancel out your lead. I should think this is obvious.
Some have suggested election surveillance. This would require a huge, coordinated open source intelligence effort in every key district in every swing state, with citizens shining a bright light on every single ballot that gets counted. This should absolutely be done, but I’m skeptical that this will be very effective in practice. In many cases citizens won’t be allowed in to observe as their votes are counted; forcing their way in on election night would disrupt the count, and probably get citizen observers arrested for election interference. Monitoring electronic voting is extremely difficult, as the systems are all proprietary. Keeping track of mail-in ballots is similarly hopeless. And of course, whatever evidence of fraud is detected, no matter how blatant, the propagandists will simply lie about it, right to the country’s face ... and their demoralized base will be only too happy to believe them.
What about secession? Perhaps in the aftermath of an obviously fraudulent election, a coalition of red state governors, with Florida and Texas in the lead, might have the backbone to declare the obvious, that the ‘elected’ president is a pretender, and leave the Union. We had a preview of how rapidly this might spread last January, when Texas’ dispute with the Feds over the border rapidly led to a large number of states declaring for Texas. ...
I do not wish to blackpill. There is much about this election that is more favourable than in 2020. In 2020, Twitter was in the hands of the enemy, which enabled them to shadowban Trump’s supporters, and to suppress the news of the Hunter Biden laptop scandal; had that news been allowed to spread beyond the narrow circle of the Very Online, it might have changed enough votes to complicate the regime’s vote fraud. In 2024, X belongs to Musk, who has purged the state’s agents, taken the leash off of the right, and has recently come out for Trump, inviting him back to the platform and hosting a conversation with him that broke every record, racking up over a billion views. Indeed, it looks as though the tech elite – or at least a considerable part of it, for Google is certainly still wholly owned by the regime – has thrown its weight behind Trump. They certainly do so for their own ambitions, not out of any sense of patriotism, but this split in the elite is to the regime’s detriment, and our advantage.
The well-wishes of billionaires and a levelled playing field on social media won’t count for anything, however, if the regime simply steals the vote again. It won’t matter if Musk himself points out the obvious fraud, as he surely will; Musk is a fascist or something, remember, and you shouldn’t believe anything that racist incel says. It won’t matter how many people see right through it if they aren’t willing to do something about it in the real world. And if their leader tells them not to do anything, they almost certainly won’t. Not in enough numbers to matter.
So we come back to the question.
When the regime steals the election, what happens then?
Does anyone have a plan for this?
1630
Patrick
2024 Aug 19, 12:42pm
Patrick
2024 Aug 19, 12:42pm
My response:
https://barsoom.substack.com/p/what-happens-when-the-regime-steals/comment/66016713
The solution is as simple to state as it is difficult to implement:
A missionary movement to convert the TV-addled Left to Team Reality, a movement which clearly understands and addresses the REAL reasons they want to fall for the bullshit.
It's not pretty. The frothing epileptic-level hatred of Trump by the blue-haired nose ring feminist crowd has nothing to do with Trump's record, which is excellent, and everything to with their anger that feminism has essentially eliminated their prospects for a happy marriage and children while leaving dominant daddy-figure men like Trump with their pick among supermodels.
And that's just one tentacle of the psychological roots of the Left's willingness, even eagerness, to undermine elections, free speech, and 2A.
If the right nerves can be hit and a plausible plan presented to take away their pain, they will become loyal allies of Team Reality, and will dedicate themselves to converting others in a chain reaction.
https://barsoom.substack.com/p/what-happens-when-the-regime-steals/comment/66016713
The solution is as simple to state as it is difficult to implement:
A missionary movement to convert the TV-addled Left to Team Reality, a movement which clearly understands and addresses the REAL reasons they want to fall for the bullshit.
It's not pretty. The frothing epileptic-level hatred of Trump by the blue-haired nose ring feminist crowd has nothing to do with Trump's record, which is excellent, and everything to with their anger that feminism has essentially eliminated their prospects for a happy marriage and children while leaving dominant daddy-figure men like Trump with their pick among supermodels.
And that's just one tentacle of the psychological roots of the Left's willingness, even eagerness, to undermine elections, free speech, and 2A.
If the right nerves can be hit and a plausible plan presented to take away their pain, they will become loyal allies of Team Reality, and will dedicate themselves to converting others in a chain reaction.
« First « Previous Comments 1,591 - 1,630 of 1,702 Next » Last » Search these comments
Trump continues to insist there was mass fraud, but all media simply dismisses his claim as "false" without any reasoning or evidence.
I'm pretty damn sure Biden's election was fraudulent.
Update: after 2000 Mules presented the evidence, I'm 100% sure that Biden's election was fraudulent. See https://2000mules.com/