5
0

Lawless Judges Thread


               
2021 Sep 9, 9:26pm   1,201 views  43 comments

by TheAntiPanicanLearingCenter   follow (9)  

Here's one. While Judges everywhere uphold the powers of even the lowest levels of governance to impose mask mandates, they simultaneously shoot down the powers of the highest executive of the state from banning them - that is, reducing government oversight.

Earlier this year, DeSantis called it “completely unacceptable for either the government or the private sector to impose upon you the requirement that you show proof of vaccine to just simply be able to participate in normal society.”

The new rule comes nearly a week after a Florida judge ruled that DeSantis had overstepped his authority by banning public institutions from enacting mask mandates.

In his opinion, Judge John Cooper wrote that state law “does not support a statewide order, or any action interfering with the constitutionally provided authority of local school districts to provide for the safety and health of children, based on the unique facts on the ground in a particular county.”

He added that the governor’s order contradicts a medical and scientific consensus that masks are effective in curbing transmission of COVID.

So the fuck what? Medical and Scientific "consensus" isn't elected and has no legislative or executive power.


“The evidence submitted by the defendant [the state] I think reflects a minority, perhaps even a small minority of medical and scientific opinion,” Cooper said.

Despite the judge’s ruling, the Florida Department of Education announced earlier this week that it had withheld funding from two school districts that imposed mask mandates without a parental opt-out in violation of the mask-mandate ban.


The state said it would withhold an amount equal to the school board members’ salaries and that it plans to continue withholding the funds each month until the districts change their mask policies.

https://news.yahoo.com/florida-businesses-require-proof-vaccination-013916984.html
Good to know Desantis is ignoring lawless, illegitimate Judiciary fiat.

« First        Comments 31 - 43 of 43        Search these comments

31   Patrick   @   2025 Nov 3, 10:50am  

https://www.kunstler.com/p/last-ditch


The Lefty federal judges have been uniformly humiliated as one temporary restraining order (TRO) after another gets tossed by the SCOTUS. Judge James Boasberg of the DC District, the very model of a judicial “Resistance” activist, is about to get his ass impeached after ten-years of dabbling in malicious abuse of judicial process (28 U.S.C. § 2680-h under the Federal Tort Claims Act), plus 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (false statements or concealment in federal matters, potentially covering abusive filings), and 8 U.S.C. § 1503/1512 (obstruction of justice via tampering or corrupt persuasion, applicable to malicious process abuse), Stand by on that. Might be a caution to the rest of the federal judge gang to back off their Resistance shenanigans.

In case you haven’t followed the story — since The New York Times and network news won’t report on it — we are in the midst of the “Arctic Frost Investigation” scandal when, in 2022, “Joe Biden” induced AG Merrick Garland and FBI Director Christopher Wray to go mad-dog on Donald Trump and hundreds of political conservatives, including nine US Senators, whose phone records were seized, with gag orders (from Judge Boasberg) to prevent notification of the seize-ees, which has raised accusations of violating their First Amendment rights, and grand jury secrecy. Arctic Frost is still unspooling, with reverberations to come, including insights on the Jack Smith / Norm Eisen lawfare spree in 2023-24 against Donald Trump that followed it.
32   HeadSet   @   2025 Nov 3, 6:29pm  

Patrick says


James Boasberg of the DC District, the very model of a judicial “Resistance” activist, is about to get his ass impeached

I will believe that when I see it.
33   Ceffer   @   2025 Nov 3, 7:29pm  

HeadSet says

I will believe that when I see it.

I don't even think I will believe it when I see it at this point.
34   Patrick   @   2025 Nov 14, 1:11pm  

https://www.chicagotribune.com/2025/11/12/federal-judge-says-hell-order-release-of-hundreds-of-operation-midway-blitz-arrestees-on-bond/


A federal judge on Wednesday said he plans to grant bond to hundreds of immigrants whose arrests during Operation Midway Blitz are being challenged under a consent decree that limits so-called warrantless arrests that occur without a prior warrant or probable cause.

In a packed hearing at Chicago’s federal courthouse, U.S. District Judge Jeffrey Cummings ordered the immediate release of 13 people whose arrests the Department of Justice agreed violated the 2022 agreement.

The judge also told lawyers for the government to produce a list by Nov. 19 detailing how many of a subset of 615 class members were still in custody, and whether they qualified for mandatory detention due to a prior criminal history or removal order.

Unless a detainee was shown to be a security risk, Cummings said he would allow their release on a $1,500 bond and some form of monitoring, including electronic ankle monitors, pending the outcome of immigration proceedings. Most of those arrested were originally processed at the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility in west suburban Broadview, but have since been moved to jails around the country.
35   MolotovCocktail   @   2025 Nov 14, 4:45pm  

Patrick says

is about to get his ass impeached after


Doesn't mater. Not enough votes in the Senate to remove.
38   HeadSet   @   2026 Jan 1, 7:51pm  

What does "judges under fire" mean? That someone somewhere points out that the dismissal is tainted? These judges will not even be removed let alone jailed.
40   Patrick   @   2026 Jan 11, 8:56am  

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/12/how-three-judges-dismantled-federal-indictment-judicial-overreach/


The American public expects prosecutors to prove cases and defendants to challenge them. But in United States v. James B. Comey Jr., something very different occurred. A federal grand jury voted to indict the former FBI Director on two felony counts — and then three federal judges unraveled that indictment through conjecture, media narratives, personalized attacks on the United States Attorney, and procedural anomalies that have no precedent in federal criminal practice.

Together, they reveal a pattern inconsistent with judicial neutrality, ethical obligations, and the constitutional role of the grand jury.
41   Patrick   @   2026 Jan 25, 6:14pm  

https://x.com/Cernovich/status/2014738507454181550


Under the made-up blue slip rule, for a Trump judge or US Attorney nomination to go forward for approval, BOTH SENATORS, even from a Democrat state, must approve. Otherwise Grassley won't send the nominee forward.

Because of the blue slip system, there are entire judicial regions (the 9th Circuit) where it's known by lawyers and other judges that the law doesn't apply. There's no way to reform the system, because the Senate won't change the rules.

This also means that Trump, despite winning the popular vote and 7 for 7 swing states, cannot appoint US Attorneys who will enforce the will of the American people. One Democrat can veto anything.

Even worse, there are line attorneys inside DOJ who are working to protect Democrats. They were hired by Biden. There's no way to remove them, because Trump cannot put his own US Atty inside the office.

The blue slip system is made up, by the way. It's not in law. Grassley could end it today. Why won't he?

« First        Comments 31 - 43 of 43        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste