by mell ➕follow (10) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 676 - 715 of 909 Next » Last » Search these comments
However, even after doubling the current amount of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) in their calculations, the scientists found that figures quoted for the impact on “global warming” were exaggerated by at least 40 percent.
In addition, they found that CO2 isn’t capable of heating the atmosphere beyond the levels already passed in the pre-industrial age.
“Transmissivity in the CO2 band center is unchanged by increased CO2 as the absorption is already saturated,” they note.
The study’s findings destroy the “settled” climate science that backs the collectivist “Net Zero” agenda of WEF and its allies.
A top European Union official has spoken out to warn the public that the World Economic Forum (WEF) is pushing to seize control of carbon dioxide (CO2) so the unelected globalist organization can “control the people.”
The warning was issued by Rob Roos, a Dutch politician and a current independent Member of the European Parliament (MEP).
As farmer protests rage across Europe, sits down with The HighWire’s Del Bigtree to discuss the climate scam being pushed by globalist elites as part of the WEF’s “Net Zero” agenda.
As Roos notes, the WEF has no interest in environmental issues and is only pushing the green agenda to seize more power and control in the Western world.
“[WEF elites] go against family values,” Roos explained.
“They go against natural food.
“They go against freedom – because if you have to buy an electric car.
“They’re almost twice as expensive – and people cannot buy that – it’s not about the car – it’s about you can’t go anywhere and must depend on public transportation.
“It’s also digitalization,” he noted.
“What we see is the digital identity and central bank digital currency.
“This is all about a new form of communism,” Roos said.
“If you want to control the people, you have to control the CO2 – because everything we do in life, breathing, living, traveling, eating, and everything we do in life leads to CO2 emissions.
“And if you can control the CO2, you can control the people.”
Latest environmental catastrophe: The earth is getting greener. Oh no! We're all doomed?
When you are faced with an unsettling truth, the realization that everything you've believed, everything you've been taught, was all a lie, a ruse, a construct designed to keep you in line, there's really only one thing you can do.
Make believe you were right all the time, no matter how ridiculous you may appear to others.
"Scientists are worried."
Of course they're worried, there are grant dollars on the line!
Vox Senior Environmental Reporter, Benji Jones, starts off the piece with a recitation of how we humans are destroying the planet almost as if it's just muscle memory and he can't help it. In times of personal upheavals we often return to the safe and the known, like comfort foods. For Jones, it's his comfort narrative.
Suddenly, as the economy’s nose-cone turns back Earthward and heads down, big corporations are ditching — not just ESG — but now their climate pledges too. In bunches. ...
A pesky awkwardly-named group, the ‘Climate Action 100+,’ has been collecting Fortune 100 companies that “pledge” to adopt expensive, useless, and money-wasting green policies. But conservative lawyers have been claiming all this concerted corporate action violates antitrust laws, and on top of that, is usually not in the shareholders’ best interests. Directors, after all, are responsible to shareholders rather than to The Earth, which does not pay their oversized salaries or vote or attend shareholder meetings.
Even if it wanted to pay the Directors, I’m not sure The Earth could even get a bank account, since The Earth includes Russia. Ick.
On Friday, JPMorgan, Blackrock, State Street, and Pimco all pulled out of the Climate Action 100+ group. On the same day. Which doesn’t show concerted action, at all, so stop whining. Oh, and Goldman Sachs ‘declined to comment’ on Saturday, which is not a good sign for that one, either.
While the Times framed the story as bad news, it’s actually terrific news, and it is significant progress. Virtue-signaling climate boondoggles are getting unaffordable.
As I’ve often said, we don’t have many problems that a good recession won’t fix.
Several world-renowned experts have dropped the hammer on the anti-carbon agenda pushed by the World Economic Forum (WEF) and the United Nations, warning that the globalist agenda is based on a hoax.
“Decarbonization” is one of the key goals of the WEF’s “Net Zero” agenda.
To reach these targets, members of the general public will need to make significant cuts to their quality of life.
Achieving “Net Zero” by the year 2030 requires bans on air travel, private car ownership, an end to privacy, and the introduction of digital IDs, vaccine passports, 15-minute cities, and “cashless societies” that only facilitate central bank digital currency (CBDC) instead of physical cash.
It will also require most of the farming industry to be eliminated with major restrictions on the food supply enforced that include banning meat and dairy products and replacing them with lab-grown alternatives and insect-based “foods.”
Additionally, the introduction of large global carbon taxes would need to be introduced to cover the cost of the globalist agenda.
Each year from 2023 to 2030, climate change sustainable development goals will cost every person in economies such as the United States $2,026, the U.N. Conference on Trade and Development estimates.
In lower-income economies, the per-person annual cost ranges from $332 to $1,864.
In total, the global price tag comes to about $5.5 trillion per year.
Separately, a report from the left-aligned nonprofit Climate Policy Initiative found that in 2021 and 2022, the world’s taxpayers spent $1.3 trillion each year on climate-related projects.
It also found that the “annual climate finance needed” from 2031 to 2050 is more than $10 trillion each year.
One of the world’s most prominent and highly respected climate scientists has just dropped the hammer on the entire “global warming” fearmongering narrative by warning the public that it is all a “lie.”
Politicians and activists alike have warned of a looming “climate catastrophe” for decades.
“Biden urged to declare climate change a national emergency,” reported NBC last year.
“Climate Changes Threatens Every Facet of U.S. Society, Federal Report Warns,” announced Scientific American.
Cambridge University climate scientist Mike Hulme disagrees.
“Declaring a climate emergency has a chilling effect on politics,” he tells Public.
“It suggests there isn’t time for normal, necessary democratic process.”
Scientists have discovered geological evidence that the gravitational interaction between Mars and Earth drives a 2.4-million-year cycle of deep-sea circulation and global warming.
The surprising link between Mars and Earth's seas and climate sees deep currents wax and wane, and this connects to periods of increased solar energy and a warmer climate. The research could help reveal how climate change over geological timescales — not the type humanity is currently causing via the emission of greenhouse gases — affects the circulation of the oceans.
Sounds unlikely to me, but I guess it's possible.
« First « Previous Comments 676 - 715 of 909 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,249,904 comments by 14,904 users - Eric Holder, GreaterNYCDude, RC2006 online now