patrick.net

Patrick says

https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/worldwide-vaccine-failure

But don’t worry, the boosters will fix everything!

It should be pretty obvious by now the vaxx is causing this.

MSM can only ignore this and perpetuate a fake pandemic for so long

https://www.ntd.com/covid-19-cases-surge-across-germany-amid-2g-vaccine-passport-system_700620.html?utm_source=patrick.net&utm_medium=patrick.net&utm_campaign=patrick.net

German officials confirmed that daily COVID-19 cases surpassed 50,000 for the first time during the pandemic, coming weeks after a number of states have implemented “2G” rules that increased restrictions on individuals who haven’t been vaccinated.

https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/if-unvaccinated-were-a-drug-to-stop

all data in this piece come the the UK week 45 vaccine surveillance report or from prior versions of that report.

you can download them HERE.

it has become an exceedingly well established fact that the covid vaccines are non-sterilizing. they do not prevent infection, transmission, or spread. the balance of evidence no looks very strong that they actually accelerate it, are making spread worse, and are likely making the virus itself worse as well.

obviously, this is not RCT data, but these relative risk ratios are absolutely stunning. there’s basically no way this is all cohort bias, especially given the prior knowledge of immune suppression from vaccines.

CaptainHorsePaste says

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/sohrab-lutchmedial-cardiac-surgeon-obituary-1.6242359

This is ridiculous, the article doesn't give any clue as to the cause of death.

A 52 year old doesn't just die, w/o cause.

There's never been a person, who's died, just because his body decided to stop living. The causes are usually cardiac, pulmonary, neurological, renal, or some other systemic failure if not a simple blunt trauma like getting shot or bludgeoned.

https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1002198

Imperfect Vaccination Can Enhance the Transmission of Highly Virulent Pathogens
Andrew F. Read ,Susan J. Baigent,Claire Powers,Lydia B. Kgosana,Luke Blackwell,Lorraine P. Smith,David A. Kennedy,Stephen W. Walkden-Brown,Venugopal K. Nair
Published: July 27, 2015
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002198

Could some vaccines drive the evolution of more virulent pathogens? Conventional wisdom is that natural selection will remove highly lethal pathogens if host death greatly reduces transmission. Vaccines that keep hosts alive but still allow transmission could thus allow very virulent strains to circulate in a population. Here we show experimentally that immunization of chickens against Marek's disease virus enhances the fitness of more virulent strains, making it possible for hyperpathogenic strains to transmit. Immunity elicited by direct vaccination or by maternal vaccination prolongs host survival but does not prevent infection, viral replication or transmission, thus extending the infectious periods of strains otherwise too lethal to persist. Our data show that anti-disease vaccines that do not prevent transmission can create conditions that promote the emergence of pathogen strains that cause more severe disease in unvaccinated hosts.

http://epidemics.psu.edu/articles/view/leaky-vaccines-promote-the-transmission-of-more-virulent-virus

Mareks Disease

Leaky vaccines promote the transmission of more virulent virus
Posted January 14, 2016

Not all vaccines prevent infection. Some, known as leaky vaccines, prolong host survival or reduce disease symptoms without preventing viral replication and transmission. Although leaky vaccines provide anti-disease benefits to vaccinated individuals, new research by CIDD’s Andrew Read, David Kennedy and colleagues at the Avian Oncogenic Virus Group in the United Kingdom, and The University of New England in Australia, has demonstrated that leaky vaccines can make the situation for unvaccinated individuals worse. Leaky vaccines work by enhancing host immunity to a particular pathogen, without necessarily blocking or slowing viral replication. The result is that infected but vaccinated individuals have extended survival, allowing highly virulent pathogen that would normally reach an evolutionary dead-end in a dead host, can transmit. The evolutionary consequences of high virulence are thus reduced and these pathogens can be selectively favored as a result of leaky vaccination.

Stay away from the vaxxed. They are dangerous to everyone else.

Rin says

A 52 year old doesn't just die, w/o cause.

A female Indian doctor who works at Kaiser that we talk with on walks said her husband died in his mid 50's (ironic, another cardiologist) from natural causes (heart attack) way, way pre-Covid.

I had a client (smoker) who already had had coronary bypass surgery before the age of 40. He looked older than his years. I think he smoked because he just thought he was going to die young of a heart attack, anyway, and was flipping the bird at the devil. Heart problems in men even at younger ages aren't unheard of. However, I'm sure the holy vaccines are helping things a lot.

