patrick.net

Japanese health ministry admits to second “undeniable” causal link between a COVID mRNA vaccine & death when healthy teen girl was found unresponsive after 3rd Pfizer injection...

Finally, the UK Daily Mail shattered the vaccine shield Wednesday with this astounding headline, which was so fascinating I’m giving you the screen shot:




How about that? The headline’s a two-fer, mentioning both vaccine injury and censorship. If they’re not careful, this kind of thing might give people the impression that vaccine injuries are more common than they’re letting on and even make some folks hesitant.

💉 Maybe it’s just me, but it seems like the baffled headlines are picking up steam lately, all avoiding the obvious point in a thousand different tricksy ways. From the Guardian, Thursday, about the latest alarming — but baffling — worldwide trend:




Needless to say, the Guardian’s “Explainer” explained nothing. It quoted experts gassing about obesity rates and equitable access to healthcare. At least they didn’t try climate change this time. But the headline that garnered the most attention this week was this remarkable debut from the Wall Street Journal:




The confused doctors are not just baffled. They’re baffled and alarmed. But back in 2020, the public health community instantly and confidently knew everything there was to know about a novel, lab-designed coronavirus and most importantly, exactly how to avoid it. But now? Now experts are baffled and alarmed about how to avoid cancer, which has been studied for ages.

You know what I say? Their bafflement is baffling. ...

Clearly, the Journal editors want us to know one thing: cancer in young people was shooting up even before the mRNA jabs. So there.

Maybe … and so another way to look at the pre-2020 data is youthful cancer rates have been increasing right along with the ever-expanding childhood vaccine schedule. I’m just saying.

I’m won’t bother dissecting the exasperating article. It was just some kind of psyop anyway. The Journal’s article deliberately missed the point, which is what concerns modern, post-2020 observers: the dramatic increase in atypical cancers, especially (but not only) in a cluster of types. What do I mean by atypical? This is what I mean:

Cancers presenting for the first time at Stage 4, or already metastasized, that do not usually first appear at Stage 4.

Cancers highly or totally resistant to established treatments.

Cancers presenting in uncommon demographics, like lung cancers appearing in twenty-two year-old nonsmokers.

Cancers progressing to death much faster than established survival rates (so-called “turbo” cancers).

Multiple unrelated cancers appearing in the same patient at the same time.

Clusters of cancer, like where a young married couple both diagnose with Stage 4 cancers — different types — around the same time.

I can back up each of those categories with eye-popping current scholarship, like this new study published in Nature’s Oncology journal just this week:




... Remember: the problem is not just the general spike in young cancers, which is a problem, but it’s not the most suggestive piece of the puzzle. The bigger problem is the recent spike in atypical cancers.

Dr. Joel Wallskog, Diagnosed with Transverse Myelitis After One Dose of Moderna
US Senator Ron Johnson Holds Expert Panel On Federal Vaccine Mandates - Nov 2 2021
https://rumble.com/vu8wa4-us-senator-ron-johnson-holds-expert-panel-on-federal-vaccine-mandates.html

DR. JOEL WALLSKOG: My name is Joel Wallskog. Thank you for the opportunity to speak today. I'm an orthopedic surgeon from Mequon, Wisconsin. After high school I spent almost 14 years in education and training. I developed a large orthopedic practice focusing primarily in joint replacement. I average over 5,000 patient visits per year and perform well over 800 surgical procedures per year. While my personal core identity focuses on my family, I love my job as an orthopedic surgeon. My patients and coworkers will undoubtedly say that I have a passion for my job.

On December 30th of 2020 I received the first covid Moderna vaccine without incident initially. Approximately one week later, I recognized that my feet were numb. A sensation of pins and needles. I also began having powerful electrical shocks sensations down my entire spine, radiating to my feet.

Within days I obtained an MRI of my cervical spine. It revealed no acute changes to account for my numbness. Move forward three or four days, I was sitting in a clinic room at work talking with a patient. I attempted just simply to stand from a sitting position. I couldn't stand. I pushed myself up with my arms and quickly fell backwards. Later that day, I had MRIs of my thoracic and lumbar spine. I soon saw a neurologist, actually two to three days later, who diagnosed me with transverse myelitis, a rare condition that involves a demyelinated lesion of my thoracic spinal cord.

While my neurologist recommended I take two or three months off of work, I agreed to take two weeks. After I returned, I operated on a, on two consecutive days, although an intended shortened schedule. After the second day, I felt horrible. I was numb from my umbilicus to my feet, I could barely walk, and I really, I have been off work since. I'm just not safe to work as an orthopedic surgeon.

After my diagnosis, I brought up the question of whether my condition could be related to the Moderna covid vaccine that I received. I asked my employer to report it to VAERS.[1]

I was aware that the UK AstraZeneca covid vaccine trial was delayed twice because of three cases of transverse myelitis. Assuming the FDA and the CDC would be alarmed at my diagnosis, I expected to be contacted soon after my VAERS submission. No phone call. No contact. In fact, weeks passed.

I then contacted the CDC myself. They acknowledged my VAERS submission but stated my reaction was categorized as not serious, as I had not been hospitalized and I hadn't died. I have never heard from the CDC again. No contact with the NIH [National Institutes of Health], no contact from the FDA.

I notified Moderna directly numerous times and asked that I be contacted. No one from Moderna ever contacted me.

One word describes how I felt in the first few months after my diagnosis. Abandoned.

My life has dramatically changed after this adverse reaction. [voice breaks] My career of 19 years. Excuse me. That I took almost 14 years to train for is likely over. While my electrical sensations have decreased, my numbness, weakness, and poor balance are unchanged as compared to January of 2021. I compare myself now to a car. I begin each day with a quarter tank of gas. When my fuel tank is empty, I'm done for the day. If I overdo it, like today, I plan on spending the next day or two on the couch.

Let me be clear, I am pro-vaccine. I got one Moderna covid vaccine. Let me be clear, I had a real adverse event.

I urge the CDC, the FDA, the NIH and all other involved governmental agencies to listen to the injured. There— Adverse events are real. I urge everyone to become open and transparent with covid vaccine data. The VAERS system is grossly inadequate. I am bewildered how we as a country seem to be dependent on foreign data. I urge additional monies to be allocated to studying the etiologies and treatment of these adverse events. I also urge Congress to enact legislation to allow for financial remedy under the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program for those injured by the covid 19 vaccinations.

[1] VAERS is the official US government Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. https://vaers.hhs.gov/about.html
(Note: https://openvaers.com/ provides VAERS data in a more reader-friendly presentation)

On January 11, 2024, in Japan, the Vaccine Issues Study Group convened a press conference to reveal the critical and worrisome findings of their initial six-month investigations into the side effects of vaccines. The results, as presented by a panel of esteemed medical experts, have been nothing short of alarming, drawing particular attention to a wide range of medical concerns, from cancer to neurological disorders.

Professor Emeritus Masanori Fukushima of Kyoto University urgently addressed the diverse array of side effects uncovered by their study. “A systematic review of the literature has unveiled some shocking information," he stated, setting a grave tone from the outset. "Thousands of papers have reported side effects after vaccination, affecting every possible aspect of human pathology – from ophthalmology to psychiatry." Noting the broad scope of these findings, he highlighted that "This kind of reporting on drug side effects or the like is unprecedented."

Providing more specifics, Professor Fukushima mentioned significant spikes in certain conditions following vaccination campaigns, "For example, the age-adjusted mortality rate for leukemia has increased. And there are significant findings for breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and so on," pointing to serious implications for critical illness due to vaccines, which is unlike anything previously documented.

The press conference did not shy away from discussing the suppression of such information. "Japanese doctors are trying hard, but they face various obstructions," Professor Fukushima remarked, shedding light on the undercurrents of medical censorship that have stonewalled professional discourse around the vaccination issues.

On brain-related adverse events, the evidence was equally disturbing, with Professor Fukushima expressing, "mental disorders, psychiatric symptoms, depression, mania, anxiety, came up in abundance, but it's endless." He emphasized that the sheer volume and variety of neurological issues raised in response to the vaccines were unforeseeable, "So this is just a part of it."

Speaking out about the implications of these findings, Professor Yasufumi Murakami from Tokyo University of Science did not mince words regarding the responsibility to halt the use of vaccines based on their adverse effects. "It's very clear what happens when you administer a toxic gene to a human. There are cases that occur within one or two weeks after injection, but there are also many cases that appear after one or two years," he specified, indicating the long-term risks involved with vaccine-induced conditions.

💉 The Epoch Times ran a revealing story yesterday headlined, “EXCLUSIVE: Veterans Affairs Found Safety Signal for Pfizer COVID Vaccine, Never Disclosed It.” It was even more embarrassing for the government than the headline suggested.

