Comments 1 - 40 of 79 Next » Last » Search these comments
Most of us that are not deep into the mass formation process at this point can see the coordinated pivot from legacy media pushing the COVID fear-porn to the same outlets pushing the “Putin crazy bad man - Zelenskyy good man” theme. But almost as soon as the shooting war started, a more nuanced and complex counter-narrative cropped up.
That is the deep ties between children of key Democratic party leaders and Ukrainian petroleum industry interests.
And the USA-sponsored bioweapon research facilities located throughout Ukraine, including along the Russian border.
And the legitimate Russian concerns about NATO efforts to geopolitically encircle Russia.
And the issue of whether Zelenskyy is really just a western puppet, rather than being the populist leader that has been pitched to us.
And the surreptitious hand of World Economic Foundation meddling in all of this.
Things started looking a lot more complicated that just “Putin crazy bad man - Zelenskyy good man”.
Here’s the point. Once upon a time, the US engaged in thermonuclear war brinksmanship with the USSR because of Russian missiles being placed on Cuban soil. The weapons of war have evolved. Bioweapons technologies have matured. What would the USA do if Russia was transforming Mexico into a client state and had placed biowarfare research laboratories along our southern border. Would we invade? I strongly suspect so.
Are “we” the good guys or the bad guys here?
NATO has done a good job over the years painting itself as the “defender of freedom” against an autocratic Russia. However, given the brutality showed across the world connected to COVID-19 restrictions, coupled with the fact that it was the USA’s own government (albeit only a clandestine part of it) that had a direct hand in developing the COVID-19 pathogen, it is increasingly getting harder to tell the difference between the two sides.
Putin sure did flip over a rock and show some US snakes. How many “Wuhan labs” are there?
The Russian claims of Ukrainian bio labs are coming fast and furious.
US Govn admits there are bio-chemical weapons labs in Ukraine.
March 3, 2022
Press Release
Institutes of Health (NIH) stop funding animal research at Russian state-run labs.
“Our tax dollars should never be sent to state-run labs in adversary nations like Russia and China that threaten our national security. My AFAR Act would prohibit tax dollars from being shipped to animal testing labs in any countries that are deemed foreign adversaries. This legislation is even more crucial in light of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Vladimir Putin’s actions are in violation of international law, and must be held accountable for his actions. American taxpayer dollars should not be used to subsidize the Kremlin,” said Rep. McClain.
American taxpayer dollars are flowing to Vladimir Putin’s state-run laboratories through the National Institutes of Health. A recent report from the non-profit White Coat Waste Project has revealed that, as recently as November 2021, the NIH shipped $549,331 (via the Georgia Institute of Technology) to Russia’s state-run Pavlov Institute of Physiology for invasive experiments on cats. Another $221,135 in NIH funding was sent to the same Russian lab in 2018. The NIH currently authorizes four different Russian state animal testing labs to receive taxpayer funding.
The Accountability in Foreign Animal Research Act of 2021 (the AFAR Act)would prevent the Secretary of Health and Human Services, acting through the Director of NIH, from conducting or supporting research on vertebrate animals in foreign countries that the federal government has labeled “foreign adversaries.” These nations are defined in a January 2021 interim final rule from the Department of Commerce, and comprise China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, Cuba, and the Maduro regime of Venezuela.
“Taxpayers shouldn’t be forced to pay white coats in the Russian government to torture and kill cats in wasteful experiments. We have found that there are four Kremlin-run animal testing labs authorized by NIH to receive our money. U.S. sanctions against Russia should include defunding them, and Congresswoman McClain’s AFAR Act should swiftly be signed into law,” said Justin Goodman, Senior Vice President at White Coat Waste Project.
Rep. McClain calls on President Biden to halt funding to Russian labs, and revoke their eligibility to receive U.S. taxpayer funds, as soon as possible.
Further demonstration that our tax dollars and Federal agencies are entirely captive to foreign agendas? I'm shocked, I tell you, just shocked.
Victoria Nuland: Ukraine Has "Biological Research Facilities," Worried Russia May Seize Them
The neocon's confession sheds critical light on the U.S. role in Ukraine, and raises vital questions about these labs that deserve answers.
Glenn Greenwald
Self-anointed "fact-checkers” in the U.S. corporate press have spent two weeks mocking as disinformation and a false conspiracy theory the claim that Ukraine has biological weapons labs, either alone or with U.S. support. They never presented any evidence for their ruling — how could they possibly know? and how could they prove the negative? — but nonetheless they invoked their characteristically authoritative, above-it-all tone of self-assurance and self-arrogated right to decree the truth and label such claims false.
