patrick.net

Patrick says

"Sadly, seems to be a hoax:
Robert W Malone, MD... Jul 22... This is a fake account and has nothing to
do with the Secretary HHS. Furthermore, Jay is at NIH not FDA....
https://x.com/RWMaloneMD/status/1947613336277057774

So, is this story from July 10, true?

"Moderna Receives Full U.S. FDA Approval for COVID-19 Vaccine, Spikevax,
in Children Aged 6 Months Through 11 Years at Increased Risk for COVID-19 Disease"
https://feeds.issuerdirect.com/news-release.html?newsid=5090085430616980&symbol=MRNA

"presumably it’s rescinded now"

I still remember the headlines. “COVID Vaccines Saved 14.4 Million Lives in One Year.” It was everywhere. It sounded definitive—like the scientific verdict had been delivered, stamped, and sealed. Anyone who questioned it was accused of misinformation. And yet, as I’ve learned through both research and experience, the truth in science has a habit of evolving—sometimes uncomfortably so.

Fast forward to 2025, and a new study has quietly revised the estimate. Not 14.4 million in one year, but just 2.5 million over four years. You read that right. From a thunderous proclamation of vaccine triumph to a humble whisper of revised projections. I couldn’t ignore the implications.

The original estimate came from Imperial College London and was backed by every major player with a stake in the vaccine rollout—WHO, GAVI, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the UK Medical Research Council. The newer study? It came from Stanford researchers, without the same global affiliations or massive funding. That difference alone should make us pause. ...

What’s most disturbing, though, is how this newer paper didn’t account for adverse events. It only looked at lives “saved from severe COVID”—without balancing that against the potential lives lost to vaccine complications. If even one or two people died for every 5,000 doses given—through myocarditis, thrombosis, or other immune-triggered injuries—the net benefit could be zero. Or worse.

Let’s not forget the data point that stunned me most: only 299 young people under 20 were estimated to be saved across the entire world. That’s 0.1%. And yet vaccine mandates were—and in some places still are—imposed on this age group. Where was the risk-benefit analysis then? ...

And the greatest irony? By overselling one vaccine, we may have undermined trust in all vaccines. The same institutions now expressing concern about rising measles cases don’t seem to understand the damage they’ve done. When you push an intervention without acknowledging its limitations—and then silence those who point them out—you break the contract of trust.

Top HHS Advisor: mRNA ‘Vaccines’ Are ‘More Dangerous Than Covid’

In an explosive revelation, a senior special advisor to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has confirmed that mRNA “vaccines” were “more dangerous than Covid” and admitted that the injections killed “a significant amount” of people.

HHS Special Adviser Dr. Steven Hatfill made these shocking statements during an appearance on Steve Bannon’s War Room on Thursday.

He explained that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. had pulled funding for the mRNA “vaccines” after data revealed that getting “vaccinated” was actually more dangerous than contracting COVID-19 itself.

In other words, the so-called “cure” was worse than the disease.

“It was more dangerous to take a vaccine than it was to contract COVID-19 and be hospitalized with it,” Dr. Hatfill stated.

He went on to explain that meta-analyses conducted consistently showed there was “no benefit to risk ratio” for taking the mRNA shots.

The injections flood the body with mRNA, overwhelming cells and creating what Dr. Hatfill described as “biological havoc.”

Alarmingly, Hatfill revealed that these Big Pharma companies wielded so much power that they effectively controlled the government’s pandemic response.

“Nobody stood up to them. Nobody questioned them,” he said.

“Pfizer wanted a 75-year moratorium on the clinical trial data, which from the start showed these never prevented infection or disease transmission.”

He went on to say that there was no solid clinical data proving that the “vaccines” reduced the severity of the disease.

Dr. Hatfill’s statement reflects a clear and urgent call for the immediate withdrawal of these vaccines from the market.

“It’s completely unethical to have a ‘vaccine’ on the market that is not only ineffective, but more dangerous than the disease it is supposed to protect against,” he said.

The next step, according to Dr. Hatfill, is for the government to follow Kennedy’s lead by pulling the plug on mRNA “vaccines” entirely.

Conclusions This study found that influenza vaccination of working-aged adults was associated with a higher risk of influenza during the 2024-2025 respiratory viral season, suggesting that the vaccine has not been effective in preventing influenza this season.

Summary Among 53402 working-aged Cleveland Clinic employees, we were unable to find that the influenza vaccine has been effective in preventing infection during the 2024-2025 respiratory viral season.

U.S. Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. publicly warned that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines can spread throughout the body, reach “every organ,” and, in the case of upper respiratory illnesses like COVID-19 and influenza, may actually prolong pandemics rather than end them.

Speaking at the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium in Anchorage alongside local senators, Kennedy defended his department’s August 5 decision to halt most federally funded mRNA vaccine development for COVID and flu.

While he believes the technology could be useful in certain treatments such as cancer—though the platform is widely linked to cancer (see suggested articles below)—he made clear it is “not” appropriate for respiratory viruses.

Peer-reviewed studies and case reports have linked COVID-19 mRNA vaccination to cancer recurrence, stimulated tumor growth and metastasis via the mRNA ingredient N1-methyl-pseudouridine, excess cancer deaths following mass vaccination, and a “multi-hit” model suggesting repeated doses may accelerate cancer development. ...

“The mRNA vaccines don’t work against upper respiratory infections,” Kennedy said. “There are two problems with them. One is they target a single protein, which drives what’s called antigenic shift. It drives the virus to mutate, and it actually can prolong the pandemic.”

Kennedy also pointed to serious safety concerns stemming from how the shots travel in the body.

“The other issue is the way that it distributes in the body… there’s no control over it and no predictability,” he continued. “It goes to every organ. It turns your body into an antigen factory.”

Eighth Study Confirms mRNA Shots Increase Infection Risk

New study of 1,745 healthcare workers finds mRNA boosters raise risk of influenza-like illness by up to 70% and increase workdays lost by 50%.

A major Swiss study of 1,745 healthcare workers, published in Nature’s Communications Medicine, found that recent COVID-19 booster shots were linked to a significantly higher risk of illness and missed work compared to the unvaccinated.

Experts Puzzled By Why Haiti Has One of the Lowest COVID-19 Death Rates In the World Despite Administering Zero Vaccine Doses: ‘We Don’t Know’

By Niara Savage | Published on: May 11, 2021

... Dr. Jean “Bill” Pape, a top Haitian infectious disease expert, said the nation’s low death rate can’t be attributed to strict adherence to mask-wearing or social distancing guidelines.

“Most people don’t wear a mask,” he said.

By December, most restrictions had been lifted and buses and markets have been crowded in recent months. No one in Haiti has received a single dose of a coronavirus vaccine.

They could not afford to pay for the jabs, so they were just fine

Based on our data, we conclude that SARS-CoV-2 booster vaccination does not contribute to the protection of the healthcare workforce in a post-pandemic setting. SARS-CoV-2 vaccination may even temporarily increase the likelihood of symptomatic infection and workday loss.