patrick.net

Trump Tells Supreme Court His Presidential Authority Is Under Attack from Activist Federal Judges

President Donald Trump’s administration has issued a plea to the Supreme Court as activist federal judges across the country seek to undermine the authority of the White House.

On Wednesday, the Trump administration told the high court that the president’s authority to protect the nation is under siege from lower court rulings.

White House lawyers used a final brief in a high-stakes deportation case to accuse federal judges of imperiling the executive branch’s core powers.

The brief was the last fling before Supreme Court justices are slated to rule on Trump’s use of a 1798 immigration law to deport Venezuelan nationals.

In the filing, Trump admin lawyers outlined what they call a pattern of judicial overreach.

It comes as Trump is under mounting attacks from Democrat-aligned federal judges seeking to undermine the president’s agenda.

In the Wednesday filing, U.S. Acting Solicitor General Sarah Harris said:

“A single district court cannot broadly disable the President from discharging his most fundamental duties, regardless of the order’s label, and irrespective of its duration.”

‘Should Have Recused Himself’: Legal Experts Sound Alarm On Obama-Appointed Judge Blocking Trump’s Deportations

As U.S. District Court Judge James Boasberg continues to be a thorn in the side of the Trump administration’s effort to deport gangbangers, legal experts have begun to raise questions about his handling of the case.

The Obama-appointed judge in March blocked President Donald Trump from using wartime authorities to send suspected Tren de Aragua gangbangers to a mega-prison in El Salvador, prompting incredible pushback from the president himself. As the challenge to the deportations play out in court, some legal experts have argued Boasberg should recuse himself from the case entirely, while others say he appears to be “making policy from the bench.”

Critics have pointed to the fact that Boasberg’s daughter, Katharine Boasberg, works for an organization whose founder openly celebrated her father’s decision to halt the deportations.

“Under Canon 3 (C) (1) of the ‘Code of Conduct for United States Judges’ it states that judges must disqualify themselves from a case ‘in which the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned,'” Hans von Spakovsky, a senior legal fellow at the Heritage Foundation, said to the Daily Caller News Foundation. “Given that his daughter works directly for an organization that supports illegal aliens, opposes deportation of aliens, and has voiced its support for Boasberg’s action in this very case, the impartiality of his judgment is obviously open to be reasonably questioned.”

The Supreme Court on Tuesday halted a lower court order requiring the Trump administration to reinstate thousands of federal employees who were dismissed as part of a sweeping effort to shrink the federal workforce.

The decision came in response to the administration's emergency appeal of a California judge's ruling, which had directed the government to bring back 16,000 probationary employees while a lawsuit challenging the legality of the mass firings moves forward. The Supreme Court's action means that affected employees at six federal agencies will remain on paid administrative leave for now.

The U.S. House of Representatives has passed a bill that seeks to limit the powers of “rogue” activist judges attempting to undermine the authority of President Donald Trump.

The No Rogue Rulings Act, led by Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) and backed by Trump, aims to limit federal district judges’ ability to affect Trump administration policies on a national scale.

The legislation passed the House Wednesday evening.

All but one Republican voted for the bill, which passed 219 to 213.

No Democrat lawmakers voted in favor.

The bill limits district courts’ power to issue U.S.-wide injunctions.

Instead, federal judges will be forced to focus their scope on the parties directly affected in most cases.

Since the president took office, the Trump administration has faced more than 15 nationwide injunctions from Democrat-aligned activist judges.

The politically motivated injunctions have been targeting a wide range of Trump’s policies

Sounds like a good law.

Whoops ! ! ! ! !

The bitch practicing Lawfare gets caught up committing mortgage fraud and I'm sure other charges will be forthcoming because nobody is above the law.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-administration-refers-ny-ag-letitia-james-for-possible-prosecution-over-allegations-of-mortgage-fraud/ar-AA1CZBRG?pc=U531

If it is prosecuted in NY, she'll get a deal.

I believe @ElonMusk was right when he said that Democrats were importing illegals as a means of having a permanent majority in all swing states.

However, he missed a more sinister underlying reason for doing so...

By importing twenty million illegals, they also set up an absurd mission for President Trump to pursue, which is deporting every single one of them. This will not result in making America great again. It will simply make America 2020 again.

This is 100% by design. When you have an elite problem solver who is capable of multi-tasking and operating high-level organizational control, the only way to manage that opponent is to control the problems he's focused on solving. Much like Covid-19 derailed the entire Trump agenda in 2020, the invasion is designed to do the same thing. Give Trump and MAGA a false sense of victory over problems the deep state set to eat up time and resources.

How do you counter this tactic? The same way you counter all tactics in 2025... speed.

The administration must understand that they're solving problems and fighting enemies inside of a prefabricated environment. The real problems and real enemies exist outside of this environment. The only way to escape the environment is to adopt an attitude of permanent offense and permanent speed. Speed allows for mistakes. Speed allows for smaller organizations that don't have the numbers to destroy much larger and well funded institutions.

Speed is the great equalizer with information warfare. There are only so many judges. There are only so many Dem leaders, activists, and organizers. Trump must turn the tables and begin dictating terms across multiple war zones and environments.

Fire people who can't be fired. Force them to litigate. Mass deport people who can't be deported. Force them to litigate. Cancel hundreds of billions in funding that are not lawful to cancel and force them to litigate.

If their strategy is to bog you down in court, saturate the environment in such a way that they don't have enough time and resources to litigate every dramatic action you've taken. Close down agencies. Lock the doors. Seize computers. Send them all home. Force them to litigate.

We must begin dictating the battlefield and playing a higher level of war, or we will get victories, but they will only be the ones that our communist opponents allow.

Apr 19, 2025

A great consternation boils and bubbles across the land as the sinister forces of Jacobin lawfare keep up their legalistic battery against the nation. You better believe that the country will not stand for much more of this lunatic judicial coup aimed at wrecking the authority of law itself, and with that, any chance for sane management of our affairs.

On Saturday, the activist org Indivisible, sponsored by Linked-In billionaire Reid Hoffman and dark money “pass through” funder the Tides Foundation (Bill Gates and others), sent its “protest” troops into the streets to pretend that there is public support for national suicide. It was a pitiful showing, after all. There are only so many mind-fucked Boomers out there who can be marshaled to militate for the psychopathocracy behind these monied actors.

Easter weekend looked like a turning point in this struggle for sanity over the public interest. On Saturday night, the SCOTUS shot its wad staying the deportation of Venezuelan gang-bangers rounded-up by ICE in Texas. Do you suppose that means the executive branch is powerless now to remove anyone who entered the USA illegally? It’s alleged that the illegal aliens have a right to some due process beyond their deportation orders — which themselves entail sufficient due process to execute their removal, since entering the country illegally is an actionable violation.

Of course, millions of illegal immigrants ditched their own identity documents before crossing into the USA, so there is no way of even establishing who they actually are, were they to appear in an American court for any proposed due process sorting-out. The identity erasure was carried out deliberately to confound the law, and was part of the concerted efforts of NGOs working with the “Joe Biden” regime to stuff illegals into the country as fast as possible with no vetting whatsoever.

It was, you understand, an elaborately engineered operation, down to the CPB One cell phone app created by the US Department of Homeland Security itself under Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas to mass produce phony asylum cases that streamlined illegal entry for millions. This was complemented by the DHS program of “humanitarian parole and travel authorization” to enter the US on commercial flights directly from foreign countries, bypassing customs interviews.

The motivation for all that was understood by anyone with a functional brain: to assemble a new voter cohort, using motor-voter procedures and mail-in ballots to guarantee Democratic Party election victories in key districts for all time to come. It couldn’t have been more cynically corrupt, as is the new campaign to prevent these millions of new fake voters from being deported back to where they came from.

All of this points to the question: what can be done about such an arrant insult to the citizens of our country? The consternation arises from the failure of federal appeals courts, and now even the SCOTUS, to end the coup. What’s needed is a raft of major DOJ prosecutions for the serious crimes around the vast panoply of lawfare operations going back to 2016. I believe they are coming and that the reason you hear nothing lately out of the DOJ and the FBI is because the cases are under construction and details about them have not been leaked.

A good place to start would be a case for mass murder, battery, obstruction of justice, and lying to Congress against the people responsible for the Covid-19 caper.

You might have noticed last week — though The New York Times and the cable news networks didn’t report it — that the White House issued a major document titled Lab Leak; the True Origins of Covid 19. The doc succinctly outlines the case that Anthony Fauci of NIAID and Ralph Baric of the University of North Carolina presided over the design of the Covid-19 virus and outsourced its production, with the help of Peter Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance, to the Wuhan Virology Institute lab. Include the CEOs or Pfizer and Moderna, Francis Collins, Rochelle Walensky, and their chief deputies at CDC, and Stephen Hahn, Janet Woodcock, and Robert Califf all serially chiefs of the FDA from 2020 to 2024, for enabling the phony and harmful Covid Vaccine program. Indict them all. Let a jury decide if Dr. Fauci’s preemptive pardon was legitimate. The others enjoy no pardon protection.

Bring cases against, John Brennan, James Comey, and a long list of DOJ / FBI officials for the crimes around RussiaGate. Include Judge James “Jeb” Boasberg for his activities running the FISA court during the period. Indict them under federal statute 18 USC 371, Conspiracy to Defraud the United States. Throw in sedition and possibly treason, since the UK’s MI6 agency was a party to the seditious frauds involved.

Indict Alejandro Mayorkas and his deputies, and the White House aides manipulating “Joe Biden,” for engineering the mass entry of illegal immigrants between January 2021 and 2025.

Bring cases against Nancy Pelosi and the Democratic Party leadership for instigating the January 6, 2021, riot at the US Capitol building, as well as the DNC / RNC pipe bomb hoax.

Investigate the previously ignored incidents of voter fraud in Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Georgia in the 2020 election.

Indict Joe Biden and his family for bribery and treason for their money laundering activities in Ukraine, China, Kazakhstan and elsewhere during Biden’s years as vice-president and the period when he was out-of-office, 2017 to 2021 (and enjoyed no immunity).

