patrick.net

Latest Numbers from the CDC

95% of Wuhan deaths were from people over 50. If you are immunocompromised or have other conditions that make you at risk please quarantine.

Let the rest of us get back to life.

Onvacation says

95% of Wuhan deaths were from people over 50. If you are immunocompromised or have other conditions that make you at risk please quarantine.

Let the rest of us get back to life.

That's IF you even get it as well. I know a lot of positive tested people, but over my whole network of people it's maybe 10%. So I have a 1 in 10 chance of even getting it and then once I have it a 1 in 100 chance for someone my age dying. I suck at math, but the odds of death are almost nothing for me.

It would be like a $200 slot pull to even get it and then from there a $50,000,000 winning lotto ticket to die from it. Basically not happening.

Only 2% of deaths are under 40. Let our kids go back to school!

Onvacation says

Only 2% of deaths are under 40. Let our kids go back to school!

And 0% under 17.

HeadSet says

And 0% under 17.

A grand total of 349 children under the age of 18 have died from the Wuhan. The CDC is not keeping track of comorbidities amongst these children. But anecdotally we have only seen obese and already sick kids die from the Wuhan.

According to a new CDC report, roughly 0.03% of coronavirus cases in kids and teens under 21 have been fatal so far — very few deaths.
But overwhelmingly, the deaths have been people of color.
It's another stark indicator that racism is the biggest reason that Black and brown Americans have a higher likelihood of dying from the coronavirus.

https://www.businessinsider.com/cdc-black-and-brown-children-dying-from-the-coronavirus-2020-9?op=1

By "overwhelmingly, the deaths have been people of color." they mean that 243 or 70% were black or hispanic.

The Wuhan is RACIST!

It seems the Wuhan was introduced in New York City.

Total Deaths from Wuhan Table

After playing with the numbers for a couple of months I am convinced that the Wuhan was deadly. That is what you would expect from a virus engineered to kill.

I am also convinced that the death toll would have been much lower if treatment were allowed.

Somebody intentionally killed a lot of people and want to kill more.

Onvacation says

Total Deaths from Wuhan Table

California has twice as many people as New York but just 20% more deaths.

Onvacation says

It seems the Wuhan was introduced in New York City.

The CDC's numbers have a special column for New York City. I had to combine NYC and NY state to create this graph.

Onvacation says

California has twice as many people as New York but just 20% more deaths.

More sunshine means more Vitamin D means less Fauci Flu.

Onvacation says

Onvacation says

Total Deaths from Wuhan Table

California has twice as many people as New York but just 20% more deaths.

Newsome wasn't putting sick people in to nursing homes. Cuomo killed a lot of people that way.

Top 5 most vaccinated states- Deaths from covid/Population
Vermont- 0.015%
Massachusetts- 0.179%
Hawaii- 0.019%
Connecticut- 0.214%
New Hampshire- 0.077%

Top 5 least vaccinated states- Deaths from covid/Population
Mississippi- 0.227%
Louisiana- 0.195%
Alabama- 0.211%
Wyoming- 0.082%
Idaho- 0.101%

Then there is New York and New Jersey
New York- 0.258%
New Jersey- 0.254%

Over all in the USA the covid death/ Population is 0.165%. The difference between the worst state New York with 0.258% and Vermont with 0.015% is statistically insignificant.

I would assume this is mostly related to general health. Unfortunately the southern states aren't known for healthy lifestyles amongst their citizens.

mell says

I would assume this is mostly related to general health. Unfortunately the southern states aren't known for healthy lifestyles amongst their citizens.

Obesity seems to be a big comorbidity. The BBQ belt SHOULD be overrepresented from death due to a disease that targets the fat and sick.

@Onvacation Other people have also noticed the spike in "unclassified" deaths after the jab came out:



From https://gab.com/Curn

Onvacation says

mell says

I would assume this is mostly related to general health. Unfortunately the southern states aren't known for healthy lifestyles amongst their citizens.

Obesity seems to be a big comorbidity. The BBQ belt SHOULD be overrepresented from death due to a disease that targets the fat and sick.

Pretty sure the BBQ belt is one in the same as the unvaccinated deplorable belt that the anointed ones feel are going to kill them,..

Onvacation says

Say Onvacation -

What is the area under that vaxx death spike?

That would be the number of Americans murdered by Fauci so far.

And far more in the rest of the world.

Patrick says

What is the area under that vaxx death spike?

I didn't do the math but I estimated it to be about 40,000 deaths above and beyond normal.

That would be close to the estimate here:

https://patrick.net/post/1340319/2021-07-28-the-true-number-of-vaccine-related-deaths

Latest from CDC as of 7/31/2021
Rare disease: 2,573
Flu and Pneumonia: 399
From Covid: 1,910

There is good evidence that Covid-19 has supplanted the flu. A more virulent virus like the Wuhan will infect people that would have got the flu.



Lack of treating the Wuhan WAS a killer. Like I said before they are running out of sick people to kill while they are waiting for the healthy to die from the vax.

Onvacation says

Lack of treating the Wuhan WAS a killer.

I agree that the criminal rejection of HCQ and Ivermectin among other proven helpful treatments resulted in many preventable deaths.

Onvacation says

Patrick says

What is the area under that vaxx death spike?

I didn't do the math but I estimated it to be about 40,000 deaths above and beyond normal.

I attempted the math just now. Using calculus would be the most accurate, but it’s been years since I’ve done that and a right triangle could be imposed on the data graph with a rough sort of equivalency. I put 1000 deaths as the baseline, so beginning in February and ending where the spike begins to trend downward again accounts for 121 days of (I assume) daily reporting. If it’s weekly reporting then these numbers are off by a factor of seven. Recalling that the area of a right triangle is the multiple of the two perpendicular sides, divided by half. We arrive at 142,780 deaths.
Anyone wanna check my method? That’s quite a few deaths!

