by mell ➕follow (10) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 44 - 82 of 82 Search these comments
tanked saysEnded up 6-3 ending mandate. Obviously I preferred 9-0 but it was better than the 5-4 I thought would happen.Liberal Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan issued a blistering dissent."
"When we are wise, we know not to displace the judgments of experts, acting within the sphere Congress marked out and under Presidential control, to deal with emergency conditions," they wrote. "Today, we are not wise. In the face of a still-raging pandemic, this Court tells the agency charged with protecting worker safety that it may not do so in all the workplaces needed. As disease and death continue to mount, this Court tells the agency that it cannot respond in the most effective way possible.
Reads like something Babylon Bee would publish.
"When we are wise, we know not to displace the judgments of experts, acting within the sphere Congress marked out and under Presidential control, to deal with emergency conditions," they wrote. "Today, we are not wise. In the face of a still-raging pandemic, this Court tells the agency charged with protecting worker safety that it may not do so in all the workplaces needed. As disease and death continue to mount, this Court tells the agency that it cannot respond in the most effective way possible.
The Supreme Court on Thursday blocked the Biden administration’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate for private businesses but decided to let a separate regulation that requires health care workers to get a vaccine take effect.
tanked says"When we are wise, we know not to displace the judgments of experts, acting within the sphere Congress marked out and under Presidential control, to deal with emergency conditions," they wrote. "Today, we are not wise. In the face of a still-raging pandemic, this Court tells the agency charged with protecting worker safety that it may not do so in all the workplaces needed. As disease and death continue to mount, this Court tells the agency that it cannot respond in the most effective way possible.
This shit will go down in infamy as one of the most retarded and detrimental statements ever issued by the SCOTUS. It's an op ed ticker tape, fed by some aspect of the MSM, not legal reasoning. It is literally gibberish.
tanked saysEnded up 6-3 ending mandate. Obviously I preferred 9-0 but it was better than the 5-4 I thought would happen.Liberal Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan issued a blistering dissent."
"When we are wise, we know not to displace the judgments of experts, acting within the sphere Congress marked out and under Presidential control, to deal with emergency conditions," they wrote. "Today, we are not wise. In the face of a still-raging pandemic, this Court tells the agency charged with protecting worker safety that it may not do so in all the workplaces needed. As disease and death continue to mount, this Court tells the agency that it cannot respond in the most effective way possible.
Reads like something Babylon Bee would publish.
Sotomayor doesn't even give a fuck about the Constitution, it's alarmingly clear.
Clarence definitely belongs on SCOTUS. I'm glad he's there.
I've been saying it for the past few months, now let me say it a little louder, WE ARE WINNING!!
And also, this wasn't decided by the courts. We decided this. We decided it when we quit our jobs. When we were fired. When we refused to disclose our personal medical information. When we refused to take an experimental shot for a made up threat. When we refused to wear a mask, refused to be bullied and fear-mongered. When we refused to give into lies, and instead sought for the truth amidst the darkness. And how deep that darkness has been! But there was always someone holding a light. Someone blowing a whistle, researching the truth, using critical thinking, refusing to bow to tyranny.
"Freedom had been hunted round the globe; reason was considered as rebellion; and the slavery of fear had made men afraid to think. But such is the irresistible nature of truth, that all it asks, and all it wants, is the liberty of appearing."
Sotomayor is an ignorant slob.
I recall seeing people like her riding to their menial jobs or the projects on the NYC subways years ago.
The “wise latina” moniker always made me chuckle, what a joke.
I love your positivity. I just hope you're right because I do not believe Covid is the only angle to the Great Reset.
How in the fuck can any sane reasonable person say the OSHA mandate is unconstitutional, but Health Facilities that take Medicare and Medicaid money can party on with their mandates.
Technically what they said is if you take government money, you have to follow government mandates. This whole thing has signaled the beginning of the end for Rockefeller's medical establishment.
joshuatrio saysFirm I do consulting with demanded my vaxx status earlier this week. I declined to give it. They pushed again and I ran the clock out for the SCOTUS decision.
You were not an employee. How could they legally demand it even before SCOTUS deepsixed it?
https://www.theepochtimes.com/supreme-court-blocks-business-vaccine-rule-declines-to-stay-healthcare-worker-mandate_4211577.html?source=patrick.net&utm_source=share-btn-copylink
The Supreme Court on Thursday blocked the Biden administration’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate for private businesses but decided to let a separate regulation that requires health care workers to get a vaccine take effect.
