patrick.net

https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/bill-gates-foundation-should-be-investigated

Scott, executive director of the World Peace Through Education Foundation, filed his amended appeal and petition for Writ of Mandamus on January 8, 2025, accusing the Gates Foundation of exploiting its tax-exempt status while engaging in vaccine-related profiteering.

“Under the pretense of improving World Health, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation/Trust has been engaged in the promotion, manufacture and sale of Covid-19 vaccines that were not sufficiently tested for safety or for effectiveness for their intended use,” Scott stated bluntly in his filing.

He argues that the IRS should retroactively tax these activities as ordinary income and cease allowing the foundation’s alleged misuse of tax exemptions.

“The claim that its efforts are charity are bogus and it has acted in bad faith,” Scott charged, amplifying his calls for government accountability.

BUMP.

And making THEM file lawsuits when you control the government to stop you is key.

Let them waste money and time trying to hold ground.

Another benefit is that when the Court interferes, and it cycles up the appeals ladder, they usually provide the process need to conform to their interpretation, or provide an alternate route.

Trump should be extremely expansive. The last 4 years for certain showed there is NO benefit is being softhanded in the name of Princuhpuls, it's never reciprocated.

DC has more lawyers per capita than anywhere in the world. 92% of the inhabitants of DC are registered democrats. Figure 6% are GOPe. The DC courts are festered with liberal judges *that's why the Democrats were putting in rules to have laws overseen specifically by the DC courts. The upper echelons of the Pentagon have gone fully Woke and the Stasi have white nationals as their basis for terrorists.

We need a humane Stalinist purge and yes they will fight every step of the way.

Here is evidence that HCQ and ivermectin were well known from before the time of the deadly EUA to be effective treatments:

view pdf

Anyone want to help me start a lawsuit against Pfizer and the FDA for their bogus EUA which allowed millions to be murdered by mandated mRNA?

I don't really know where to begin, or to get "standing".

Patrick says

I don't really know where to begin, or to get "standing".

May have to be a state AG to get standing.

https://classythomasmassie.substack.com/p/pfizer-hit-with-lawsuits-from-five

By rolling out vaccines that caused so much harm, Pfizer essentially led millions of Americans to their own demise. It’s for this very reason that Texas, Louisiana, Kansas, Utah, and Mississippi are taking the big pharma company to court.

Each of these states alleges that Pfizer misled the public about the safety and efficiency of COVID jabs. Furthermore, Pfizer stands accused of hiding the fact that its vaccines could cause pregnancy complications, myocarditis, pericarditis, and even death.

In light of this, the five states suing Pfizer are seeking damages and civil monetary penalties. On top of this, they’re asking the court to issue an injunction that prevents Pfizer from further marketing COVID immunizations as reliable and safe for consumption.

The big pharma company’s claim that getting vaccinated would protect people’s loved ones against COVID is also being challenged in court. Through this claim, Pfizer asserted repeatedly that COVID vaccination would prevent virus transmission.

(paywall)

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/doge-days-wednesday-february-5-2025

It is the far-left Pulitzer Board’s worst nightmare. Yesterday, Fox ran the story under the headline, “Trump scores big legal win against Pulitzer Prize board members as lawsuit moves to discovery.” The sub-headline reported the worst possible news for Pulitzer: “Pulitzer Prize board communications will not be protected from discovery in the landmark case.”

This might even be worse than losing the lawsuit outright. Back in 2022, Trump sued the Pulitzer Board for defamation, because it shamed itself by granting Pulitzer Prizes in 2018 to the New York Times and to the Washington Post for, get this, their fake-news reporting on RussiaGate.

Last week, corporate media crowed with anticipatory delight over the Board’s excellent motion to prevent discovery, in which it argued that the internal emails and texts between board members would embarrass the Board and besmirch the vaunted reputation of the Pulitzer Prize itself. Scores of articles reported the Board’s motion.

Only Fox reported that after the hearing, the judge denied the Board’s dumb motion and ordered it to turn over the communications. Corporate media was silent yesterday.

As I’ve told you many times, discovery is a worst-case scenario for the Board. I’d bet a week’s salary the Board members are Trump-deranged lunatics, and their internal communications, instead of reflecting professional acumen, journalistic expertise, and wise restraint, probably more resemble a Discord channel of middle-school mean girls.

Embarrassing, indeed. It could destroy the award, not that anyone would care. The Board should settle. Immediately. Expect a generous offer soon.

Patrick says

Expect a generous offer soon.

It will be "confidential."

https://nypost.com/2025/04/24/media/paramount-cbs-settle-discrimination-lawsuit-over-dei-policies-punishing-straight-white-males/

Paramount, CBS settle discrimination lawsuit over DEI policies punishing straight white males

Patrick says

As I’ve told you many times, discovery is a worst-case scenario for the Board. I’d bet a week’s salary the Board members are Trump-deranged lunatics, and their internal communications, instead of reflecting professional acumen, journalistic expertise, and wise restraint, probably more resemble a Discord channel of middle-school mean girls.

I tried to quote your entire post but was denied. The first time, my attempt to quite you in fact quoted some other member's post. The quoting mechanism of Patrick.net has problems.

That being said, yes, discovery is the worst case scenario for bullshit lawsuits. This is where they live or die - failure to disclose is in effect dismissal with prejudice for wasting the court's time.

stereotomy says

quoted some other member's post

Happens to me a lot too. Do you use the Brave browser?

No big deal. Patrick lets us use this site for free.

Half of the time I can't even quote at all in the https://www.f150gen14.com/ forum.

Maga_Chaos_Monkey says

stereotomy says

quoted some other member's post

Happens to me a lot too. Do you use the Brave browser?

No big deal. Patrick lets us use this site for free.

Half of the time I can't even quote at all in the https://www.f150gen14.com/ forum.

I use Edge. I agree that despite the bugs, PatNet is probably one of the freest places on the intarwebs.

Yes, quoting is fucked up. I worked on it for a while, but didn't make much progress.

Patrick says

Yes, quoting is fucked up.

Works well for me. I am using Edge.

I can't get it to work on an iPhone at all.

I really like that the site is sort of old school. No adds popping out at me. No stupid video player jumping out at the bottom right I have to close. All of the important stuff without the crap.

Easy to read, easy on the eyes. The content and the main summary pages.

Thank you!

All of that is very deliberate on my part. No harassment. Not even static image ads.

Patrick says

I can't get it to work on an iPhone at all.

I just quoted you here on man iPhone 13.

Sorry, my mistake. I meant that I cannot get quoting of selections to work on an iphone.

Also, when quoting a small portion on an iphone, it doesn't jump to the comment box, right?

Patrick says

Sorry, my mistake. I meant that I cannot get quoting of selections to work on an iphone.

I just did this as a selection quote in my iPhone 13.

Patrick says

Also, when quoting a small portion on an iphone, it doesn't jump to the comment box, right?

No, but maybe this time it does not drag those vertices quite bar over Mr added comment.

I hate using that iPhone because the damn thing "autocorrects" my typing to gibberish. I meant to say "No, but maybe this time it does not drag that vertical quote bar over my added comment."

How much did they pay out, and how much of it made it to the white guys who were discriminated against?

Patrick says

How much did they pay out, and how much of it made it to the white guys who were discriminated against?

I would like to know that for the Covington Kid settlement as well.

HeadSet says

I just did this as a selection quote in my iPhone 13.

@HeadSet Thanks for telling me. Nice to know maybe it's not just me, but the iPhone itself.

https://tdefender.substack.com/p/pfizer-covid-vaccine-deceptive-marketing-kansas-lawsuit-state-court

The state of Kansas can sue Pfizer in state court for misleading the public about its COVID-19 vaccines, a federal judge ruled today.

Pfizer tried to keep the case in federal court, arguing that the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act), which shields COVID-19 vaccine makers from liability for injuries caused by the vaccines, “completely preempts” consumer protection claims made by the state of Kansas.

Ray Flores, senior outside counsel for Children’s Health Defense (CHD), called the ruling a “major victory.”

“This first-of-its-kind ruling declares Pfizer’s deceptions aren’t afforded carte blanche treatment, as Mr. Bourla [CEO of Pfizer] probably assumed they’d be,” Flores said.

CHD General Counsel Kim Mack Rosenberg agreed. “This decision is important because it creates a viable path for Pfizer to potentially be held accountable for its wrongdoing on a massive scale.”

On June 17, 2024, Kansas sued Pfizer, alleging the pharmaceutical giant misled the public by marketing its COVID-19 vaccine as “safe and effective” while concealing known risks and critical data on limited effectiveness.

