patrick.net

UkraineIsFucked says

Patrick says

Not if they steal.it.

Yeah, they're going to steal it, again.

WisOpinion.com.

On Friday, Green Bay Election Observer Janet Angus won an important battle in the fight for transparent elections. A Brown County Circuit Court Judge ruled in Angus’ favor over the City of Green Bay, who had retaliated against her. This case stems from Green Bay City Clerk Celestine Jeffreys accepting multiple absentee ballots on election day in Spring 2022. Janet Angus bravely challenged this illegal acceptance, was rebuffed by the City Clerk, and then had the City of Green Bay try to intimidate her. Janet Angus’ court victory on Friday is a significant win for election integrity.

Wisconsin law (Wis. Stat. 7.41(1)) states that election observers have a right to “be present at any polling place, in the office of any municipal clerk whose office is located in a public building on any day that absentee ballots may be cast in that office.” Yet when Janet Angus followed this law in the April 2022 Spring Election, she was charged with disorderly conduct for pointing out that Clerk Jeffreys was not following Wisconsin law in accepting multiple absentee ballots from voters. Angus was not engaging in any disruptive behavior, interfering with voting, or intimidating anyone. When she saw wrongdoing, she went to the City Clerk, which is what you are supposed to do. Angus did this in a conversational tone of voice, keeping her voice down so as not to cause a disturbance. She asked if the Clerk had accepted 2 ballots and the Clerk admitted she had. Janet Angus then objected and challenged the Clerk for taking the two ballots in violation of Wisconsin law (Wis. Stat. 6.87 (4)(b)(1) says the absentee envelope is to be delivered in person to the municipal clerk). Janet Angus also filed a complaint with the Wisconsin Elections Commission for Clerk Jeffries breaking the law.

About 3 months later, the City of Green Bay charged Janet Angus with municipal disorderly conduct. Rather than address the issue the day the supposed incident occurred, the court transcript reveals that this investigation began weeks later after a city official reached out to the police department.

https://www.wispolitics.com/2024/matt-batzel-big-win-for-election-integrity-in-green-bay/

Patrick says

There are no fake ballots when they rig the elections.

They are real, printed ballots. Adding a watermark on them won't do shit.

You are forgetting the #1 force behind the fraud, which for some reason most do not want to discuss, is niggers. When was the last time you found a nigger that could comprehend a watermark or how it works. I am not ignorant of their coaches, but... despite the best efforts this will be a smoking gun because... well, you know.

UkraineIsFucked says

They are real, printed ballots. Adding a watermark on them won't do shit.

Correct, especially when the tallies are changed by Dominion anyway. If they wanted to take the fraud out, they would do what virtually every other Western country does and have voter ID with paper ballots counted at each polling station under supervision of competing parties.

https://slaynews.com/news/oregon-supreme-court-bans-10-gop-state-senators-seeking-re-election/

Oregon Supreme Court Bans 10 GOP State Senators from Seeking Re-Election

The Supreme Court of Oregon has banned ten Republican state senators from seeking re-election.

Fox News reports that the court’s members blocked the GOP lawmakers by accusing them of violating state rules.

It is, perhaps, not irrelevant that the court is dominated by leftist judges.

Banning the opposition party is also a form of election fraud.

original link

https://babylonbee.com/cleanArticle/study-finds-people-who-screamed-about-russia-for-last-4-years-have-100-chance-of-now-believing-elections-are-foolproof

https://babylonbee.com/cleanArticle/study-finds-people-who-screamed-about-russia-for-last-4-years-have-100-chance-of-now-believing-elections-are-foolproof

https://www.theblaze.com/columns/opinion/trump-likely-won-the-2020-election-after-all

In 2020, Biden won each of the six swing states by fewer than 20,000 votes, a tiny margin in the context of the overall vote.

But here’s the rub: When we extrapolated for mail-in voter fraud in the six crucial swing states, using state-specific mail-in voter data and accounting for a variety of fraud rates (from the 28% level all the way down to the 1% level), the Electoral College vote changed considerably.

In almost all the hypothetical scenarios we lay out, Trump would have won enough Electoral College votes to defeat Biden soundly. In other words, Biden’s Electoral College victory, although seemingly large, was predicated on razor-thin margins in all six of the swing states.

We know for a fact that each of the six swing states changed its election rules in the months leading up to the 2020 election to allow for mass mail-in voting based on inaccurate state voter registration rolls. We also know that several of these states made it easy for mail-in voting fraud to be committed by eliminating common-sense guardrails like signature verification and permitting shady election practices to take place like ballot harvesting.

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/going-blank-saturday-february-10

🔥 The Orlando Sentinel ran an uplifting election-law story yesterday headlined, “Federal judge grudgingly rules for DeSantis in elections law challenge.” Grudgingly is one way of putting it.

In 2021, Florida passed a package of election-law reforms designed to prevent cheating. After a legal challenge in 2022, a federal Judge (an Obama appointee) ruled large parts of the new laws were unconstitutional because, to him, they were obviously targeting black folks, because the entire Florida Legislature and Governor DeSantis are obviously racists.

In 2023, a three-judge panel on the 11th Circuit overturned part of Judge Walker’s decision, but allowed other parts to stand, barring elections reforms that to you and me look like commonsense proposals completely unrelated to anybody’s race, but to race-experts are clearly, without a doubt, 100%, invidious racism masquerading as election security reforms.

