6
0

Paleoconservatism


 invite response                
2023 Mar 12, 11:41am   1,024 views  8 comments

by Patrick   ➕follow (61)   💰tip   ignore  

One reason it is pointless to edit Wikipedia articles anymore is that Wikipedia always disparages or deletes everything other than the far left viewpoint, reverting changes which give the truth, and locking articles when the public repeatedly puts too much truth into them. This all started when the Wikipedia mysteriously got $100 million donation.

Yet in their extreme bias, sometimes they accidentally point out truths. The article on paleoconservatism of course links it to the "white supremacy" and "Nazi" narrative which so plagues the imagination of the far left and justifies the ongoing leftist violence, but it does point out the central tenets of paleoconservatism, all of which sound pretty good to me:

- restrictions on immigration, like having a border to the country
- state's rights as the Constitution intended
- trade tariffs so that US executives may not give away our manufacturing base to China, for example
- national economic self-sufficiency so that the US may not be extorted
- non-interventionism abroad
- a return to traditional conservative ideals relating to gender, culture, and society
- opposition to abortion and gay marriage

"Paleoconservatism differs from neoconservatism in opposing free trade and promoting republicanism. Paleoconservatives see neoconservatives as imperialists and themselves as defenders of the republic."

I love the mastodon idea for a logo, like a Republican elephant, but much older:


Comments 1 - 8 of 8        Search these comments

1   Ceffer   2023 Mar 12, 12:04pm  

Postmodernism used as a fashion tool to beat the stale, dead horse of failed KommieKunt ideologies, as if the tried and true conservative values represent primitive thought. Another nice Satanic inversion.

Neocons are the traditional land pirates who ride the nations as steeds to plunder and rob the resources of the Middle East, Africa, South America et alia. May the best thieves with the best mafias, militias, and preempted armies win.
2   HeadSet   2023 Mar 12, 4:54pm  

Patrick says


I love the mastodon idea for a logo, like a Republican elephant, but much older:

Unfortunately, the mastodon is an old, dumb, and extinct being from a bygone era - not a good representative. We need something that shows traditional intellect that can push aside these new infantile ideas of woke culture, selling out industry, and interventionism. Maybe a wise owl or something like that.
3   richwicks   2023 Mar 12, 4:59pm  

HeadSet says

Unfortunately, the mastodon is an old, dumb, and extinct being from a bygone era - not a good representative. We need something that shows traditional intellect that can push aside these new infantile ideas of woke culture, selling out industry, and interventionism. Maybe a wise owl or something like that.


Why not a human being?
4   Misc   2023 Mar 12, 5:10pm  

richwicks says

HeadSet says


Unfortunately, the mastodon is an old, dumb, and extinct being from a bygone era - not a good representative. We need something that shows traditional intellect that can push aside these new infantile ideas of woke culture, selling out industry, and interventionism. Maybe a wise owl or something like that.


Why not a human being?


Because if was not depicted as a Black, female, trans, then it would be Racyst
5   Patrick   2023 Mar 12, 8:03pm  

Elephants are quite smart and have amazing memories, so the mastodon was probably the same, being just a hairy elephant.

Also, it's entirely possible that the mastodon will be resurrected from genes taken from frozen maston bodies in Siberia, using elephants as surrogate mothers.
6   HeadSet   2023 Mar 12, 9:05pm  

Are you thinking of mammoths?
7   richwicks   2023 Mar 12, 10:36pm  

Patrick says

mastodon

I believe both had hair, or fur.
8   Patrick   2023 Mar 12, 10:39pm  

TBH, I don't know the difference between a mastodon and a mammoth.


Mammoths and mastodons are herbivores that differ in how they eat. Mastodons have cone-shaped cusps on their molars designed to crush leaves, twigs and branches while mammoths have ridged molars that allow them to cut through vegetation and graze like modern-day elephants. Additionally, mastodons had flatter heads while mammoths had a distinctive knob on top of their skulls formed by a bulbous protrusion of bone. Both had long upper tusks but mammoth tusks grew at a curve, sometimes even crossing in front of each other while mastodons had more linear tusks and some even formed a small chin tusk on their lower jaw.


Pretty much the same thing I think.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste