« First « Previous Comments 1,302 - 1,341 of 2,070 Next » Last » Search these comments
In 2020, Biden won each of the six swing states by fewer than 20,000 votes, a tiny margin in the context of the overall vote.
But here’s the rub: When we extrapolated for mail-in voter fraud in the six crucial swing states, using state-specific mail-in voter data and accounting for a variety of fraud rates (from the 28% level all the way down to the 1% level), the Electoral College vote changed considerably.
In almost all the hypothetical scenarios we lay out, Trump would have won enough Electoral College votes to defeat Biden soundly. In other words, Biden’s Electoral College victory, although seemingly large, was predicated on razor-thin margins in all six of the swing states.
We know for a fact that each of the six swing states changed its election rules in the months leading up to the 2020 election to allow for mass mail-in voting based on inaccurate state voter registration rolls. We also know that several of these states made it easy for mail-in voting fraud to be committed by eliminating common-sense guardrails like signature verification and permitting shady election practices to take place like ballot harvesting.
🔥 The Orlando Sentinel ran an uplifting election-law story yesterday headlined, “Federal judge grudgingly rules for DeSantis in elections law challenge.” Grudgingly is one way of putting it.
In 2021, Florida passed a package of election-law reforms designed to prevent cheating. After a legal challenge in 2022, a federal Judge (an Obama appointee) ruled large parts of the new laws were unconstitutional because, to him, they were obviously targeting black folks, because the entire Florida Legislature and Governor DeSantis are obviously racists.
In 2023, a three-judge panel on the 11th Circuit overturned part of Judge Walker’s decision, but allowed other parts to stand, barring elections reforms that to you and me look like commonsense proposals completely unrelated to anybody’s race, but to race-experts are clearly, without a doubt, 100%, invidious racism masquerading as election security reforms.
So then Governor DeSantis appealed the panel’s ruling to the entire 12-judge 11th Circuit. And the whole 11th said, wait a minute, this isn’t right, and sent the case back to the start, to Judge Walker, to certify whether the suing plaintiffs had met a key evidentiary test required to invalidate any law for racism: whether plaintiffs provided real evidence in the record that the law in fact “unduly burdened” their First Amendment and equal-protection rights.
Whoops. Judge Walker was forced to admit that, no, there was no evidence the laws in fact burdened the plaintiffs. So he closed the case, leaving the original law in place. But he was not very happy about it, and grabbed the last word, criticizing his judicial bosses on the 11th Circuit on the way out, who apparently are also racists. I’m not saying Judge Walker sees racists everywhere he looks or anything (he’s a very smart judge), but in this case, well, decide for yourself:
“As this court previously found after a lengthy, two-week bench trial, the state of Florida has, with surgical precision, repeatedly changed Florida’s election code to target whichever modality of voting Florida’s Black voters were using at the time,” Walker wrote. “That was not this court’s opinion — it is a fact established by the record in these cases. Even so, following the state of Florida’s appeal, this persistent and pernicious practice of targeting the modalities of voting most used by Florida’s Black voters has apparently received the stamp of approval in this (11th) Circuit.”
In case you were wondering, by “modalities of voting most used by Florida’s Black voters” I think Judge Walker means voting without showing a driver’s license and using mail-in voting options.
There you go. According to Judge Walker, we are going backwards. Racism now has the official stamp of approval by the 11th Circuit Court of appeals. Cue a federal investigation by the Justice Department. But in the meantime, the package of election security laws is no longer enjoined and is fully in place, right in time for the 2024 election season.
Progress!
Meta has HOW MANY people working on "election integrity" ahead of the 2024 election?
Reporter: How many people do you have working on this (election integrity) issue and how do you know what's enough?
Clegg: So, we have around 40,000 people working around safety and integrity on our platforms.
[WHISPERS ON HOT MIC]: 40,000?? But they only have 67,000 employees…
Clegg: Generally we spend a lot of money on it. We spent about $20 billion US Dollars in recent years on things like election integrity, about $5 billion in the last year alone...
But now, thanks to Benz, I know they were mapping all social circles online. That’s how they were able to censor Trump supporters. This was especially chilling regarding their campaign for mail-in ballots, which they’d planned long in advance. ...