Ceffer says

Rin says

A 52 year old doesn't just die, w/o cause.

A female Indian doctor who works at Kaiser that we talk with on walks said her husband died in his mid 50's (ironic, another cardiologist) from natural causes (heart attack) way, way pre-Covid.

I had a client (smoker) who already had had coronary bypass surgery before the age of 40. He looked older than his years. I think he smoked because he just thought he was going to die young of a heart attack, anyway, and was flipping the bird at the devil. Heart problems in men even at younger ages aren't unheard of. However, I'm sure the holy vaccines are helping things a lot.

What you've summarized are causes. A heart attack or some elements of early onset heart disease are a cause.

When I read an article and it reads, '52 year old dead' and nothing else, it really has me scratching my head.

Even the obituaries of old people in their 80s and 90s reads ... died of complications of cancer, pulmonary dysfunction, kidney failure, etc

zzyzzx says

Maybe that is what the Xi - Biden call is about. Taiwan cancels vax, Biden tell CCP to invade.

The best Vax Failure of them all:

Rin says

Even the obituaries of old people in their 80s and 90s reads ... died of complications of cancer, pulmonary dysfunction, kidney failure, etc

You want to know what is going on?

Look at the obituaries in a given newspaper. I'm not willing to do this, but if somebody can find me an online source for an obituary from a newspaper, I can datamine it. Preferably a few of them.

Gibraltar has nearly 100% adult vaccination. In top 5 for COVID deaths and currently experiencing peak deaths and cases.

From September
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/gibraltar-has-100-covid-vaccination-5th-highest-rate-schabinsky-msc

More recent:
"In March, Gibraltar became the first nation in the world to fully vaccinate its entire adult population against coronavirus.

Gibraltar - with a population of approximately 34,000 people - has had 6,509 coronavirus and 98 deaths since the start of the pandemic."

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1521786/Gibraltar-news-covid-cases-rise-Christmas-lockdown

The only question is: is it White Supremacy or Global Warming?

https://eugyppius.substack.com/p/germany-continues-to-post-record

Gosh, it's like all that vaxxing make it worse.

https://dossier.substack.com/p/the-war-on-the-unvaccinated-is-a

The war on the ‘unvaccinated’ is a desperate attempt to demonize and destroy the control group
The ruling class is very worried about non-compliant citizens.

Jordan Schachtel

I wanted to turn your attention to a side by side comparison map comparing the COVID pandemic of last year to this year. It is a true “photo is worth a million words” tweet from Rational Ground’s Woke Zombie:




... Schallenberg is lying and he knows it. The shots will not prevent another wave of sickness. These “waves” are simply the reality of a seasonal respiratory effect that happens every single year. The global ruling class have been lying to the masses for a long time. They’d rather not admit to all of these sunk costs, so the political elite will continue to uphold the myth that the COVID shots are still some kind of magic bullet that they are not.

Those who did not comply from the beginning of COVID Mania serve to pose the biggest threat to the power of these maniacal politicians. That’s why they’re attacking us so ferociously. The political elite pretend as if they care about COVID, but it’s not the virus that is keeping them up at night. It’s those pesky individuals who refuse to bend the knee – those are the ones in the crosshairs. The control group is the biggest threat to the people in power. They simply can’t survive the political ramifications of a control group outperforming the citizens living under the weight of destructive COVID Mania mandates and societal edicts.

https://eugyppius.substack.com/p/ukhsa-vaccine-surveillance-week-46

https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/vaccinated-english-adults-under-60

Vaccinated English adults under 60 are dying at twice the rate of unvaccinated people the same age
And have been for six months. This chart may seem unbelievable or impossible, but it's correct, based on weekly data from the British government.

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/new-study-from-germany-confirms-higher

New study from Germany confirms higher vax coverage --> higher excess mortality
The Harvard study showed vaccination makes things worse as far as cases goes. This new study from German shows that the more you vaccinate the more people get killed. Not a surprise to me. ...

More likely than not, it is the people with the most comorbidities that are getting the vaxx. Generally speaking the healthy aren't really into it.

Thus, since they have a higher chance of dying because of their heath, this is just born out in the statistics.

Nothing to see.

Misc says

More likely than not, it is the people with the most comorbidities that are getting the vaxx. Generally speaking the healthy aren't really into it.

Thus, since they have a higher chance of dying because of their heath, this is just born out in the statistics.

