patrick.net

https://rairfoundation.com/italian-court-rules-mandatory-vaccination-unconstitutional-fatal-side-effects-to-risky-video/?source=patrick.net

Sicily’s Court of Administrative Justice has ruled that Italy’s mandatory Covid vaccination obligation is unconstitutional. The court stated that the experimental mRNA treatments intended to protect the public from Covid have been shown to cause “serious or fatal adverse effects.” The court explains that even if such fatalities are rare, a single death is enough to render the mandate unconstitutional.

The Sicilian ruling passes the decision to the Constitutional Court, which will now have to rule on the issue.

https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/p/we-didnt-understand-that-covid-is?s=r&source=patrick.net

TheNo1Waffler
@TheNo1Waffler
Bill Gates on Covid 19.

“We didn’t understand that it’s a fairly low fatality rate & that it’s a disease mainly in the elderly, kind of like flu is, although a bit different than that.”

Patrick says

No link?

Similar article:

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/fda-americans-should-treat-covid-19-flu?source=patrick.net

https://www.infowars.com/posts/bill-gates-admits-school-shutdowns-during-pandemic-was-complete-disaster/?source=patrick.net

Patrick says

https://www.infowars.com/posts/bill-gates-admits-school-shutdowns-during-pandemic-was-complete-disaster/?source=patrick.net

Surprised he admits what most of us saw from the start.

RC2006 says

Patrick says

https://www.infowars.com/posts/bill-gates-admits-school-shutdowns-during-pandemic-was-complete-disaster/?source=patrick.net

Surprised he admits what most of us saw from the start.

Because they have already cashed the check.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberthart/2022/05/11/eu-will-scrap-mask-mandate-for-air-travel/?source=patrick.net

https://notthebee.com/article/wow-even-good-morning-america-is-starting-to-get-skeptical-of-the-seemingly-neverending-series-of-vaccine-boosters-people-are-taking

The truly unprecedented nature of Dr. Ashton's remarks cannot be overstated. Here they are transcribed:

There's a new published study out in the Lancet … about the fourth dose and what happens to our antibody levels. It is not a surprise … that after the fourth dose, antibody levels rise significantly. They ‘surge' in the several weeks after that dose. We've known that for a while. But here are the caveats: we don't know how long that lasts, number one, and our immune response, remember, is not just about antibodies. It's about that T-cell response also, which you can't measure as well as just a pure antibody level. And it's about whether [boosters are] blocking or neutralizing antibodies to the variants that we're seeing.

Yeah WOW. The chief medical correspondent for a major news network is openly promoting skepticism of the boosters on the major news network. That's nuts.

I mean, sure, it IS just Good Morning America 3. That's kind of low on the totem pole of network shows. Still...

The MSM is openly printing anti-Biden economic articles.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/howie-carr-meet-bidens-nutty-professors-giving-economic-advice/ar-AAY2685?li=BBnb7Kz

Not only that, but the article blasts leftist economic professors by name.

Misc says

Not only that, but the article blasts leftist economic professors by name.

Maybe MSM remind their owners to keep coughing up the fiat bribe monies or they will actually start releasing some truth. "Keep paying your whores, or we will start fucking other clients!"

https://thecountersignal.com/global-aviation-union-waves-red-flag-on-pilots-vaccine-injuries/

Booger's Article says

Trudeau said that vaccine mandates must stay to protect against future variants that do not even exist.
https://thecountersignal.com/global-aviation-union-waves-red-flag-on-pilots-vaccine-injuries/

The great reset requires vaxports.

They want to rule us and control what we do. They have not given up and we haven't even begun to expose the real people behind this planned tyranny.

The covid fraud has all but failed but a lot of damage has been done to we the people. The world governments have colluded in an attempt to impose a mandated inoculation. They had planned on jabbing EVERYONE. The plan was not about saving us from infection but for tying us to an ID system that stated exactly where you could go and exactly what you could do.

Many of us immediately saw through the stupidity of locking down for a bad cold. YES IT KILLS! Covid-19, the Wuhan, is a gain of function virus that just zaps your energy an will take you down if you are old and weak or have comorbidities. The strong easily survive this disease. The young and healthy have statistically zero percent chance of dying from this disease.

Treatments have and are continuing to be restricted. My doctor is not allowed to prescribe Ivermectin, a cheap miraculous drug that could zap this virus from the start, but is allowed to prescribe experimental treatments that costs much more and don't work as well.

The governments of the world planned this. Did they intentionally release the Wuhan? It doesn't matter.

