patrick.net

The utterly corrupted AMA has issued a no-nonsense proclamation affirming their corruption:

“Use of ivermectin for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 has been demonstrated to be harmful to patients. Calls to poison control centers due to ivermectin ingestion have increased five-fold from their pre-pandemic baseline. A recent CDC Health Alert Network Advisory (PDF) recommends that health care professionals should counsel patients against use of ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19, including emphasizing the potentially toxic effects of this drug, including “nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. Overdoses are associated with hypotension and neurologic effects such as decreased consciousness, confusion, hallucinations, seizures, coma, and death.”

Luckily the pompous old wind-bags at the AMA only represent roughly 30% of American Doctors.

The AMA is now contradicting the American Journal of Therapeutics:

https://patrick.net/post/1340797/2021-08-23-american-journal-of-therapeutics-recommends-ivermectin

Karloff says

"Water? You mean that liquid that fish use to crap in?"

It's all about framing.

A concept from https://heartiste.org/

That guy needs to get the Nobel Prize for his excellent and accurate explanations.

For the FLCCC I-Mask+ protocol, you can find the PDF on their web page:

https://covid19criticalcare.com/covid-19-protocols/

https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/FLCCC-Protocols-%E2%80%93-A-Guide-to-the-Management-of-COVID-19.pdf

Robert Sproul says

Calls to poison control centers due to ivermectin ingestion have increased five-fold from their pre-pandemic baseline.

So, increased from "one" to "five" calls?

Robert Sproul says

“nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. Overdoses are associated with hypotension and neurologic effects such as decreased consciousness, confusion, hallucinations, seizures, coma, and death.”

Sounds like the same effects as drinking too much scotch.

Karloff says

Robert Sproul says

Calls to poison control centers due to ivermectin ingestion have increased five-fold from their pre-pandemic baseline.

So, increased from "one" to "five" calls?

My thought exactly lol. If they wouldn't ban the human version, people wouldn't risk overdosing on the animal form.

https://shop.coolhorse.com/store/product/DURAMECTIN

This link still works as a source of ivermectin. Most others are toast now. Get it while you can!

Dr. Brian Tyson, MD 🇺🇸
@btysonmd
12h
I cannot believe I have to say this:

“If you do not want early treatment for COVID-19, do not ask for it. However, do not prevent others from getting it just because you don’t agree.”

Its not about politics or vaccines. Its about treating sick people!! Let us treat the sick.
6:31 PM · Sep 3, 2021

https://twitter.com/btysonmd/status/1433860282334384130#m

But wait! Maybe if people get early treatment then they won't die. But deaths are needed to keep the fear going, because fear is what keeps people submitting to the jabs and so keep profits up for Pfizer and Moderna. Therefore early treatment will be stopped by the mafia at the CDC/NIH/FDA.

Profits über alles!

joshuatrio says

PREVENTION PROTOCOL
Quercetin 250 mg/day

Since most ppl use the Quercetin DiHydrate w/ Bromelain, it's too low of a dosage.

If one's not using the Quercetin Phytosome and is taking the Quercetin DiHydrate w/ fish or olive oil, then one needs at minimum, 500 mg per day, if not 1000 mg per day, just as a preventative measure with Zinc, Vitamin D, Vitamin C, and N-Acetyl-Cysteine (a/o R-Lipoic Acid).

Realize, it's not very bioavailable.

Rin says

Realize, it's not very bioavailable.

Here's what I'm talking about ...

https://patrick.net/post/1340407?0#comment-1780905

Here's another article on the Phytosome version vs the regular one ...

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6418071



That's clearly over 6 hours at peak concentration in vivo which is not bad.

Rin says

joshuatrio says

PREVENTION PROTOCOL
Quercetin 250 mg/day

Since most ppl use the Quercetin DiHydrate w/ Bromelain, it's too low of a dosage.

