patrick.net

https://www.thecardiologyadvisor.com/home/topics/acs/acute-coronary-syndrome-acs-biomarkers-mrna-covid19-vaccine/
ACS Risk Biomarkers Significantly Increase After mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine

The risk of developing acute coronary syndrome (ACS) significantly increased in patients after receiving mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, according to a report presented at the American Heart Association (AHA) Scientific Sessions 2021, held from November 13 to 15, 2021.

The study included 566 men and women (1:1) aged 28-97 years, who were patients in a preventive cardiology practice. All patients received a new PULS Cardiac Test 2-10 weeks after their second COVID-19 vaccine. This test result was compared with a PULS score from 3-5 months prevaccination. The PULS Cardiac Test measures multiple protein biomarkers, including hepatocyte growth factor [HGF], soluble Fas, and IL-16, and uses the results to calculate a 5-year risk score for new ACS. The PULS score increases with above-normal elevation. All participants received this test every 3-6 months for 8 years. From prevaccination to postvaccination, the levels of IL-16 increased from 35=/-20 to 82=/-75 above the norm. Soluble Fas showed an increase from 22±15 to 46=/-24 above the norm. HGF rose from 42±12 to 86±31 above the norm. As a result, the 5-year ACS PULS risk score increased from 11% to 25%. By the time the report was published, changes had persisted for 2.5 months or more after the second vaccine dose.

The study author concluded that “mRNA [vaccines] dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.”

Here's the actual study:
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712

Onvacation says

The CDC is flattening the curve.

Wow, looks like outright fraud to protect Pfizer and Pfauci.

Patrick says

Wow, looks like outright fraud to protect Pfizer and Pfauci.

Or something. Maybe they are reclassifying these deaths under different categories but I don't think so.

All of the dataset downloads were pretty much in synch until the vax campaign began.

Has anyone linked vax/sudden/rare deaths to a map?

That would be interesting for sure.

Wife is experiencing strange things. Getting headaches, nausea, she just had her second period in 4 weeks. She's in her 40s, and double vaxxed. She's incredibly anxious and high strung.

Onvacation says

All of the dataset downloads were pretty much in synch until the vax campaign began.

it's a grand experiment.

Onvacation says

This data set ended in March. This chart, from a different dat set, shows the rare deaths for all from rare diseases.

The rare deaths started spiking before the jab officially started being given out. I think Dec 14 was when they started public jabbing people, but this chart shows that Dec 4th already had elevated deaths.

Does anyone know how many people received the jab prior to the official rollout on Dec 14th? We know some people clearly got the jab early, like the people in the clinical trial.

edit
this phase 3 moderna said 30k usa participants https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/promising-interim-results-clinical-trial-nih-moderna-covid-19-vaccine
and this pfizer phase 3 trial said 43k'ish global participants (not sure how many of those in the usa) https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/pfizer-and-biontech-conclude-phase-3-study-covid-19-vaccine

And or course there was phase 2 trials too. I saw 8k mentioned in one of them. So maybe we can assume 60-100k usa people got the jab before Dec 14th, and the trials seemed to start in early summer.

WineHorror1 says

Has anyone linked vax/sudden/rare deaths to a map?

I created a table with vax rates, Wuhan and rare death rates, along with overall death rates. I could not see any obvious correlations.

Some of the rows

DEATHS PERCENTAGE OF DEATHS
State AllCause RareDisease FromCovid Rare% Covid% Vac%
Florida 470,924 9408 53193 2% 11% 61%
California 601,305 8824 71063 1% 12% 63%
Texas 482,156 6521 72095 1% 15% 54%
Puerto Rico 60029 1062 2721 2% 5% 74%
Vermont 11654 22 119 0% 1% 72%
Pennsylvania 283,628 5811 29708 2% 10% 62%
Ohio 261,443 5473 25679 2% 10% 53%
New York 216,261 4503 25415 2% 12% 68%
Virginia 149676 3736 12848 2% 9% 64%
Massachusetts122080 2694 13259 2% 11% 71%
New Jersey 165,451 3376 23960 2% 14% 67%
Nevada 59659 704 7695 1% 13% 54%
Mississippi 72425 325 9214 0% 13% 47%
Rhode Island 21391 43 2204 0% 10% 72%
Maine 29680 171 1036 1% 3% 72%
Connecticut 65080 640 8010 1% 12% 72%
West Virginia 44300 648 3899 1% 9% 41%
Idaho 31674 237 3265 1% 10% 45%
Wyoming 10423 10 912 0% 9% 45%
Alabama 120150 2398 14735 2% 12% 46%
Mississippi 72425 325 9214 0% 13% 47%
North Dakota 15264 10 1640 0% 11% 48%
Louisiana 103743 949 12368 1% 12% 49%
Hawaii 22868 374 686 2% 3% 61%
Alaska 9414 0 554 0% 6% 54%
South Dakota 17645 0 1974 0% 11% 54%

CaptainHorsePaste says

Wife is experiencing strange things. Getting headaches, nausea, she just had her second period in 4 weeks. She's in her 40s, and double vaxxed. She's incredibly anxious and high strung.