Nothing to see.

That absurdity is blown apart by looking at places where the vaxx is mandated. In Israel, for example, a high rate of deaths and hospitalizations tracks right along with the high vaxx rates. Lots to see here.

Misc says

More likely than not, it is the people with the most comorbidities that are getting the vaxx. Generally speaking the healthy aren't really into it.

Thus, since they have a higher chance of dying because of their heath, this is just born out in the statistics.

Nothing to see.

Myocarditis in children is up 19 times. Have you ever heard of a 10 year old kid having a heart attack before this?

At this point, this is a Darwin test.

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/uk-data-shows-the-vaccines-are-not

UK data shows the vaccines are NOT saving any lives at all. Zero. Zip. Nada.
Mathew Crawford just did an analysis showing that the data from the UK shows that the vaccines aren't saving any lives at all. Zero. Zip. Nada. So we're killing over 150K people to save no lives. Wow.

Misc says

More likely than not, it is the people with the most comorbidities that are getting the vaxx. Generally speaking the healthy aren't really into it.

Thus, since they have a higher chance of dying because of their heath, this is just born out in the statistics.

Nothing to see.

Yeah. They were going to die anyway.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666776221002581

High COVID-19 vaccination rates were expected to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in populations by reducing the number of possible sources for transmission and thereby to reduce the burden of COVID-19 disease. Recent data, however, indicate that the epidemiological relevance of COVID-19 vaccinated individuals is increasing. In the UK it was described that secondary attack rates among household contacts exposed to fully vaccinated index cases was similar to household contacts exposed to unvaccinated index cases (25% for vaccinated vs 23% for unvaccinated). 12 of 31 infections in fully vaccinated household contacts (39%) arose from fully vaccinated epidemiologically linked index cases. Peak viral load did not differ by vaccination status or variant type [1].

https://dailyclout.io/citizens-corner-analysis-real-world-cost-benefit-scenario/

CITIZENS’ CORNER: [ANALYSIS] “Real-World Cost-Benefit Scenario for COVID-19 Vaccines”
October 13, 2021 • by Dr Ronald Neil Kostoff
Introduction

Our recent paper on vaccinating children against COVID-19 showed a best-case cost/benefit (c/b) ratio of ~5 for the most vulnerable demographic, 65+. The costs were defined as the deaths resulting from the “vaccine”, and the benefits were the true COVID-19 deaths that could have been prevented by the “vaccine”. This meant that five “vaccine”-driven deaths occurred for every truly attributable COVID-19 death prevented. In the paper, we concluded: “if the best-case scenario looks poor for benefits from the inoculations, any realistic scenario will look very poor”. The present analysis replaces the best-case scenario with a real-world scenario, followed by a tradeoff analysis that addresses some of the concerns raised by a few critics of the article.

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/latest-devastating-news-on-the-vaccine

Latest devastating news on the vaccine
If you weren't already convinced, you double your risk of cardiac incidents and the rate of stillborn babies is up by 29 times (but only if you are vaccinated). Does anyone in authority care?

http://philosophers-stone.info/2021/11/19/its-happening-now-in-the-uk-the-double-jabbed-are-in-serious-trouble/

Its Happening now in the UK. The Double jabbed are in serious trouble

https://dailyclout.io/citizens-corner-analysis-real-world-cost-benefit-scenario/

“Real-World Cost-Benefit Scenario for COVID-19 Vaccines”
October 13, 2021 • by Dr Ronald Neil Kostoff
Introduction

Our recent paper on vaccinating children against COVID-19 showed a best-case cost/benefit (c/b) ratio of ~5 for the most vulnerable demographic, 65+. The costs were defined as the deaths resulting from the “vaccine”, and the benefits were the true COVID-19 deaths that could have been prevented by the “vaccine”. This meant that five “vaccine”-driven deaths occurred for every truly attributable COVID-19 death prevented. In the paper, we concluded: “if the best-case scenario looks poor for benefits from the inoculations, any realistic scenario will look very poor”. The present analysis replaces the best-case scenario with a real-world scenario, followed by a tradeoff analysis that addresses some of the concerns raised by a few critics of the article.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2021/11/23/they-said-vaccines-were-safe-for-pregnant-women-now-this-happens/

They Said Vaccines Were Safe For Pregnant Women, Now This Happens
November 23, 2021 | Sundance | 230 Comments
Something troubling is happening in Scotland. At least 21 babies under four weeks old died in September, a rate of 4.9 per 1,000 births. The former average was 2.1 deaths per 1,000 births. The nationalized health service tracks records, because everyone is on the same system; that’s why when an internal alarm is triggered by the data as it rolls in, they stop and look immediately.

https://eugyppius.substack.com/p/of-all-covid-patients-in-the-icu

"Of all Covid patients in the ICU, about 80% are over 50 and most have risk factors such as high blood pressure, heart failure or diabetes."
The vaccinators are vaccinating the wrong people, Part 1491230471325. ...

Mandate centrism aside, the basic point here is crucial: People who end up in hospital dying of Corona are overwhelmingly very old and very sick. If our press or our bureaucrats truly wished to solve the problem of overwhelmed hospitals, they would be investigating the demographic characteristics of severely ill unvaccinated patients, discovering trends in this group, and pondering ways to get vaccines to them. Reducing the likelihood of severe outcome in the very old and the very sick is the only conceivable application that our leaky, rapidly fading vaccines have. ...

Lockdowns have implanted in the minds of policymakers everywhere, the unshakeable belief that by reducing spread overall, you can also save the elderly. Over a year’s worth of experience has shown that this is the wrong strategy, and yet vaccination policy continues to operate on the same premise, hoping to use vaccines in place of lockdowns to suppress SARS-2. This idée fixe is particularly unfortunate, because it is above all in stopping transmission that the vaccines have failed.

What nobody will recognise in all of this, is the simple fact that most infections don’t matter. Most people feel sick for a few days and recover without incident. Accepting for the sake of argument all the official doctrines about the safety and efficacy of the vaccines, it necessarily follows that most vaccinations don’t matter either. Universal suppression policies are destroying our economies, our societies, and our lives, while also failing to do anything much about SARS-2.

Patrick says

If our press or our bureaucrats truly wished to solve the problem of overwhelmed hospitals, they would be investigating

...why there is a staffing shortage at pretty much every hospital, nursing home, transitional care facility and implement policies to get staffing up to where it needs to be to meet demand for these services (COVID is only part of the story)

Patrick says

What nobody will recognise in all of this, is the simple fact that most infections don’t matter.

Patrick says

it necessarily follows that most vaccinations don’t matter either.

That’s a double shot of pure logic. Focus the efforts on the most at risk? that just would not sell enough vaccine nor would it promote the fear mongering and government over reach, so those facts must be memory holed. Why is Fauci not in prison yet?

Patrick says

Latest devastating news on the vaccine
If you weren't already convinced, you double your risk of cardiac incidents and the rate of stillborn babies is up by 29 times (but only if you are vaccinated). Does anyone in authority care?

My biggest fear is that they are intentionally pushing this poison on kids to make infertile the ones they don't kill with heart attack, stroke, and "sudden death".

https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/2/frontlinenews/immunization-expert-unvaccinated-people-are-not-dangerous-vaccinated-people-are-dangerous-for-others/

Immunization expert: ‘Unvaccinated people are not dangerous; vaccinated people are dangerous for others’

World Health Organization European Advisory Group of Experts in Immunization former Vice President Professor Christian Perronne yesterday said that all vaccinated people must quarantine over the winter months or risk serious illness.

Perronne specializes in tropical pathologies and emerging infectious diseases. He was Chairman of the Specialized Committee on Communicable Diseases of the High Council of Public Health.

Confirming the rapidly deteriorating situation in Israel and the UK, the infectious disease expert stated: “Vaccinated people should be put in quarantine, and should be isolated from the society.”

He went on to say: “Unvaccinated people are not dangerous; vaccinated people are dangerous for others. It’s proven in Israel now – I’m in contact with many physicians in Israel – they’re having big problems, severe cases in the hospitals are among vaccinated people, and in UK also, you have the larger vaccination program and also there are problems.”

The current working group on the COVID-19 pandemic in France was reported to be “utterly panicked” on receipt of the news, fearing pandemonium if it follows the guidance of the experts.

Israeli doctor Kobi Haviv told Channel 13 News: “95% of seriously ill patients are vaccinated. Fully vaccinated people account for 85-90% of hospitalizations. We are opening more and more COVID branches. The effectiveness of vaccines is declining or disappearing.”

https://maryannedemasi.com/publications/f/are-adverse-events-in-covid-19-vaccine-trials-under-reported

But there are serious concerns about publication bias or selective omission of data, whereby adverse events are less likely to be published than positive results.

A systematic review in PLOS journal analysed 28 studies and found that adverse events were less likely to appear in published journal articles than unpublished studies (e.g. industry-held data).

Experts now suggest that the pivotal Covid-19 vaccine trials may have beenunder-reported adverse events in several ways.

Virtual monitoring with digital apps
In the Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccine trials, participants were given digital apps to record adverse events remotely - a more convenient, time efficient and cost-effective way of gathering patient data.

A major problem however, is that the pre-determined options on the digital apps have a narrow focus on particular adverse events.

For example, the app only allows a participant to record what the company deems as ‘expected’ events such as fever, pain at injection site, temperature, redness, swelling, fatigue, headache, diarrhoea, chills, muscle and joint pain.

But if they experience a serious adverse event like myocarditis or early signs of transverse myelitis, Guillain-Barre Syndrome, a myopathic disorder, myocarditis or thrombosis, there is no option for them to record it on the app.

Case in point: Brianne Dressen, a participant in the AstraZeneca (AZD1222) trial. She suffered a severe adverse event after her first injection and became disabled.

Brianne Dressen
Brianne Dressen

But her smartphone app did not allow her to record the particular type of adverse event, nor did it allow her to record her symptoms in her own words.

Once hospitalised, Ms Dressen was ‘unblinded’ from the trial. She was informed that she had been given the AstraZeneca vaccine, not the placebo, and advised not to have the second injection.

The investigators subsequently “withdrew” Ms Dressen from the trial, they disabled her smartphone app, and all her data from that day onwards, were never documented despite still experiencing disability today.

Ms Dressen was concerned about the lack of reporting of her adverse event (and others) in the trial’s publication in the top-tiered New England Journal of Medicine.

She wrote to the journal’s editor-in-chief Dr Eric Rubin, seeking to “request inaccuracies in the trial publication be corrected, and to demand complete reporting of the trial publication and results.”

Dr Rubin refused to correct the inaccurate data in his journal. The full email exchange has been made public.

https://www.brighteon.com/474635ae-9e29-4696-8d29-20f0fefd9a08

PRESS SECRETARY FOR ISRAELI PM: VACCINATED PEOPLE NOW DYING, AND GOING TO HOSPITAL VERY SICK

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/significantly-elevated-cardiac-risk

Significantly elevated cardiac risk caused by the vaccines justifies an immediate halt
The researchers who confirmed the results from the Circulation paper won't publish their results because they are worried about losing their research funding in the future. So don't tell anyone, OK?

https://notthebee.com/article/who-director-says-vaxxed-people-should-wear-masks-socially-distance-and-meet-people-outside

WHO director says VAXXED people should wear masks, socially distance, and meet people outside

Because the vaxx does not work.

Did this brave dude get posted somewhere on Pat.net yet?
https://twitter.com/GBNEWS/status/1463926037889396736
'They aren't going to publish their findings, they are concerned about losing research money' Dr Aseem Malhotra reveals a cardiology researcher found similar results to a new report showing an increase in risk of heart attack following the mRNA COVID vaccine."

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/we-are-mandating-a-vaccine-where

We are mandating a vaccine where there is no scientific evidence that it has ever saved a single life
As the BMJ noted today, we will NEVER have that evidence because the vaccine makers are structuring the trials to avoid proving an all-cause mortality benefit since they know it is negative.


1 hr ago

If you are are still in doubt as to whether we are being hoodwinked on the safety and efficacy of the COVID vaccines, this Editorial in the BMJ today should remove all doubt. We are being hoodwinked. And it’s not going to get better. Ever. So we are stuck with a vaccine that is being mandated where most people have no fu*&($#ing clue as to whether it works or not.

Why? It’s simple. They know full well from the VAERS data that the vaccine kills far more people than it saves (regardless of age) and they want to make sure you will never find out.

Get it?

Those of us who know how to interpret the safety data from VAERS and other similar systems know full well what is going on, but when we try to warn people, we are being marginalized as spreaders of misinformation. Who’s lying? Well, suffice it to say that no self-proclaimed VAERS expert will agree to a debate.

Note: For those of you upset about the headline, sure, they can argue that the COVID vaccines saved people from dying from COVID. I concede that. But the all-cause mortality (ACM) rate (which nobody is looking at), has always been far greater than the COVID lives saved.

And that my friends is the inconvenient truth.