Our government, either through incompetence or evilness has shown itself to not be worthy of governing us.

Onvacation says

They want to rule us and control what we do. They have not given up and we haven't even begun to expose the real people behind this planned tyranny.

The only possible way to defeat them is to beat them at their own game. One person at a time, we must educate and redeem those who fail to understand the truth of what has been going on.

But is it too late? I say yes, this world is irredeemable, but there are still individuals who can be saved. But it won’t stop the system from going to the dark side, it will just save a few souls from being destroyed by the lies and crimes of the global cabal.

Patrick says

Is that cognitive dissonance?

Looks like the intelligence services cut back on the funds they were giving to USA Today.

https://pluralist.com/parent-co-gannett-tells-usa-today-enough-with-the-opinions-already-opinion/

https://www.eugyppius.com/p/austria-set-to-retire-the-vaccine

Austria Set to Retire the Vaccine Mandate by End of August
Health Minister admits that the law "isn't convincing anyone to accept vaccination," and has been responsible for deep social rifts

Patrick says

https://www.eugyppius.com/p/austria-set-to-retire-the-vaccine

Austria Set to Retire the Vaccine Mandate by End of August
Health Minister admits that the law "isn't convincing anyone to accept vaccination," and has been responsible for deep social rifts

No shit Health Minister. We know you've known this since the very start. 100% political.

https://palexander.substack.com/p/oh-oh-seems-in-austria-the-minister

oh oh, seems in Austria, the minister of health is blaming doctors for the COVID vaccine harms, shifting blame to them; yet Rauch knows if doctors did in Austria and US etc. tell truth, will be fired

Now that harms & deaths due to the COVID shot are clear, the rush is to blame doctors for not informing their patients. Doctors must now for the first time, band together & take govns down!

Lol, the criminal doctors who injected millions are now going to be found liable so that the government can deflect blame, even though the doctors were bribed and coerced by the government into committing that crime.

Predictable throwing doctors under the bus to deflect blame. Like, the doctors couldn't see that one coming? Abandon your ethics, the Globalists and oligarchs will burn you down and walk away smiling while sucking on their cheroots.

Psychopaths and sociopaths will seduce you into the lowest common denominator of amoral and immoral behavior, the kingdom where they reign supreme.

The MSM is only dialing back because they aren't getting the $Trillions that they were paid in 2020/2021.

One dollar, one vote. One dollar - one word in MSM.

Fuck them and the horses they rode in on, as well as anyone who looks like them.

I draw the line at killing, for a repentent omnicidal maniac might be useful in that they know how the bread is baked.

original link

https://gettr.com/post/p1k5leu5c5f

@EdwardDowd
·
20h
My friend @JoniHerkimer and her organization to stop college vaccinations is having an impact. She wrote letters putting these folks on notice. Princeton has dropped the booster!

https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/has-the-australian-medical-community

Has the Australian Medical Community Finally Come to its Senses?
The incoming president of the Australian Medical Professionals Society sounds a lot like our community a year ago in an email to AMPS members.

https://nitter.pussthecat.org/ezralevant/status/1564601667881943040#m

Ezra Levant 🍁🚛
@ezralevant
4h
They told pregnant women that if they didn’t take the vaccine, they’d be fired, banned from restaurants and other public places, banned from travel. It wasn’t informed consent because they had no information. It was a violation of the Nuremberg Code. And they’re still doing it.

BREAKING NEWS: UK Government website says vaccine not safe for pregnant or breastfeeding women

TracyK2017 on twitter [UPDATE: she has now been suspended from twitter] has alerted a lot of people today to the fact that the UK Government has a website page with this document that was "updated on 16 August 2022" (although as explained below there do not appear to have been significant changes since March 2021). Tracy notes the following:

The relevant text from the above paragraph (which I can confirm is certainly in the document at the end of Section 3.4) is:

In the context of supply under Regulation 174, it is considered that sufficient reassurance of safe use of the vaccine in pregnant women cannot be provided at the present time

and

Women who are breastfeeding should also not be vaccinated.

Tracy also notes now that people are pointing out that the document has not in fact been recently updated; apparently the wayback machine shows no changes since March 2021. However, this would make things even worse as it means that the Government officials and the NHS have been recommending pregnant women get the vaccine against the official Government document advice. Also, Tracy's pinned tweet dated 6 May 2022 links to an archived version of a similar but different document. That document DOES NOT HAVE THE SECTION titled 'Toxicity conclusions' in it, although it does contain the following statement in Section 4.6:

Administration of the COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 in pregnancy should only be considered when the potential benefits outweigh any potential risks for the mother and foetus.

