by AD ➕follow (1) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 2,911 - 2,950 of 5,636 Next » Last » Search these comments
In Portland, Maine this program is voluntary. In Portland, Oregon --- well we will see.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/realestate/portland-launches-home-share-program-for-asylum-seekers-amid-looming-expo-shelter-deadline/ar-AA1e2vEB?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=63ef403b075d49168221f9e1fda6e46c&ei=213
Isn't NYC also trying a similar approach? That is, the city will pay homeowners to lease out spare rooms to illegals.
WookieMan says
We don't need huge houses.
Small homes are not profitable or less profitable to the home builder, this is the reason why larger and taller square footage on small lots is built, so that the builder can make more money, is this correct?
WookieMan says
We don't need huge houses.
Small homes are not profitable or less profitable to the home builder, this is the reason why larger and taller square footage on small lots is built, so that the builder can make more money, is this correct?
In CA specifically, there has been about $50,000 to $75,000 added to the base cost of building a home no matter the square footage
ForcedTQ says
In CA specifically, there has been about $50,000 to $75,000 added to the base cost of building a home no matter the square footage
Yeah, not just the international building code changes like arc fault circuit interrupters but I suspect also California-code related such as in regards to green or eco friendly building, etc.
.
Agreed. Unless we have a massive recession with epic job losses, prices will not crash in desirable areas. There are too many rich people and house-hungry buyers who will pay cash or sell their souls to own. Additionally, so many more people with money (i.e., information workers) can work remotely, so they're less likely to be forced to sell and move if they lose their job.
No distressed (forced selling) = low inventory remains = no price crash.
In my hood several houses sold at top dollars. It’s all about location. You sell a house in a great location someone will buy your overpriced house. It’s that simple and just a matter of time.
DTI for recent buyers is obviously pretty high. If that trend continues and the job market turns a significant number of recent home owners are in trouble.
Point is, new construction- historically speaking- has always had a premium. Not in todays market.
For the '08ers who think nothing every goes down:
Builders have decreased the size of the houses they build, have less upgrades than existing homes and are generally further away from attractions.
Misc says
Builders have decreased the size of the houses they build, have less upgrades than existing homes and are generally further away from attractions.
My biggest issue with new houses is the lot size and they go for the minimum space requirements between houses.
Misc says
Builders have decreased the size of the houses they build, have less upgrades than existing homes and are generally further away from attractions.
My biggest issue with new houses is the lot size and they go for the minimum space requirements between houses.
RC2006 says
Misc says
Builders have decreased the size of the houses they build, have less upgrades than existing homes and are generally further away from attractions.
My biggest issue with new houses is the lot size and they go for the minimum space requirements between houses.
I agree. It’s the location, and the value is in the land. Land value in Palo Alto goes for $600/sqft.
Look at the chart. Being a renter sucks. Rent goes up practically every year except 2008 and 2009, where it went down at most 2-6% while it went up as high as 6-14% in the remaining 16 years, and the rate of rent increase compounds each year.
I don’t share the same sentiment about private schools. We send our daughter to public schools.
Over 50% of houses sell above asking
Yeah, this economy isn’t that bad for people with assets. Terrible for renters who are trying to buy though. But what else is new.
What industry is your wife in?
Loan officer: I’m seeing middle class homebuyers take on $7,000 mortgages thinking they can ‘always refinance when rates come down in the future’
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/loan-officer-m-seeing-middle-000641114.html
Loan officer: I’m seeing middle class homebuyers take on $7,000 mortgages thinking they can ‘always refinance when rates come down in the future’
Would you please share how you derived 24% decline in rents from the chart you shared above? I would love to learn how to read it correctly.
This year isn’t over so I don’t have the numbers to compare to last year to know the maintenance costs. I doubt it’s anywhere close to 50%, but I don’t have to numbers to share at the moment.
I don’t share the same sentiment about private schools. We send our daughter to public schools.
I heard too many parents (colleagues) say too much awful stuff about the public K-12 without ever setting foot in one to observe, volunteer or whatever.
You guys are way out of touch with reality when it comes to our(almost everyone else's) experience.
What I recounted is all SoCal, but last time I checked, California has one of the worst public school systems, so "flyover" is probably kicking your ass. In fact, I went to school in Indiana and Michigan, and my education and quality of instructors was vastly superior to what I've seen on the coast.
Are you aware California mandated curriculum change in 2013 to push perverted authors, and expend sex-ed to include un-natural acts? That currently they are attempting to usurp school boards and control all curriculum decisions from Sacramento(likely to due to pushback over same perverted, and hatred spewing indoctrination attempts). That a Riverside county school board expelled a high ranking state rep when he went over his time fighting to prevent parents from being informed when their kids express a desire to perform self-mutilation via evil plastic surgeons?
Your good public school is a unicorn, and one that will soon be shot if the state gets their way.
Reagan was right. Eliminate federal funding of education, and let communities decide for themselves
Here it is:
The question would be why new houses sell for less than existing.
I read somewhere that buyers tend to be on the market because they are looking at a lot of properties. This was said be true both in rising and falling markets. In rising markets you see a ton of bids on a house which may indicate that the seller could have listed it for more. In falling markets you see a lot of sellers turning down offers or sitting on a property for months trying to get the price that the place down the street sold for a year or two ago.
The argument would be that the new home builder being a forced seller, if they are taking less than the home owner who is not a forced seller, is a leading indicator of a falling market.
« First « Previous Comments 2,911 - 2,950 of 5,636 Next » Last » Search these comments
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/pimco-kiesel-called-housing-top-160339396.html?source=patrick.net
Bond manager Mark Kiesel sold his California home in 2006, when he presciently predicted the housing bubble would pop. He bought again in 2012, after U.S. prices fell more than 30% and found a floor.
Now, after a record surge in prices, Kiesel says the time to sell is once again at hand.