How long ago did she get her second dose?

sjmoca says

Honestly there seems to be no smoke here when you take that into account.

Honestly?

What do you think about the 600% increase in death rate that started in July, or August, or October or whenever the number spiked?

You do see the spike? Don'tcha?

sjmoca says

Looks familiar.

This isn't about "Unknown cause of death" it's about "symptoms signs and abnormal clinical and laboratory findings not elsewhere classified" or "rare diseases"

And welcome to Patrick.net, if you have not been here before.

porkchopexpress says

How long ago did she get her second dose?

About 6 months ago.

The correlation of increased "rare" deaths with the vaxx is enormous and unmistakable.

sjmoca says

Seems mistaken to me. There's enough information available to see this data is just showing the expected lag effect. Not saying nobody died of vaxx, but pointing to data lag as proof of a vaxx spike is erroneous.

How can you just ignore the immense increase in "rare" deaths after the vaxx rollout?

What are they, other than vaxx-induced deaths?

Can you summarize clearly?

sjmoca says

This "spike", or hook upwards in the most recent months of data of deaths with unknown causes, is always there, before the vaxx and before covid, due to data lag.

Can you generate such a graph for a year before 2020?

I think it needs to be earlier than 2020 to prove your point.

To be clearly earlier than the vaxx's existence.

Given the unreasonably short timeframe in which the vaxx was supposedly created, and the tremendous number of lies told by Fauci and the CDC, I suspect the vaxx may have been tested on the public in early 2020.

sjmoca says

I can try.

@sjmoca
Do you believe the vax is "safe and effective"?

And why do you suppose the CDC is no longer updating its "death by cause and age" dataset?

sjmoca says

Happy to discuss why or why not.

Why, since multiple deaths and injuries were caused by the vax, do you think it is safe?
Why, since multiple jabs are required, do you think it is effective?

Many here at patrick.net, including me, believe the vax is genocide and or an attempt to have CCP type social control.

Onvacation says

Many here at patrick.net, including me, believe the vax is genocide and or an attempt to have CCP type social control.

These are the only 4 reasons I can come up with.
1) a conditioning program
2) depopulation
3) simply to determine who are compliant and who are trouble makers
4) part of the build back better plan for total control of the population

sjmoca says

On a relative basis, much more deaths have happened in the unvaccinated. Based on UK data, 32x more likely to die of Covid. 2.8x more likely to have died of anything, all-in.

Link please. I'd like to see the raw data.

What you have shown here is that the unvaxxed mortality rate is a little over 2000 and a little over 3000 for all the vaxxed people.

The CDC data also seems cooked. I have seen vax rates of 150% in some of their datasets.

Your explanation of reporting lag makes sense as the last couple of weeks in the latest dataset are always low. I'll have to look closer and see where the deaths have been moved to.

This data is complete bullshit. Most of the kids aren't vaccinated anywhere and none of them die. If you added all the asymptomatic infected unvaxxed kids this statement would turn over on its head. They are basically taking severe cases amongst adults (aka hospitalizations) and then compare. Many unjabbed adults have comorbidities and can't take the jab. All you need to do is look at highly vaccinated states and countries and rising case, hospitalizations and deaths to see the jabs are not only dangerous, they don't work. Never has been there such a dangerous and ineffective vaccine in history, maybe the flu virus in some years when they don't get the cocktail right, could match in ineffectiveness.

The seroprevalence is estimated to be about around 40% now. They don't take any of those into account. The jab may lessen severity of symptoms for 4-6 months but at the expense of death and crippling for some, plus ADE plus cumulative side effects for all of those who need to keep boosting every 4-6 months.

sjmoca says

mell says

Never has been there such a dangerous and ineffective vaccine in history, maybe the flu virus in some years when they don't get the cocktail right, could match in ineffectiveness.

This idea doesn't seem remotely accurate. The vast vast majority of rising cases, hospitalizations, and deaths, are in the unvaccinated.

Thanks for the FAKE NEWS but your source is not at all credible. And the chart data is not given. My information shows that current Covid patients are mostly vaxxed in the USA, and almost all vaxxed in many other countries.
Also the death rate is rising, among vaxxed Covid patients. It is now almost double the rate of death for 2020.

What kind of vaccine increases your risk of dying by two fold?

sjmoca says

This idea doesn't seem remotely accurate. The vast vast majority of rising cases, hospitalizations, and deaths, are in the unvaccinated.

Is that current, or cumulative? If cumulative, that would include the time before the vax, no?

From KFF site:

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) currently monitors hospitalizations and deaths, from any cause, among fully vaccinated individuals with COVID-19, but not breakthrough infections, which it stopped monitoring as of May 1. CDC presents this data in aggregate at the national level but not by state, and there is no single, public repository for data by state or data on breakthrough infections, since the CDC stopped monitoring them.

What's the reason for the high rate of cases in Vermont, one of the most vaxxed states in the Union, or Israel, which is 80%+ vaxxed?

Shaman says

What kind of vaccine increases your risk of dying by two fold?

