patrick.net

Al_Sharpton_for_President says

Onvacation says

Are you implying the pandemic was manipulated?

I can't explain the rationale behind the insanity that gripped this country, but our institutions clearly are compromised.

I think I can explain the insanity.

Our institutions are clearly compromised and a large percentage of the population aren't aware of it and continue to listen to these corrupt institutions believing they are truthful and not corrupt.

It's a combination of corruption, and naivety. Apparently corruption + naivety = societal insanity. I think we've had societal insanity for at least 22 years. That's at least when I first became aware of it. It's very likely that society has been insane longer than I've been aware of it as well. I only became dimly aware of it 22 years ago, and it's certain I was part of it as well. 22 years ago, climate change and CO2 emissions were going to kill us all, or so I believed.

The election of Bush was my first REAL awakening, to realize all our media is propaganda.

Al_Sharpton_for_President says

So if younger, get out into the environment. Enjoy life. Don't shelter in place, it may kill you when you are older. Don't be obese, smoke, or neglect your health. And stay the fuck out of the hospital.

This all that should have been promoted. I'm in a small town and see the same 6-10 people walking the dog or running. 2k people.... Maybe they take different routes on the other side of town, but no one moves!

My one neighbor who walks his dog is in his 70's. He's fucking awesome. He's a kindred spirit so to speak. He yells at his mower when doing yard work and also his dog when he's walking him. Basically it will be me at 70. We'll chat for an hour if we cross paths when he's walking. Really cool old dude, but has a temper like a mother fucker and it makes me smile. I don't know why... lol. He's happy, but gets pissed at stuff, much like me.

Tangent aside, covid is a virus of being unhealthy if you die. Not much else to it. I don't know anyone personally that has died from it, but everyone that has gotten it really has little to no issues. Some are unhealthy as well. I think age is factor 1 and then your comorbidities. If you have 2+ co's (diabetes, heart disease, asthma, lupus, etc) you're likely in for at least a rough bout of it or you could die.

Onvacation says

My analyses of the data indicates very few comorbidities contributed to the death toll, which is the opposite of what we saw and common sense would indicate. You can see in this chart that 90% of the WITH people died FROM covid.

I agree. Like I said, I would think deaths with comorbidities would be the majority, but the data according to your definitions shows the opposite. I'm assuming you didn't accidentally swap the data columns.

Have you done any research into what specifically those columns mean? I think you might be making faulty assumptions about what those 2 categories mean. I've dealt with a decent amount of data sets in my life, and often the title of some column of data does not well describe the data - they're often wildly different, and frequently leads to "WTF why is it named this???". So many times a column has a simple name but ends up being a mishmash of other stuff added and removed as time went on and business rules evolved, eventually leading to bizarre column names and combinations of columns, including historical columns that store a previous version that is included for backwards compat or different use cases. That might be the case here. How do you know which category includes comorbidities, and which comorbidities, and under which scenarios, each column covers? They may BOTH cover comorbidities for all we know, but have some different rules.

Hircus says

Have you done any research into what specifically those columns mean? I think you might be making faulty assumptions about what those 2 categories mean.

The data dictionary CDC provided is vague. I tried to find more info online with no luck.

Hircus says

How do you know which category includes comorbidities, and which comorbidities, and under which scenarios, each column covers? They may BOTH cover comorbidities for all we know, but have some different rules.

The data does not include info on comorbidities.

I think the worldwide proliferation of live on camera collapses and deaths of hundreds of major and minor media celebrities would be enough evidence for anyone with two functioning brain cells that the clot shot is a killer more than a cure.

None of these people, as well as anyone in the medical profession, is allowed to admit the reason for the collapse and/or deaths.

I believe that the principle of "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" can be suspended during this time of universal, ubiquitous censorship.

This shit is going on, it is real, it is coming for you and everyone you love. Though you might have your heads in the sand, they can still stick you with the clot shot in your collective asses, or is that in fact your brains?

Al_Sharpton_for_President says

However, once infected and hospitalized in intensive care, case-fatality ratios were high for all adults, especially in those over 60 years.

A cynical person might think the tens of thousands of dollars in federal funding per patient to administer lethal treatments like ventilators and Remdesivir had something to do with this.

All we know is that when Remdesivir doesn't do the trick in the ICU units, they have huge supplies of "The Pillow Man" pillows to finish the job.

It sure would be interesting to get a simple database with every victim of Covid-19.

NAME | BIRTHDATE | DEATHDATE | ADDRESS | TREATMENTS | COMORBIDITIES

Looked for it but couldn't find it. There were only a million US victims. It would not be hard to do and a lot of questions could be answered.

Onvacation says

Looked for it but couldn't find it.

Now you will be audited.

HeadSet says

Now you will be audited.

We're all on the list now. Process crimes are now worse than robbery.

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/impactful-saturday-august-17-2024

In a way, the science mags are running into the same problem media had back during covid, when every new, more terrifying variant, arriving like clockwork every eight-point-three minutes, stretched the journalistic thesaurus to the breaking point. Alarming, dire, dangerous, dreadful, fearsome, formidable, horrifying, and so on until they reached the end of the alphabet: worrisome.

Then they went back to the beginning and started over, patiently and methodically working their way back through the letters, but Newsweek prematurely jumped the queue and ejected the “Doomsday variant.” It was all downhill from there, and reporters limply accepted they’d shot their wad and became a spent force.

This phenomenon is only ‘new’ in the sense that, as we’ve become increasingly mentally vaccinated to media alarmism through a long-term desensitization process, they’ve steadily increased the frightfulness-volume setting to a deafening ’11.’

I fondly recall how, back in the halcyon 90’s, enjoying the post-Soviet peace dividend, media would run much simpler doomsday stories like “Formica: The Silent Killer.” Or my personal, all-time favorite, even beyond covid (to which I’ve now devoted a substantial chunk of my career), the Venn-diagram convergence of about six attention-grabbing media gambits: “Is Your Bra Killing You?”