patrick.net

There is no such thing as a 'defensive' biolab. They exist to develop agents to kill and maim offensively, that is their only purpose. It takes some exotic bullshit propaganda to ever attempt to portray biolabs as 'defensive'. I suppose they are defensive in the same way an atom bomb is defensive if you manage to get the drop on your enemies and deliver the first volleys before they can get their own missiles off the ground.

AmericanKulak says

alleged purpose.

Didn't they release it because the first impeachment failed?

Funny how triple jabbed (supposedly) Pelosi now has the Wuhan. I'm surprised she did not catch it way back at the beginning of the pandemic when she had her roots died.

Onvacation says

Funny how triple jabbed (supposedly) Pelosi now has the Wuhan.

Guess vodka doesn't kill fake Covid. Of course, the Woo says this is code for 'arrest'. However, the Woo has had Pelosi arrested dozens of time already. The hopium carrot has kind of dried up there.

AmericanKulak says

Natalie Winters is like 20 years old, she's unbelievably great.

Damn, youre right. Just scanning the headlines and excerpts gets me excited to read them all.
https://thenationalpulse.com/author/natalie-winters/?source=patrick.net

https://www.malone.news/p/ukraine-biolabs-update?triggerShare=true

The first of these articles raised the question of whether military action by the Russian Federation to destroy these facilities would be justified, with an analogy drawn to the question of what would be the likely actions of the US Military if it were determined that analogous biological infectious disease research laboratories funded by a global competitor (such as China) were to be discovered in Northern Mexico.

After these articles were published, I was contacted by an active Air Force LTC-rank officer who had direct visibility/intelligence on the early events of the Ukraine conflict that the bombing and destruction via air of those laboratories, attributed by US Corporate media to Russian air force action, was performed by the US Air Force. The implication is that the USG either actively destroyed evidence or acted to prevent the armed forces of the Russian Federation from acquiring information and resources (potentially including biological specimens) from those laboratories. ...

The U.S. has long dismissed claims about the biological research laboratories in Ukraine as "Russian propaganda," until senior State Department official Victoria Nuland unexpectedly confirmed their existence at a 2022 Senate hearing under questioning by Senator Marco Rubio.

Yawn: moving goalposts from weaponisation (which is a problem) to research (which is not) as proof of any weaponisation efforts has failed to emerge. Clown world.

This is the sign that even the most rabid proponents of bioWEAPONSlabs has dropped the claim and now trying to reframe the issue.