Claims that Ukraine currently maintains dangerous biological weapons labs came from Russia as well as China. The Chinese Foreign Ministry this month claimed: "The US has 336 labs in 30 countries under its control, including 26 in Ukraine alone.” The Russian Foreign Ministry asserted that “Russia obtained documents proving that Ukrainian biological laboratories located near Russian borders worked on development of components of biological weapons.” Such assertions deserve the same level of skepticism as U.S. denials: namely, none of it should be believed to be true or false absent evidence. Yet U.S. fact-checkers dutifully and reflexively sided with the U.S. Government to declare such claims "disinformation” and to mock them as QAnon conspiracy theories.
Unfortunately for this propaganda racket masquerading as neutral and high-minded fact-checking, the neocon official long in charge of U.S. policy in Ukraine testified on Monday before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and strongly suggested that such claims are, at least in part, true. Yesterday afternoon, Under Secretary of State Victoria Nuland testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL), hoping to debunk growing claims that there are chemical weapons labs in Ukraine, smugly asked Nuland: “Does Ukraine have chemical or biological weapons?”
Rubio undoubtedly expected a flat denial by Nuland, thus providing further "proof” that such speculation is dastardly Fake News emanating from the Kremlin, the CCP and QAnon. Instead, Nuland did something completely uncharacteristic for her, for neocons, and for senior U.S. foreign policy officials: for some reason, she told a version of the truth. Her answer visibly stunned Rubio, who — as soon as he realized the damage she was doing to the U.S. messaging campaign by telling the truth — interrupted her and demanded that she instead affirm that if a biological attack were to occur, everyone should be “100% sure” that it was Russia who did it. Grateful for the life raft, Nuland told Rubio he was right. ...
That a neocon like Nuland is admired and empowered regardless of the outcome of elections illustrates how unified and in lockstep the establishment wings of both parties are when it comes to questions of war, militarism and foreign policy. Indeed, Nuland's husband, Robert Kagan, was signaling that neocons would likely support Hillary Clinton for president — doing so in 2014, long before anyone imagined Trump as her opponent — based on the recognition that the Democratic Party was now more hospitable to neocon ideology than the GOP, where Ron Paul and then Trump's neo-isolationism was growing.
You can vote against neocons all you want, but they never go away. The fact that a member of one of the most powerful neocon families in the U.S. has been running Ukraine policy for the U.S. for years — having gone from Dick Cheney to Hillary Clinton and Obama and now to Biden — underscores how little dissent there is in Washington on such questions. It is Nuland's extensive experience in wielding power in Washington that makes her confession yesterday so startling: it is the sort of thing people like her lie about and conceal, not admit. But now that she did admit it, it is crucial that this revelation not be buried and forgotten.
More like outsourcing criminal and illegal activities that would attract too much attention or are banned on American soil.
Looks like Russia is destroying/capturing BioLabs run by Metabiota and financed by the USA DoD, Ecohealth Alliance, and Hunter Biden.
Maybe the battle is Putin vs the WEF.
Not a pleasant choice, but definitely not "good guy" vs "bad guy".
Shaman saysLooks like Russia is destroying/capturing BioLabs run by Metabiota and financed by the USA DoD, Ecohealth Alliance, and Hunter Biden.
Where? In Saint-Petersburg?
Our government is overrun with snakes.
Cast them out Saint @Patrick.
Looks like Russia is destroying/capturing BioLabs run by Metabiota and financed by the USA DoD, Ecohealth Alliance, and Hunter Biden.
EastCoastPatriot
@lawilliams1803
Russia FM Lavrov:
"We have information that US built two biological warfare labs in Kiev & Odessa.
They have developed pathogens in those labs in Ukraine️."
If it's just research into cures and everyday viruses, what's the big whoop if Russia gets them?
Candace Owens
@RealCandaceO
3h
Have we yet received any explanation for why the US embassy in Kiev removed the fact sheets pertaining to their biological labs in Ukraine from their website?—Why did our department of defense fund them and what does “permit for working with pathogens” mean?
Comments 1 - 40 of 79 Next » Last » Search these comments
https://thenationalpulse.com/2022/03/08/obama-led-ukraine-biolab-efforts/?source=patrick.net
Natalie Winters is like 20 years old, she's unbelievably great.