The lawsuit, filed by Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach in the District Court of Thomas County, alleged that beginning in 2021, Pfizer covered up the fact that the vaccine was connected to serious adverse events, including myocarditis and pericarditis, failed pregnancies and deaths.

The complaint also alleged the company falsely claimed that its original vaccine retained high efficacy while knowing that efficacy waned over time and didn’t protect against new variants.

Pfizer also misled the public by claiming the COVID-19 vaccine would prevent transmission, even though the company never studied the vaccine’s capability to prevent transmission.

By marketing the vaccine as safe and effective despite its known risks, Pfizer violated the Kansas Consumer Protection Act because millions of Kansans heard those misrepresentations, the complaint alleged.

Lawsuit is about deceptive marketing, not physical injuries or death

In July 2024, Pfizer successfully removed the Kansas lawsuit to federal court. However, in a September 2024 motion, Kansas asked for the case to be sent back to state court.

Pfizer filed an opposing motion in October 2024, in which it presented three arguments for why the case belonged in federal court. The final argument was that Kansas’ claims were “completely preempted by the PREP Act and are thus removable to federal court.”

In today’s ruling, U.S. District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree rejected all three of Pfizer’s arguments.

Crabtree rejected Pfizer’s PREP Act argument because all of Kansas’ claims are about deceptive marketing, not physical injury or death from Pfizer’s COVID-19 shot. “That point alone ends the debate,” Crabtree wrote.

Patrick says

" https://tdefender.substack.com/p/pfizer-covid-vaccine-deceptive-marketing-kansas-lawsuit-state-court "

From the link:

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has launched an investigation into the leftist pro-censorship organization Media Matters for alleged coordination with other media watchdog groups accused by X owner Elon Musk of coordinating advertiser boycotts of the social media platform.

A civil investigative demand obtained by Reuters revealed that the regulator is seeking all documents that Media Matters has produced or received as part of the ongoing lawsuit launched by Musk in 2023, which alleges that it attempted to damage the site’s relationship with advertisers.

The commission is seeking information about the Washington, DC-based organization’s communications with similar Democrat-aligned groups, including a World Federation of Advertisers initiative called Global Alliance for Responsible Media — another subject of an ongoing X lawsuit.

Media Matters President Angela Carusone called the move by the FTC a “threat” by the Trump administration in a statement to the New York Post.

“Right-wing media figures holding key posts and abusing government power to target critics are two hallmarks of the Trump administration,” he said in a statement on Thursday. “Threats won’t work, our mission continues.”

While the FTC has yet to publicly comment on the investigation, Trump-appointed Chairman Andrew Ferguson said, “We must prosecute any unlawful collusion between online platforms, and confront advertiser boycotts which threaten competition among those platforms,” in a December statement on an unrelated case.

Ferguson later stated in April, “Drying up the advertising will dry up the idea. So, the risk of an advertiser boycott is a pretty serious risk to the free exchange of ideas.”

The left-wing watchdog was forced to lay off dozens of employees last May as they fought the “legal assault” by Musk, Carusone said at the time.

The group has often attacked Breitbart News and its late founder, Andrew Breitbart, smearing his platform as a “disaster” and a “hotbed of ridiculous smears.”

https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2025/05/22/ftc-launches-investigation-into-far-left-group-media-matters/

https://www.stevesailer.net/p/vox-baffling-that-supreme-court-tolerated

How many hundreds of billions does The Establishment owe in damages for racist affirmative action and DEI?

The Supreme Court’s 9-0 Ames decision this week in which the Justices finally cleared up a 44-year-long dispute among federal circuit courts, with five of the 12 districts holding that whites, men, and straights should be discriminated against in discrimination law, has mostly elicited rather baffled commentary in the mainstream media.

You see, if you accept the conventional wisdom about white supremacy and systemic racism, the news that the Supreme Court tolerated since 1981 an indefensibly blatant racist anti-white concoction with no legislative basis whatsoever is … well, hard to process. Does Not Compute in your worldview. ...

Meanwhile, in The Nation, Elie Mystal admits that the Supreme Court made the right decision, but worries that America will become bogged down in discrimination lawsuits.

Yes, there should be millions of discrimination lawsuits filed now, and every company which discriminated against whites must be punished.