So then Governor DeSantis appealed the panel’s ruling to the entire 12-judge 11th Circuit. And the whole 11th said, wait a minute, this isn’t right, and sent the case back to the start, to Judge Walker, to certify whether the suing plaintiffs had met a key evidentiary test required to invalidate any law for racism: whether plaintiffs provided real evidence in the record that the law in fact “unduly burdened” their First Amendment and equal-protection rights.

Whoops. Judge Walker was forced to admit that, no, there was no evidence the laws in fact burdened the plaintiffs. So he closed the case, leaving the original law in place. But he was not very happy about it, and grabbed the last word, criticizing his judicial bosses on the 11th Circuit on the way out, who apparently are also racists. I’m not saying Judge Walker sees racists everywhere he looks or anything (he’s a very smart judge), but in this case, well, decide for yourself:

“As this court previously found after a lengthy, two-week bench trial, the state of Florida has, with surgical precision, repeatedly changed Florida’s election code to target whichever modality of voting Florida’s Black voters were using at the time,” Walker wrote. “That was not this court’s opinion — it is a fact established by the record in these cases. Even so, following the state of Florida’s appeal, this persistent and pernicious practice of targeting the modalities of voting most used by Florida’s Black voters has apparently received the stamp of approval in this (11th) Circuit.”
In case you were wondering, by “modalities of voting most used by Florida’s Black voters” I think Judge Walker means voting without showing a driver’s license and using mail-in voting options.

There you go. According to Judge Walker, we are going backwards. Racism now has the official stamp of approval by the 11th Circuit Court of appeals. Cue a federal investigation by the Justice Department. But in the meantime, the package of election security laws is no longer enjoined and is fully in place, right in time for the 2024 election season.

Progress!

https://twitter.com/atensnut/status/1756706512540499971

Lol, https://gab.ai/ is based:

I just found out about first hand evidence of dead people voting. My wife's Grandma died in early 2020 and one of my wife's Aunt's just admitted that she sent in the ballot for her dead Mother and voted for Biden. From what I heard, they are still receiving ballots in the mail under dead Grandma's name.

Anybody know a legitimate source where I can file an official report with names, dated and everything? Asking for a friend.

Also...

Wife renewed her DL back in January. She changed her party affiliation from Independent to Republican and all of a sudden... Everyone else in our household received their mail in ballots for the upcoming elections, except for her. It's been more than 4 weeks since she renewed her DL and now they say they are investigating because they did mail it out.

https://notthebee.com/article/meta-40000

Meta has HOW MANY people working on "election integrity" ahead of the 2024 election?

Reporter: How many people do you have working on this (election integrity) issue and how do you know what's enough?

Clegg: So, we have around 40,000 people working around safety and integrity on our platforms.

[WHISPERS ON HOT MIC]: 40,000?? But they only have 67,000 employees…

Clegg: Generally we spend a lot of money on it. We spent about $20 billion US Dollars in recent years on things like election integrity, about $5 billion in the last year alone...

That's censorship those 40,000 people are working on, preventing ordinary people like you from even mentioning the mass fraud via mail-in ballots. Facebook enables election fraud.

https://sashastone.substack.com/p/this-is-what-totalitarianism-looks

But now, thanks to Benz, I know they were mapping all social circles online. That’s how they were able to censor Trump supporters. This was especially chilling regarding their campaign for mail-in ballots, which they’d planned long in advance. ...

That’s why it was such a relief to hear Mike Benz finally validate what so many of us have known since 2020. Yes, they rigged the election. Yes, they knew Biden would win in advance. Yes, they censored speech via social media with the sole purpose of pushing the mail-in ballot scheme on their obedient flock. They censored and silenced Trump supporters — American citizens — all to install Joe Biden and remove Trump. ...

Probably, they figured they could dispense with Trump easily enough. They hired foreign intelligence agencies to spy on him. The FBI sent dozens of informants to embed themselves in the Trump administration. But everything they tried kept blowing up in their face, Keystone Cop style.

I noticed this as well in California.

My voting station is 1500 feet from where I live, on the other side of the street.

Last "election," I had to sign, but I don't think they checked my signature. I had my registration card FWIW.

We'll see where I have to vote this year.. .

Sounds like Belarus is doing exactly what is happening here in the States.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/the-us-state-department-has-issued-a-statement-declaring-that-the-recent-elections-were-conducted-under-a-climate-of-fear-suggesting-they-were-not-legitimate/ar-BB1iWhFi?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=bdc1166a00be4001a24236fb3576163a&ei=49

Send this one to a TDS libtard:

https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2024/02/27/tucker-carlson-the-2020-election-was-100-stolen-from-president-trump-n4926819

Tucker Carlson: The 2020 Election Was ‘100 Percent Stolen’ From President Trump

In an interview with Russian-American computer scientist and podcaster Lex Fridman, Tucker Carlson declared that the 2020 presidential election was "100% stolen" and explained why.

"You said to some degree the election was rigged," Fridman began. "Was it stolen?"

"It was 100% stolen," Carlson replied. "Are you joking?"

"Like, it was rigged to that large—"

“They completely change the way people vote right before the election on the basis of COVID—which had nothing to do with—"

"So, in that way, it was rigged?" Fridman asked.

Carlson replied: One hundred percent. And then you censor the information people are allowed to get.