Fauci deservedly gets all the hate, but slippery CDC official Tom Shimabukuro is just as culpable and maybe even more directly responsible for millions of unnecessary deaths and injuries from the vaccines. He should be just as well known as Fauci. While Fauci was appearing as the official face of the pandemic on every rapper’s podcast to push the jabs, Shimabukuro was the one behind the scenes holding the pillow smothering legitimate scientists and ensuring nothing made the jabs look bad.

Through public records requests, Epoch got hold of an email from the Veteran’s Administration showing the CDC was told about the myocarditis signal on May 13, 2021 — right after the jab campaign started — and even though the agency would deny the obvious connection between the vaccines and heart problems until nearly a year later in 2022, long after most young people had already been vaccinated.

Here’s the May 2021 email from a VA doctor to the CDC official in charge of the covid vaccines, Dr. Shimabukuro:



“We have a signal for myocarditis/pericarditis…with Pfizer vaccine following the 1st dose,” VA doctor Fran Cunningham wrote to Dr. Shimabukuro on May 13, 2021. Dr. Cunningham, who is probably worried about keeping her job, did not answer Epoch’s calls or emails. When asked about the agency’s lack of response to Cunningham’s email, a CDC spokesman told Epoch flatly that the VA later determined the signal “was not a true signal.”

Really. But how? How did they determine it was “not a true signal?” I mean, however you slice it, it was a true signal, as the CDC would finally admit over a year later. Is the CDC saying the VA’s particular signal was wrong, even though in a bigger picture way it was right? Was it more likely the VA determined it was “not a true signal” because they were told it was not a true signal and to shut up fast?

In May 2021, there were plenty of other signals of jab problems besides the VA email, such as everything flooding into VAERS. And the person at the CDC who made sure nobody found out about the problems was Dr. Tom Shimabukuro.

A paper published on a preprint server on Jan 20, 2023, by scientists at Health New Zealand and the NZ Ministry of Health showed conclusively that the COVID vaccine causes kidney injury.

The paper “disappeared” from the preprint server and reappeared 8 months later in a peer-reviewed journal on Aug 9, 2023, but with key numbers changed to make the vaccine look safe with respect to kidney injury.

The incidents in the paper couldn’t happen by chance. The p-value calculated from the data they observed is 1.28e-115 which is ridiculously small. I’ve never seen a p-value that small. It means that it is a certainty that the effect wasn’t just due to random chance: it was causal.

Lord of Adders Black
@LeAdderNoire
One of my best friends, female 33, jabbed up to the eye balls and 7 months pregnant is in hospital with Covid and a blood clot on her lung. Consultant said "it'd be much worse without vaccinations".

I fucking hate these people masquerading as doctors with our interests at heart.
10:04 AM · Apr 1, 2022

"A paper published on a preprint server on Jan 20, 2023, by scientists at Health New Zealand and the NZ Ministry of Health showed conclusively that the COVID vaccine causes kidney injury."

Pat, Do you have a link for this?

A popular social media influencer has tragically died suddenly after suffering an unexpected cardiac arrest at just 35 years old.

Brazil-born newlywed Mila De Jesus lived in Boston with her husband and leaves behind four children. ...

According to posts on X, De Jesus was reportedly “fully vaccinated.”

His fiancée reported him vaccinated and boosted and is blaming the death on Covid, not the jab.

💉 Last night, the CBS-2 Iowa ran a story headlined, “Sen. Chuck Grassley in the hospital for treatment of infection.” ...

They won’t say what kind of infection. But according to Fox, Grassley is getting “antibiotic infusions.”

We don’t know for sure, of course, but an infusion of antibiotics either suggests that Grassley is comatose and can’t take oral meds, or that the infection is alarmingly severe or antibiotic-resistant and they want the drugs in his bloodstream, stat.

Like maybe sepsis, for example. ...

Of course, Grassley is the Senate’s oldest member, and has enjoyed that stately title ever since Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-Ca.) died in September after getting an infection. I’m not sure which part of this story to highlight: the astounding elderly ages of too many of our current crop of leaders, a 90-year old’s shaky prospects after any infection requiring hospitalization, or the obvious intersection between what’s quickly becoming a very common category of potential jab injury (sepsis) and obscure reports without any actual appearances by the affected public official.