That’s why it was such a relief to hear Mike Benz finally validate what so many of us have known since 2020. Yes, they rigged the election. Yes, they knew Biden would win in advance. Yes, they censored speech via social media with the sole purpose of pushing the mail-in ballot scheme on their obedient flock. They censored and silenced Trump supporters — American citizens — all to install Joe Biden and remove Trump. ...
Probably, they figured they could dispense with Trump easily enough. They hired foreign intelligence agencies to spy on him. The FBI sent dozens of informants to embed themselves in the Trump administration. But everything they tried kept blowing up in their face, Keystone Cop style.
Tucker Carlson: The 2020 Election Was ‘100 Percent Stolen’ From President Trump
In an interview with Russian-American computer scientist and podcaster Lex Fridman, Tucker Carlson declared that the 2020 presidential election was "100% stolen" and explained why.
"You said to some degree the election was rigged," Fridman began. "Was it stolen?"
"It was 100% stolen," Carlson replied. "Are you joking?"
"Like, it was rigged to that large—"
“They completely change the way people vote right before the election on the basis of COVID—which had nothing to do with—"
"So, in that way, it was rigged?" Fridman asked.
Carlson replied: One hundred percent. And then you censor the information people are allowed to get.
Fox News ran a story this morning headlined, “Court strikes down early voting law in Biden’s home state: 'A little bit of irony.’” Yesterday, Delaware Superior Court Judge Mark Conner issued a 25-page opinion striking down a law allowing early voting and unlimited mail-in voting, because those things were barred by the plain language of the state’s constitution.
The relevant part of Delaware’s constitution provides that a "general election shall be held biennially on the Tuesday next after the first Monday in the month of November." That’s it. Pretty simple. But Democrats tried arguing that what the constitution’s language really means is that elections must be finished by the first Monday in November.
Judge Conner rejected the democrats’ creative argument. So.
Trump has been declared winner of the Missouri Caucuses.
However, this doesn’t feel like news, as we all know Trump is going to win the Primary. The election doesn’t depend on the vote, it depends on election interference and fraud.
Will they remove Trump from the ballot? Will they release another pathogen to implement mass mail-in voting, harvest ballots, and dump them at swing states at 3:00AM after they stopped counting?
Will they censor accurate information about the Bidens in the week leading up to the election?
If the American public are properly informed, the Deep State are unsuccessful in removing Trump from the ballot, and there is no mass mail-in ballots for them to harvest, Trump will win in a landslide.
This is not “democracy”. It’s war.
How are they gonna do election fraud if Nobody participates in the mail-in voting???
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/nearly-90-of-california-voters-haven-t-returned-ballots-yet-how-will-that-affect-races/ar-BB1jeBPc?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=531ab957b20045f98318522285e47609&ei=14
Of course, that is not the main thing to worry about with what altogether amounts to millions of border-jumpers flooding our land. The main reason to worry is what the blob that invited them here intends for them to do, which, you may suspect, is to unleash mayhem in the streets, malls, stadiums, and upon our infrastructure just in time to derail the election — perhaps even to make war on us right in our homeland. The US government is paying for this whole operation, you understand, funneling our tax money to international cut-out orgs who set up the transfer camps in Panama, and buy the plane tickets for the mutts to cross the ocean, and coordinate with the Mexican cartels to shuttle this horde of mystery people among us to work their juju for the Democratic Party. The pissed-off-ness of the public has passed the red line on this.
Nope, in California of all places, they're only getting a 10% audience participation rate for mail-in ballots. Everyone is headed for the polls on election day.
Seems everyone is tired of the Commie Crap.
The pissed-off-ness of the public has passed the red line on this.
« First « Previous Comments 1,302 - 1,341 of 2,070 Next » Last » Search these comments
Trump continues to insist there was mass fraud, but all media simply dismisses his claim as "false" without any reasoning or evidence.
I'm pretty damn sure Biden's election was fraudulent.
Update: after 2000 Mules presented the evidence, I'm 100% sure that Biden's election was fraudulent. See https://2000mules.com/