If one's not using the Quercetin Phytosome and is taking the Quercetin DiHydrate w/ fish or olive oil, then one needs at minimum, 500 mg per day, if not 1000 mg per day, just as a preventative measure with Zinc, Vitamin D, Vitamin C, and N-Acetyl-Cysteine (a/o R-Lipoic Acid).

Realize, it's not very bioavailable.

Can't find N-Acetyl-Cysteine (a/o R-Lipoic Acid) anywhere.

Rin says

N-Acetyl-Cysteine (a/o R-Lipoic Acid).

Are those two the same?

porkchopexpress says

Rin says

N-Acetyl-Cysteine (a/o R-Lipoic Acid).

Are those two the same?

Oh, right. I can't find either of them.

https://www.vitacost.com/life-extension-super-r-lipoic-acid-240-mg-60-vegetarian-capsules

I bought the Thorne R-Lipoic Acid.

Rin - do you recommend taking both NAC and R-lipoic Acid?

If you're having a tough time getting to N-Acetyl-Cysteine, you can opt for the base amino acid L-Cysteine, which is NAC's base prior to acetylation.

Rin says

If you're having a tough time getting to N-Acetyl-Cysteine, you can opt for the base amino acid L-Cysteine, which is NAC's base prior to acetylation.

Thanks.

Separate question on your J&J mitigation strategy. They say that adenovirus vaccines have an increased risk of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT). Does your supplement cocktail prevent that risk because CVT is caused by spike protein production?

porkchopexpress says

Separate question on your J&J mitigation strategy. They say that adenovirus vaccines have an increased risk of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT). Does your supplement cocktail prevent that risk because CVT is caused by spike protein production?

In a nutshell, what that is is a blood clot in the brain, esp on the venous side, which drains the blood from the brain to the rest of the body.

And as for them forming, either the adenovirus/J&J or the mRNA/Pfizer-Moderna can lead to the lining of the arteries & veins forming clots due to the presence of the Spiked protein which forms platelets in-situ. The difference is that much of the J&J proteins will originate from the shoulder's deltoid muscle, whereas the mRNA ones could form just about anywhere, including within the brain itself.

So with that stated, you have several things going on; you have platelet inhibitors with high amounts of Aspirin along with high amounts of Allisure Allicin. But guess what also serves a hand here? ... Yes, Quercetin again

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15613018/

So that's a three pronged Spiked protein platelet de-activator in your system and all of them were present, a full day before the shot.

And then, you have the antiviral defensive play of Zinc, Vitamin C, Quercetin, Allisure Allicin with the glutathione immune enhancing engine of NAC (or L-Cysteine) with R-Lipoic Acid & Vitamin D and what'll happen is that a slew of adenovirus will essentially die upon landing, kinda like paratroopers when machine gunners are stationed at the shoulder's drop zone.

Rin says

So that's a three pronged Spiked protein platelet de-activator in your system and all of them were present, a full day before the shot.

I forgot to mention team member no 4, Turmeric, but its anticoagulant properties need more studying.

Rin says

Rin says

So that's a three pronged Spiked protein platelet de-activator in your system and all of them were present, a full day before the shot.

I forgot to mention team member no 4, Turmeric, but its anticoagulant properties need more studying.

I had heard of this use for Turmeric years before the pandemic. An older friend who was diagnosed with pulmonary edema and had a three year death sentence used turmeric to help his lungs recover and wound up surviving much much longer.

Ivermectin overdose fake news propaganda shut down. "Rolling Stone 'Horse Dewormer' Hit-Piece Debunked After Hospital Says No Ivermectin Overdoses zerohedge.com/covid-19/rolli…"


https://t.me/FirstAmendmentPraetorian/4273

Jim Rogenmoser
@JimRogenmoser
10h
Replying to @RWMaloneMD
MY VERY IMPORTANT QUESTION. Dr. Malone, are the cohort of older people, with comorbidities, close to as safe if they choose (and have access) to the therapeutic protocols (IVM, HCQ, zinc, etc.) instead of the jab?

