patrick.net

Patrick says

Like I said, I don't believe that the vaxx is a deliberate plan to kill people. It's just that the Pfizer-government complex doesn't care who dies from it, as long as they rake in the profits and have no liability for the deaths.

If it was population control, the two groups they'd love to depopulate fatest: Right Wing Whites and Ghetto Trash are the most vaccine "hesitant", whereas their Soyboy/Fat Bureaucrat Bitch (FBB) 10% Outer Party were the most likely to get it.

Reality says

Today, people have little savings, so it's a game about annulling pension funds and grabbing assets.

This makes sense to me. The USA monetary system is in serious trouble. And since it’s the world reserve currency, that means the world has the same problem. We owe too much to too many people. The majority of them are pensions and old people. Release a virus that targets old people, then a vaxx that sets most people up with a seriously damaged immune system, and then the counter punch is a truly dangerous virus with decent lethality that’s immediately widely spread… you’ll wipe out tens of millions in weeks. Perhaps more. And they’ll be systematically older adults with more money/assets and also be creditors of the USA. After all, the National Debt isn’t owed as much to foreigners as it is owed to ourselves.
Mix in a healthy dose of inflation and it’s a recipe for balancing our books on the cheap. Not only that, but you’ll remove nearly all the “useless eaters” and frivolous consumers of excess healthcare. Hell, with most of the doctors and nurses vaxxed, you’ll remove most of the medical system itself!
And without a medical system, the spending on federal and state entitlements drops like a stone.

Also… anyone else remember what they did with the death tax recently? It’s at like 40% for wealth over $11.7 million. Knock off 20 or 30 million of your wealthiest citizens and the state could stand to “inherit” trillions.
For an example, let’s say 1 million of the people who die have 22 million dollars in wealth. The government would stand to make 20 trillion times 0.4 = 8 trillion in inheritance taxes just from those fat little sheep.

Very good point on their deliberate attempt to paralyze the medical industry to speed up the killings. Be wary about "our books" though, there is no "our books": when we put money in a bank, we think we have an asset whereas the bank has a liability. Balancing it to "zero" means clearing us out like in this Southpark clip:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-DT7bX-B1Mg

Likewise for government pension liabilities and what people (especially government employees) think they have.

There are only about 3 million people in the US with net-worth over a million dollars. People with significantly more than $10mil are likely to have the assets in family trust funds that do not die; that's the problem Bernie Madoff eventually faced: his clients were not natural persons and did not die. A few far more likely scenarios where the banks and governments can make off big when people die (through the vast larger number of cases):

1. husbands hiding money from their wives for side flings; when the husbands die, the wives don't know; according to statistics, nearly 90% of married couples are not happily married.

2. single estranged elderly, especially elderly women who have no kids of their own but were "successful" in their careers and saved up some money after selling themselves to the corporations and government jobs;

These two types already have their money in the bank, and "it's gone" so their deaths remove the liabilities for the banks.

3. elderly people who live in their own houses. A few months after deaths, there would be either estate sale or tax lien sales by the cities/towns. Kids are either too lazy, to desperate or too much conflict among the siblings to seek the best price. That's when the governments and the banks/private-equity would have a chance at buying a house at much lower than normal market prices. Didn't the money managers just complain about not having enough houses to buy? The fund-manager "cash buyers" borrowing from the FED window at near-zero interest rate can then flip to home buyers on mortgage or renters, pocketing the difference in between. The city/town also gets to raise property tax much higher than whatever the elderly owner may have qualified.

Reality says

There are only about 3 million people in the US with net-worth over a million dollars.

https://www.ramseysolutions.com/retirement/how-many-millionaires-in-us

How Many Millionaires Are in the U.S.?
Do you know how many millionaires are in the U.S. today? The answer is there are about 12 million millionaire households, according to Spectrem Group’s Market Insights Report 2020.1 And that number is growing.



https://www.thekickassentrepreneur.com/millionaires-in-america/

The number of millionaires in the US is 20.27 million.

Currently, there are over 4,473,836 or 4.4 million households in the United States of America that have $4 million or more in wealth.

the number of households that have $5 million or more in wealth is estimated at around 3,592,054 or 3.59 million.

"Household worth more than a million" is counting the sum of all members of the household. A husband and a wife each with good jobs and retirement funds with combined wealth of $1.5mil may not have a single millionaire in that household. You are correct though in pointing out the real number is likely higher than the 3mil estimate I gave, but the inheritance tax kick in at a higher threshold so still may not catch that many people; not that I support inheritance tax or anything. The sources of death windfall for banks and governments are far more likely to be the middle class: the elderly home-owners etc. that I mentioned above.

Also, by mid-2019, there were about 650k reverse-mortgages outstanding. If an average house in reverse mortgage is $300k, killing even half of those 650k reverse-mortgage homeowners would net the lenders $100 Billion!