Patrick says
https://www.theepochtimes.com/supreme-court-blocks-business-vaccine-rule-declines-to-stay-healthcare-worker-mandate_4211577.html?source=patrick.net&utm_source=share-btn-copylink
The Supreme Court on Thursday blocked the Biden administration’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate for private businesses but decided to let a separate regulation that requires health care workers to get a vaccine take effect.
To be fair if you work in healthcare administering shots… you should be required to take the shots. Just like all the politicians who vote for manda...
Supreme Court Sets Dangerous Precedent Of Letting The American People Make Medical Decisions For Themselves
Politics
January 13th, 2022 - BabylonBee.com
U.S.—The SCOTUS has struck down Biden’s vaccine mandates on the grounds that they are unconstitutional. Experts say this sets a dangerous precedent of letting individuals make their own medical decisions.
“What am I supposed to do now that I don’t have private companies working with the Federal government to force me to inject a foreign substance into my body?” said Linda Waddlebum, a concerned mother of 6 cats. “So dangerous and shortsighted. How will I stay healthy? I don’t even recognize this America anymore.”
In response to the court’s decision, a large group of protestors has gathered outside of the Supreme Court building. “Pfizer knows best! What they inject, I can’t object!” they chanted while ripping up copies of the constitution. “Give us petty tyranny or give us death! Abolish the Supreme Court!”
“You can’t give people choices! What if they make the wrong one? One that isn’t what I wanted them to do?” said Waddlebum. “Next thing you know, people will decide to send their kids back to school and return to work in person without masks.”
At publishing time, people were dangerously continuing on with their lives making the best medical decisions possible for themselves and their families. They were even able to make these decisions without fear of losing their livelihood.
Right, it never could have been legal for an employer to demand that you be injected with a drug as a condition of employment, especially not an experimental one.
NuttBoxer saysI've been saying it for the past few months, now let me say it a little louder, WE ARE WINNING!!
I think it is more like WE ARE NOT LOSING (MUCH) and that is because of the fucking incompetence of the other side, not anything our side is doing.
But that is a win in and of itself. It helps us get to the WE ARE WINNING!! phase.
Patrick saysRight, it never could have been legal for an employer to demand that you be injected with a drug as a condition of employment, especially not an experimental one.
Agreed but that is where we're at now. It should be illegal or employers should be allowed to hire by race, gender, religion and orientation as well
Mayor Eric Adams
@NYCMayor
The Supreme Court may not want to put the health and safety of Americans first but New York City does.
Yesterday’s ruling doesn’t have any affect on our private sector vaccine mandate. It’s still in effect.
As always, cities must lead when some in Washington won’t.
How can NY get away with this crime?
Patrick saysHow can NY get away with this crime?
Did the NYC mayor make a mandate, or did the city council vote on it?
Booger saysPatrick saysHow can NY get away with this crime?
Did the NYC mayor make a mandate, or did the city council vote on it?
As I understand the mandate was declared by that DeBlasio fuck before he was kicked out.
Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch has refused to wear a mask during in-person proceedings, despite a request from Chief Justice John Roberts for all members of the high court to accommodate Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s concern about Covid-19, according to a new report Tuesday.
Gorsuch’s continued defiance has led Sotomayor — who has diabetes and is therefore at a higher risk of serious illness from Covid — to attend oral arguments remotely, according to veteran NPR Supreme Court reporter Nina Totenberg, citing court sources.
When the justices returned to the courtroom last fall to hear arguments in person, Sotomayor was the only one to wear a mask. With the surge of the highly transmissible omicron variant in the winter, however, Sotomayor felt unsafe sitting next to unmasked people, according to NPR.
Roberts “in some form” then asked the other justices to wear masks, Totenberg reported. Gorsuch, one of three justices nominated by former President Donald Trump, was the only one to refuse.
mell saysPatrick saysRight, it never could have been legal for an employer to demand that you be injected with a drug as a condition of employment, especially not an experimental one.
Agreed but that is where we're at now. It should be illegal or employers should be allowed to hire by race, gender, religion and orientation as well
How can NY get away with this crime?
01/25/22
OSHA Withdraws Workplace Vaccine Mandate After Facing Lethal Blow by U.S. Supreme Court
The Biden administration withdrew its COVID vaccine-or-test mandate for large employers, saying the administration recognized the Emergency Temporary Standard could not be revived after the U.S. Supreme Court blocked it earlier this month.
« First « Previous Comments 44 - 82 of 82 Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,250,093 comments by 14,908 users - Ceffer, Patrick, Rin, stereotomy online now