I'd like to know the answer to that. I suspect it's "yes, absolutely".

But this would devastate hundreds of billions of dollars in Big Pharma revenues, so it's not a question that anyone in research dares to answer. They will never get funding from the mafia-run NIH if they answer in the affirmative.

https://twitter.com/EnchantersAwake/status/1434193422231867392#m

Thinking About It
@Jorlev_11
4h
Replying to @RWMaloneMD
Doctor who said ER Overwhelmed with Ivermectin Overdoses FULL OF HORSE SHIT. Hospital says he hasn't worked in their ER for over 2 months and they are Not Treating ANY IVM O.D. Cases or IVM Related Cases. Where are the MEDIA RETRACTIONS?

https://twitter.com/Jorlev_11/status/1434336421771419650#m



https://www.newswars.com/rolling-stone-runs-ivermectin-poisoning-hoax-story/

Et tu, Rolling Stone?

https://rescue.substack.com/p/opinion-ivermectin-ii-cons-and-pros?r=nxypy&utm_campaign=patrick.net&utm_medium=patrick.net&utm_source=patrick.net

Ivermectin II: Cons and pros
Florida newspaper editor Matt Walsh gives an Old School journalism lesson to his statewide audience: both sides of a story!
Matt Walsh Sep 3

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32533071/

In this comprehensive systematic review, antiviral effects of ivermectin are summarized including in vitro and in vivo studies over the past 50 years. Several studies reported antiviral effects of ivermectin on RNA viruses such as Zika, dengue, yellow fever, West Nile, Hendra, Newcastle, Venezuelan equine encephalitis, chikungunya, Semliki Forest, Sindbis, Avian influenza A, Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome, Human immunodeficiency virus type 1, and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Furthermore, there are some studies showing antiviral effects of ivermectin against DNA viruses such as Equine herpes type 1, BK polyomavirus, pseudorabies, porcine circovirus 2, and bovine herpesvirus 1. Ivermectin plays a role in several biological mechanisms, therefore it could serve as a potential candidate in the treatment of a wide range of viruses including COVID-19 as well as other types of positive-sense single-stranded RNA viruses. In vivo studies of animal models revealed a broad range of antiviral effects of ivermectin, however, clinical trials are necessary to appraise the potential efficacy of ivermectin in clinical setting.

zzyzzx says

In HORSE cells ONLY!!!

Robert W Malone, MD
@RWMaloneMD
9h
For those that don't know, Peru did a massive campaign with ivermectin in last half of 2020. The mortality dropped 14 fold over 3 months. A new president came in - and stopped the campaign. And deaths rose 13 fold over the next month. This figure is from:"

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8383101/

Abstract
In 2015, the Nobel Committee for Physiology or Medicine, in its only award for treatments of infectious diseases since six decades prior, honoured the discovery of ivermectin (IVM), a multifaceted drug deployed against some of the world’s most devastating tropical diseases. Since March 2020, when IVM was first used against a new global scourge, COVID-19, more than 20 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have tracked such inpatient and outpatient treatments. Six of seven meta-analyses of IVM treatment RCTs reporting in 2021 found notable reductions in COVID-19 fatalities, with a mean 31% relative risk of mortality vs. controls. During mass IVM treatments in Peru, excess deaths fell by a mean of 74% over 30 days in its ten states with the most extensive treatments. Reductions in deaths correlated with the extent of IVM distributions in all 25 states with p < 0.002. Sharp reductions in morbidity using IVM were also observed in two animal models, of SARS-CoV-2 and a related betacoronavirus. The indicated biological mechanism of IVM, competitive binding with SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, is likely non-epitope specific, possibly yielding full efficacy against emerging viral mutant strains.
""

https://www.psychoactif.org/forum/uploads/documents/161/74-1_44-95.pdf

Furthermore, by the 27th of February, the results of 42 clinical trials, including
approximately 15,000 patients (both registered and unregistered studies) have been
subjected to a meta-analysis after exclusion of biasing factors. It was found that 83%
showed improvements with early treatment, 51% improved during late-stage
treatment, and there was an 89% prevention of onset rate noted. This confirms the
usefulness of ivermectin. Since it is a meta-analysis based on 42 test results, it is
estimated that the probability of this comprehensive judgment being a mistake is as
low as 1 in 4 trillion.