Grassley is a popular Republican Senator. To his credit, Grassley vocally opposed mandates. But in July of 2021, Grassley took the jabs...

Sep 1, 2021, 06:27pm

The NBA has set an Oct. 1 deadline for team personnel to be fully vaccinated and left open the possibility that it could require a booster shot at a later date. The mandate applies to all personnel who will work near the court...

Warriors Assistant Coach Dejan Milojević Dead At 46 After Heart Attack

Milojević, a former coach and mentor to two-time NBA MVP Nikola Jokic, died after a heart attack Tuesday at a team dinner in Salt Lake City.

November 3, 2023

"We’re seeing a disturbing continued trend of cardiac arrests in people who have taken the vaccine," reported world-renowned cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough to Real America’s Voice Friday. “Now we have data from Nakahara in a human cardiac PET study showing that positron emission tomography scans of the heart change in almost everybody who took the shot, at least for six months or longer, where the heart’s metabolism changes."

San Diego Coroner just ruled it a suicide by gunshot. WTF?

🔥 The American Cancer Society’s 2024 Annual Report came out this week, and it is a sick joke. Again and again, the authors cited cancer data only through 2020, cutting off any more recent analysis and otherwise bypassing the last three years, poof!, gone, vanished, down the memory hole. The Society relied only on pre-2021 data to predict 2024. Even when it did provide comparative data, the report misleadingly used different units for its 2024 estimates versus the figures it charted for pre-2021.

For example, while the report estimated the numbers of projected 2024 cancer victims, it only provided the rates of pre-2021 cancers. There’s no easy way to compare numbers versus rates; so good luck.

Presumably attempting to explain the shocking failure to give any insights into the last three years of cancer, a note on the Society’s website claimed that current cancer data is lagging two to four years. Uh huh. For whatever reason, that claim was omitted from the 2024 Report, which doesn’t even try to explain the omission.

Non-mathematicians have zero chance of comparing figures based on the Report. But Ethical Skeptic, a statistics expert, did crunch the Report’s cancer numbers and concluded it shows a +12.7% excess in cancer deaths over the pre-jab baseline, extending 2023’s excess and showing an excess growth rate of around +3% a year.



Apart from that, there were a couple other buried headlines in the Report. Unsurprisingly, the 80-page report included a woke 20-page insert — one quarter of the whole report — on cancer in LGBTQ+ people — the only demographic subgroup enjoying separate treatment. At first, I rolled my eyes at the obvious pandering, but scanning the LGBT section turned up some fascinating information that really should be more widely known.

Apparently, one’s atypical sexual lifestyle choices have a measurable effect on cancer risk. And it’s not a good effect. Being gay or trans increases the risk of several types of cancer.

After stripping out all the hedged qualifications and implicit apologies, here’s what the 2024 Report said about “Disparities in Cancer Occurrence” between gay/trans people and heterosexuals:

Lesbian and bisexual women likely have a higher risk of breast cancer due to higher prevalence of risk factors, including fewer childbirths, higher alcohol use, and excess body weight. One modeling study found a +10% higher breast cancer risk among bisexual women and +6% higher risk among lesbian women compared to heterosexual women.

Transgender women (biological males) appear to be at an increased cancer risk during hormone treatment compared to cisgender men. Transgender men (biological females) appear to have a higher risk of breast cancer compared to heterosexual men. Although women receiving gender-affirming hormone therapy are at lower risk for prostate cancer than cisgender men, there is some evidence of a higher prevalence of more aggressive disease.

Hormone-taking women are getting more aggressive prostate cancers than men do. How about that — hormone treatments appear to increase cancer risks. But you don’t hear too much about it, now do you?

The Daily Mail’s veteran tennis correspondent Mike Dickson has dropped dead while covering the Australian Open, according to reports.

The esteemed sportswriter collapsed and died suddenly in Melbourne while covering the tennis championship, his family has announced.

He was 59 years old.

The rescheduling of the royals’ other appearances strongly suggests that neither hospitalization was in fact planned, similar to how Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin’s efforts to hide his post-benign-prostate-surgery hospitalization suggests that Austin’s surgery wasn’t really planned either.

I don’t know what the odds might be for such a Royal Cluster of two sudden and unexpected hospitalizations on the same day, but I would have to guess they are pretty long odds. We pray for full recovery for both Royal Persons, whatever might be going on, and even though the U.S. jettisoned the whole royalty thing with prejudice back during the late unpleasantness.