Shaman says

If it’s weekly reporting then these numbers are off by a factor of seven.

@Onvacation Are the deaths in your graphs per day or per week?

The CDC's numbers are weekly.

Shaman's numbers are too big.

However, I have been downloading the numbers from the CDC for months now and the numbers for older weeks do not match the newer weeks. I'll have to take a closer look.

The CDC may be manipulating numbers. (ya think).

I downloaded a new dataset from the CDC
https://data.cdc.gov/NCHS/AH-Monthly-Provisional-Counts-of-Deaths-by-Age-Gro/ezfr-g6hf

Here is the rare disease death count for children 0 to 4:



Notice that the curve stays pretty flat with a slight rise after the vaxxing started. This could be attributed to the anecdotal stories of vaxxed mothers' breastfeeding babies dying or lack of care because of the lockdowns. Historically the death rate from rare diseases, though tragic, remained stable.

Here is the rare disease death count for youth aged 15 to 24:



DON"T VAX YOUR KIDS! You are not protecting them from a disease that doesn't kill healthy people and you are exposing them to deadly short term effects and unknown long term effects.

The CDC is murdering children.

I made a post out of this graph:

https://patrick.net/post/1340649/2021-08-14-the-cdc-is-murdering-children-at-an-exp

The CDC is probably murdering future generations as well.

Anecdotal: I know a young woman (age 27) that was excited to be pregnant with her first baby last year. Her baby daddy proposed, they got married and vaxxed. She had a miscarriage.

this is fucked up! https://1000covidstories.com/

This data set ended in March. This chart, from a different dat set, shows the rare deaths for all from rare diseases.


I was too lazy to combine charts (going to the boat soon) so I filtered each age group and charted each individually.

Not much effect for old people:


If the jab were to kill them it was right away.

The jab ended life early for some of the elderly:



Retired folks suffered:


But saved on Social Security and pension costs.

People on the home stretch to retirement:



People in the prime of life:



And finally the youth:




The CDC has not updated this data since the beginning of the spike in "Rare Deaths".

I noticed that the numbers didn't add up. When I summed up all of the "rare deaths" it totaled to 102,734 and that was just at the beginning of the spike. Something fishy is going on or I am making a mistake.

I would appreciate it if someone would download the data and doublecheck my numbers.

https://data.cdc.gov/NCHS/AH-Monthly-Provisional-Counts-of-Deaths-by-Age-Gro/ezfr-g6hf

Fuck the small craft advisory. I am going sailing.

Huh, that https://data.cdc.gov/NCHS/AH-Monthly-Provisional-Counts-of-Deaths-by-Age-Gro/ezfr-g6hf reports your viewing the page to Google via inclusion of googleapis.com and refuses to work without that spyware.

Could you email me the data @Onvacation ?

Patrick says

Huh, that https://data.cdc.gov/NCHS/AH-Monthly-Provisional-Counts-of-Deaths-by-Age-Gro/ezfr-g6hf reports your viewing the page to Google via inclusion of googleapis.com and refuses to work without that spyware.

Could you email me the data Onvacation ?

Does that mean Google is spying on me? I'm SHOCKED!

Did you get and can you work with it?
@patrick

Yes, I got your email and can work with that .csv file. Thanks!

Onvacation says

I noticed that the numbers didn't add up. When I summed up all of the "rare deaths" it totaled to 102,734 and that was just at the beginning of the spike. Something fishy is going on or I am making a mistake.

I would appreciate it if someone would download the data and doublecheck my numbers.

Here are the columns from the .csv you sent:

Date Of Death Year
Date Of Death Month
HHSRegion
AgeGroup
AllCause
NaturalCause
Septicemia (A40-A41)
Malignant neoplasms (C00-C97)
Diabetes mellitus (E10-E14)
Alzheimer disease (G30)
Influenza and pneumonia (J09-J18)
Chronic lower respiratory diseases (J40-J47)
"Other diseases of respiratory system (J00-J06 J30-J39 J67 J70-J98)"
"Nephritis nephrotic syndrome and nephrosis (N00-N07 N17-N19 N25-N27)"
"Symptoms signs and abnormal clinical and laboratory findings not elsewhere classified (R00-R99)"
"Diseases of heart (I00-I09 I11 I13 I20-I51)"
Cerebrovascular diseases (I60-I69)
"COVID-19 (U071 Multiple Cause of Death)"
"COVID-19 (U071 Underlying Cause of Death)"
AnalysisDate
Note
flag_allcause
flag_natcause
flag_sept
flag_neopl
flag_diab
flag_alz
flag_inflpn
flag_clrd
flag_otherresp
flag_nephr
flag_otherunk
flag_hd
flag_stroke
flag_cov19mcod
flag_cov19ucod

Is this the one you're plotting as "Rare Disease Deaths per Month" above? :

"Symptoms signs and abnormal clinical and laboratory findings not elsewhere classified (R00-R99)"

Patrick says

Is this the one you're plotting as "Rare Disease Deaths per Month" above? :

"Symptoms signs and abnormal clinical and laboratory findings not elsewhere classified (R00-R99)"

Yup. Seemed an appropriate name.

Notice the cdc put R in front of (R00-R99) Kind of a catch all for diseases that wouldn't show up otherwise; "rare". I am pretty sure you would agree.

See results here:

https://patrick.net/post/1340649/2021-08-14-the-cdc-is-murdering-children-at-an-exp#comment-1774397