Great observation. We now have a COVID death rate higher after almost a year of a vaccine, than a year before ANY vaccine was available. And it's spreading fastest in areas that are the most vaccinated.

Onvacation says

sjmoca says

Honestly there seems to be no smoke here when you take that into account.

Honestly?

What do you think about the 600% increase in death rate that started in July, or August, or October or whenever the number spiked?

You do see the spike? Don'tcha?

Thats the problem, it does lessen symptoms for 4-6 months without ADE, but it kills so many on the way along. And ADE is lurking. Net net it kills more than it saves, the only reliable number is the number of vaccines to give to save one live and it's horribly high and kills and maims more on the way. The only people who should consider taking it are those at high risk of dying who haven't had covid yet

sjmoca says

This idea doesn't seem remotely accurate. The vast vast majority of rising cases, hospitalizations, and deaths, are in the unvaccinated.

Of course only the unvaccinated are tested.


A lot of brainwashed people think the Wuhan is really dangerous and the vax is safe and effective

sjmoca says

Texas released their report:

Even though Texas was 50% vaxxed in June they still had a spike in deaths.

sjmoca says

I think it's the "delta variant"

That's what I've been hearing.

CaptainHorsePaste says

We now have a COVID death rate higher after almost a year of a vaccine, than a year before ANY vaccine was available. And it's spreading fastest in areas that are the most vaccinated.

This is clearly true. Look at Singapore, Israel, Austria, Netherlands.

Then look at Africa, which has almost no vaxxing and almost no Wuhan Virus.

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/uk-data-shows-the-vaccines-are-not

UK data shows the vaccines are NOT saving any lives at all. Zero. Zip. Nada.
Mathew Crawford just did an analysis showing that the data from the UK shows that the vaccines aren't saving any lives at all. Zero. Zip. Nada. So we're killing over 150K people to save no lives. Wow.

https://eugyppius.substack.com/p/ukhsa-vaccine-surveillance-week-46

sjmoca says

That is very interesting. From the same data, the death rate is still higher among the unvaxed.

True. The vax is usually somewhat protective vs Covid for mitigating death risk. Looks like it ranges from 7 times less risk to 2 times less risk. But consider Taiwan’s data: they had low Covid from the beginning, but experienced almost a thousand deaths from the vax itself! At one point a couple weeks ago, Taiwan actually had more deaths from the vax than from Covid!
Australia is the same although their data is very corrupt. What they can’t hide though, is that since this vax campaign has been in effect, their hospitals have been packed full of people in distress and/or dying. But there’s no Covid.

Finally, a study that was undergoing BCA (blood testing) of a group of patients for an issue unrelated to Covid, reported their findings last week.
“ The risk of developing acute coronary syndrome (ACS) significantly increased in patients after receiving mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, according to a report presented at the American Heart Association (AHA) Scientific Sessions 2021, held from November 13 to 15, 2021.

The study included 566 men and women (1:1) aged 28-97 years, who were patients in a preventive cardiology practice. All patients received a new PULS Cardiac Test 2-10 weeks after their second COVID-19 vaccine. This test result was compared with a PULS score from 3-5 months prevaccination. The PULS Cardiac Test measures multiple protein biomarkers, including hepatocyte growth factor [HGF], soluble Fas, and IL-16, and uses the results to calculate a 5-year risk score for new ACS. The PULS score increases with above-normal elevation. All participants received this test every 3-6 months for 8 years.

From prevaccination to postvaccination, the levels of IL-16 increased from 35=/-20 to 82=/-75 above the norm. Soluble Fas showed an increase from 22±15 to 46=/-24 above the norm. HGF rose from 42±12 to 86±31 above the norm. As a result, the 5-year ACS PULS risk score increased from 11% to 25%. By the time the report was published, changes had persisted for 2.5 months or more after the second vaccine dose.“

So it looks like the vax does permanent heart damage as a “side effect.” The reports of myocarditis are just from the people who were more critically affected by the cardiac damage. If you took the vax, you most likely have heart damage.
https://www.thecardiologyadvisor.com/home/topics/acs/acute-coronary-syndrome-acs-biomarkers-mrna-covid19-vaccine/

sjmoca says

More likely

Know what’s “more likely?” That a vax with a solidly proven history of causing myocarditis and pericarditis as well as sudden fatal heart attacks and clots so severe they cause strokes and necessitate amputation of limbs… it’s MORE LIKELY that such a vax causes fucking heart damage!
But you’re just assuming that the test, a test which has been in use for decades without question… is the real problem.
In response to that, I’m rolling my eyes savagely.

sjmoca says

, influenza, covid-19, and bacterial infections. What the vax hesitant keep ignoring is that pediatric experts are saying covid-19 causes more fucking myocarditis than the vax!

Bold faced lie by the "experts"! There are close to zero serious covid 19 cases among kids, the factor of severe damage (incl. myocarditis) from the jab is higher by 100x - 10000 x. They are being paid off by big pharma and literally killing and maiming kids. There are a few MDs with integrity left though who will tell you it's asinine and criminal to jab kids