Another one:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34466270/

During mass IVM treatments in Peru, excess deaths fell by a mean of 74% over 30 days in its ten states with the most extensive treatments.

https://aapsonline.org/aaps-letter-to-ama-re-ivermectin-and-covid/

The AMA has taken the startling and unprecedented position that American physicians should immediately stop prescribing, and pharmacists should stop honoring their prescriptions for ivermectin for COVID-19 patients. The AMA is thus contradicting the professional judgment of a very large number of physicians, who are writing about 88,000 prescriptions per week. It also contradicts the Chairman of the Tokyo Medical Association, Haruo Ozaki, who recommended that all doctors in Japan immediately begin using Ivermectin to treat COVID.

AMA claims that ivermectin is dangerous and ineffective despite the safe prescription of billions of doses since 1981, and the mostly favorable results of 63 controlled studies in COVID-19.

AMA does not specify any recommended early treatments, but simply urges face masks, distancing, and vaccination.

Our members would appreciate clarification of the AMA’s stand on the following questions:

What are the criteria for advocating that pharmacists override the judgment of fully qualified physicians who are responsible for individual patients?
What are the criteria for forbidding off-label use of long-approved drugs, which constitute at least 20 percent of all prescriptions?
On what basis does AMA demand use only within a clinical trial for ivermectin, but call for virtually universal vaccination outside of controlled trials, despite FDA warnings of potential cardiac damage in healthy young patients, and no information about long-term effects?
We believe that these questions get to the heart of issues of physician and patient autonomy, as well as scientific principles such as the need for a control group in experiments.

We look forward to your response.

The AMA is corrupt.

Patrick says

Chairman of the Tokyo Medical Association, Haruo Ozaki, who recommended that all doctors in Japan immediately begin using Ivermectin to treat COVID.

Trying to confirm this by translating https://www.yomiuri.co.jp/choken/kijironko/cknews/20210818-OYT8T50030/ with https://translate.yandex.com/translate

"Just the other day,in India Corona infection treatment guidelines determine the All India Medical University (All India Institute of Medical Sciences/AIIMS) study group, the campaign for the prevention investigated the effect papers as possible. According to it, about 3900 people of health care workers(employees and students)to the subject,ivermectin per 1 kg of body weight per 0. 3 Milli・G to 3-day intervals 2 times group that was administered, 1 time only group that was administered,the administration did not group consisting of three groups divided into clinical trials as a result,campaign 2 times administered in person, the new Corona infection was 83%reduction in the other. Thesis for world-class research groups from very reliable"

But the translation is pretty bad.

C W
@pablovspeanut
Sep 4
Replying to @Dmdufy @joerogan
I’ve been in medicine for about 14 years now. I’ve never seen an adverse reaction to ivermectin or hydroxychloroquin. So on the safety scale both are most likely much safer than Benadryl, ibuprofen, Tylenol, alcohol, shellfish, and most antibiotics that we often use
2:08 PM · Sep 4, 2021

https://twitter.com/pablovspeanut/status/1434156527871352832#m

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7505114/

Recently, ivermectin has been reported to inhibit the proliferation of several tumor cells by regulating multiple signaling pathways. This suggests that ivermectin may be an anticancer drug with great potential. Here, we reviewed the related mechanisms by which ivermectin inhibited the development of different cancers and promoted programmed cell death and discussed the prospects for the clinical application of ivermectin as an anticancer drug for neoplasm therapy.

Truly a wonder drug if it cures some cancers as well as parasites and some viruses.

https://babylonbee.com/news/pfizer-releases-popular-new-drug-pfivermectin