Now compare what we know from above with what Sajid Javid (and many other Government and NHS officials) have been saying:

And look what this Government web page says (screenshot just now at 18:19 on 29 August 2022)

And indeed here is the current advice given to NHS staff:

This all also raises further alarms about the BBC who, in its documentary Unvaccinated had Prof Asma Khalil stating the vaccine was not only safe and effective for all pregnant women but that it 'reduced the risk of miscarriage by 15%'.

So as of now we have these directly contradictory recommendations on the Government website (screenshots taken at the same time on 29 August 2022):

UPDATE: Viki Male (one of the staunchest advocates for vaccinating pregnant women) has responded to this by arguing that there is no contradiction because the Summary of the Public Assessment Report refers only to the Pfizer report and does not take account of new UK data. When I asked her to confirm when the crucial changes were made to the Summary Report she referred me to this link:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/regulatory-approval-of-pfizer-biontech-vaccine-for-covid-19#full-publication-update-history

This list of updates does not include the crucial "Toxicity Conclusions" paragraph. However, the very existence of this update list introduces new confusion. Why does the wayback machine insist that the document has never been changed?

UPDATE: Tracy has been suspended from Twitter.

UPDATE: A retired healthcare professional has sent me one of the original Government documents issued to UK Healthcare professionals in December 2020 when the Pfizer vaccination programme was beginning. The highlights in the text are those of the person who sent it. Section 4.6 on "Fertility, pregnancy and lactation" states the following:

Pregnancy
There are no or limited amount of data from the use of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2. Animal reproductive toxicity studies have not been completed. COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 is not recommended during pregnancy.

For women of childbearing age, pregnancy should be excluded before vaccination. In addition, women of childbearing age should be advised to avoid pregnancy for at least 2 months after their second dose.

Breast-feeding
It is unknown whether COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 is excreted in human milk. A risk to the newborns/infants cannot be excluded. COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 should not be used during breast-feeding.

Fertility
It is unknown whether COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 has an impact on fertility.

https://www.normanfenton.com/post/breaking-news-uk-government-says-vaccine-not-safe-for-pregnant-or-breastfeeding-women

You beat me to it, but here's the same reported elsewhere:

https://thenationalpulse.com/2022/08/30/british-government-rules-safe-use-of-pfizer-covid-vaccine-in-pregnant-women-cannot-be-provided/

Hate to have to say it but the fact that no COVID-19 vaccine has been adequately safety tested for pregnant or breastfeeding women has been out there since day one on the FDA approved materials for this stuff as well.

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22administered+to+pregnant+women+are+insufficient+to+inform+vaccine-associated+risks+in+pregnancy%22&ia=web

True, but the news is that the British government is finally publicly acknowledging that the death jab is not safe for pregnant or breastfeeding women.

This is the first time any government has been even that honest, I think.

Onvacation says

Treatments have and are continuing to be restricted. My doctor is not allowed to prescribe Ivermectin, a cheap miraculous drug that could zap this virus from the start, but is allowed to prescribe experimental treatments that costs much more and don't work as well.

It's a simple fix.

All the doctor has to say is you have intestinal worms.

There, you're magically not off label.

Bet street smart. If the doctor says "you appear to be coming down with covid", ask "well, does that mean I have intestinal worms and that Ivermectin may work?" - right there you have told the doctor you're willing to take Ivermectin, and their response will tell you their position. Ivermectin is harmless, it's EXTREMELY hard to overdose on.

Maybe it doesn't work, but - if it doesn't? Who cares?

If the doctor is like "WTF?" maybe shop around for another doctor...

But Ivermectin is not that hard to get anyhow.

richwicks says

right there you have told the doctor you're willing to take Ivermectin

Be real, the government is wise to this obvious ploy. The gov will come down on any doctor who proscribes Ivermectin for any reason. May even ask to see the tests that show the patient has "intestinal worms." The right way, like in Nebraska, is to make off-label use legal when proscribed by a doctor with a consenting patient.

https://nypost.com/2022/08/30/goldman-sachs-lifts-covid-protocols-urges-workers-back-to-office/

Goldman Sachs lifts all COVID protocols, orders staff to return to office full-time

Goldman Sachs told workers it will no longer require vaccines, COVID testing or masks

https://nakedemperor.substack.com/p/uk-government-stops-vaccinating-5

UK Government stops vaccinating 5-11 year olds