Indict Norm Eisen, Mary McCord, Andrew Weissmann, and Lisa Monaco for organizing the malicious prosecutions of Donald Trump in 2024 in Georgia, Florida, the District of Columbia, and New York City. And bring a case against Eisen and his assistants for orchestrating the current judicial coup outlined above.

Start making this happen, Pam Bondi and Kash Patel, and you will begin to shatter the giant glass cloche of cognitive dissonance that holds the minds of half the country hostage to a long-running Jacobin conspiracy aimed at wrecking the country. You will at least witness a startling shift in what the people pay attention to. Call it retribution if you like. It represents payback for a host of crimes committed against the American people by government officials who warred against them. It is well-deserved.

Our existing immigration system wasn’t built for mass enforcement— it’s built for case-by-case adjudication.

⚖️ Here’s where things get spicy. Trump, citing judges making it impossible for him to fulfill his mass deportation promises, could next ask Congress to authorize suspension of the writ in a continuing resolution, which circumvents the Senate filibuster. (Continuing resolutions are short-term funding bills that let the federal government stay open.)

If the Continuing Resolution also agreed that America is currently under invasion, then two branches would be lined up against one, and the Supreme Court would find it very difficult to undo. Even Justice Taney found that Congress can legally suspend the writ, so Congressional delegation of that authority to the President in a CR would be constitutionally sound.

And the Supreme Court has always deferred to the other branches over things like declarations of emergency, war, or invasions, calling those political questions rather than legal issues.

Once again we see the outlines of a carefully considered plan. One of Trump’s first moves was to declare an invasion, and to declare cartels to be foreign terrorist organizations, which put the Alien Enemies Act on the chessboard, framed the problem in military terms, and teed up an eventual showdown over the writ. Trump’s team must have known they’d face these due process problems in carrying out the mass deportation plan.

Democrat "Rule of Law" personified. If a person had vandalized a 20-year old beater Volvo in MN belonging to a Dem Staffer with "Coexist" stickers, they'd be getting months of jail and probation at a minimum.

In case you somehow missed the excitement, here’s what actually happened. About eight days ago, back on April 18th, Milwaukee Circuit Court Judge Hannah Dugan was presiding over an unremarkable criminal case involving a Mexican national charged with three counts of battery and domestic abuse. A couple of his victims were seated in the gallery waiting to testify. The accused, Jose Flores-Ruiz, was an illegal alien already deported in 2013, but it didn’t stick and he came back to commit more crimes.

Because of all the media misinformation, here is a link to the government’s complaint so you can read it for yourself.

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/d2msoiwnkhjgh3pwbofyo/Doc.-01-Criminal-Complaint-USA-v.-Dugan.pdf?rlkey=7oxwjlxen2ghys7k4wcyd62xh&e=1&dl=0

Note that a federal judge signed Judge Dugan’s arrest warrant— she had ample due process. Or, if you’re more of a listener, here’s Pam Bondi’s explanation about both arrests from a Fox interview yesterday (8:00).

Anyway, before Flores-Ruiz’s hearing started, court staff snuck word to Judge Dugan got word that FBI, CBP, and DEA agents had staked out the gallery and the hallway outside the courtroom, and were waiting for the hearing to finish so they could arrest Lopez. This enraged the judge (“this is absurd!”). So she sprang up —or at least attempted a rough approximation of ‘springing’— and moved ponderously into action. She first adjourned the hearing, grabbed the judge in the courtroom next door for backup and, after demanding to see the agents’ warrant, ordered them to go to the Chief Judge’s office. They complied.




While agents were on the phone with the Chief Judge, Judge Dugan’s courtroom deputy came over and warned them the judge was trying to “push through” Lopez’s hearing, to get him out of the building while the agents were tied up talking to the Chief Judge. Meanwhile, back in her courtroom, Judge Dugan ordered Lopez and his attorney to come up to the bench, and after a frenzied, whispered conversation, personally escorted them out the courtroom’s private back door reserved for jurors and prisoners.

Lopez fled using a back elevator and sprinted off down 9th street. Fortunately, an alert agent spotted the serial crimedoer leaving. The team scrambled and a dramatic foot chase ensued. They finally tackled Lopez near State Street and 10th.

Yesterday morning, the FBI filed a federal complaint and shortly thereafter arrested Judge Dugan at the courthouse. She’s charged with obstruction of ICE proceedings (18 U.S.C. § 1505) and harboring or concealing a person to prevent discovery and arrest (18 U.S.C. § 1071)— both serious felonies.

The federal criminal complaint identifies several witnesses who saw everything that happened.

Later in the day, Judge Dugan was released without bond after making her first appearance in federal court. If convicted, she certainly can’t be a judge, and will probably lose her law license. Even without a verdict, the pending charges are a huge headache for the Chief Judge. How can Judge Dugan continue to preside over other criminal cases while she’s under indictment herself?

Will Wisconsin’s left-leaning Supreme Court remove her?