Comments 1 - 20 of 20 Search these comments
Democrat Rep Refuses to Explain How ‘Inflation Reduction Act’ Lowers Inflation
Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) refused to explain how the Democrats’ recently-passed “Inflation Reduction Act” will help lower inflation.
Former “impeachment manager” Raskin was asked for an explanation from a reporter while he was gloating about how the legislation will lower inflation.
Raskin was praising Democrat President Joe Biden for “the inflation going down” while touting the passage of the act to the media.
He continued by saying that the sooner its provisions could be implemented, the sooner Americans would start seeing some relief.
A reporter then asked the congressman to point to a specific provision that would act to lower inflation.
However, Raskin made it clear that he was no longer interested in continuing the conversation and refused to answer the question.
"What parts of the bill do you think will put to work on [lowering inflation] specifically?"
Democrat Rep. Jamie Raskin: "Next question."
Democrat Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) has defended the blank-check spending in Ukraine by claiming that arming the Eastern European nation is essential for protecting “woke” values.
According to Raskin, U.S. taxpayers must continue funding the war because transgender issues are not a priority in Russia.
Raskin released the statement after 30 “progressive” Democrats backtracked their letter demanding that President Joe Biden starts negotiating peace with Vladimir Putin.
This guy makes me ill every time I see him on TV. And sure enough, some boneheaded comment.
He reminds me of the guy from Aliens, if he made it back to Earth and became a Senator.
https://slaynews.com/news/democrat-jamie-raskin-arming-ukraine-protecting-woke-values/
Democrat Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) has defended the blank-check spending in Ukraine by claiming that arming the Eastern European nation is essential for protecting “woke” values.
According to Raskin, U.S. taxpayers must continue funding the war because transgender issues are not a priority in Russia.
Raskin released the statement after 30 “progressive” Democrats backtracked their letter demanding that President Joe Biden starts negotiating peace with Vladimir Putin.
The Federalist ran a story yesterday headlined, “EXCLUSIVE: Bill Barr Confirms Rep. Jamie Raskin Lied About Biden Family Corruption Investigation.”
Weasel-faced Representative Raskin (D-Md), a democrat member of the House Oversight Committee investigating the Biden crime family, attended a private conference with Committee Chair James Comer (R-Ky) and the FBI earlier this week. The group discussed the FBI’s reasons for refusing to release the document relating to credible accusations of bribery against Joseph Robinette Biden.
Immediately following that meeting, faster than a New York rat runs down a subway track, Raskin raced to the podium to tell credulous reporters all about the new information. As it turns out, Raskin was lying like a rug, or a dog, or a snake, you pick. I won’t bother detailing all his lies, but it included more nonsense about Rudy Giuliani and a new (false) claim that Trump-appointee Bill Barr killed the investigation.
Since then, Comer and Barr have (separately) set the record straight. Here are the facts the we know so far. First, the information came from a long-standing FBI informant, who had proven so reliable the FBI had paid them over six figures. Apparently the informant got the intel directly from a foreign national who described in great detail how he personally paid Vice President Biden, to buy some favorable policy decisions.
Quid pro quo, in its barest form.
In other words, the information came directly from the person who paid the bribe. It wasn’t just something the informant heard somewhere. It was an explicit admission. “A trusted confidential human source obtained information from a foreign national who claimed to have bribed then-Vice President Biden,” Comer explained to The Federalist. ...
After the FBI got the report, under Barr’s direction, the Delaware U.S. attorney’s office was assigned to investigate. That’s when things go sideways. Two months after receiving the report, and shortly after the case was assigned to Delaware, in August, 2020, FBI Supervisory Intelligent Analyst Brian Auten filed an “assessment” discrediting the informant’s report as “misinformation,” which effectively shut down the investigation. ...
Weasel-faced Representative Raskin (D-Md)
And yet Maryland morons elect him.
.you have to live in the DC metro area to understand ..
Al_Sharpton_for_President says
And yet Maryland morons elect him.
he's from monkey county (montgomery county) maryland...you have to live in the DC metro area to understand ...
.
he's from monkey county (montgomery county) maryland
Democrat Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) is trying to convince the American people that President Donald Trump made a choice to “disqualify” himself from the 2024 election.
The congressman claims that blocking Trump from running is more “democratic” than other clauses in the U.S. Constitution.
Raskin compared it to the clause disqualifying foreign candidates to run for president, which he described as “undemocratic.”
Raskin attempted to do so on Sunday, during an appearance on CNN’s State of the Union. ...
The claim is that Trump took such an oath when he became president and that he “engaged in insurrection” on Jan. 6, 2021.
Legal experts, however, insist that this amendment was never meant to be applied the way anti-Trump groups are attempting to apply it to the 45th president.
Also, Jan. 6 was not an “insurrection” and Trump has never been convicted of any such charges.
Montgomery County is the San Francisco of Maryland
Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) the House Oversight Committee’s ranking member and a former Trump “impeachment manager,” previously advocated for non-citizen participation in the U.S. election system.
Raskin argues that the framers of the U.S. Constitution did not “intend” for a citizenship requirement to vote.
It comes as the House gears up to vote on a bill that would repeal a Washington D.C. law to grant non-citizen residents of the city the right to vote in local elections. ...
Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) has suggested that Democrats are planning to block the certification of the 2024 election results if President Donald Trump wins.
Raskin, who sat on the anti-Trump January 6 Committee, discussed overturning the election results in order to supposedly “save democracy” if Democrats don’t get the outcome they want.
Raskin raised the alarming scenario in resurfaced comments from February.
He argued that Congress would disqualify Trump after the November election, even if the 45th president wins the presidential race.
The Democrat described the action as a necessary response to the Supreme Court’s refusal to disqualify Trump from the ballot.
In March, the Supreme Court ruled 9-0 that individual states cannot enforce the so-called “insurrection ban.”
Democrats had pushed the ban in a desperate attempt to keep Trump out of power.
Anticipating the court’s pro-Trump ruling, Raskin told a crowd at a Washington D.C. bookstore that Congress would have to take drastic action.
“They want to kick it to Congress, so it’s going to be up to us on January 6, 2025, to tell the rampaging Trump mobs that he’s disqualified,” he said.
_congressman